logo
SC's energy future: A case for expanding nuclear power to meet demand

SC's energy future: A case for expanding nuclear power to meet demand

Yahoo28-03-2025
Nuclear reactor assemblies pictured Sept. 12, 2024, in storage at V.C. Summer nuclear site near Fairfield. (Provided by S.C. Nuclear Advisory Council)
South Carolina has made considerable progress in strengthening its energy and transmission infrastructure, but much more remains to be done to secure a reliable, cost-effective and independent energy future.
A critical piece of this effort lies in expanding nuclear power, which offers the unique combination of low-carbon emissions, sustainability, 24/7 reliability, and long-term affordability.
This is why I fully support an 'all-of-the-above' approach to energy, including the revitalization of the unfinished reactors at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, and commend the South Carolina's state and congressional lawmakers for taking decisive steps to advance nuclear energy in our state.
Efforts to expand South Carolina's clean energy portfolio have already incentivized energy-efficient practices, expanding nuclear capabilities, and attracted private-sector investment in emerging renewable energy.
Tax credits such as the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit and the Advanced Energy Production Credit fuel business growth in the Palmetto State.
However, more work remains as our state's energy demands are growing rapidly due to population increases and economic expansion.
State leaders and utility officials have been increasingly focused on the growth in demand for energy.
Our major utilities are already experiencing unprecedented load demand growth.
South Carolina's population growth and accelerating economic development have caused utility planners to drastically increase their load growth forecasts, with electricity demand expected to surge over the next 15 years.
This demand growth will require an 'all-of-the-above' increase in electricity generation capacity, including natural gas, renewables, and nuclear. It will also require a more streamlined approach to the planning and construction of new energy generation, regardless of the energy source.
To meet these challenges, South Carolina's policymakers are now considering legislation that strengthens our energy sector, streamlines permitting and accelerates energy generation capacity.
Last month, the South Carolina House of Representatives passed H.3309, the South Carolina Energy Security Act, a bill prioritizing nuclear expansion as an energy source, alongside natural gas, hydrogen and renewables.
The state Senate will next debate this measure.
The Senate can develop legislation that balances reasonable permitting reforms with environmental protections, ensures appropriate regulatory oversight of the utilities while accelerating new energy generation, and prioritizes an 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy that includes the expansion of nuclear energy.
Reviving the V.C. Summer nuclear project represents one of the most promising opportunities to meet South Carolina's energy needs.
Sen. Lindsey Graham recently affirmed his support for nuclear power, stating, 'We cannot give up on nuclear power … South Carolina needs as much power as we can get.'
His leadership and advocacy for small modular reactors (SMRs) highlight the potential of modern nuclear technology to supplement traditional reactors and provide scalable, efficient energy solutions for our state.
As Congress sets its legislative agenda, Graham and South Carolina's delegation can prioritize continued support for policies that modernize the state's energy infrastructure, revitalize manufacturing, and strengthen national security.
Sen. Tim Scott has also championed efforts to ensure nuclear energy can be deployed more efficiently.
His recently introduced Nuclear Permitting Reform bill takes a commonsense approach to cutting through the bureaucratic red tape that slows down nuclear project approvals.
By reducing unnecessary delays and modernizing regulations, this bill would pave the way for projects like V.C. Summer's revival and the expansion of next-generation nuclear technology in South Carolina.
Beyond state efforts, federal investments are playing a crucial role in advancing energy security. The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in 2022, has provided South Carolina homes and businesses with key tax credits and incentives that help increase energy efficiency, promote solar energy, clean hydrogen and nuclear power production, and support offshore wind development.
Funding from that law has also fueled a resurgence in American manufacturing, leading to the announcement of 29 South Carolina projects promising to bring 16,500 jobs to the state.
Leveraging these resources, alongside nuclear expansion, will ensure South Carolina remains a leader in clean energy innovation.
Federal and state collaboration is crucial to ensuring South Carolina remains at the forefront of energy innovation.
The leadership shown by our congressional delegation and proactive efforts from our state Legislature put us in a strong position to secure our energy future.
However, the job is not yet done.
The state needs energy legislation that includes strong provisions for nuclear expansion and balanced permitting reform.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches

President Donald Trump has offered his critics, the world and U.S. allies contrasting images on how America treats its friends and adversaries after failing to broker a ceasefire in Russia's unprovoked war to annex Ukraine. At the Alaska-based summit Russian President Vladimir Putin received a red-carpet welcome from the U.S. that included a B-2 bomber fly-by and a ride in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast" with video of him laughing with Trump. The two superpower leaders exchanged flatteries, with Putin saying the war wouldn't have started it Trump had been president in 2022. Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation. That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III. Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House. Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with." The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin. Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement. Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater' After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe. "The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty." But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies. "Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy—it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks. Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, who said the war wouldn't have started if Joe Biden hadn't been in charge back in 2022. But without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers. Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past. Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made. "The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions." In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit. "I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."

Hundreds of 'Fight the Trump Takeover' protests held nationwide
Hundreds of 'Fight the Trump Takeover' protests held nationwide

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Hundreds of 'Fight the Trump Takeover' protests held nationwide

1 of 3 | Protesters are demonstrating against the move by Texas state Republicans and Governor Gregg Abott's push to redraw the district lines mid-decade at the urging of President Donald Trump. File Photo by Will Oliver/UPI | License Photo Aug. 16 (UPI) -- Demonstrations are taking place Saturday in 34 states to protest congressional redistricting efforts in Texas that have caused state House Democrats to flee the state to prevent the measure. Well over 150 rallies are being organized by the movement "Fight the Trump Takeover," as part of a national day of action. Protesters are demonstrating against the move by Texas state Republicans and Governor Gregg Abott's push to redraw the district lines mid-decade at the urging of President Donald Trump. The re-drawn maps could add five Republican seats in the U.S. House of Representatives if the Republican proposal passes. State House Democrats left Texas last week, heading to Blue states like Illinois to prevent a vote from taking place on the issue. Abbott this week called a second special session of the state's House of Representatives, after Democrats suddenly left Texas to stymie the vote. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., said if Abbott pushes ahead with Trump's request, his state will respond by redrawing its districts to establish more Democratic seats in Congress. Typically, congressional redistricting is done at the end of a decade in conjunction with a new census. "Texas House Democrats are blocking a redistricting vote in the Texas House right now to Stop the Trump Takeover. But Trump has made it clear that he's not stopping at Texas. He's targeting Missouri, Ohio, Florida and every state he can twist to help him steal Congress. States like Florida and New York are already fighting back," the protest organizers' website states. Newsom has been a vocal supporter of the Texas state Democratic caucus. "Califorina coming on board gives us more options," said Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu told reporters in an interview Friday. "If California passes a trigger bill, then there will be real incentive for Texas to not pass its [redistricting] bill." In June, millions of people attended hundreds of "No Kings" protests across the United States, demonstrating against Trump's large-scale military parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the U.S. Army and his 79th birthday.

Schumer to Trump: No Nobel Peace Prize for ‘selling out Ukraine'
Schumer to Trump: No Nobel Peace Prize for ‘selling out Ukraine'

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Schumer to Trump: No Nobel Peace Prize for ‘selling out Ukraine'

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) tore into President Trump early Saturday after his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without a deal, accusing the president of 'selling out' Ukraine. 'Looks like once again Trump is selling out Ukraine and bowing down to dictator Putin,' he wrote on social media platform X. 'No Nobel Peace Prize for that.' His critique comes days after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quipped that she would nominate Trump for the coveted prize if he successfully squeezed a ceasefire agreement out of the Russian leader. Trump and Putin met at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday for a roughly three-hour discussion. While details of the conversation have not been released, the president touted the meeting as 'productive' and signaled that while progress was made, a deal was not yet on the table. 'We didn't get there, but we have a good chance,' he told reporters following the summit, but did not take questions. The president later briefed NATO and European leaders — who responded by doubling down on their support for Ukraine — on the meeting. Schumer, in separate comments late Friday, accused Trump of rolling out the red carpet for Putin, who he called an 'authoritarian thug.' 'Instead of standing with Ukraine and our allies, Trump stood shoulder to shoulder with an autocrat that has terrorized the Ukrainian people and the globe for years,' he wrote on X. 'While we wait for critical details of what was discussed — on first take it appears Trump handed Putin legitimacy, a global stage, zero accountability, and got nothing in return.' 'Our fear is that this wasn't diplomacy — it was just theater,' the New York Democrat added. Trump defended the outcome of the summit in an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity late Friday, saying it is up to Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to come to an agreement. Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet on Monday at the Oval Office. Clinton earlier this week said she would support Trump's quest for a Nobel Peace Prize if he is able to negotiate an end to the more than three-year war that repudiates the Kremlin's claims to Ukrainian territory. The president later expressed gratitude for his former opponent's remarks. Zelensky has pushed back on Trump's suggestion that any truce would likely require a land swap of territories Russia has taken over since it's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. 'We will never leave the Donbas,' the Ukrainian leader told reporters on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store