This is the worst criminal conduct known to humankind
Victims and perpetrators come in all colours, races and religions. Maybe Shakespeare would have said: "If you starve us, do we not look skeletal".
In Tel Aviv last week, Jewish people took to the streets holding photographs of children whose starvation is being caused by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu's illegal waging of an aggressive war and the illegal withholding of food in Gaza.
If you offend decency, do we not protest.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this week: "Quite clearly it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered which was a decision that Israel made in March."
He said, "You can't hold innocent people responsible" for the actions of Hamas.
Indeed, the only lawful warfare is defence. What Israel is doing in Gaza has for months now gone well beyond what would be a legitimate defensive response to the Hamas attacks in October 2023. It is similar to the unnecessary Allied fire-bombing of Dresden in February 1945.
Waging an aggressive war is the worst criminal conduct known to humankind. It is worse than the crimes of serial killers or serial rapists.
Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin should be compared to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, the Columbine School shooters, or Martin Bryant - not just other authoritarian leaders of nations.
Those who wage an aggressive war do not just condone or turn a blind eye to death and suffering; they cause it - as surely as a serial killer.
Worse, because they bring many of the resources of the state and its people to join in to their crime - wittingly or unwittingly - the scale of the crime is much greater than that of the serial killer or mass shooter, and so is the scale of evil.
Netanyahu's action a breach of international law the same as Putin's action because he is waging war beyond the borders of his own nation as recognised by the United Nations. It is the same as Putin's because its aim is the genocidal removal of the civilian populations.
"Netanyahu's action" is the deliberate starvation of innocent civilians, particularly children. There is more than enough food to prevent the starvation of anyone in Gaza.
The reason people are starving is that the food is not getting through. And getting it through or not getting it through is within the power of Netanyahu. He is causing the starvation and death.
"To starve" is a peculiar verb. It is too often used in the passive voice, as in, "The child starved to death." It is rarely used in the active voice, as in, "Netayanhu starved the child to death."
The passive voice removes any active person. It removes responsibility, as if the words "the child starved to death" mean that the child caused their own starvation.
Ironically, the passive voice is part of the armoury of war. A reporter can write or broadcast the words: "Ten civilians were killed in the Middle East conflict yesterday" - and the people who did the killing are not identified.
Similarly: "A hospital was bombed today, killing 23 people."
The words "shooting", "killing", "bombing", and the like, however, can just as easily, and without any awkwardness, be used in the active voice, as in "Houthi rebels fired a missile at a Greek oil tanker yesterday."
But using the verb "to starve" in the active voice, as in "Netanyahu starved the child", is awkward so people avoid it, thereby shielding the perpetrator.
Moving from the passive voice to the active voice is critical to the effective rule of law. The rule of law only enters the picture after the passive voice. "Veronica Victim was murdered" is in the passive voice. "Peter Perpetrator murdered Veronica Victim" is in the active voice and, in rule-of-law countries, is usually only uttered after a legal finding of guilt.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
Unfortunately, that might never happen in the case of Netanyahu. He has visited the US three times and Hungary once since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest in November 2024 under the Statute of Rome.
The US has never signed up to the International Criminal Court, nor to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. It is a member of the World Trade Organisation but has effectively neutered it by vetoing appointments to its judicial arm.
Even so, it used to support a rules-based international order. Now it has even dispensed with that pretence. Israel (under Netanyahu) and Hungary (Under Viktor Orban), once rule-of-law democracies, have done likewise.
Albanese can take credit for expressing Australia's traditional rule-of-law values this week. In doing so he further distanced himself for the US which has been complicit in the starvation by withholding humanitarian aid and complicit in the slaughter at food-distribution centres and in general because it supplies weapons. Unlike President Donald Trump and the US leadership generally he has not been silent.
If we want a rules-based international order, however, nations must seek out the individual leaders who are accused of crimes on the basis of credible evidence and under the rule of law bring them to account.
The images of starving children coming out of Gaza reminded me of the images of the liberation of the concentration camps at the end of World War II.
Victims and perpetrators come in all colours, races and religions. Maybe Shakespeare would have said: "If you starve us, do we not look skeletal".
In Tel Aviv last week, Jewish people took to the streets holding photographs of children whose starvation is being caused by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu's illegal waging of an aggressive war and the illegal withholding of food in Gaza.
If you offend decency, do we not protest.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this week: "Quite clearly it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered which was a decision that Israel made in March."
He said, "You can't hold innocent people responsible" for the actions of Hamas.
Indeed, the only lawful warfare is defence. What Israel is doing in Gaza has for months now gone well beyond what would be a legitimate defensive response to the Hamas attacks in October 2023. It is similar to the unnecessary Allied fire-bombing of Dresden in February 1945.
Waging an aggressive war is the worst criminal conduct known to humankind. It is worse than the crimes of serial killers or serial rapists.
Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin should be compared to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, the Columbine School shooters, or Martin Bryant - not just other authoritarian leaders of nations.
Those who wage an aggressive war do not just condone or turn a blind eye to death and suffering; they cause it - as surely as a serial killer.
Worse, because they bring many of the resources of the state and its people to join in to their crime - wittingly or unwittingly - the scale of the crime is much greater than that of the serial killer or mass shooter, and so is the scale of evil.
Netanyahu's action a breach of international law the same as Putin's action because he is waging war beyond the borders of his own nation as recognised by the United Nations. It is the same as Putin's because its aim is the genocidal removal of the civilian populations.
"Netanyahu's action" is the deliberate starvation of innocent civilians, particularly children. There is more than enough food to prevent the starvation of anyone in Gaza.
The reason people are starving is that the food is not getting through. And getting it through or not getting it through is within the power of Netanyahu. He is causing the starvation and death.
"To starve" is a peculiar verb. It is too often used in the passive voice, as in, "The child starved to death." It is rarely used in the active voice, as in, "Netayanhu starved the child to death."
The passive voice removes any active person. It removes responsibility, as if the words "the child starved to death" mean that the child caused their own starvation.
Ironically, the passive voice is part of the armoury of war. A reporter can write or broadcast the words: "Ten civilians were killed in the Middle East conflict yesterday" - and the people who did the killing are not identified.
Similarly: "A hospital was bombed today, killing 23 people."
The words "shooting", "killing", "bombing", and the like, however, can just as easily, and without any awkwardness, be used in the active voice, as in "Houthi rebels fired a missile at a Greek oil tanker yesterday."
But using the verb "to starve" in the active voice, as in "Netanyahu starved the child", is awkward so people avoid it, thereby shielding the perpetrator.
Moving from the passive voice to the active voice is critical to the effective rule of law. The rule of law only enters the picture after the passive voice. "Veronica Victim was murdered" is in the passive voice. "Peter Perpetrator murdered Veronica Victim" is in the active voice and, in rule-of-law countries, is usually only uttered after a legal finding of guilt.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
Unfortunately, that might never happen in the case of Netanyahu. He has visited the US three times and Hungary once since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest in November 2024 under the Statute of Rome.
The US has never signed up to the International Criminal Court, nor to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. It is a member of the World Trade Organisation but has effectively neutered it by vetoing appointments to its judicial arm.
Even so, it used to support a rules-based international order. Now it has even dispensed with that pretence. Israel (under Netanyahu) and Hungary (Under Viktor Orban), once rule-of-law democracies, have done likewise.
Albanese can take credit for expressing Australia's traditional rule-of-law values this week. In doing so he further distanced himself for the US which has been complicit in the starvation by withholding humanitarian aid and complicit in the slaughter at food-distribution centres and in general because it supplies weapons. Unlike President Donald Trump and the US leadership generally he has not been silent.
If we want a rules-based international order, however, nations must seek out the individual leaders who are accused of crimes on the basis of credible evidence and under the rule of law bring them to account.
The images of starving children coming out of Gaza reminded me of the images of the liberation of the concentration camps at the end of World War II.
Victims and perpetrators come in all colours, races and religions. Maybe Shakespeare would have said: "If you starve us, do we not look skeletal".
In Tel Aviv last week, Jewish people took to the streets holding photographs of children whose starvation is being caused by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu's illegal waging of an aggressive war and the illegal withholding of food in Gaza.
If you offend decency, do we not protest.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this week: "Quite clearly it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered which was a decision that Israel made in March."
He said, "You can't hold innocent people responsible" for the actions of Hamas.
Indeed, the only lawful warfare is defence. What Israel is doing in Gaza has for months now gone well beyond what would be a legitimate defensive response to the Hamas attacks in October 2023. It is similar to the unnecessary Allied fire-bombing of Dresden in February 1945.
Waging an aggressive war is the worst criminal conduct known to humankind. It is worse than the crimes of serial killers or serial rapists.
Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin should be compared to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, the Columbine School shooters, or Martin Bryant - not just other authoritarian leaders of nations.
Those who wage an aggressive war do not just condone or turn a blind eye to death and suffering; they cause it - as surely as a serial killer.
Worse, because they bring many of the resources of the state and its people to join in to their crime - wittingly or unwittingly - the scale of the crime is much greater than that of the serial killer or mass shooter, and so is the scale of evil.
Netanyahu's action a breach of international law the same as Putin's action because he is waging war beyond the borders of his own nation as recognised by the United Nations. It is the same as Putin's because its aim is the genocidal removal of the civilian populations.
"Netanyahu's action" is the deliberate starvation of innocent civilians, particularly children. There is more than enough food to prevent the starvation of anyone in Gaza.
The reason people are starving is that the food is not getting through. And getting it through or not getting it through is within the power of Netanyahu. He is causing the starvation and death.
"To starve" is a peculiar verb. It is too often used in the passive voice, as in, "The child starved to death." It is rarely used in the active voice, as in, "Netayanhu starved the child to death."
The passive voice removes any active person. It removes responsibility, as if the words "the child starved to death" mean that the child caused their own starvation.
Ironically, the passive voice is part of the armoury of war. A reporter can write or broadcast the words: "Ten civilians were killed in the Middle East conflict yesterday" - and the people who did the killing are not identified.
Similarly: "A hospital was bombed today, killing 23 people."
The words "shooting", "killing", "bombing", and the like, however, can just as easily, and without any awkwardness, be used in the active voice, as in "Houthi rebels fired a missile at a Greek oil tanker yesterday."
But using the verb "to starve" in the active voice, as in "Netanyahu starved the child", is awkward so people avoid it, thereby shielding the perpetrator.
Moving from the passive voice to the active voice is critical to the effective rule of law. The rule of law only enters the picture after the passive voice. "Veronica Victim was murdered" is in the passive voice. "Peter Perpetrator murdered Veronica Victim" is in the active voice and, in rule-of-law countries, is usually only uttered after a legal finding of guilt.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
Unfortunately, that might never happen in the case of Netanyahu. He has visited the US three times and Hungary once since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest in November 2024 under the Statute of Rome.
The US has never signed up to the International Criminal Court, nor to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. It is a member of the World Trade Organisation but has effectively neutered it by vetoing appointments to its judicial arm.
Even so, it used to support a rules-based international order. Now it has even dispensed with that pretence. Israel (under Netanyahu) and Hungary (Under Viktor Orban), once rule-of-law democracies, have done likewise.
Albanese can take credit for expressing Australia's traditional rule-of-law values this week. In doing so he further distanced himself for the US which has been complicit in the starvation by withholding humanitarian aid and complicit in the slaughter at food-distribution centres and in general because it supplies weapons. Unlike President Donald Trump and the US leadership generally he has not been silent.
If we want a rules-based international order, however, nations must seek out the individual leaders who are accused of crimes on the basis of credible evidence and under the rule of law bring them to account.
The images of starving children coming out of Gaza reminded me of the images of the liberation of the concentration camps at the end of World War II.
Victims and perpetrators come in all colours, races and religions. Maybe Shakespeare would have said: "If you starve us, do we not look skeletal".
In Tel Aviv last week, Jewish people took to the streets holding photographs of children whose starvation is being caused by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu's illegal waging of an aggressive war and the illegal withholding of food in Gaza.
If you offend decency, do we not protest.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this week: "Quite clearly it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered which was a decision that Israel made in March."
He said, "You can't hold innocent people responsible" for the actions of Hamas.
Indeed, the only lawful warfare is defence. What Israel is doing in Gaza has for months now gone well beyond what would be a legitimate defensive response to the Hamas attacks in October 2023. It is similar to the unnecessary Allied fire-bombing of Dresden in February 1945.
Waging an aggressive war is the worst criminal conduct known to humankind. It is worse than the crimes of serial killers or serial rapists.
Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin should be compared to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, the Columbine School shooters, or Martin Bryant - not just other authoritarian leaders of nations.
Those who wage an aggressive war do not just condone or turn a blind eye to death and suffering; they cause it - as surely as a serial killer.
Worse, because they bring many of the resources of the state and its people to join in to their crime - wittingly or unwittingly - the scale of the crime is much greater than that of the serial killer or mass shooter, and so is the scale of evil.
Netanyahu's action a breach of international law the same as Putin's action because he is waging war beyond the borders of his own nation as recognised by the United Nations. It is the same as Putin's because its aim is the genocidal removal of the civilian populations.
"Netanyahu's action" is the deliberate starvation of innocent civilians, particularly children. There is more than enough food to prevent the starvation of anyone in Gaza.
The reason people are starving is that the food is not getting through. And getting it through or not getting it through is within the power of Netanyahu. He is causing the starvation and death.
"To starve" is a peculiar verb. It is too often used in the passive voice, as in, "The child starved to death." It is rarely used in the active voice, as in, "Netayanhu starved the child to death."
The passive voice removes any active person. It removes responsibility, as if the words "the child starved to death" mean that the child caused their own starvation.
Ironically, the passive voice is part of the armoury of war. A reporter can write or broadcast the words: "Ten civilians were killed in the Middle East conflict yesterday" - and the people who did the killing are not identified.
Similarly: "A hospital was bombed today, killing 23 people."
The words "shooting", "killing", "bombing", and the like, however, can just as easily, and without any awkwardness, be used in the active voice, as in "Houthi rebels fired a missile at a Greek oil tanker yesterday."
But using the verb "to starve" in the active voice, as in "Netanyahu starved the child", is awkward so people avoid it, thereby shielding the perpetrator.
Moving from the passive voice to the active voice is critical to the effective rule of law. The rule of law only enters the picture after the passive voice. "Veronica Victim was murdered" is in the passive voice. "Peter Perpetrator murdered Veronica Victim" is in the active voice and, in rule-of-law countries, is usually only uttered after a legal finding of guilt.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
Unfortunately, that might never happen in the case of Netanyahu. He has visited the US three times and Hungary once since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest in November 2024 under the Statute of Rome.
The US has never signed up to the International Criminal Court, nor to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. It is a member of the World Trade Organisation but has effectively neutered it by vetoing appointments to its judicial arm.
Even so, it used to support a rules-based international order. Now it has even dispensed with that pretence. Israel (under Netanyahu) and Hungary (Under Viktor Orban), once rule-of-law democracies, have done likewise.
Albanese can take credit for expressing Australia's traditional rule-of-law values this week. In doing so he further distanced himself for the US which has been complicit in the starvation by withholding humanitarian aid and complicit in the slaughter at food-distribution centres and in general because it supplies weapons. Unlike President Donald Trump and the US leadership generally he has not been silent.
If we want a rules-based international order, however, nations must seek out the individual leaders who are accused of crimes on the basis of credible evidence and under the rule of law bring them to account.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Russia kills 25 in Ukraine, as Kremlin says 'committed' to peace
The Kremlin said on Tuesday that it wanted to pursue peace in Ukraine hours after mounting attacks that killed at least 25 people, including a 23-year-old pregnant woman and more than a dozen prison inmates. The strikes on several regions came hours after US President Donald Trump issued Moscow with a new deadline to end its grinding invasion of Ukraine -- now in its fourth year -- or face tough new sanctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of purposefully targeting a prison in the Zaporizhzhia region -- that Russia claims as its own -- killing 16 people and wounding more than 40 others. "It was a deliberate strike, intentional, not accidental. The Russians could not have been unaware that they were targeting civilians in that facility," Zelensky said on social media in response. The Kremlin denied that claim. "The Russian army does not strike civilian targets," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, including from AFP. Peskov added that Moscow had "taken note" of Trump's new deadline and told journalists that it remained "committed to the peace process to resolve the conflict around Ukraine and secure our interests." - 'War crimes' - Ukraine's justice ministry said Moscow's forces hit the prison with four glide bombs, while police said 16 inmates were killed and 43 were wounded. Bricks and debris were strewn on the ground around buildings with blown-out windows, according to images released by the ministry. The facility's perimeter was intact and there was no threat that inmates would escape, it added. Rescue workers were seen searching for survivors in pictures released by the region's emergency services. A senior Ukrainian source said that 274 people were serving sentences in the Bilenkivska facility, where 30 people worked. The source added there were no Russian war prisoners being held at the centre. Ukraine's human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets said the Zaporizhzhia attack was further evidence of Russian "war crimes". "People held in places of detention do not lose their right to life and protection," he wrote on social media. In addition to the glide bomb attack, the Ukrainian air force said that Russia had launched 37 drones and two missiles overnight, adding that its air defence systems had downed 32 of the drones. Zelensky said that among the separate attacks, Russian forces had targeted a hospital in the town of the Kamyanske in the Dnipropetrovsk region. - Hospital targeted - "Three people were killed in the attack, including a pregnant woman. Her name was Diana. She was only 23-years-old," Zelensky said. Separate strikes in the eastern Kharkiv region that borders Russia killed six people, regional authorities said. In the southern Russian region of Rostov, a Ukrainian drone attack killed one person, the region's acting governor said. Kyiv has been trying to repel Russia's summer offensive, which has made fresh advances into areas largely spared since the start of the invasion in 2022. The Russian defence ministry claimed fresh advances across the sprawling front line on Tuesday, saying its forces had taken control of two more villages -- one in the Donetsk region, and another in the Zaporizhzhia region. The prison strike on Tuesday came on the three-year anniversary of a attack on another detention facility in occupied Ukrainian territory that Kyiv blamed on Moscow and that was reported to have killed dozens of captured Ukrainian soldiers. Ukraine and Russia blamed each other for the strike over the night of July 29 three years ago on the detention centre in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region, which the Kremlin says is part of Russia. Ukraine says that dozens of its soldiers who laid down their arms after a long Russian siege of the port city of Mariupol were killed in that attack on the Olenivka detention facility.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Trump opens golf course in Scotland before heading home
US President Donald Trump has formally opened a new golf course at his sprawling property in Scotland, saying he would play a quick round before heading home to focus on addressing crises in the Middle East and elsewhere. Trump, wrapping up a five-day visit to Scotland, was joined by former football players, golfers and business leaders for a first round of golf at his new second 18-hole course at Trump International near Aberdeen, Scotland. Initially billed as a private visit, the trip quickly morphed into a diplomatic mission, including a trade agreement sealed with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, bilateral meetings with British officials and phone calls aimed at ending a nascent war between Cambodia and Thailand. During a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday, Trump raised pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over a worsening hunger crisis in the war-torn Palestinian enclave of Gaza. Asked at Tuesday's event what he would say to Netanyahu, Trump said he was trying to get things "straightened out". During his talks with Starmer, Trump said he disagreed with Netanyahu's assessment there was no starvation in Gaza, while giving Russian President Vladimir Putin a much tighter deadline to make progress towards ending the war in Ukraine. Flanked by his two sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr, with several grandchildren nearby, Trump raved about the beauty of the new golf course in the dunes of northeastern Scotland, before teeing off. "I look forward to playing it today. We're going to play it very quickly, and then I go back to (Washington) DC and we put out fires all over the world," he said at a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the new course, alluding in part to a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. "We stopped a war - we've stopped about five wars. So that's much more important than playing golf." Several nations have nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a message endorsed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a social media post in recent days. Golfers Paul McGinley and Rich Beem teed off with Trump and his son Eric, and an eclectic mix of notable figures followed. Former Chelsea and AC Milan striker and top Ukraine goal-scorer Andriy Shevchenko, who is now the president of his country's football association, was a guest, as were fellow ex-football players Robbie Fowler, Gianfranco Zola and Jim Leighton. Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who met with Trump earlier on Tuesday, also attended, along with Adrian Mardell, the chief executive of Jaguar Land Rover, and Alastair King, the Lord Mayor of the City of London, who represents Britain's finance industry.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Out of depth': Clover Moore slammed for support of Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest
Sky News host Danica De Giorgio slams the Lord Mayor of Sydney, Clover Moore, for her public support of holding a pro-Palestine protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge. 'It seems the Lord Mayor of Sydney has suffered another public hallucination – she's seemingly forgotten her core duties of roads, rates, and rubbish,' Ms De Giorgio said. 'Gee, what a gift of propaganda to Hamas. 'How out of her depth is this woman?'
