logo
Interest Rates Are More Complicated Than The Fed And 10-Year Treasury

Interest Rates Are More Complicated Than The Fed And 10-Year Treasury

Forbes6 days ago
Man carrying heavy stone with growing interest rate symbol increasing debt. 3D. getty
The Wall Street Journal 's editorial board wrote about interest rates this week. They tried to explain that a change by the Federal Reserve in its short-term benchmark federal funds rate on Wednesday wouldn't necessarily improve borrowing costs. They're right to a degree, but the explanation is overly simplified and seems to miss the biggest point: how global markets, not the Fed, are the real force.
Interest rates at all levels are always based on fundamental rates with an additional amount for risk. To understand what rates will be, the question is which reference value is in place and how much is added.
The Journal noted that expectations are for the part of the Fed that sets rates, the Federal Open Market Committee, to keep the federal funds rate at its current 4.25%–4.5%. What the editorial board called a 'rate-cutting spree' last fall that was 'premature' set off a run-up of yields on the 10-year Treasury Note. The response was unusual; historically, the Treasury yield curve has fallen with the federal funds rate.
There was a rebound in unexpected consumer inflation. 'This climb in yields coincided with a rebound in consumer-price inflation that the Fed didn't expect. After flattening through October, the consumer-price index rose 0.3% in November, 0.4% in December, and 0.5% in January. The FOMC hadn't conquered inflation by September as its members had thought.
It is good to remember that, at the time, the Journal 's editorial board admonished the Fed: 'The real risk for the Fed is if it embarks on a monetary easing cycle that stops the current disinflation and causes prices to rise again.' It was a risk; they were right.
'That's critical because the rates that matter most to the economy are longer rates, especially the 10-year Treasury,' they wrote. 'Those are rates that most affect corporate borrowing and consumer mortgages.' The Broader View Of Interest Rates
The federal funds rate and the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note are both critical to interest rates for commercial and consumer needs. But they aren't the only ones.
The federal funds rate range is the set of interest rates that banks charge one another for overnight unsecured loans. The secure overnight financing rate (SOFR) also involves short-term borrowing called repurchase agreements (repo) backed by Treasury securities. SOFR is calculated by ongoing calculations of loan terms, so ultimately controlled by market activity.
Put more formally by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 'The SOFR is calculated as a volume-weighted median of transaction-level tri-party repo data collected from the Bank of New York Mellon as well as GCF Repo transaction data and data on bilateral Treasury repo transactions cleared through FICC's DVP service, which are obtained from the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Financial Research (OFR).' The New York Fed publishes the SOFR on its website at about 8:00 a.m. Eastern time.
SOFR is important as a base for adjustable-rate mortgages, private student loans, home equity lines of credit, and many commercial real estate mortgages. While the Fed has indirect influence on it, SOFR is based on market-driven forces.
As for the 10-year Treasury, it is also driven by market forces. The Trump administration has known all along how important the 10-year Treasury is. In February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview on Fox Business, 'In my talks with [the president], he and I are focused on the 10-year Treasury [yield].' But the administration has tried to convince and nudge the banking industry to invest more in 10-year Treasury Notes. The intent was to increase demand that, in turn, would boost price and push down yields, which move inversely to price.
And then there is the 5-year Treasury, which is important to banks that are lending on properties or uses that will likely try to refinance within three to five years, like may commercial real estate businesses. It also follows market forces. Interest Rate Complexities
Trying to understand how interest rates work and their potential impact on the economy, companies, and individuals is critical to survive financially. What will happen next is impossible to know. As the Journal wrote of Fed monetary policy moves: 'If short rates fall but long rates rise in anticipation of higher inflation, the economic gain Mr. Trump expects won't occur. What the President needs is a Fed that investors believe favors low inflation and a sound and stable dollar. That will yield lower long-bond and mortgage rates over time.'
However, the uncertainty and distrust the administration has created globally is likely a reason the 10-year yield stays up. With tariffs still creating concern about their potential impact on inflation and Trump pushing for faster economic growth (which usually means higher inflation), it also seems unlikely that a broad set of investors will assume low inflation is going to be a direct goal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two
Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two

By Ann Saphir (Reuters) -San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly on Monday said that given mounting evidence that the U.S. job market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for interest rate cuts. "I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever," Daly said of the Fed's decision last week to leave short-term borrowing costs in their 4.25%-4.50% range rather than cut them, as a couple of her colleagues wanted and as President Donald Trump has demanded. While that doesn't mean a September rate cut is a lock, she said, "I would lean to thinking that every meeting going forward is a live meeting to think about these policy adjustments." The two quarter-point interest-rate cuts that Fed policymakers back in June penciled in for this year still "look to be an appropriate amount of recalibration, and less important is, does it happen in September and December than does it happen at all kinds of permutations to get those two cuts." Daly said there is still plenty of data including a couple of labor market and inflation reports due out before the Fed's policy-setting meeting, in September, and she's keeping an open mind. "We of course could do fewer than two (rate cuts) if inflation picks up and spills over or if the labor market springs back," Daly said. But "I think the more likely thing is that we might have to do more than also should be prepared in my judgment to do more if the labor market looks to be entering that period of weakness and we still haven't seen spillovers to inflation." A Labor Department report Friday showed U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, and massive revisions to previously reported data showed only 33,000 jobs were added in the two prior months. Those figures, to Daly's mind, don't mean the job market is precariously weak - in times of economic flux, she said, raw employment numbers are often less informative than ratios like the unemployment rate, which ticked up just a tenth of a percentage point in July to 4.2%. Still, she said, looking at a broad dashboard of labor-market measures, there is "evidence after piece of evidence" that the labor market is softening quite a bit compared to last year. "I would see further softening as an unwelcome result," she said. "I'm comfortable with the decision we made in July, but I am increasingly less comfortable with making that decision again and again." At the same time, she said, there's no evidence that tariff-driven price increases are seeping more broadly into inflation, and if the Fed waits long enough to be certain it won't -- a process that could take six months or a year, she said - the Fed will "for sure" be too late to move. The Fed is approaching a "tradeoff space where you are trying to make a judgment about where does policy need to be to continue to put downward pressure on inflation, and where does it need to be to continue to make sure that sustainable employment can be achieved," she said. "That's why I didn't think that July was a necessary change, but I do think, increasingly, policy is not aligned." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two
Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two

By Ann Saphir (Reuters) -San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly on Monday said that given mounting evidence that the U.S. job market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for interest rate cuts. "I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever," Daly said of the Fed's decision last week to leave short-term borrowing costs in their 4.25%-4.50% range rather than cut them, as a couple of her colleagues wanted and as President Donald Trump has demanded. While that doesn't mean a September rate cut is a lock, she said, "I would lean to thinking that every meeting going forward is a live meeting to think about these policy adjustments." The two quarter-point interest-rate cuts that Fed policymakers back in June penciled in for this year still "look to be an appropriate amount of recalibration, and less important is, does it happen in September and December than does it happen at all kinds of permutations to get those two cuts." Daly said there is still plenty of data including a couple of labor market and inflation reports due out before the Fed's policy-setting meeting, in September, and she's keeping an open mind. "We of course could do fewer than two (rate cuts) if inflation picks up and spills over or if the labor market springs back," Daly said. But "I think the more likely thing is that we might have to do more than also should be prepared in my judgment to do more if the labor market looks to be entering that period of weakness and we still haven't seen spillovers to inflation." A Labor Department report Friday showed U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, and massive revisions to previously reported data showed only 33,000 jobs were added in the two prior months. Those figures, to Daly's mind, don't mean the job market is precariously weak - in times of economic flux, she said, raw employment numbers are often less informative than ratios like the unemployment rate, which ticked up just a tenth of a percentage point in July to 4.2%. Still, she said, looking at a broad dashboard of labor-market measures, there is "evidence after piece of evidence" that the labor market is softening quite a bit compared to last year. "I would see further softening as an unwelcome result," she said. "I'm comfortable with the decision we made in July, but I am increasingly less comfortable with making that decision again and again." At the same time, she said, there's no evidence that tariff-driven price increases are seeping more broadly into inflation, and if the Fed waits long enough to be certain it won't -- a process that could take six months or a year, she said - the Fed will "for sure" be too late to move. The Fed is approaching a "tradeoff space where you are trying to make a judgment about where does policy need to be to continue to put downward pressure on inflation, and where does it need to be to continue to make sure that sustainable employment can be achieved," she said. "That's why I didn't think that July was a necessary change, but I do think, increasingly, policy is not aligned." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

GOP senators place holds on Treasury nominees over solar, wind credits
GOP senators place holds on Treasury nominees over solar, wind credits

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

GOP senators place holds on Treasury nominees over solar, wind credits

A person familiar with the effort granted anonymity because the move was not made public told POLITICO that Curtis has also placed holds on the same three nominees. The pair, alongside other GOP senators, have escalated their pressure on the Trump administration in recent days to back off its efforts to strangle new solar and wind energy projects, warning that potential cancellations would make it harder to meet growing power demand, as POLITICO has detailed. Grassley said he would object to consideration of the nominees until he can be 'certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent.' His comments follow a July executive order from Trump that injected new uncertainty for solar and wind developers facing already onerous new deadlines under Republicans' mega tax and spending law, H.R. 1 (119). The order called on Treasury to 'strictly enforce' the termination of the production and investment tax credits for wind and solar facilities, including by issuing new guidance related to when a project is deemed to have begun construction — a potential outcome that Grassley and other GOP senators said they sought to safeguard against. While the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ends the tax credits for projects that start producing electricity after 2027, those GOP senators added a last-minute compromise to offer more time for projects that begin construction in the next 12 months. 'What it means for a project to 'begin construction' has been well established by Treasury guidance for more than a decade. Moreover, Congress specifically references current Treasury guidance to set that term's meaning in law,' Grassley said in the Congressional Record. 'This is a case where both the law and congressional intent are clear.' Trump's executive order targeting the long-standing metric followed pushback by hard-right House Republicans who briefly withheld their votes for the tax and spending package over the Senate's easing of the clean energy credit rollbacks. The White House and Treasury Department did not immediately provide comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store