Bernie Sanders accuses Harris of being 'influenced' by billionaires in 2024 race
During a rally in Wheeling, West Virginia, on Aug. 8, Sanders told a crowd that one of the reasons he thinks Harris lost the election was that she had 'too many billionaires telling her not to speak up for the working class of this country.' The rally was one of the many Sanders is holding around the country as part of his 'fighting oligarchy' tour, aimed at mobilizing voters to stand up against the Trump administration.
When asked about his remarks, Sanders told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union' that Harris is a friend of his, but that her 'core consultants were heavily influenced by very wealthy people.'
An Oct. 30, 2024, Forbes analysis found that more billionaires backed Harris than Trump. Some of Harris' supporters included film director Steven Spielberg; Eric Schmidt of Google; Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs; and Melinda French Gates, former wife of Bill Gates, Forbes says.
'How do you run for president and not develop a strong agenda which speaks to the economic crisis facing working families?' he said, adding that most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and that the healthcare system is 'broken.'
Bash then said that Harris did discuss affordability, to which Sanders replied that she did it in a 'vague' manner and that he didn't want to 'rehash' the campaign.
'I think the key to Democratic victories is to understand that you got to stand unequivocally with the working class of this country,' Sanders said. 'You need an agenda that speaks to the needs of working people."
Harris said on July 30 that she won't run for California governor, leaving the door open for a potential 2028 presidential run.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
3 reasons Republicans' redistricting power grab might backfire
Texas state Democratic representatives, shown at a rally in Washington, previously left the state in 2021 to try to prevent the state's Republicans from reaching a quorum and passing new voting restrictions legislation. File Photo by Michael Reynolds/EPA The gerrymandering drama in Texas -- and beyond -- has continued to unfold after Democratic state legislators fled the state. The Democrats want to prevent the Republican-controlled government from enacting a mid-decade gerrymander aimed at giving Republicans several more seats in Congress. The Texas GOP move was pushed by President Donald Trump, who's aiming to ensure he has a GOP-controlled Congress to work with after the 2026 midterm elections. Other Republican states such as Missouri and Ohio may also follow the Texas playbook; and Democratic states such as California and Illinois seem open to responding in kind. But there are a few factors that make this process more complicated than just grabbing a few House seats. They may even make Republicans regret their hardball gerrymandering tactics, if the party ends up with districts that political scientists like me call "dummymandered." Democrats can finally fight back Unlike at the federal level, where Democrats are almost completely shut out of power, Republicans are already facing potentially consequential retaliation for their gerrymandering attempts from Democratic leaders in other states. Democrats in California, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, are pushing for a special election later this year, in which the voters could vote on new congressional maps in that state, aiming to balance out Democrats' losses in Texas. If successful, these changes would take effect prior to next year's midterm elections. Other large Democratic-controlled states, such as Illinois and New York -- led by Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Gov. Kathy Hochul, respectively -- have also indicated openness to enacting their own new gerrymanders to pick up seats on the Democratic side. New York and California both currently use nonpartisan redistricting commissions to draw their boundaries. But Hochul recently said she is "sick and tired of being pushed around" while other states refuse to adopt redistricting reforms and gerrymander to their full advantage. Hochul said she'd even be open to amending the state constitution to eliminate the nonpartisan redistricting commission. It's unclear whether these blue states will be successful in their efforts to fight fire with fire; but in the meantime, governors like Hochul and Pritzker have welcomed the protesting Democratic legislators from Texas, in many cases arranging for their housing during their self-imposed exile. Dummymandering Another possible problem for either party looking to gain some seats in this process stems from greediness. In responding to Democrats' continued absence from Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott threatened even more drastic gerrymanders. "If they don't start showing up, I may start expanding," Abbott said. "We may make it six or seven or eight new seats we're going to be adding on the Republican side." But Abbott might think twice about this strategy. Parties that gerrymander their states' districts are drawing lines to maximize their own advantage, either in state legislatures or, in this case, congressional delegations. When parties gerrymander districts, they don't usually try to make them all as lopsided as possible for their own side. Instead, they try to make as many districts as possible that they are likely to win. They do this by spreading groups of supportive voters across several districts so they can help the party win more of these districts. But sometimes the effort backfires: In trying to maximize their seats, a party spreads its voters too thin and fails to make some districts safe enough. These vulnerable districts can then flip to the other party in future elections, and the opposing party ends up winning more seats than expected. This phenomenon, commonly referred to as "dummymandering," has happened before. It even happened in Texas, where Republicans lost a large handful of poorly drawn state legislative districts in the Dallas suburbs in 2018, a strong year for Democrats nationwide. With Democrats poised for a strong 2026 midterm election against an unpopular president, this is a lesson Republicans might need to pay attention to. There's not much left to gerrymander One of the main reasons dummymandering happens is that there has been so much gerrymandering that there are few remaining districts competitive enough for a controlling party to pick off for themselves. This important development has unfolded for two big reasons. First, in terms of gerrymandering, the low-hanging fruit is already picked over. States controlled by either Democrats or Republicans have already undertaken pretty egregious gerrymanders during previous regular redistricting processes, particularly following the 2010 and 2020 censuses. Republicans have generally been more adept at the process, particularly in maximizing their seat shares in relatively competitive states such as Wisconsin and North Carolina that they happen to control. But Democrats have also been successful in states such as Maryland, where only one Republican serves out of nine seats, despite the party winning 35% of the presidential vote in 2024. In Massachusetts, where Democrats hold all eight seats, Republicans won 37% of the presidential vote in 2024. There's also the fact that over the past half-century, "gerrymanderable" territory has become more difficult to find regardless of how you draw the boundaries. That's because the voting electorate is more geographically sorted between the parties. This means that Democratic and Republican voters are segregated from each other geographically, with Democrats tending toward big cities and suburbs, and Republicans occupying rural areas. As a result, it's become less geographically possible than ever to draw reasonable-looking districts that split up the other party's voters in order to diminish the opponents' ability to elect one of their own. Regardless of how far either party is willing to go, today's clash over Texas redistricting represents largely uncharted territory. Mid-decade redistricting does sometimes happen, either at the hands of legislatures or the courts, but not usually in such a brazen fashion. And this time, the Texas attempt could spark chaos and a race to the bottom, where every state picks up the challenge and tries to rewrite their electoral maps - not in the usual once-a-decade manner, but whenever they're unsatisfied with the odds in the next election. Charlie Hunt is an associate professor of political science at Boise State University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Espresso Translations Launches Italian Website to Strengthen Local Access and Cultural Relevance
08/11/2025, London // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // Espresso Translations has advanced its digital presence through the strategic migration of its Italian Culture content from the global .com domain to the newly launched, fully localized Finalized in August 2025, the move delivers a faster, more culturally immersive experience for Italian users, unlocking stronger search visibility, regional relevance, and a more direct path to expert language services. But this is more than just a URL change, it's a redefinition of how Espresso Translations connects with its Italian audience. By shifting to a country-specific domain, the company shows it understands that effective multilingual communication means delivering the right words in a space that feels local and intuitive. It's a fusion of language, culture, and user expectations, where every click feels native and every phrase feels personal. That vision is echoed internally as well. ' Our aim has always been to connect, not just translate,' said a company spokesperson. ' This new website brings us closer to our Italian-speaking clients, geographically, linguistically, and digitally.' The newly launched Italian domain isn't just a new address, it's a high-performance gateway built for speed, clarity, and cultural connection. Visitors to the new site will experience faster load times, smoother navigation, and a layout that feels instinctively local. Far beyond visual appeal, the site functions as a true digital home for Italian users. It delivers the same trusted services through a refined interface shaped around native behaviors and language-first architecture. With over a decade of localization expertise and a global network of native linguists, Espresso Translations executed the migration with seamless precision, delivering culturally adapted solutions in more than 150 languages. That trust is reflected in its 4.8-star average rating across platforms like Trustpilot, and Sitejabber, where clients consistently praise the company's certified translations, rapid delivery, and clear communication. With the launch of the Italian website, those same qualities now reach Italian users through a platform designed exclusively for their needs. This website move comes at just the right time. Today, search engines like Google are more likely to show results from local websites when people search in their native language. By switching to an Italian domain, Espresso Translations becomes easier to find for users in Italy, and gives them a smoother, more familiar online experience. Visitors from the old site are automatically redirected to the new one, so nothing is lost in the process. This update reflects the company's values, clarity, accuracy, and user focus, while paving the way for continued growth in Italy and beyond. Headquartered in Milan and founded in London, Espresso Translations serves a diverse global client base, from legal firms and healthcare providers to multinational corporations and individual customers. The launch of the Italian website is more than a technical upgrade. It's a clear statement of the company's long-term vision: to make high-quality language services accessible, locally meaningful, and digitally seamless. By blending global expertise with local insight, the Espresso Translations team strengthens its position as a trusted language service provider ready to grow alongside its clients worldwide. Explore the new Italian site and see how Espresso Translations bridges language and culture at About Espresso Translations Espresso Translations is a premier international language services provider specializing in translation, localization, transcription, and interpreting across more than 150 languages. Supported by a global team of native linguists and subject matter experts, the company delivers fast, accurate, and culturally aligned solutions across sectors including legal, medical, technical, and creative. With headquarters in Milan and a strong foundation in London, Espresso Translations is globally recognized for its agility, precision, and dedication to client success. ### Media Contact Espresso Translations Address: Foro Buonaparte 59, 20121 - Milano, Italia Phone: +39 02 9475 0226 Website: Source published by Submit Press Release >> Espresso Translations Launches Italian Website to Strengthen Local Access and Cultural Relevance
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Oversight Committee to hold hearing with Bowser, DC leadership in September
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-K.Y.) said he plans to hold a hearing with Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D), Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D), and Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) in September following President Trump's announcement that he will take federal control of the city. 'Alongside President Trump, the House Oversight Committee is also advancing legislative solutions to protect Americans in their capital city and plans to hold a hearing with District Attorney General Brian Schwalb, DC Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and Mayor Muriel Bowser this September,' Comer said in a statement on Monday. 'The committee looks forward to continuing its constitutional duty to oversee DC and will work with the Trump administration to ensure a safe, beautiful, and prosperous capital,' he continued. Trump announced on Monday that in addition to taking federal control of the city's police department, he would deploy the National Guard in an effort to take on crime in the city. The president also announced that he was declaring a public safety emergency in the District, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it,' Trump said from the White House press briefing room. Under the Home Rule Act, Trump can temporarily take control of the District's police department if he determines 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' It is unclear if the administration coordinated its actions on Monday with D.C. officials. A spokesperson for Mayor Muriel Bowser's (D) office declined to comment just before Trump began speaking. DC Ward 6 Councilmember Charles Allen (D) pushed back on Trump's announcement, calling it 'dangerous.' 'The President taking over local control of MPD & putting the US military onto the streets of DC under the guise of public safety is wrong,' Allen said in a post on X. 'It's an extreme, outrageous, and dangerous move for our city and the safety of all our residents. '
