What is ‘dark woke'?
NEW YORK - There was a time last summer when the Democratic Party was cool.
Ms Kamala Harris had just stepped in as the Democratic Party's nominee for president in the waning days of Brat summer. She went on the popular podcast 'Call Her Daddy'.
Mr Tim Walz's outdoorsy drip led to a Chappell Roan-inspired camo trucker hat. The memes were flowing, and the party's mood was high.
That moment has long passed. With Mr Donald Trump back in the White House, the culture of dude-heavy pop-podcast programming, provocative insults and so-called masculine energy that helped him get there seems like the dominant one.
And to some, the response from the left during the previous Trump era – defined by an earnest 'resistance' to the president's agenda – appears outdated and cringe.
As liberals try to get their groove back, some party insiders say Democratic politicians have been encouraged to embrace a new form of combative rhetoric aimed at winning back voters who have responded to Mr Trump's no-holds-barred version of politics.
It's an attempt to step outside the bounds of the political correctness that Republicans have accused Democrats of establishing. And it requires being crass but discerning, rude but only to a point.
Online, it has a name: 'Dark woke'.
'Republicans have essentially put Democrats in a respectability prison,' said Mr Bhavik Lathia, a communications consultant and former digital director for the Wisconsin Democratic Party.
'There is an extreme imbalance in strategy that allows Republicans to say stuff that really grabs voters' attention, where we're stuck saying boring pablum. I see this as a strategic shift within Democratic messaging – I'm a big fan of 'dark woke'. '
'Dark woke,' for now, is a meme that lives mostly online. But its roots have been sown throughout the party for years.
In the waning days of the Biden administration, memes about 'Dark Brandon' often referred to the version of the former president that conservatives most feared.
Outside the party, the 'dirtbag left', the term for a cohort of leftists provocateurs who eschew civility politics, inspired headlines for their unrestrained derision of conservatives and liberals alike.
Every so often, these political currents would come to a head. During a meeting of the House Oversight Committee last May, Rep. Jasmine Crockett found herself in a spat with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, after Ms Greene made a jibe about 'fake eyelashes' that the chair, Rep. James Comer, declined to prosecute under the committee's rules on decorum.
'Mr Chair, a point of order,' Ms Crockett said. 'I'm just curious, just to better understand your ruling. If someone on this committee then starts talking about somebody's bleach blond bad built butch body, that would not be engaging in personalities, correct?'
Ms Crockett's moment became a meme. It was printed on T-shirts. It got her an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel. And now, Democratic strategists say, it has become a perfect example of 'dark woke'.
The reach of Ms Crockett's comment seemed to show that Democratic clapbacks could permeate into cultural spaces, giving the leaders who delivered them new platforms to spread their ideas. To a new, younger generation of Democratic staffers, this was exactly the link they had seen their opponents exploiting for years.
'All these new staffers, we grew up seeing extremely vile content overflowing from right-wing spaces into regular spaces,' said Mr Caleb Brock, 23, the director of digital strategy for Rep. Ro Khanna. 'We're ready to combat that by any means necessary.'
Democrats have looked within their own ranks. Mr Chi Osse, the Brooklyn council member whose meme-fluent, sometimes confrontational presence on the social platform X has put him on the radar of national Democratic organizers, says he was recently asked to help the Senate Democratic Caucus with their social media strategy.
'Being able to use this strategy of being raw and unapologetic and unabashed about our beliefs is something our base really wants,' Mr Osse said. He referred to a quote by one of Mayor Eric Adams' advisers, Ms Ingrid Lewis-Martin, who said, 'When they go low, you gotta dig for oil.'
It goes against the well-known credo of Mrs Michelle Obama, who in 2016 preached, 'When they go low, we go high.' Instead, some Democrats want to see how low they can go, too.
In an email, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee said the party's main account on X had gained 1 million followers since the beginning of the year, pointing to several examples of viral moments – some embodying the principles of 'dark woke' – that had garnered some 800 million impressions across platforms in the same time period.
It's not resonating with everyone. For some, the universal truism that it can never be cool to try so hard applies here. Others, too, have criticised Democrats for seeming to place a premium on affect over policy.
Mr Alex Peter, a lawyer and left-wing commentator who makes content under the handle LOLOverruled, said the Democrats' new focus on viral 'dark woke' posts was just 'a lot of hot air'.
'Part of the problem with the mainstream Democratic Party is that it all kind of rings hollow,' Mr Peter, 33, said. 'I don't care about another clapback. People want concrete deliverables.'
Republicans, as well, do not seem fazed. Mr Vish Burra, 34, the press secretary for the New York Young Republicans Club, said the Democrats' fledgling attempts to go dark woke were not a significant threat.
'They're getting spicier and being more vicious in their attacks,' said Mr Burra, who has advised former Reps. Matt Gaetz and George Santos. 'Whatever. You have no power against us. The best you can squeeze out is Chuck Schumer on TikTok and Cory Booker going on for 25 hours?' NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AsiaOne
21 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump threatens 'severe consequences' if Putin blocks Ukraine peace, World News
WASHINGTON/BERLIN — US President Donald Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Russia's Vladimir Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine but also said on Wednesday (Aug 13) that a meeting between them could swiftly be followed by a second that would include the leader of Ukraine. Trump did not specify what the consequences could be, but he has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday proves fruitless. The comments by Trump and the outcome of a virtual conference with Trump, European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy held on Wednesday could provide encouragement for Kyiv after fears the Alaska summit could end up selling out Ukraine by carving up its territory. However, Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands strongly and previously has said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. When asked if Russia would face any consequences if Putin does not agree to stop the war after Friday's meeting, Trump responded: "Yes, they will." Asked if those consequences would be sanctions or tariffs, Trump told reporters: "I don't have to say. There will be very severe consequences." But the president also described the aim of the meeting between the two leaders in Alaska as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelenskiy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskiy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Trump did not provide a time frame for a second meeting. Red lines European leaders and Zelenskiy had earlier spoken with Trump in a last-ditch call hosted by Germany to lay out red lines ahead of the Alaska meeting. "We had a very good call. He was on the call. President Zelenskiy was on the call. I would rate it a 10, very friendly," Trump said. French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump agreed Ukraine must be involved in any discussions about ceding land, while Zelenskiy said Trump had supported the idea of security guarantees in a post-war settlement. "President Trump was very clear that the United States wanted to achieve a ceasefire at this meeting in Alaska," Macron said. "The second point on which things were very clear, as expressed by President Trump, is that territories belonging to Ukraine cannot be negotiated and will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who hosted the virtual meeting, said the principle that borders could not be changed by force must continue to apply. "If there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should ... increase the pressure," he said. "President Trump knows this position. He shares it very extensively and therefore I can say: We have had a really exceptionally constructive and good conversation with each other." Trump and Putin are due to discuss how to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict, the largest in Europe since World War Two. Trump has previously said both sides will have to swap land to end fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. Russia makes sharp advance into Ukraine On a day of intense diplomacy, Zelenskiy flew to Berlin for the virtual conferences with European leaders and then with Trump. He and the Europeans worry that a land swap could leave Russia with almost a fifth of Ukraine, rewarding it for nearly 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land, the last three in all-out war, and embolden Putin to expand further west. Russian forces have made a sharp thrust into eastern Ukraine in recent days in what may be an attempt to increase the pressure on Kyiv to give up territory. "I told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing (about his stated wish to end the war)," Zelenskiy said. "He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front. Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine." A source familiar with the matter said the call with Trump discussed possible cities that could host a three-way meeting, depending on the outcome of the talks in Alaska. Wary of angering Trump, European leaders have repeatedly said they welcome his efforts, while stressing that there should be no deal without Ukraine's participation. Trump's agreement last week to the summit was an abrupt shift after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace initiative. Trump said his envoy, Steve Witkoff, had made "great progress" at talks in Moscow. A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 per cent of Ukrainians favour a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also indicate Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means significant concessions. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev earlier said Moscow's stance had not changed since last year. As conditions for a ceasefire and the start of talks, Putin had demanded Ukraine withdraw its forces from four regions that Russia has claimed as its own but does not fully control, and formally renounce plans to join Nato. Kyiv swiftly rejected the conditions as tantamount to surrender. [[nid:721315]]


AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Migrants apprehended in marijuana farm raids recount living nightmare, World News
Yahir remembers growing up in Mexico without a bed or a stove. He didn't own a pair of shoes until he was 10, and in the mid-1990s — when he was 13 — he crossed with a group illegally into the US in search of work. He settled in California and worked on farms across the state. He met his wife and had six children, the eldest of whom is now 15. Then, on July 10, Yahir, 43, was apprehended while working at a marijuana farm in southern California, in one of the largest immigration raids since US President Donald Trump took office. "It was like a nightmare, but I was awake," said Yahir, his skin dotted by sun stains from working in the fields, just hours after being deported to Tijuana. Yahir asked to withhold his last name to protect his family in the US. As Trump ramps up his deportation efforts targeting immigrants in the country illegally, Mexicans — with the largest population of immigrants in the US without status — are living in fear. They are being arrested at restaurants, farms, Home Depot outlets and 7-Eleven convenience stores. A remarkable 42 per cent of Hispanic adults are worried they or someone close to them might be deported, according to a Pew Research Centre survey from earlier this year. Last week, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to halt a court order restricting immigration stops on the basis of what language they speak or where they work. Yahir said he knew of other immigrants being deported. "But I never thought it would happen to me," he said, adding that he didn't have a criminal record. Reuters couldn't independently confirm his account. More than 360 alleged immigration offenders were apprehended during the July 10 marijuana farm raids in southern California. One immigrant worker died after he fell 30 feet from a greenhouse roof. The president of the United Farm Workers union criticised the raids, saying they "terrorise American communities, disrupt the American food supply chain, threaten lives and separate families." 'My life is no longer here' Manuel, 32, another worker at the Camarillo farm, said he hid among marijuana plants in a greenhouse for five hours until agents cut the locks on the door. An agent in military garb then hit him on the head and put a gun to his chest, he said. Manuel declined to share his last name because he hopes to one day return to the US legally. He overstayed his tourist visa in 2023. The Department of Homeland Security said it could not comment on Manuel's allegations without further evidence. After his arrest, Manuel bounced between detention centres and eventually ended up in one in Adelanto, about 60 miles east of Los Angeles, where he said he slept on the floor of a freezing cell that reeked of urine. "The torture was more mental but it was horrible," he said. Democratic lawmakers who visited the nearly 2,000-bed centre in June criticised its conditions, saying some detainees were unable to get fresh clothes or towels for more than a week. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said, "The allegations about the Adelanto detention centre are FALSE. All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment, and have opportunities to communicate with their family members and lawyers." The DHS added 185,000 people have been deported from the US during the second Trump administration. Manuel and Yahir were both deported to Tijuana. Manuel has returned to his hometown in the state of Oaxaca but Yahir remains in Tijuana, unsure of what to do next. He has never been away from his children for so long, he said. "I am from Mexico but my life is no longer here." [[nid:720910]]
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
The Trump administration's South-East Asia policy: a new era of pressure and diversification
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump's return to the White House in January 2025 has marked a dramatic shift in US relations with South-east Asia. Central to the Trump administration's South-east Asia policy has been its all-encompassing tariff regime, implemented as part of the president's 'reciprocal tariffs'. On 'Liberation Day' (Apr 2), President Trump announced sweeping tariffs targeting every Asean member state , creating significant economic chaos across the region. The tariff structure reflected the administration's mixed approach to different South-east Asian countries. Cambodia faced the highest penalties at 49 per cent, followed by Laos at 48 per cent and Vietnam at 46 per cent. Thailand confronted a 36 per cent tariff, while Indonesia faced 32 per cent duties. Malaysia and Brunei each face 24 per cent tariffs, the Philippines 17 per cent, and Singapore 10 per cent. In August, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia saw their tariff rate reduced to 19 per cent, while Laos' rate was adjusted to 40 per cent. The Philippines saw its rate go from 17 to 20 per cent in July, before being revised to 19 per cent. These measures have impacted key sectors across the region, including Vietnam's electronics and semiconductors, Cambodia's textiles and footwear, and Thailand and Indonesia's agricultural products and forced governments in the region to reassess their trade policies. The tariffs represented a fundamental challenge to decades of economic integration between the US and South-east Asia. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Trade shocks notwithstanding, the Trump administration appears keen to maintain and even strengthen its military and security relationships in South-east Asia. The approach reflects the administration's broader Indo-Pacific strategy, which views the region as a critical arena for competition with China. Stressing the need to reassert American strength in the region, and reflecting the transactional nature of President Trump's diplomacy, the US administration has promoted military modernisation and more direct negotiations on defence cooperation and burden-sharing arrangements. This focus on bilateral relationships over multilateral engagement represents a departure from previous approaches to regional security building. Rather than working primarily through Asean or other regional forums, the Trump administration has advanced direct bilateral relationships that can deliver more immediate strategic benefits. While the US administration has shown some tactical flexibility – announcing a 90-day pause on high tariffs in April and negotiating rate reductions with various countries – these moves have arguably done little to allay underlying strategic concerns. For many South-east Asian states, such abrupt policy shifts underscore American unpredictability, feeding anxiety about the reliability of Washington's long-term economic and security commitments. In response to this combination of economic pressure and strategic uncertainty from Washington, South-east Asian nations are actively diversifying their partnerships. This strategic realignment has pushed some closer to alternative economic blocs. Indonesia, for instance, formally joined Brics in early 2025, while Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam have become Brics 'partner' countries. As a result, governments across the region find themselves caught in a difficult balancing act. Their economic relationships with China and their security partnerships with the United States could force difficult choices. This strategic diversification is most evident in a wave of new bilateral agreements that extend beyond traditional regional frameworks. The strengthening relationship between Vietnam and South Korea exemplifies this trend. Elevating their 'Comprehensive Strategic Partnership', the two nations have agreed to double their bilateral trade to US$150 billion by 2030. This partnership has also created strategic supply chain diversification for critical materials like urea solution, reducing dependency on single sources. Meanwhile, Indonesia and the European Union appear to be making progress in ongoing negotiations on the Indonesia-EU Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement . Aimed to be finalised by September, the deal is projected to raise bilateral trade by around 8 billion euros (S$12 billion), and open access to new market opportunities. This wave of bilateral negotiations demonstrates how Asean's attractiveness as an economic partner continues to grow. The EU has been particularly active, concluding free trade agreements with Singapore and Vietnam and advancing negotiations with Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Asean's economic dynamism, robust growth and demographic advantages make its member nations attractive partners for global powers seeking to diversify their economic relationships. The Trump administration's South-east Asia policy presents both significant challenges and potential opportunities for the US. The economic disruption caused by tariffs has forced countries to diversify their trade relationships and reduce dependence on the American market. While the administration's transactional approach has produced quick results in bilateral negotiations, it could undermine confidence in the consistency and reliability of American commitments. For the Trump administration, the challenge will be balancing its economic nationalism with the strategic imperative of maintaining influence in a region increasingly important to the Great Power Competition. The success of this approach will likely depend on the administration's ability to demonstrate that its economic pressure produces tangible benefits for American interests while maintaining the security partnerships essential to its Indo-Pacific strategy. From a broader perspective, the Trump administration's policies toward South-east Asia reflect the tensions in American foreign policy between unilateral economic measures and multilateral strategic cooperation. How these tensions are resolved will significantly impact not only US-South-east Asia relations but the broader balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region. The effectiveness of the Trump administration's approach will be measured by its ability to achieve its stated goals of reducing trade deficits and strengthening strategic partnerships without undermining American influence in one of the world's most economically dynamic and strategically important regions.