logo
Ekurhuleni turning tide after losing billions due to tampering with electricity accounts

Ekurhuleni turning tide after losing billions due to tampering with electricity accounts

Eyewitness News29-04-2025
JOHANNESBURG- The City of Ekurhuleni is turning the tide on revenue leakages after losing billions in the first quarter of the current financial year.
The metro recorded a R2 billion revenue deficit between July and September last year, primarily due to the tempering of electricity accounts.
ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni Mayor not satisfied with his executive
This saw more than a thousand households and businesses underpaying for electricity, while some had their outstanding balances erased from the system
Ekurhuleni Mayor, Doctor Xhakaza, says the city lost far less than R2 billion in the second and third quarters.
"We have begun to turn the tide. From quarter one's R2 billion, we took it down to R587 million in the this quarter, it went down to R416 million. So you'll agree with me that there's been a huge intervention in that area."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns
Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns

TimesLIVE

time10 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns

The Paarl magistrate's court has fined former Springbok rugby player Schalk Burger Sr and his company Welbedacht Wines for failing to submit VAT, pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) and income tax returns. The court fined the company R6,000 on each count of failing to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023 and a monthly employer declaration return for March 2023. Burger, 69, was convicted on 14 counts, which included failure to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023, a monthly employer declaration (EMP201) return for March2023 and IT12 income tax returns for the period 2011 to 2022. He was fined R6,000 or 12 months imprisonment on each count, of which R2,000 or four months imprisonment was suspended for five years. 'This amounts to a payable fine of R56,000, or 112 months imprisonment and a further R28,000 or 56 months imprisonment suspended for five years on specific conditions,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said. Burger successfully requested the court to grant him a deferred fine and was ordered to pay the R56,000 in instalments of R6,000 per month and a final payment of R8,000. The accused entered into a plea and sentence agreement with the state. The court confirmed the agreement and convicted and sentenced him accordingly. According to the agreement, Burger admitted that Welbedacht Wines was registered for VAT and PAYE at the Paarl office of the South African Revenue Services. Burger failed to submit the returns on behalf of the company. In addition, Burger, in his personal capacity, was registered for income tax at the Paarl Sars office . 'Following his successful registration for e-filing in 2011, he failed to submit his IT12 income tax returns for the tax years of 2011 to 2022. This was despite Sars' best efforts to encourage all taxpayers to submit their income tax returns.' It was only after the institution of a prosecution and his being summoned to appear in court that he submitted all outstanding returns relating to himself and his company, and both are currently tax compliant. 'The accused's son, Christiaan Francois Burger, was on July 21 also convicted and sentenced on 12 counts of failing to submit his IT12 personal income tax returns for the 2011 to 2022 period.' The 40-year-old was sentenced to a fine of R48,000 or 96 months imprisonment, and a further R24,000 or 48 months imprisonment, suspended for five years on conditions. The NPA said the sentence sent a strong message of deterrence. 'With the filing season for income tax currently under way, this is a clear message that failure by persons and juristic persons to file their Income Tax returns will not be tolerated. It is a serious offence that impacts negatively on the fiscus,' he said.

Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal
Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal

IOL News

time20 hours ago

  • IOL News

Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal

The decision comes after the Tribunal upheld exceptions filed by both the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) and AfroCentric Health, citing multiple deficiencies in Glenmore's case. Image: Supplied The Competition Tribunal has ruled against Glenmore Capital, dismissing its complaint regarding the alleged exclusion of its COVID-19 rapid antigen test kits from the South African public and private sectors. The decision comes after the Tribunal upheld exceptions filed by both the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) and AfroCentric Health, citing multiple deficiencies in Glenmore's case. Glenmore's complaint, originally lodged with the Competition Commission in August 2022, sought damages nearing R2 billion, claiming that NHLS and AfroCentric engaged in exclusionary practices that barred it from entering the market for COVID-19 test kits. The Commission, however, chose not to pursue the case, citing Glenmore's struggle to achieve market acceptance as a result of commercial factors, including delays in regulatory approval and a decrease in demand as the COVID-19 pandemic waned. Frustrated with the Commission's decision, Glenmore escalated the matter to the Tribunal. At a pre-hearing in December 2024, Glenmore was afforded an opportunity to amend its founding affidavit to address the concerns raised by NHLS and AfroCentric. Despite making amendments, both defendants argued that Glenmore's case remained fundamentally flawed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In its defence, NHLS and AfroCentric articulated four primary exceptions, asserting that Glenmore's complaint lacked a valid cause of action, failed to properly identify the legal entities involved, lacked a clear market definition, and exceeded the Tribunal's jurisdiction due to the nature of the claims made. No valid cause of action: Glenmore's complaint failed to establish a legal basis under the Competition Act, lacking both legal and factual foundation. Glenmore's complaint failed to establish a legal basis under the Competition Act, lacking both legal and factual foundation. Improper citation of entities: Glenmore did not adequately identify which legal entity allegedly contravened the Act, despite having been given several opportunities to rectify this. Lack of proper market definition: The complaint failed to clarify the relevant market, with Glenmore shifting references between disparate health products without defining a cohesive product or geographic market. The complaint failed to clarify the relevant market, with Glenmore shifting references between disparate health products without defining a cohesive product or geographic market. Lack of jurisdiction and procedural issues: The Tribunal highlighted that it cannot award damages unless under consent orders and noted allegations outside the ambit of competition law, such as irregular procurement and insider trading. The Tribunal noted that Glenmore had been granted ample opportunity to clarify and bolster its case but ultimately failed to provide a coherent argument. With the exceptions upheld, Glenmore's complaint referral was dismissed in its entirety. BUSINESS REPORT

Pick n Pay the new major 'bank' taking over South Africa
Pick n Pay the new major 'bank' taking over South Africa

The South African

time2 days ago

  • The South African

Pick n Pay the new major 'bank' taking over South Africa

From FNB to Absa, TymeBank to Standard Bank, and now Capitec, Pick n Pay continues to unite South Africa's leading banks under one roof, giving customers unmatched convenience when managing their money while they shop. With the addition of Capitec cash deposits at Pick n Pay tills, now empowers all banked customers to deposit cash, withdraw funds, and transfer money instantly at the checkout, making Pick n Pay the most accessible banking point in retail. Already South Africa's retailer with the most accessible in-store banking footprint, that now spans over 11 financial institutions nationwide, Pick n Pay's growing network ensures that millions of customers can access secure, affordable, and convenient financial services without making a separate trip to the bank. The compatible banks include: African Bank Albaraka Bank Bidvest Bank Capitec Bank Discovery Bank FNB Grindrod Bank Nedbank TymeBank Sasfin Bank Standard Bank Customers can now conveniently take care of their banking at the checkout, with no need for a separate trip or to queue at a bank or automated teller machine (ATM). Deposits are secure and reflect in the customer's account within minutes. The simplicity of the process requires no app, special onboarding process, or bank account, making Pick n Pay's cashpoint banking solution one of the most accessible in the country. 'We are proud to offer the most inclusive retail banking solution in South Africa,' says Deven Moodley, Executive Head of Pick n Pay's value-added services, financial services, and mobile division. 'By integrating an expanded banking offering into the retail experience, we're helping customers save time and reduce transport costs, while providing essential financial services that are safe and convenient.' Pick n Pay's partnerships simultaneously benefits the customer and banks, as the South African banking landscape is undergoing a transformation. Over the past five years, the number of ATMs operated by four South African banks declined by 8 345. Due to of the high maintenance costs, security, and limited reach of ATMs, banks are turning to strategic partnerships with retailers like Pick n Pay to expand their footprint more cost-effectively. This shift translates to numerous customer advantages, such as extended service hours, accessible locations, and the ability to bank during their everyday shopping routines. Over and above an improved customer experience, communities benefit from greater financial inclusion and reduced reliance on informal cash systems. With one of the lowest flat fees for store-to-store money transfers in the country, Pick n Pay has made this affordable banking option available at over 1 400 stores nationwide. However, the convenience does come at a cost. While Pick n Pay does not charge any additional fees when using tillpoints to do banking, the different banks do carry charges. For FNB, while withdrawals at tillpoints carry no charge up to R2 000 per month, this moves up to R2.00 after that point. Deposits carry a flat fee of R19.95. For Capitec customers, deposits are charged at R1.40 per R100 deposited – the same as depositing cash at ATMs. Bank Withdrawals Deposits FNB R2.00 R19.95 Capitec R2.00 R1.40 / R100 Absa Free N/A (CashSend) Nedbank R2.00 R2.00 (Boxer only) Standard Bank Free R19.95 To find out how to bank while you shop, visit Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store