China unveils prototype of world's fastest and most advanced locomotive: 'Travel between major cities ... in just 1-3 hours'
According to China Daily, the country plans to add 1,600 miles of new rail lines in 2025 and 7,000 miles of high-speed track by 2030. This comes on top of the 100,000 miles of rail lines and 30,000 miles of high-speed tracks that have already been built in the country.
China has one of the best and most extensive rail systems in the world, and its high-speed system is already the envy of virtually everyone. The star of the show has been the CR400 locomotive, but that could soon be a thing of the past as well.
Would having access to a high-speed train change how often you use public transit?
Absolutely
Probably a little
Not much
Not at all
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
According to CNN, China unveiled the prototype for the CR450, so-named because its max speed is 450 kilometers per hour (279 mph). The CR450 will operate commercially at 400 kilometers per hour (249 mph), making it the fastest train in the world.
Both the new track and train will aid China's goal of making "travel between major cities possible in just 1-3 hours" while also supporting rapid cargo transit around the country.
High-speed rail is one of the most effective tools for reducing our carbon footprint and reliance on air travel. We've seen it growing as France and Germany unveiled a new train between Paris and Berlin that reduces travel time to just 9 to 10 hours with a stop, while plans have been unveiled for another line between Barcelona in Spain and Toulouse in France.
A study of high-speed rail in Morocco shows that it can also ignite an increase in driving a massive boost in the economy. While it has yet to really gain a proper foothold in the United States, that is slowly changing, as projects in Texas, California, and even Las Vegas to Los Angeles are underway.
But, as the most recent announcements show, the rest of the world still has some catching up to do if they hope to match China's progress on this front.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump Says Marijuana Rescheduling Will Be Decided Within Weeks
In rare comments on marijuana since taking office, U.S. President Donald Trump said he would decide on marijuana rescheduling in the coming weeks. During a White House press conference on Monday, Trump said his administration was 'looking at it,' and they will make a decision 'over the next few weeks,' calling it a 'very complicated subject.' This marks one of Trump's rare public comments on marijuana rescheduling since he took office on Jan. 20, and comes a few days after the Wall Street Journal and CNN reported that he discussed loosening federal restrictions on marijuana at his private club in Bedminster, New Jersey. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump told attendees he was interested in a change, according to people who declined to be named. Guests at Trump's fundraiser included Kim Rivers, chief executive of marijuana company Trulieve, who urged him to pursue the change and expand medical marijuana research, the people said. In June, Marijuana Herald also reported that during a private meeting last week with two U.S. House members, Trump said, 'We'll be moving forward soon with rescheduling marijuana,' according to a staffer for one of the lawmakers present. During the 2024 election campaign, Trump said he would make it easier for adults to access regulated marijuana products and give states more leeway to pursue legalization, indicating support for removing marijuana from the same legal category as narcotics such as heroin. He also supported a ballot initiative in Florida that aimed to legalize recreational marijuana, but it eventually failed. But seven months into his second term, Trump has yet to act on marijuana reform. Rescheduling marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, which places it alongside heroin and LSD as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse, to Schedule III, defined as substances with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence, would make it easier to access recreational marijuana and could potentially boost the profitability of marijuana businesses, which are currently burdened by heavy taxation. Marijuana rescheduling would also better align with state-level legalizations. Medical marijuana is legal in 39 states plus Washington D.C., while recreational marijuana is legal in 24 states plus Washington D.C. Marijuana Rescheduling Stalemate Trump's remarks on marijuana rescheduling come amid a stalemate in the process to change the drug's classification. The effort to move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III began under the Biden Administration in 2022. In 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services formally recommended rescheduling. Following that, the Department of Justice published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in May 2024, opening a public comment period that closed in July with over 43,000 submissions. An administrative hearing was scheduled for January 2025 but was postponed due to procedural disputes and an interlocutory appeal. As of today, the process remains stalled pending the outcome of that appeal, with no new hearing date set. Newly appointed DEA Administrator Terrance Cole made remarks before his confirmation and swearing-in on July 23. During his confirmation hearings in April and May, Cole stated that advancing the marijuana rescheduling process would be 'one of my top priorities' and that he would 'give the matter careful consideration.' However, after his confirmation, Cole did not include rescheduling among his top eight strategic priorities.

USA Today
10 hours ago
- USA Today
Bernie Sanders accuses Harris of being 'influenced' by billionaires in 2024 race
WASHINGTON - Progressive independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders accused former Vice President Kamala Harris of being 'heavily influenced' by rich people in the 2024 race, which she lost to President Donald Trump. During a rally in Wheeling, West Virginia, on Aug. 8, Sanders told a crowd that one of the reasons he thinks Harris lost the election was that she had 'too many billionaires telling her not to speak up for the working class of this country.' The rally was one of the many Sanders is holding around the country as part of his 'fighting oligarchy' tour, aimed at mobilizing voters to stand up against the Trump administration. When asked about his remarks, Sanders told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union' that Harris is a friend of his, but that her 'core consultants were heavily influenced by very wealthy people.' An Oct. 30, 2024, Forbes analysis found that more billionaires backed Harris than Trump. Some of Harris' supporters included film director Steven Spielberg; Eric Schmidt of Google; Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs; and Melinda French Gates, former wife of Bill Gates, Forbes says. 'How do you run for president and not develop a strong agenda which speaks to the economic crisis facing working families?' he said, adding that most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and that the healthcare system is 'broken.' Bash then said that Harris did discuss affordability, to which Sanders replied that she did it in a 'vague' manner and that he didn't want to 'rehash' the campaign. 'I think the key to Democratic victories is to understand that you got to stand unequivocally with the working class of this country,' Sanders said. 'You need an agenda that speaks to the needs of working people." Harris said on July 30 that she won't run for California governor, leaving the door open for a potential 2028 presidential run.


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
NATO chief on whether Trump is at risk of rewarding Russia for invading Ukraine: ‘I don't think the risk is there'
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Sunday that he doesn't believe there is a risk that peace negotiations in Alaska with President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will reward Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. ABC News's Jonathan Karl asked Rutte on 'This Week' if he believed, like former national security adviser John Bolton does, that negotiations are sliding in Russia's favor, which could potentially reward the country for its invasion. 'No, I don't think the risk is there,' Rutte replied. 'And all my respects for John, and please send him my best regards, but I would not agree on this point with him. We have seen President Trump putting incredible pressure on Russia.' 'So, this is all clear evidence that President Trump is absolutely adamant to bring this war to an end, but also to keep maximum pressure on Putin,' Rutte later added. Rutte said the Friday meeting between to two leaders was important because it 'is testing Putin, how serious he is in this whole process, which will then have to continue after Friday, with Ukraine involved, with others involved, to bring this war to an end.' Trump and Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss peace negotiations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to the summit; however, the White House and the NATO Ambassador Matthew Whitaker said there is a possibility he will attend. Bolton, who was the national security advisor during Trump's first term, said Saturday on CNN's 'The Source' with host Kaitlan Collins, 'The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow.' 'So, the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin,' he continued. On Aug. 6, Trump signed an executive order adding a 25 percent tariff on India's purchases of Russian oil, bringing the tariffs up to a total of 50 percent. The tariffs will be in effect 21 days after Trump signed the executive order. This was intended to let India negotiate with Russia; however, in the meantime, India's leader has reaffirmed its bipartisan relations with the Kremlin. 'We also reviewed the progress in our bilateral agenda, and reaffirmed our commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. I look forward to hosting President Putin in India later this year,' Narendra Modi said. The NATO chief also mentioned Trump's actions within the international organization as proof that the president is dedicated to this peace deal. 'He was the one delivering the big success at the NATO summit, the 5 percent spending commitments in June, one of the biggest foreign policy successes of the U.S. in the last couple of years,' he said. Rutte also mentioned the deal struck in July between the Trump administration and NATO countries to send more weapons to Ukraine. The meeting in Alaska will discuss territorial claims. Last week, Putin shared a ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration, which asked for control of Eastern Ukraine. Zelensky adamantly opposed the deal by posting on X, 'Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace.' Rutte said the negotiations would include talks about territory as well as 'security guarantees' and 'the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides of its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future, of course, having no limitations to its own military troop levels, and for NATO to have no limitations on our presence on the Eastern flank in countries like Latvia, Estonia and Finland.' Whitaker reassured on Sunday that no matter what deal is struck between the parties, there will be verification that both countries are acting towards peace.