
Caste census faces early hurdles in Karnataka as teachers oppose deployment
The massive exercise, scheduled to begin on Sept 22, is expected to be completed within 15 days, but staffing challenges threaten to derail the tight timeline.
The govt plans to deploy around 1.6 lakh enumerators for the survey, with teachers forming the core of this workforce, alongside ASHA activists and anganwadi workers. However, teacher unions are opposing the move, citing overburdening due to repeated non-academic duties.
"Under the provision of the Right to Education Act, the service of teachers is not supposed to be used for anything other than school academic activities and the Supreme Court's order is very clear about it. We are disheartened about the govt's proposal to use them again for the caste census after the just-ended internal reservation survey. We will write to the chief minister and chief secretary requesting them not to deploy teachers to the caste census," said Siddabasappa B, president of Karnataka State High School Teachers Association.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help!
Donate For Health
Donate Now
Undo
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
Earlier this year, teachers were engaged in a door-to-door exercise from April 5 to June 8 for the internal reservation survey aimed at implementing a quota matrix among scheduled castes. In addition, the Karnataka State Election Commission has asked the govt to assign teachers for electoral roll revision. With around 40% teaching posts lying vacant across govt schools, teacher bodies argue that learning outcomes are being compromised.
Siddabasappa added, "There are about 45,000 vacancies of teachers cumulatively from primary to high schools out of the sanctioned strength of 1.1 lakh posts." He said the govt must prioritise filling these vacancies instead of burdening the existing staff with non-teaching responsibilities. The teachers' associations had earlier submitted a memorandum to chief secretary Shalini Rajneesh on July 8 and are now planning another round of appeals against the caste census duty.
Despite the concerns, govt officials maintain that they are attempting to minimise academic disruption. The enumeration has been strategically planned during the Dasara holidays to avoid overlap with school sessions. Enumerators are to be given Rs 6,000 for surveying 100 households, which may be revised to Rs 8,000. Teachers will also receive earned leave, which can either be encashed or used later.
"We are well aware of the Supreme Court's judgement concerning the utilisation of the service of teachers for non-teaching activities.
We are planning the survey in such a way that it would affect the academic calendar of schools," said Madhusudan R Naik, chairman of the Karnataka State Commission for Backward Classes.
——-
Quote
We have prepared the draft notification and will soon forward a proposal to deploy teachers with the terms of reference for the survey and it will be issued soon. It is always better to use teachers for survey and and the govt will take a final call
-Tulasi Maddineni | Principal Secretary, backward classes welfare department

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Bengal teacher retirement extension case: SC sets aside 2023 Calcutta HC order
New Delhi, Jul 30 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside a 2023 Calcutta High Court order upholding the West Bengal government's stance that the retirement age of a teacher cannot be extended as he did not fulfill a 10-year continuous teaching condition in a university in the state. The court also said classifying employees based on past teaching experience from universities within or outside West Bengal, particularly on the verge of retirement, after having served for decades 'lacks nexus and discernible object". A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Misra said the intent of the February 2021 notification extending the retirement age from 60 to 65 years was not to exclude employees with experience from universities outside West Bengal. It said the text, context and objective of the notification revealed that its purpose was solely to distinguish between state-aided and private institutions. 'Classifying employees based on past teaching experience from universities within or outside West Bengal, particularly at the verge of retirement, after having served for decades lacks nexus and discernible object," the bench said. While allowing the appeal filed by the employee challenging the high court's division bench verdict, the bench said the appellant would be entitled to costs quantified at Rs 50,000. The apex court said when such decisions were subjected to strict scrutiny in judicial review, they unfortunately expose themselves as parochial, potentially undermining our resolve of fraternity. The bench said executive decisions like these seem minor or simple errors of perception but have far reaching consequences. 'Constitutional courts must be vigilant and identify such decisions, embedded in the nooks and crannies of public administration and set them aside, for they have the potentiality of triggering similar actions by other states and their instrumentalities," it said. Observing that principle of fraternity never asserts itself, the bench said it was the duty of constitutional court to recognise its erosion, 'even in the bylanes of public administration and to restore the essential 'We' to ensure the unity and integrity of the nation". The bench noted the appellant was initially appointed as a member of the teaching staff at Cachar College, Silchar in Assam in January 1991 and under the Assam College Employees (Provincialisation) Act, 2005, the college was taken over as a government college. It said after serving there for 16 years, he applied in response to an advertisement in June 2007 issued by the Burdwan University for a vacancy in the post of Secretary, Faculty Council for Post-Graduate Studies in Science. The bench said he was selected and after working for some time, was promoted to the post of senior secretary, Faculty Council for Post-Graduate Studies in Science, in January 2012. It noted after he already rendered over 14 years of service, the West Bengal government issued a memorandum in February 2021 increasing the age of retirement from 60 years to 65 years. The bench said the memorandum provided that benefit of increased age of retirement was extended only to those who had acquired a minimum of 10 years of continuous teaching experience in any state-aided university or college. It said after the appellant made a representation to the vice-chancellor of the university claiming benefit of the memorandum, the university informed that he would retire on August 31, 2023 on attaining the age of 60 years as he had no teaching experience in a 'university or college aided by the State of West Bengal'. Aggrieved by this, he approached the high court. A single judge of the high court allowed his plea and held that he was squarely covered by the memorandum and would retire on attaining the age of 65. Later, the state and the university filed separate appeals challenging the single judge's order. The division bench allowed the appeals and set-aside the order of the single judge. In its verdict, the apex court said the appellant was a regular employee, having joined the university in 2007 and continued in service uninterruptedly till 2021. 'The purpose of the notification is not to exclude those who had acquired the 10 years of teaching experience from universities or colleges outside West Bengal," the bench said. It said to insist on past teaching experience of 10 years within the state of West Bengal for extension of service, particularly when the employee had already worked for fourteen years was arbitrary and illegal. top videos View all 'It is a classic case of a suspect classification intended to sub-serve only parochial interests and nothing more. To insist on such a requirement for extension of date of retirement is totally unjustified," it said. The bench said the appellant would be entitled to the benefit of the notification. PTI ABA ZMN (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 30, 2025, 20:45 IST News agency-feeds Bengal teacher retirement extension case: SC sets aside 2023 Calcutta HC order Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
What Caused the Mansa Devi Temple Stampede? Uncovering the Truth
News • 1 Week ago Jagdeep Dhankhar has suddenly resigned as Vice President, effective immediately, citing health concerns – two years before his term was set to end. This shocking move, coming right after the Monsoon Session began, has sparked intense speculation. Was it truly health-related, or was there more to his abrupt exit? Known for his outspoken views and frequent clashes with the judiciary and opposition, Dhankhar's tenure was tumultuous. From questioning Supreme Court rulings to allowing a motion for Justice Yashwant Varma's removal (after wads of cash were found at his home), his actions often stirred controversy. Now, the focus shifts to who will be the next Vice President of India. Names like Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh Singh are in the running, but social media is abuzz with other possibilities, from Nitish Kumar to Shashi Tharoor. The Constitution mandates that the vacancy must be filled "as soon as possible."


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explainer: What do Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on India mean? What happens if they stay…
India has become the latest addition to the list of countries subjected to higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade strategy. (AI image) US President Donald Trump has hit India with a 25% tariff rate ahead of his August 1 reciprocal tariff deadline. India and the US are working on a trade deal but no interim agreement has been finalised. With this India has become the latest addition to the list of countries subjected to higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade strategy, which seeks to restructure American trade partnerships through enhanced reciprocal arrangements. The revised US tariffs will affect India's export of goods to America, projected at approximately $87 billion in 2024. This includes labour-intensive sectors including apparel, medicines, gems and jeweler, and petrochemical products. The trade imbalance between the United States and India is at $45.7 billion, favouring India. US Tariffs on India : What did Trump announce? Taking to social media platform Truth Social, Trump said, 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Last Chance: 80% Off This Artisan's Retirement Jewelry Sale The Maker's Journal Read More Undo Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA! The additional penalty for trade with Russia remains unclear for now. Also Read | Donald Trump imposes 25% tariffs on India! How does India compare to other economies like China, Japan, Vietnam on the rate list? Check details What India Has Said About the 25% tariff In a statement, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said, "The Government has taken note of a statement by the US President on bilateral trade. The Government is studying its implications." "India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs. The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK," India has said. How will the 25% tariffs hit India? Agneshwar Sen, Trade Policy Leader, EY India says, 'The decision to raise the US tariff to 25% on Indian exports is an unfortunate development, particularly given the strong strategic partnership that has been steadily built between India and the USA in recent years. If this tariff is sustained, this move may directly affect key sectors such as marine products, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather, and automobiles, where bilateral trade has been especially robust. However, it's important to note that both countries remain positively engaged in active negotiations with the US team expected in India later in August to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement,' he said. 'I am confident that, considering our shared interests and history of cooperation, the two sides will be able to address these contentious issues constructively and arrive at a mutually beneficial agreement in the very near term,' he added. Garima Kapoor, Economist and Executive Vice President at Elara Capital sees the 25% tariff as a negative development, and one that may shave off 20 basis points from India's GDP growth if the tariff rate stays at that level. 'The exact details of the tariffs on the exempted items such as pharma and the ones that were charged at a differential rate such as iron, steel and auto is unknown as of now, but inclusion of pharma into tariffs should be incremental negative for India's exports as US accounts for more than 30% of India's pharma exports. If no deal is signed by Sept-October, we see a downside to the full year GDP growth estimate for India by 20 basis points,' she said. Also Read | India-US trade deal: Donald Trump announces 25% tariff on India, plus penalty for buying energy and arms from Russia Agricultural economist Ashok Gulati is of the view that the tariff will significantly affect India's seafood exports, particularly shrimps. The decision by US President Donald Trump to levy higher tariffs on Indian products is "very bad" and "shocking", noted Gulati, who had anticipated a more modest increase of 10-15 per cent. "This clearly shows Trump is unpredictable and punitive," he told PTI. The economist indicated that this development will substantially affect India's shrimp trade, whilst Ecuador stands to benefit due to its reduced tariffs and closer proximity to the United States. The impact of increased US tariffs will extend beyond shrimps to affect India's textile sector as well. Gulati further added that the benefits acquired through the India-UK free trade agreement would be offset by these elevated US tariffs. Earlier this month, an SBI Research report said that even if India is unable to secure a trade deal as per its desire, the impact is likely to be limited. 'With India's service exports reaching a new high each year, a record $387.5 bn in 2024-25 driven by sectors like IT, financial and business services, our total exports are not likely to get significantly impacted,' the report said. India's Exports Uncompetitive? The most worrying bit about the 25% tariff is not the figure itself, but the fact that India's Asian peers have managed to secure deals with the Trump administration that have lower duties. Japan will pay 15%, Vietnam will pay 20% and Indonesia has a tariff of 19%. This will hit India's competitive advantage for US exports. India is actually looking to secure a trade deal that will give it preferential access to US markets compared to peers. Talking about the India-US trade deal negotiations Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said, '...what is important is to get preferential market access over our competitors, our peers.' Garima Kapoor of Elara Capital says, 'The 25% tariff rate is certainly a negative development as it compares to lower rates for peers such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Philippines which compete with India in a similar category of labour-intensive products and electronic goods.' But is the 25% tariff rate all bad? Ajay Srivastava from Global Trade Research Initiative explains, 'Some sectors like our top exports to the US are pharmaceuticals, medicines, so Europe will be paying 15%, but European medicines are expensive, high-end proprietary medicines. We are into generics. So if we are paying 25%, I don't think much of the generic market exports to India, exports to the US from India will be impacted.' Regarding smartphone exports, particularly iPhones, he noted that with only China and India being major exporters to the US market, the 5% duty differential (China at 30% and India at 25%) would not significantly affect trade patterns. Garima Kapoor believes a hasty deal would have not helped. 'On the positive side, it is pertinent to note that any hotchpotch deal which would have compelled India to give concessions to its agriculture and dairy sector may have had much deeper ramifications politically, socially, and eventually on livelihoods,' she says. 'A well negotiated deal that addresses all aspects of trade, investment and tariff and non- tariff barriers by September October 2025 is likely to yield long term benefits than a hurried deal. The India-UK deal template which gave concessions to auto and opened public procurement sector has shown that India is willing to shed its protectionist tag in sectors where it doesn't impact the marginal producer, which is a huge departure from its earlier stance,' she adds. 25% Trump Tariffs temporary in nature? As trade deal talks appeared to have hit a stalemate with the next round expected in August-end, it appears that India was already bracing for 20-25% tariffs from the Trump administration. "Talks are progressing well," a government official had been quoted as saying by Reuters, adding Trump could issue a tariff order in a "worst-case scenario". "But, we assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out,' the official had said. As US officials visit India for the sixth round of talks in August-end, there are hopes that a trade deal will be finalised in the coming months. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025