Nebraska consumption tax — ‘EPIC Option' — won't be considered in 2025 legislative session
State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering, center, hosts a news conference. Behind him are, from left: State Sens. Margo Juarez of Omaha, Danielle Conrad of Lincoln, Tom Brandt of Plymouth, Jana Hughes of Seward and Glen Meyer of Pender. Jan. 9, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — The conservative grassroots efforts for an 'EPIC' rewrite of Nebraska's tax code, to eliminate all taxes in place of consumption taxes, will skip the Legislature this year.
State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering, the heir to the 'EPIC Option' effort long carried by term-limited former State Sens. Steve Erdman of Bayard and Steve Halloran of Hastings, filed Tuesday to withdraw Legislative Resolution 10CA and LR 11CA, two related constitutional amendments, and Legislative Bill 331, aimed at adopting the 'Nebraska EPIC Option Consumption Tax Act.'
Supporters of the effort have fallen short in the Legislature and through signature-gathering efforts. Still, they are determined to reach voters for whether property, income and corporate taxes — and miscellaneous taxes like the inheritance tax — should go away by Jan. 1, 2028.
Grocery items purchased for off-premises consumption would not be taxed through LR 11CA, while LR 10CA would prohibit all taxes except retail consumption taxes and excise taxes.
In Nebraska, all bills and constitutional amendments get a public hearing, unlike many other state legislatures.
Hardin, speaking with the Nebraska Examiner on Tuesday, said the need for hearings complicated the timing for EPIC in the 2025 legislative session. He awaits a dynamic study on EPIC.
'We just learned yesterday it's not going to be done until late April,' Hardin said Tuesday. 'I can't get the data that I need to get through everything.'
Hardin's legislation had not yet been scheduled for a public hearing before the Revenue Committee. Public hearings end in late March.
By withdrawing the proposals, Hardin or another senator would need to reintroduce them in January 2026, for a chance to appear on the November 2026 ballot. The three withdrawal motions will go to a procedural vote of the full Legislature later this session.
Erdman, who passed the EPIC mantle to Hardin, said in January that 'big, bold changes' take time and that 'EPIC is alive and well.' Erdman said the next effort would be 'far more involved,' with a specific plan to reach the ballot.
In a text Tuesday, Erdman said that withdrawing the bills won't impact the movement's future.
'Going forward, we will have a whole new look,' Erdman said in January. 'I think it'll be an opportunity for the Nebraska people that are being taxed out of their homes and farms and businesses to understand that there's only one option, and that's to change the whole system.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here are the Steuben County primary candidates on the ballot in June
Registered Republicans in 15 Steuben County towns will decide the winners of GOP primary races on Tuesday, June 24. This year, only Republican primary elections will take place in Steuben County, and only registered Republican voters in designated towns are eligible to vote. Depending on the municipality, primary voters will choose candidates for a variety of town offices, including supervisor, highway superintendent, clerk and town council. In addition, Republicans voters in seven towns will have a primary for the Steuben County Legislature on their ballots. Polls are open 6 a.m. until 9 p.m. on primary day. Primary winners earn the Republican ballot line for the November general election. Steuben County has approximately 31,000 registered Republicans, according to the New York State Board of Elections. Here are the Steuben County towns with at least one Republican primary on the ballot June 24. Candidates (vote for any two): Brian Knowles, Mike Hann, Hal W. Bailey Candidates: Frederick Thompson, Michael J. Volino Candidates: Michael Austin, Norman Maynard Candidates (vote for any two): Les Smith, Terry E. Wheat, Kyle Peterson Candidates: Frederick Thompson, Michael J. Volino Candidates: Justin Eberlin, Jenniffer L. Mullen Candidates: Justin Eberlin, Jenniffer L. Mullen Candidates: Judith Hall, Brian S. Giuliano Candidates: Cassandra Sick, Loraine M. Sanderson Candidates (vote for any two): Karen M. Johnson, William E. Schumacher, Jonathan Weldy Candidates: Drinald V. Bilcari, Kristen Klemenz-Westervelt, James W. Kuhl Candidates: Justin Eberlin, Jenniffer L. Mullen Candidates: Lydia Aguilera, Al Wordingham Candidates: William J. Reagan, Russell W. Morseman III Candidates: Richard W. Risley, Nathan McChesney, Dan Barney Candidates: Michael J. Volino, Jeffery P. Sweeney Candidates: Frederick Thompson, Michael J. Volino Candidates: Abram N. Weeks, Tonya R. Tompkins Candidates (vote for any two): Paula J. Brewer, Kenneth A. LeCrone Jr., Christopher Jordan Candidates (vote for any two): Shirley Ann Dusty Bills, Robert Peoples, Laura L. Knowles Candidates: Alan Trenchard, Richard J. Decker More: Why Alstom dedicated Plant 4 to Jim Griffin, 'a champion of local development' Early voting for primary elections will take place June 14-22. Only one location for early voting will be available in Steuben County − the Steuben County Annex, 20 E. Morris St., Bath. Early voting hours are 9 a.m.-5 p.m. daily with extended hours until 8 p.m. on Tuesday, Thursday. Email Neal Simon at nsimon@ To get unlimited access to the latest news, please subscribe or activate your digital account today. This article originally appeared on The Leader: Steuben County NY primary election: Who's on the ballot in 2025
3 hours ago
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
BATON ROUGE, La. -- As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Around the West, politicians are writing more bills than ever
Who knew there were this many things that had to be fixed? The legislative sessions in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and Washington are over. Depending on your political perspective, the benefits — or damages — will be felt for years to come. One thing that isn't in dispute? Lawmakers couldn't help but introduce a record number of bills in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Washington may also be added to that list, depending on what happens in the second part of its biennium. In Idaho, lawmakers introduced nearly 800 pieces of legislation — the highest mark going back at least 16 years. Less than 50% of the legislation actually made it across the finish line. Higher numbers are expected in Idaho, as lawmakers now individually introduce and approve every state department budget, rather than just one large state budget. Still, the numbers are staggering, not only for lawmakers who work at the state capitol, but also for citizens who try to follow the session and be involved in the process. Making it more challenging in Idaho is the sometimes minimal lack of notice regarding hearings for bills that have been introduced. We've recommended that lawmakers commit to a Rule of Three to allow citizens more time to be engaged. In Montana, lawmakers also hit a record of 1,761 bills introduced, with a little more than half being signed into law by Gov. Greg Gianforte. Montana's joint Rule 40-40 'allows members of the Montana Legislature to request an unlimited number of bill or resolution drafts before December 5. After that date, a member may request the Legislative Council to prepare no more than seven bills or resolutions. Unused requests by one member may be granted to another member. The limits do not apply to code commissioner bills or committee bills.' In Wyoming, which divides sessions among general session years and budget years, lawmakers also hit a record of 556 bills introduced. But only 31% became law. Washington state lawmakers were by far the least productive, passing only 19.5% of the more than 2,000 bills they introduced. And they're not done yet, as Washington works on a biennium and lawmakers will return next January to continue increasing the number. Passing legislation certainly isn't a contest. And this column is in no way an encouragement to increase the across-the-finish-line percentages. But it is worth pointing out that introducing legislation takes time and resources - resources that are provided by taxpayers (so perhaps a new state rock shouldn't be high on a lawmaker's list). More bill introductions also make tracking your elected official's work more difficult. Some states, including Arizona, California, New Jersey, Colorado, North Carolina, Florida, North Dakota, Indiana, Louisiana and Montana have sought to restrict how many bills a legislator can introduce each session. Do all states need a rule that limits a lawmaker's appetite for more and more legislation? Maybe. But we'd rather see a self-imposed diet. Chris Cargill is the president of Mountain States Policy Center, an independent free market think tank based in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and eastern Washington. Online at
