logo
Hyundai Inster vs BYD Dolphin Surf: cool urban EVs go wheel-to-wheel for the crown

Hyundai Inster vs BYD Dolphin Surf: cool urban EVs go wheel-to-wheel for the crown

Auto Express2 days ago
Barely 12 months ago, the chances of getting your hands on a small electric car were pretty slim. One or two contenders were around, but more choice at this end of the market – especially where simple, clean EV powertrains designed for urban use make the most sense – will always be welcome. Advertisement - Article continues below
Two such options have arrived recently: one from a brand that's in a fantastic run of form, the other from a manufacturer that has burst onto the UK market and introduced a range that grows more comprehensive by the month. Hyundai has been one of the best car makers this decade, with its Ioniq 5 and Kona Electric both winning our New Car Awards Car of the Year crown in the past five years.
Its latest electric car is significantly smaller than either of those champions, but not when it comes to personality; the Inster is a quirky-looking electric vehicle that stands out even among some very distinctive new rivals.
Here, it faces off against BYD's Dolphin Surf. The brand's arrival in the UK market has been largely promising, but so far its cars have never quite hit the highs to top their class. Could its smallest and cheapest contender yet be about to change all of that? Model: Hyundai Inster 02 Price: £26,755 Powertrain: 49kWh battery, 1x e-motor, 113bhp 0-62mph: 10.6 seconds Test efficiency: 3.8 miles/kWh Official range: 223 miles Annual VED: £195
The Inster is the smallest member of Hyundai's EV line-up, arriving just before the firm's largest EV offering, the Ioniq 9. This little-and-large pairing bring the total number of models to five, giving buyers a very comprehensive range to choose from. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Its size will no doubt make the Inster an ideal choice as the second vehicle in a two-car family, although alongside some of its similarly sized rivals, the prices look a touch high, ranging from £23,505 to £28,755. In 02 trim, as tested here, it costs £26,755.
There aren't many cars on sale measuring just 3.8 metres long that offer up so much space inside, and the clever details which allow that to happen start right at the front of the Hyundai Inster's cabin.
As with the larger Ioniq 5, the Inster has a column-mounted shifter that allows more space to be freed up between the front seats. Storage space is mounted either on the tall dash area or, in the case of the cup-holders, sitting in an upholstered section integrated between the front seats.
We think the sweet spot in the Inster range is the 02 model, giving the best balance between value and standard equipment. At almost 27 grand, it's still pricey, but it makes more sense than the Inster Cross.
In addition to its chunky SUV-inspired looks, this brings a sunroof, a surround-view monitor and extra driver- assistance tech, but costs a full £2,000 more than the 02. At that point, it's bringing the Inster's price very near to £29,000, which draws it very close to significantly more substantial cars. Model: BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort Price: £23,950 Powertrain: 43kWh battery, 1x e-motor, 154bhp 0-62mph: 9.1 seconds Test efficiency: 3.9 miles/kWh Official range: 193 miles Annual VED: £195
BYD has adopted an aquatic theme for most of its car names so far. In other markets, this newcomer is known as the Seagull, but that wasn't fancied in the UK. Instead, it's called the Dolphin Surf – and not to be confused with the slightly larger Dolphin compact EV. The Surf is priced very keenly, starting from £18,650, but that buys a model with both a relatively small 30kWh battery and a modest 87bhp power output. The version we're testing here, with a 43.2kWh pack and 154bhp, costs £23,950.
Nobody can accuse the Dolphin Surf of being short of driver-assist tech, because adaptive cruise control, emergency lane-keep assist and traffic-sign recognition are all standard. There's also a driver-monitoring system fitted on all cars – and it's one of the worst we've had the displeasure of using. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Peering around an approaching corner, a lingering look in one of the mirrors, looking just beyond the bonnet line for an upcoming speed bump; these are just some of the situations that caused the BYD to bark 'Keep eyes on road!' at us when on the move.
Even though this is BYD's cheapest car in the UK, there's been no skimping on the eye-catching tech. Just as with its larger siblings, the Dolphin Surf gets a rotating touchscreen. At the push of a button (either on the steering wheel or the 10.1-inch display itself), the screen electrically rotates from a landscape to a portrait layout. It may impress your mates for a moment or two, but beyond that, it's a bit of a gimmick – especially when the Android Auto and Apple CarPlay systems that most drivers will use only work in landscape mode.
Did you know you can sell your car through Auto Express ? We'll help you get a great price and find a great deal on a new car, too .
For such small cars, this pair ride with remarkable compliance, easily making them feel grown up enough to live with every day. The BYD's tiny turning circle makes it great to drive in town, but its steering response and feedback have plenty of room for improvement. The Hyundai's natural-feeling steering makes it more fun to drive than the BYD, but the Dolphin Surf is quieter at motorway speeds.
When it comes to battery capacity, the Inster steals a march on its rival with a 49kWh unit – 5.8kWh more than the BYD. However, the Dolphin Surf's electric motor delivers more performance. Figures of 154bhp and 220Nm beat the Hyundai by a significant 41bhp and 73Nm, so even though the BYD is the heavier car, it still accelerates from 0-62mph in 9.1 seconds, 1.5 seconds quicker than the Inster.
In our hands, the Dolphin Surf proved to be the more efficient of this pair – if only just – achieving 3.9 miles/kWh to the Inster's 3.8 miles/kWh figure. Thanks to its larger battery, the Hyundai can travel further on a single charge, though; when we tested both models until they ran out of charge, the Hyundai covered 184 miles before it reached zero, while the BYD managed just 168 miles.
The Inster lets drivers choose between vast interior space or a decent boot, thanks to a sliding rear bench. With that in its rearmost position, knee and head room are superb, but the boot is a modest 238 litres. With the bench moved forward, there's 351 litres, but knee room drops behind the BYD and its 308-litre boot. Given that the Hyundai is smaller than its rival on the outside, its packaging is very impressive.
Blind-spot monitoring is only offered on the top-spec Inster Cross, but other versions get lane-keep and lane-follow assist as standard. The on-board safety tech contributed to the Hyundai's four-star rating when it was tested by Euro NCAP in 2025. The body hasn't evaluated the Dolphin Surf yet, but every BYD tested by NCAP so far has got a maximum five-star rating, which bodes well for the brand's smallest car.
Hyundai finished 20th out of 31 in our 2025 Driver Power customer satisfaction survey for brands – not outstanding, but largely consistent with what the Korean firm achieved in 2024. BYD's first showing in our survey wasn't a strong one; it beat only MG on the way to 30th place. At least both marques here provide strong warranties, with Hyundai owners getting five years' cover and BYD drivers six years'.
Most of what BYD has offered in the UK so far has been competent yet fairly unremarkable, but the Dolphin Surf is its best offering yet. In a segment where value really matters, BYD has delivered a competitively priced, well equipped small EV, that blends plenty of performance, interior space and maturity for its asking price. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Character and fun aren't high on its list of qualities, but that won't bother value-focused buyers. An efficient powertrain and a long warranty hold more appeal for those choosing a car with their head. That value gives the BYD the edge over the Hyundai in this contest.
Buy a new BYD Dolphin Surf now
If we take price out of the equation, then the Hyundai Inster is the superior package in this contest. More spacious, better to drive and boasting a fantastic range for a car of this size, there's a huge amount to appreciate.
However, it's not enough to overcome the difference in price between these two models, and value for money plays a big part in the overall result at the smaller, more affordable end of the market. The Inster is a more desirable, characterful product than the BYD Dolphin Surf, so those who can stretch the budget will be getting hold of a cracking small car.
Buy a new Hyundai Inster now Our choice Hyundai Inster 02 BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort Price from/price as tested £26,755/£26,755 £23,950/£23,950 Powertrain and performance Powertrain 1x electric motor 1x electric motor Power 113bhp 154bhp Torque 147Nm 220Nm Transmission Single-speed/fwd Single-speed/fwd 0-62mph/top speed 10.6 secs/93mph 9.1 secs/93mphh Usable battery capacity 49kWh 43.2kWh Official range 223 miles 193 miles Test efficiency/range 3.8mi/kWh/184 miles 3.9mi/kWh/168 miles Charging 85kW (10-80% in 30 mins) 85kW (10-80% in 30 mins) Dimensions Length/wheelbase 3,825/2,580mm 3,990/2,500mm Width/height 1,610/1,610mm 1,720/1,590mm Rear knee room 694-907mm 640-862mm Rear headroom/elbow room 941/1,312mm 890/1,316mm Boot space (seats up/down) 238-351/1,059 litres 308/1,037 litres Boot length/width 510/958mm 561/745mm Boot lip height 764mm 713mm Kerbweight/towing weight 1,325kg 1,390kg Turning circle 10.6 metres 9.9 metres Costs/ownership Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000 miles) £11,275/42.14% £10,200/42.59% Depreciation £15,480 £13,750 Insurance group/quote/VED 23/£658/£195 19/£732/£195 Three-year service cost £312 £0 (five years) Annual tax liability std/higher rate £160/£320 £143/£287 Annual fuel cost (10,000 miles) £684 £660 Basic warranty/recovery 5yrs (unlimited miles)/1yr 6yrs (94k miles)/4yrs Driver Power manufacturer position 20th 30th NCAP Adult/child/ped./assist/stars 70/81/70/67/4 _ (2025) TBC Equipment Metallic paint/wheel size £600/17 inch £650/16 inch Parking sensors/camera F&r/yes F&r/360-degree Spare wheel/Isofix points Repair kit/two Repair kit/three Keyless entry & go/powered tailgate Yes/no Yes/no Leather/heated seats No/yes Artificial/yes Screen size/digital dashboard 10.25 inch/yes 10.1 inch/yes Climate control/panoramic sunroof Yes/no Yes/no USBs/wireless charging Three/yes Two/yes Wireless CarPlay/Android Auto Wired/wired Yes/yes Blind-spot warning/head-up display No/no Yes/yes Adaptive cruise/steering assist Yes/no Yes/yes
Buyers can add the Tech Pack (£500) that includes a three-pin plug socket for powering accessories, plus a digital key which lets users lock and unlock the car with their smartphone. A £500 black contrast roof is an option.
There aren't any options for Surf buyers; gaining more kit means spending more cash on a higher trim level. There are only four colours available, but at least the retina-burning luminous 'Lime Green' is fairly cheerful.
Looking for your next car? You can now search our nationwide dealer network for a choice of great cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing deals to choose from...
Find a car with the experts Best car tyres to buy now 2025: top tyres tested and reviewed
Best car tyres to buy now 2025: top tyres tested and reviewed
Nine brands go head to head in our annual test, but which one should you put on your car? Product group tests
13 Aug 2025 New Jaecoo E5 is a Range Rover lookalike with a very attractive price
New Jaecoo E5 is a Range Rover lookalike with a very attractive price
Chinese newcomer's first electric SUV is also a rival to the award-winning Kia EV3 and Hyundai Kona Electric Shock new mid-size Range Rover to get EV power and stunning design
Shock new mid-size Range Rover to get EV power and stunning design
Mid-size SUV will end the four-year wait for a new JLR model and our exclusive images preview how it could look
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Husband ordered to tear up £5,000 front garden drive he built to help his illness-stricken wife by jobsworth council
Husband ordered to tear up £5,000 front garden drive he built to help his illness-stricken wife by jobsworth council

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Husband ordered to tear up £5,000 front garden drive he built to help his illness-stricken wife by jobsworth council

A devoted husband who spent thousands converting his front garden into a drive to help his sick wife has been ordered to rip it up by the council. Stephen Price, 65, said on-street parking was so bad on his road he laid the drive to help his wife Kim, 67, whose several health struggles means it is difficult for her to get in and out of the house. But the plumber was later told he did not have planning permission for the work - and has been ordered to revert back to his original garden. He said: 'I dug it all out and then the council got in touch and said I might need to put it all back. 'At the moment I'm £5,000 into this build. To put it all back - we haven't got the money to do it anyway.' The couple have lived in their semi-detached home for 44 years and say when they first moved in they could always get a spot outside the house. But over the years families have added more cars to their homes and parking has become a 'nightmare', as the fight for spots has led to 'arguments and disputes' between neighbours. His wife suffers from a long list of serious health problems including heart failure, two types of achalasia, diverticulitis, pernicious anaemia, osteoarthritis and low blood pressure. Due to her complex issues, the great-grandmother often has to attend appointments at hospital or her GPs - but says she struggles to get in and out of the house due to the parking. Mrs Price said: 'Due to the low blood pressure sometimes my head is just spinning and I sometimes fall. If my husband has to park up on the hill it makes it very difficult for me. 'I hardly leave the house unless I have to. I have lived here [in Hengoed] all my life and I don't want to move.' Mr Price said parking issues on his street in Hengoed, Caerphilly had made it very difficult for his wife to get in and out of their home and so he planned to make the sloping drive leading to his front door. 'There are only 12 houses on our street and when we first moved in there were only about five cars. Now if everybody is in or people have visitors over there can be 25-30 cars, it's a nightmare,' he said. 'We have to park out of the street, we desperately need extra parking.' He said he paid £300 to have a drop kerb installed outside their home 20 years ago after ringing the council to say he planned on installing a drive. He said: 'They never told me then I needed planning permission. They just told me I needed to pay this £300 - which is about £600 in today's money - that's all they said. 'I had the kerb installed and now I want to know if I was miss-sold this. They were happy enough to take my money.' The plumber believes the work required to ditch his driveway plan and rebuild his garden will cost him a further £11,000-£13,000 that he doesn't have. Planning officers recommended refusal of the application for retrospective permission saying there had been 'extensive excavation and loss of the raised front garden. Cllr Nigel Dix urged fellow councillors to 'show a bit of compassion' and overrule the planning officer to allow the drive but others disagreed. Chairman Cllr Roy Saralis said he had a 'tremendous amount of sympathy' for Mr Price and that he had the right to appeal. He added: 'Obviously it's a sad situation, but planning is planning.' The outraged husband said he will appeal the decision.

The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype
The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype

There was a time when Britain aspired to be a leader in technology. These days, it seems content to be a willing supplicant – handing over its data, infrastructure and public services to US tech giants in exchange for the promise of a few percentage points of efficiency gains. Worryingly, the artificial intelligence strategy of Sir Keir Starmer's government appears long on rhetoric, short on sovereignty and built on techno-utopian assumptions. Last week Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was promoting the use of AI-generated discharge letters in the NHS. The tech, he said, will process complex conversations between doctors and patients, slashing paperwork and streamlining services. Ministers say that by applying AI across the public sector, the government can save £45bn. But step back and a more familiar pattern emerges. As Cecilia Rikap, a researcher at University College London, told the Politics Theory Other podcast, Britain risks becoming a satellite of the US tech industry – a nation whose public infrastructure serves primarily as a testing ground and data source for American AI models hosted on US-owned cloud computing networks. She warned that the UK should not become a site of 'extractivism', in which value – whether in the form of knowledge, labour or electricity – is supplied by Britain but monetised in the US. It's not just that the UK lacks a domestic cloud ecosystem. It's that the government's strategy does nothing to build one. The concern is that public data, much of it drawn from the NHS and local authorities, will be shovelled into models built and trained abroad. The value captured from that data – whether in the form of model refinement or product development – will accrue not to the British public, but to US shareholders. Even the promise of job creation appears shaky. Datacentres, the physical backbone of AI, are capital-intensive, energy-hungry, and each one employs only about 50 people. Meanwhile, Daron Acemoglu, the MIT economist and Nobel laureate, offers a still more sobering view: far from ushering in a golden age of labour augmentation, today's AI rollout is geared almost entirely toward labour displacement. Prof Acemoglu sees a fork: AI can empower workers – or replace them. Right now, it is doing the latter. Ministerial pledges of productivity gains may just mean fewer jobs – not better services. The deeper problem is one of imagination. A government serious about digital sovereignty might build a public cloud, fund open-source AI models and create institutions capable of steering technological development toward social ends. Instead, we are offered efficiency-by-outsourcing – an AI strategy where Britain provides the inputs and America reaps the returns. In a 2024 paper, Prof Acemoglu challenged Goldman Sachs' 10-year forecast that AI would lead to global growth of 7% – about $7tn – and estimated instead under $1tn in gains. Much of this would be captured by US big tech. There's nothing wrong with harnessing new technologies. But their deployment must not be structured in a way that entrenches dependency and hollows out public capacity. The Online Safety Act shows digital sovereignty can enforce national rules on global platforms, notably on porn sites. But current turmoil at the Alan Turing Institute suggests a deeper truth: the UK government is dazzled by American AI and has no clear plan of its own. Britain risks becoming not a tech pioneer, but a well-governed client state in someone else's digital empire. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Archax and Stellar collaborate on tokenised RWAs
Archax and Stellar collaborate on tokenised RWAs

Finextra

timean hour ago

  • Finextra

Archax and Stellar collaborate on tokenised RWAs

Archax, the UK regulated digital asset exchange, broker and custodian, today announced a strategic partnership with the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF), that supports the layer-one blockchain network Stellar. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. Under the terms of this partnership, SDF has made a direct investment into Archax Group to support Archax's mission to bridge traditional finance and blockchain. Archax has recently completed a series of milestones on the Stellar network; including tokenising an Aberdeen Money Market Fund and integrating Stellar into Archax's tokenisation engine and platform. Archax's extensive network of financial institutions will be able to bring more tokenised real-world assets (RWAs) to the Stellar network. The strategic rationale is the rapid scaling of the tokenisation market, as TradFi organisations see the benefits of adopting blockchain technology, tokenisation and moving assets 'onchain.' RWA tokenisation growth has been little short of explosive; expanding from $15.2 billion in December 2024 to over $24 billion by June 2025, representing an 85% year-on-year increase**. Archax is at the forefront of this growth, with its unique and expanding international regulatory moat, as well as its focus on bridging traditional markets into the digital/crypto/DeFi space. Graham Rodford, CEO and co-founder of Archax, comments: 'The Archax vison has always been that all financial instruments will move onchain, and we find ourselves at a pivotal point right now, because institutional adoption of digital assets is vastly accelerating. 86%* of institutions now have digital assets allocations or are planning to by the end of 2025. That's huge. Having established, credible partners and investors from the crypto world is a fundamental part of our strategy, and we are excited to welcome Stellar into that family. We look forward to bringing even more institutions and real-world assets onto the platform too.' Raja Chakravorti, Chief Business Officer at the Stellar Development Foundation comments: "Real-world assets are moving onchain because costs are lower and transactions can move anywhere around the globe in seconds. The Stellar network was purpose built to enable fast settlement times, low costs, and the tokenisation of real-world assets that is the future of finance. The Stellar Development Foundation is proud to have invested in Archax and excited about where this collaboration can go from here." Archax also recently announced working with Lloyds Bank and Aberdeen Asset Management to use tokenised money-market funds as an acceptable form of collateral, to post as margin across the Archax Nest collateral transfer network, for FX trades. 'The project with Lloyds Bank and Aberdeen is the perfect example of the innovation and benefits that can come from tokenising RWAs - as a result of this new partnership, this could now be done using the Stellar blockchain', adds Rodford. 'We have over 100 funds now available in token form from many leading asset managers. These are all available on Stellar now too.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store