Letters to the editor, Aug. 4: ‘I see Mark Carney following in the steps of Brian Mulroney'
I have worked in the Palestinian territories assisting in their past elections. I got to know the area and the people.
For the past 20 years, I have been hoping and praying that democratic countries in the Western world would give support to people who have been terribly abused for much too long, by too many powerful nations.
Time for justice to prevail.
G.A. Teske Strathcona County, Alta.
Re 'Is China a better trading partner than Trump's America?' (July 31): China has taken the lead globally in electric vehicles, even recently figuring out how to recharge them in about five minutes. Yet Chinese EVs are called 'state-subsidized, inexpensive spy machines on wheels.'
Really? Compared to the monopoly Canada has allowed the United States on everything web-related, from Google to Facebook to computers to smartphones, all of which makes a fortune out of mining our personal data?
We already have spy machines in every Canadian pocket, going everywhere we go, but they're not Chinese, they're not cheap and they sure don't help reduce the impact of climate change.
Marsha Copp Toronto
Referencing China and the Tiananmen Square massacre to discourage trade with the Middle Kingdom ignores the behaviour of the United States in my lifetime: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and other disastrous imperialist adventures resulting in millions of lives lost – and now they threaten us.
As for China's 'spy machines on wheels,' Canadians using U.S. software might wonder how, when they mention a word like 'hat' in an e-mail, ads for hats can appear on screen minutes later.
Open thine eyes: Our neighbour has been spying on us for years.
Don McLellan Vancouver
Re 'The International Court of Justice's statement on fossil fuels puts Carney in a tough spot' (July 28): This makes it sound like the International Court of Justice decision is the worst thing that could happen to Mark Carney and his nation-building agenda. I think this decision just helped him shorten the list of projects that meet criteria.
There are lots of projects that can be great for Canada, such as electric interties between provinces and wind and solar power projects. These projects would not only be nation-building, they would also supply the clean energy we need for a more livable world. And now that clean energy is cheaper than fossil fuels, we would also save money. A win on many levels.
Let's move forward in a direction that aligns with international law, supports climate action and saves money.
Cathy Page Calgary
Re 'Hard place' (Letters, July 30): A letter-writer argues that the Canadian public needs to be better educated on the role of oil in our economy. Getting off it quickly would certainly have significant economic costs, but the overall cost to the economy can be a good deal less than losses to the industry itself.
For example, oil resources such as capital and labour would move to other industries and be productive there. Even getting off oil rapidly would not 'rip our economy to shreds.' More likely it would have a negative impact of 1 to 2 per cent of GDP in the short run, and less in the longer run. (In 2022, oil and gas accounted for 3.2 per cent of Canada's GDP).
I also see no reason to get off oil rapidly. Economists who bear the environmental implications in mind generally propose a gradual shrinkage.
Albert Berry Toronto
Re 'How Norway cracked the electric-vehicle code' (Aug. 1): I calculate that electric vehicles are already more economical than others in Canada.
Even though an EV's purchase price may be higher than an equivalent fossil fuel vehicle, for most drivers that difference may be reduced to zero in a few years. An EV's fuel and maintenance costs are a small fraction of those of other cars.
While EV owners are erasing the initial cost difference, they're also driving a non-polluting car with the time-saving convenience of charging at home.
Paul Rapoport Member, Electric Vehicle Society; Hamilton
Re 'For some of Canada's most prestigious university programs, mid-90s grades are not enough' (July 30): Absent a standardized test to measure academic merit, such as the U.S. SATs, there is no means by which to effectively compare the marks of students at one high school with those of another, let alone one teacher with another at the same school.
The practice of grading on a bell curve – caving to the pressure of individual parents, the pleas of students and the inherent discretion of teachers – further makes the comparison of marks a mug's game. Meanwhile, standardized tests are used for many postgraduate programs (LSATs, MCATs) to level the playing field, in recognition of the inability to compare undergraduate marks in different areas from different universities.
Standardized testing should be a requirement if Ontario is to use Bill 33 to determine merit.
Richard Austin Toronto
I graduated in 1969 from Jarvis Collegiate in Toronto, considered then to be one of the city's top schools.
My graduating class of 120-plus students had only 10 Ontario scholars – a student with a graduating average of 80 (yes, 80) or more – and only one averaged over 90. The financial reward for Ontario Scholars was terminated years later, after grade inflation rendered the distinction meaningless.
Most students have a shock when they first encounter university grading, where a mark of 70 is average, 90 is a real distinction, rarely given, and students can actually fail – many of them, in fact.
At the University of Ottawa, the highest possible grade is 10, or an A+ covering the 90-to-100 range. In my 42-year career, I only once saw a student graduate with a 10 average in my department. In other words, all others, including many really outstanding ones, had averages below 90.
William Hallett Emeritus professor, department of mechanical engineering, University of Ottawa
Recently, the Toronto District School Board touted its several graduates with 100 averages. How do you get 100 on, say, a course in English literature?
I venture to say William Shakespeare and W. B. Yeats would expect to fall short of that, and be appalled some teacher saw fit to award a perfect score to a teenage student.
Perhaps the spirits of James Joyce, William S. Burroughs and Henry Miller can be summoned to inject some awareness of the impossibility of perfection.
Barry Stagg Toronto
Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
4 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. First Nation wins rights, title along Fraser River's south arm in Richmond
VICTORIA — A Vancouver Island First Nation has won back fishing rights and title for part of the land its ancestors used as a summer home in the Lower Mainland, despite opposition by two other Indigenous communities. A B.C. Supreme Court judge says in a written decision posted Friday that the Cowichan Tribes have established fishing rights on the Fraser River and title to a portion of almost 7 1/2 square kilometres of land they claimed on Lulu Island in Richmond. The Musqueam and Tsawwassen First Nations, along with the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond and the Vancouver-Fraser Port Authority all opposed the claim during the 513-day trial. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Justice Barbara Young ruled that land titles grants issued by the Canadian and B.C. governments to others 'are defective and invalid' as they 'unjustifiably infringe the Cowichan Nation Aboriginal title to these lands.' The decision says both governments owe a duty to negotiate with the nation 'in good faith' on how to reconcile its land title with what's now in the territory, including the Vancouver airport Fuel Delivery Project property. B.C. Premier David Eby says in a response that the province is reviewing the decision for a possible appeal and will also seek to resolve the issue by negotiating with all nations involved. 'But let me be clear: owning private property with clear title is key to borrowing for a mortgage, economic certainty, and the real estate market,' Eby says. 'We remain committed to protecting and upholding this foundation of business and personal predictability, and our provincial economy, for Indigenous and non-Indigenous people alike.' The area where the Cowichan have established title was used by the nation's ancestors during the summer as a 'permanent post and beam village' but was never established as a reserve, resulting in B.C. giving away the land starting in 1871. The Musqueam Indian Band — which declared in 1976 that it holds the Aboriginal title covering both the north and south arms of the Fraser River — says in a statement that it is deeply disappointed and 'fundamentally' disagrees with the court decision. It says that it has established 'national legal precedent on Aboriginal title and fishing rights' through two major cases in the Supreme Court of Canada, and it plans to 'continue to vigorously defend these rights.' 'Musqueam is shocked the court didn't give effect to oral history and traditional governance protocols, which guide intercommunity relationships since time immemorial,' the statement says. The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority says in a statement that it is reviewing the implications and details of the decision alongside other affected federal government departments, and further updates will be provided at an appropriate time. The Cowichan Tribes says in a news release that it is 'celebrating a historic victory,' while honouring 'generations of leaders' in the community who fought to win the Aboriginal title on the Fraser River land. 'It is in their honour and for the well-being of our future generations that the elders, knowledge holders, and chiefs who have gone before us brought this case forward to recognize our Aboriginal title and fishing rights, as a basis for truth and reconciliation, through the courts,' it says. Young says in the decision that while evidence shows a number of Coast Salish groups being historically located in the lower Fraser River region, some places, such as the area of the Cowichan claim, 'belonged to specific groups.' The judge says the Cowichan 'had the capacity and intention to exclusively control their village land and some surrounding areas on the south arm of the Fraser River' before 1846, when the British Crown asserted sovereignty in the area. 'This was the Cowichan village,' the ruling says. 'It belonged to the Cowichan, and other groups respected that it was on Cowichan land. 'The Cowichan exercised effective control over their land. There is no evidence of other Indigenous groups occupying this village.' The court recognizes that the case 'raised complex … and novel issues,' its decision says. 'The fact is, all the parties have continued interests, rights and obligations around the south arm of the Fraser River and limited resources need to be shared and preserved,' Young says in the decision. 'Now that this multi‑year journey has concluded, it is my sincere hope that the parties have the answers they need to return to negotiations and reconcile the outstanding issues.'
Vancouver Sun
4 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Vancouver woman rallies to save stranded female Afghan students after U.S. foreign aid cuts
A group of Afghan women studying abroad face deportation to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan within days as a Vancouver woman tries to bring them to Canada. Thirty female post-secondary students studying at the American University of Afghanistan campus in Qatar had their education derailed when the U.S. administration cut funding to U.S. Agency for International Development, which was supporting them. Their temporary visas expire Aug. 15. Friba Rezayee, an Afghan-Canadian based in Vancouver, warns that if the students — aged 20 to 30 — are deported, they risk interrogation and imprisonment. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'They will be branded as infidels and spies by the regime simply for pursuing an American education,' said Rezayee, who arrived in Canada as a refugee in 2011. She is urging Canadians and universities to act quickly. 'It's a terrifying reality. I can imagine as soon as the students land at Taliban-controlled Kabul airport, they will be asked: 'Where is your mehram, or male chaperone?'' Rezayee said. Rezayee founded Women Leaders of Tomorrow, a Vancouver-based organization supporting Afghan women's education through partnerships with Canadian universities — the University of British Columbia and Laurentian — and B.C. high schools Crofton House and St. Margaret's Academy. Since the Taliban's seizure of the U.S.-backed Afghan government in August 2021, Rezayee said women have been forced out of public life. Females face strict gender restrictions barring them from most jobs, secondary school and higher education. Rigid dress codes, and limited movement without a male guardian is enforced. The group of Afghan students fled to an American University of Afghanistan campus in Qatar after their home campus in Kabul shut down following the takeover. UBC has secured placements in graduate studies for three of the Afghan students, but others are stranded at the Afghan university's campus in exile. 'These women are terrified of what will happen to them if they have to return,' Rezayee said. Rezayee has partnered with the University of Regina through Project Resilience — founded in 2022 to provide scholarships and emergency funding and support to students affected by conflict and political violence — which offers study in computer science, economics and business administration. The initiative aims to raise $500,000 to support as many students as possible. The estimated annual cost per student is about $40,000. But cuts to international aid and stricter immigration policies have limited the number of student visas that Canada will issue. Budget constraints at Canadian universities have also made it difficult to secure in-house financial support. In March, an executive order from U.S. President Donald Trump halted significant portions of foreign aid, including funding to programs supporting Afghan women's education abroad. 'The students reached out to me for help right after Trump pulled their funding,' Rezayee said Friday. 'Now it's Canada's time to step up and make sure these women are not sent back to the Taliban.' sgrochowski@
Montreal Gazette
4 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Dear Canada, please don't abandon us
The letter writer states Canadian-U.S. relations have been permanently tarnished and concludes that 'America has shown us who they are.' But as in most things, perception is in the eye of the beholder. As a grieving American, I ask our irate neighbours to consider a different view. If a good and trusted friend (the U.S.) begins to act weirdly, which we have, should the other (Canada) just decide the relationship is toast? Instead, wouldn't this purported friend delve into what's wrong and perhaps intervene to help? This is not to negate Canadians' disappointment and anger. But please realize the last U.S. presidential election saw Donald Trump triumph over Kamala Harris with only 49.8 per cent of the popular vote. Overall, the turnout was about 64 per cent of eligible voters. And during the 2024 election cycle, Elon Musk donated as much as US$292 million to the victor. Such data, while hardly soothing the profound concern and dismay many Americans are experiencing, suggest apathy and Big Money were instrumental in the result. Finally, Canadians might also temper their scorn by considering their erstwhile friend is utterly embroiled in a battle for its survival. The appeal of the populist movement, which thrust Trump to power, has shown itself to be an insatiable wolf. In short, Canada, don't abandon your stricken neighbour. Understand our plight instead — and pray democracy may yet prevail. R. Jay Allain, Orleans, Mass. Immigration rules to please Trump? Yosniel Alginis Villalon Lopez, a native of Cuba, is yet another potential Canadian who was forced into ICE detention after being rejected by the Canada Border Services Agency at the Lacolle border crossing. And yet he is married to a resident of Quebec. The so-called Safe Third Country Agreement, by which he was refused entry, is only an executive agreement between the Canadian and U.S. governments. It hasn't been passed by Parliament, and only in rare cases does it apply to refugee claimants arriving at Canadian airports from elsewhere. Our federal government's proposed Bill C-2 will make it almost impossible for most people entering Canada via the U.S. to have their refugee claim reviewed by the Immigration and Refugee Board. It has also been severely criticized for provisions affecting human rights in Canada. One may wonder whether all this is intended to please the Trump administration. Shloime Perel, Côte-St-Luc An acronym fit for stats bureau Donald Trump, upset with weaker than expected job numbers and a subsequent hit on markets, fired Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer. He will, no doubt, replace her with someone who will bend the knee and report numbers that he wants to hear, even if they are untrue. Maybe the bureau's name will be changed from BLS to simply the Bureau of Statistics, or more to the point, BS. Robert Filler, St-Laurent Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
