
92 Bangladeshis held for illegal stay in Delhi
New Delhi: Delhi Police has apprehended 92 Bangladeshi nationals for illegally staying in the country in two different operations during a special drive in southwest Delhi, an official said on Tuesday.
With this, the total number of Bangladeshi nationals detained in the district since December 26, 2024, has reached 142, he said. According to police, a 10-day-long special operation was launched recently in areas under the jurisdiction of the Southwest district to identify and detain foreign nationals living illegally.
Acting on intelligence inputs and with the help of local informers, teams carried out door-to-door verification in several vulnerable localities.
Earlier, four illegal Bangladeshi migrants, including a minor, were apprehended in Delhi, police said on Tuesday.
The illegal migrants were identified as Mohd. Asad Ali, 44, Nasima Begum, 40, Naim Khan, 18 and Asha Moni, 13, all hailing from Farooq Bazar Ajwatari P.O., Gongarhat, Phulbari Kurigram, Bangladesh.
In a crackdown against illegal migrants residing in India under the Union Home Ministry's campaign to deport illegal migrants, the team of Anti-Auto Theft Squad (AATS) of Delhi's South West district gathered the intelligence and apprehended the illegal migrants, Deputy Commissioner of Police South West District, New Delhi, said in a statement.
Acting on information that illegal Bangladeshi migrants were roaming in Delhi Cantt, a team led by Inspector Ram Kumar, I/C AATS/SWD and under the supervision of Ranvir Singh, ACP/Ops, approached the suspected persons and inquired about their identity/ documents.
During interrogation, the individuals failed to produce valid Indian documents and admitted to being illegal Bangladeshi migrants who had entered India approximately 12 years ago illegally (by crossing the river).
They only had photocopies of Bangladeshi documents, i.e., national ID card of Bangladesh, the statement added.
The suspects were apprehended, and after thorough verification and enquiry, the necessary legal formalities were done, leading to their deportation through the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Sebi probes Jane Street's derivative trades over 3 years: Sources
India's market regulator, SEBI, is investigating Jane Street's derivatives trading activities over the past three years, suspecting potential manipulation of benchmark stock indexes. The probe, triggered by unusually high profits and complaints from other firms, focuses on algorithmic trading strategies in NSE's Nifty 50 and banking indexes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads INCREASED SCRUTINY Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's markets regulator is investigating Jane Street's derivatives trades stretching back three years to check if one of the world's largest quant trading firms intended to manipulate the country's benchmark stock indexes, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the investigation - the largest such into a global trading firm - follows a series of steps taken by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to cool the frenzy in India's derivatives is investigating Jane Street, Jane Street Singapore Pte and JSI Investments, the firm's India unit, and studying the firms' algorithmic trading strategies in the National Stock Exchange's index of top 50 stocks and its index of banking stocks, one of the sources said."The investigation is to establish whether there was a repeated pattern of taking outsized derivatives positions in index constituents, particularly bank stocks, then trade the index in the physical market to profit from its position," the source India does not impose any restrictions on traders from taking intraday positions in derivative as well as physical markets, surveillance systems typically signal repeated patterns of taking positions in excess of 10 billion Indian rupees ($116.93 million).A report is being prepared with assistance from the stock exchange, following which the U.S.-based trading firm will be sent a regulatory notice to explain its sources declined to be named as the investigations are confidential. Jane Street and SEBI did not respond to several requests for investigation stemmed from large profits made by Jane Street on its India derivatives positions - nearly five times the profit made by the second largest trading firm, the second source for high-frequency trading and its dominance of the exchange traded funds market, Jane Street's net trading revenue for 2024 stood at $20.5 billion globally, according to Bloomberg. As of December 2024, the firm's revenue from India operations stood at 200 billion Indian rupees ($2.34 billion), the second source firm started its India operations in December from other large institutional firms on Jane Street's trade practices also prompted the investigation, the sources Street last year sued a rival hedge fund, Millennium Management, accusing it of stealing a valuable in-house trading strategy. At a court hearing, it was revealed that the strategy involved India options and had generated $1 billion in profits for Jane Street in 2023. The two firms settled the case in investigation has also prompted SEBI to increase monitoring of intraday positions to watch for large concentrated trades in index stocks, the two sources and stock exchanges are currently drafting a mechanism to do this, said the sources, adding that large positions for consecutive days could prompt thresholds for such investigations are still being will also be asked to periodically audit algo programs of large trading firms, which are already required to get approval from exchanges before using the programs.($1 = 85.8370 Indian rupees)


Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Disturbing video shows Indian student in US pinned to floor, handcuffed before deportation
A disturbing video shows an Indian student handcuffed and pinned to the floor at USA's Newark Airport before he was deported. The video was shared on social media by Indian-American entrepreneur Kunal Jain, who said that the youngster was crying and was treated like a 'criminal' by authorities. Jain called on the Indian Embassy in the United States to look into the incident and help the student. 'I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night— handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal,' he wrote on X. 'He came chasing dreams, not causing harm. As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy,' added Kunal Jain, President of HealthBots AI. According to Jain, the incident took place at Newark Airport in New Jersey. Visuals shared by him show the Indian man pinned to the floor by authorities. One photograph shows a police officer wearing a cap that reads 'Port Authority Police'. The Port Authority Police Department (PAPD) is a transit law-enforcement agency serving New York and New Jersey. It is tasked with protecting the Port Authority's critical infrastructure, such as airports, bridges, tunnels, bus terminals, seaports, rail transit, and the World Trade Center complex. It is the largest transit‑related police force in the United States. In follow-up posts, the NRI said that the student in question appeared to be speaking Haryanavi. He said that there have been several similar cases of Indians being deported over the last few weeks. He attributed it to them being unable to explain the reason for their visit. 'These children get their visas and get on a flight in the morning. For some reason, they are unable to explain the reason for their visit to the immigration authorities and are sent back on the evening flight tied up like criminals. Every day 3-4 such cases are happening. There have been more such cases in the last few days,' Jain wrote.


The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court advices Chennai Commissioner of Police not to send investigating officers on bandobust duty
The Madras High Court, on Monday (June 9, 2025) advised Greater Chennai City Commissioner of Police (CoP) A. Arun to ensure officers investigating criminal cases do not get diverted for any other work such as providing bandobust (security) for public events/VIPs so that the investigating officers (IOs) could devote their time and conclude the investigations as early as possible. Justice P. Velmurugan said, he would summon Director General of Police/Head of Police Force Shankar Jiwal too in an appropriate case and give a similar advice so that it could be followed by police officers across Tamil Nadu. The judge said, it was high time the judiciary and the police department worked in tandem to reduce the pendency of criminal cases. The judge also told State Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohamed Jinnah there were discrepancies between the data maintained by the police department and the judiciary with respect to disposal of criminal cases. He said, most of the times, the police close criminal cases by terming them as 'mistake of fact' but that does not get reflected in the judicial records. He added in some cases, the police complete investigation and file final reports but that information does not find place in judicial records because the courts do not take those reports on file. Mr. Arun told the court the discrepancies could be sorted out if the Principal District Judges and Superintendents of Police conduct monthly meetings to crosscheck the data. Concurring with him, Justice Velmurugan said, such practice of conducting monthly meetings do not appear to be followed in many districts. After asking Mr. Arun to set things right at his end in coordination with the trial courts, the judge told the Commissioner that any non-cooperation on the part of the judicial officers could be brought to his notice so that he could issue appropriate directions. 'The poor and illiterate people do not know the legal procedures beyond the process of lodging police complaints. Therefore, it is essential that the criminal justice system works for their benefit and it does not take years together even for a simple criminal case to reach its logical conclusion. Let us do something to make sure that justice is delivered at the earliest,' the judge told the CoP. He asked the officer to submit fresh data by July 8 regarding the pending criminal cases within Chennai city limits along with statistics related to those under investigation, the cases in which final reports had been filed, the cases that were pending trial and so on. The direction was issued after the Commissioner was summoned to the court in connection with non registration of a SC/ST case. Mr. Jinnah told the court that though the writ petitioner V. Vanamalai had produced a copy of a communication sent by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes calling for an action taken report from the CoP on the petitioner's complaint, the Commissionerate had not received any such communication. Though the NCSC had claimed to have sent it by e-mail, no such e-mail had been received, he said. After hearing the SPP, the judge asked him to make the submissions by way of a counter affidavit by June 23 so that appropriate orders could be passed on the writ petition.