logo
Lucy Letby and Harold Shipman-style NHS killing sprees will be prevented in future with high-tech AI reforms

Lucy Letby and Harold Shipman-style NHS killing sprees will be prevented in future with high-tech AI reforms

The Sun4 days ago
HI-TECH NHS reforms will help to prevent the next Lucy Letby or Harold Shipman, Wes Streeting has vowed.
The Health Secretary has insisted his AI rollout will stop serious incidents slipping through the net.
2
He says he will introduce new measures to identify patterns of abuse, serious injury and deaths via an early alert system — part of a ten-year plan to be unveiled later this week.
Mr Streeting last night said: 'Even a single lapse that puts a patient at risk is one too many.
'Behind every safety breach is a person — a life altered, a family devastated, a heartbreaking loss.
'By embracing AI and introducing world-first early warning systems, we'll spot dangerous signs sooner and launch rapid inspections before harm occurs.'
Nurse Letby is serving 15 whole-life orders for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill seven more at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
GP Shipman is thought to have killed more than 200 patients over two decades.
He was convicted in 2000 and died in 2004.
The technology, still in development, will flag safety issues in real time — allowing Care Quality Commission officials to investigate and take immediate action.
Top NHS figure Prof Meghana Pandit said it would 'turbo-charge' the speed and efficiency of identifying patient concerns.
It came as Mr Streeting last week ordered a national investigation into maternity services.
Women and babies had been left at 'considerably higher' risk than what was necessary.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over three-quarters of Brits cut back on boozing with one in three pub trips being alcohol-free
Over three-quarters of Brits cut back on boozing with one in three pub trips being alcohol-free

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Over three-quarters of Brits cut back on boozing with one in three pub trips being alcohol-free

WE have become a nation of sensible drinkers — with more than three-quarters cutting back on the amount of boozing we do. Some 76 per cent of over 18s, the equivalent of nearly 40million adults, admitted they were careful about how much alcohol they knocked back, a survey found. 2 And more than a third (34 per cent) alternate between low and no-alcohol drinks and alcoholic tipples when they go out, a trend known as zebra striping. That was up from 28 per cent a year ago. And 36 per cent said they thought it was less acceptable for their pals to get drunk on a night out. One in three pub visits are now totally booze-free, with a quarter of those surveyed choosing to finish off the night with a soft drink. The trend is a far cry from the traditional image of beer-swilling booze hounds sinking as many pints as possible before last orders. More than eight in ten (82 per cent) cited their health as the main reason for being more responsible around ­alcohol — rising to 90 per cent among under 35s. Four in ten drinks consumed on a night out are now low or no-alcohol, with zero or reduced booze beer the second most popular choice — up from seventh place last year. Almost two in five, some 37 per cent, admitted they went home early in a huff over the lack of low-alcohol options down the pub. More than three in ten (35 per cent) expect pubs to offer alcohol-free beer on draught. And three in five people (59 per cent) said there was less stigma attached to choosing alcohol-free beverages than there used to be. The survey was carried out by hospitality industry researchers at KAM and zero beer brand Lucky Saint. Dua Lipa 'splits the G' in popular Dublin pub Pub trade newspaper the Morning Advertiser, which published the findings, said: 'More than three-quarters of UK adults are moderating their alcohol consumption, according to new research. 'One in three pub visits are alcohol-free and a quarter of adults choose to make their final drink an alcohol-free one in order to stay out longer.'

Dad ‘scarred by burns from packet of salt and vinegar Discos crisps after tipping it into his mouth'
Dad ‘scarred by burns from packet of salt and vinegar Discos crisps after tipping it into his mouth'

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Dad ‘scarred by burns from packet of salt and vinegar Discos crisps after tipping it into his mouth'

A DAD claims he was scarred by burns from a packet of salt and vinegar Discos crisps. Gavin Emery, 43, says he was scalded after tipping the last of the bag's contents into his mouth. 3 3 The dad of three reckons the powdered flavouring left his gums burnt and swollen. Gavin said: 'If that had been my child eating these, God only knows what would have happened. 'They are young, so when there are crisps going around I always share with them. It was lucky I was at the office.' The tech sales adviser, of Saffron Walden, Essex, feared he could have swallowed the scalding powder and ruined his voice, saying: 'Had that gone to my throat, I probably wouldn't be able to talk now. 'I'm a tech sales adviser, I need my voice. But when it hit my mouth, I pushed it to one side of my cheek, where it burned. It was so intense. 'I had to instantly rush to the nearest sink in the ­bathroom.' He said his gum turned white and claims he still has a scar in his mouth three months later. KP Snacks, which makes the retro brand, offered him £15 in vouchers after admitting the flavour was 'quite powerful'. But Gavin claims they are virtually worthless, as only a few stores can accept them, 'adding insult to injury'. KP said: 'We know our Salt & Vinegar Discos crisps pack a punch — that bold flavour is exactly why fans love them. We tested supermarket ready salted crisps 'Customer satisfaction and safety are paramount. We'll continue to work with the customer to resolve the matter.'

Boy, three, who died after developing sepsis may not have suffered fatal cardiac arrest when he did if he was readmitted earlier, inquest told
Boy, three, who died after developing sepsis may not have suffered fatal cardiac arrest when he did if he was readmitted earlier, inquest told

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Boy, three, who died after developing sepsis may not have suffered fatal cardiac arrest when he did if he was readmitted earlier, inquest told

A toddler who died after developing sepsis may not have suffered his fatal cardiac arrest when he did if he was readmitted to hospital earlier, an inquest has been told. Theo Tuikubulau, three, had been gradually getting sicker with a high temperature, flu-like symptoms and breathing difficulties and was struggling to eat or drink in the lead up to his tragic death. His mother Kayleigh Kenneford called 111 shortly before 11pm on July 7, 2022 and the operator graded the case as a category two - the second most urgent level of call. He had already been admitted and discharged from Plymouth's Derriford Hospital the previous day with a suspected upper respiratory infection. An ambulance arrived at their home near Plymouth shortly before 12.30am and Theo reached the hospital just after 1am. He was treated in the emergency department's resuscitation area and suffered the cardiac arrest at 1.35am before dying a short time later, Devon Coroner's Court heard. And Professor Damian Roland, a paediatric consultant in emergency medicine, told the inquest that Theo likely would not have died when he did had he been rushed back to hospital at 11pm that night. Giving evidence as an expert witness on the hospital care Theo received, Prof Roland was asked by coroner Louise Wiltshire: 'Is it likely on balance of probabilities that Theo would have died when he did if appropriate care and treatment was administered at 11pm?' He Roland replied: 'I think had he arrived earlier, I think it is possible that he would not have suffered the cardiac arrest at that point.' Ms Wiltshire said: 'That's the key consideration for an inquest, whether somebody would have died when they did if a different treatment was given. 'On balance of probabilities, if Theo had arrived in hospital at 11pm would he have died when he did?' Prof Roland replied: 'No.' He was asked about what could have happened had Theo been readmitted by midnight if the 111 call had been graded as a category one emergency. 'I think some earlier treatment would have especially delayed the collapse,' Prof Roland said. The witness did not agree with the notion that an earlier intervention would have prevented the toddler's death altogether. 'Even if antibiotics had been given at that stage, I think the cascade may have already started and it would have been very difficult to change the outcome,' he added. 'I can't say on the balance of probability that intervention by 11pm would have made a critical difference. 'If you give me six or 12 hours, I think I would say on the balance of probability, yes, something could have been done. 'I can't say on the balance of probabilities that in that time period we could have made a huge difference.' Prof Roland said from the evidence it was difficult to be certain of Theo's condition at the time his mother spoke with the nurse, but there was evidence at the time of the 111 call. Reiterating this, the witness said the toddler's original discharge from the hospital in the early hours of July 7 was not 'unreasonable'. Ms Kenneford was sent home with details of a phone number she should ring if she was concerned about Theo over the next 72 hours. She called that number at around 10pm on July 7 and spoke with a nurse but previously told the court she felt 'fobbed off'. Asked about this call, Prof Roland said: 'I think if you've got a constellation of things which are not improving, I think a standard would have been to review in that particular situation.' An hour later, Theo's mother phoned 111, and the witness said that having listened to that call he could hear Theo's breathing in the background and described it as 'grunting' which was a 'red flag'. Prof Roland described sepsis as an 'inappropriate response' to an infection, and it was critical the patient received life-saving treatment immediately. 'Once that inflammatory cascade has started, it can be difficult, sometimes impossible to stop,' he said. 'I am very clear about the fact that the night before (July 6), we were not in a cascade situation. 'I don't think that there was sepsis then. Knowing when the intervention could have been made is very difficult.' Theo died from sepsis caused by an 'invasive' Strep A infection. The inquest before a jury at County Hall in Exeter continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store