logo
Delhi HC Allows 'Udaipur Files' Release, Film On Kanhaiya Lal Murder Case To Hit Screens Today

Delhi HC Allows 'Udaipur Files' Release, Film On Kanhaiya Lal Murder Case To Hit Screens Today

News1807-08-2025
Last Updated:
The Delhi High Court turned down a plea by one of the accused in the murder case, Mohd Javed, against an order clearing certification of the movie
The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to stay the release of Udaipur Files, a movie based on the Kanhaiya Lal murder case.
The film is scheduled to hit the screens on Friday (August 8). The court turned down a plea by one of the accused in the case, Mohd Javed, against an order clearing certification of the movie.
A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela passed the order saying the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case in his favour.
'Producer has already spent life earnings in the film and if the movie is not released the balance of convenience will be disturbed. Once a film has been certified by the Board and trial is not likely to be effected by exhibition, we find ourselves unable to agree to prayer for staying release of movie," the bench said.
On Wednesday, the ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) dismissed all revision petitions challenging the certification of the controversial film Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder, thereby clearing the path for its public release.
While allowing the release of the movie, the high court said exhibition of the film will not cause any harm. 'Trial will be conducted by the judge uninfluenced as a trained judge. He has failed to establish how irreparable loss will be caused to him if release is not stayed. Prayer for staying release is hereby rejected," it said.
During the hearing, the counsel for the petitioner told the court that if the film was allowed to be released, it would 'prejudice the trial".
'Right to fair trial is supreme. Witnesses are to be examined. Film is only going to prejudice the trial. Dialogues are lifted from charge sheet. Title itself says Kanhaiya Lal murder. It will affect the trial," senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for the accused, told the court.
The petition was opposed by the counsel representing the government, who said the authorities have applied its mind while clearing the movie for release.
'This is as fair as it can go. As transparent as it can be," the counsel said.
The counsel representing the movie produced, meanwhile, told the court that the tickets were already booked by viewers.
'Movie is to be released tomorrow. Producer has invested his lifetime saving in making this movie, which is his right as freedom of speech. Accused's name, his specific role not mentioned anywhere in film," said senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia, appearing for the film producer.
Bhati, also a national spokesperson for the BJP, later said this is a 'big victory" for the 'truth and freedom of expression".
🚨 बड़ी जीत 🚨उदयपुर फ़ाइल्स मामले में माननीय उच्च न्यायालय से बड़ी जीत मिली!मेरी दमदार टीम। कोर्ट ने फ़िल्म की रिलीज़ पर रोक लगाने से किया इंकार। सच की जीत, अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता की जीत। pic.twitter.com/R73KDCLnDO — Gaurav Bhatia गौरव भाटिया 🇮🇳 (@gauravbhatiabjp) August 7, 2025
'Big Victory. A major win from the Honorable High Court in the Udaipur Files case! My powerful team. The court refused to impose a ban on the film's release. A victory for truth, a victory for freedom of expression," Bhatia wrote on X.
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Consenting Adults Have Right To Choose Partners, Live Together: Delhi High Court
Consenting Adults Have Right To Choose Partners, Live Together: Delhi High Court

NDTV

timea day ago

  • NDTV

Consenting Adults Have Right To Choose Partners, Live Together: Delhi High Court

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has called the right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and live together "a facet of their personal liberty and privacy" being immune to the family's disapproval. "The Supreme court has repeatedly affirmed this position and directed the police to safeguard such couples from intimidation or harm," Justice Sanjeev Narula said on August 5. The court, as a result, directed the police to provide protection to a young couple, who married against the wishes of their families and were now being threatened. "The right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and to live together in peace is a facet of their personal liberty, privacy, and dignity protected under Article 21. Family disapproval cannot curtail that autonomy," the order highlighted. The couple sought the court's intervention to ensure their safety in living together, claiming threats, coercion and interference being extended by the family members. The court was urged to direct the woman's family not to harm them or interfere in their peaceful cohabitation. The plea said the woman's family was against their relationship and allegedly issued repeated threats of physical harm. It said due to the hostility and fearing for her safety, the woman left her parental home on July 18 after informing her mother about her intention to marry the man. The couple married in a temple on July 23 on their own free will and has been living together happily, it added. The high court then directed the station house office of the police station concerned to designate an official and sensitise him or her of the court order and provide immediate assistance to the couple in case of any complaint or threat. "The directions issued herein, particularly those concerning police protection, are purely preventive in nature, aimed at ensuring the petitioners' safety and safeguarding their right to life and liberty. They shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the truthfulness of the petitioners' claims, nor as any endorsement," it said. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Use of children in crimes may lead to re-fixing juvenility age: Delhi HC
Use of children in crimes may lead to re-fixing juvenility age: Delhi HC

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Use of children in crimes may lead to re-fixing juvenility age: Delhi HC

New Delhi: Delhi High Court has flagged the use of children by criminals, noting that such offences are the reason that prompted the reconsideration of the age of juvenility. Justice Girish Kathpalia made these observations while dismissing an anticipatory bail plea of a man accused of using a child in illicit liquor trafficking. The judge said that the child abuse involved in carrying out such crimes is far more seious than the illicit liquor trafficking. "It is being observed that criminals use children to commit a wide range of crimes, involving not just liquor and drug peddling, but also arms and ammunition, and even acts of extreme violence, which is leading society to consider re-fixing the age of juvenility," HC observed in its order. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

Choice to marry someone from different faith safeguarded by Constitution: Delhi High Court
Choice to marry someone from different faith safeguarded by Constitution: Delhi High Court

Hindustan Times

time2 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

Choice to marry someone from different faith safeguarded by Constitution: Delhi High Court

New Delhi The choice to marry someone from a different faith is safeguarded under the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, even if it challenges social norms and family expectations, the Delhi High Court has held. (Representative photo) The choice to marry someone from a different faith is safeguarded under the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, even if it challenges social norms and family expectations, the Delhi High Court has held, while directing the Delhi Police to continue protecting an interfaith couple facing threats from their families. A bench of justice Sanjeev Narula made the observation on August 8, while dealing with a plea filed by a 26-year-old Muslim man and a 25-year-old Hindu woman, seeking police protection and accommodation in a safe house. In a petition filed last month, the couple asserted that despite solemnising their marriage after a relationship of over seven years, there was strong opposition from the woman's family. The petition said that despite writing to the deputy commissioner of police for the southeast district on July 23, requesting police protection, the police forcibly separated the woman from her husband and detained her at Nirmal Chhaya Shelter Home on July 24. The plea stated that the woman married the man voluntarily, without any coercion. On July 25, the high court directed the DCP to look into the matter personally and, if the woman affirmed her wish to live with her husband, to ensure appropriate arrangements for the couple's safety. The counsel for the woman's father, on August 8, asserted that his client was deeply troubled by his daughter's decision to marry the man without his consent and that he was concerned for his daughter's welfare. Considering the contentions, the court directed Delhi Police to continue providing them protection and accommodation in a safe house, till they solemnise their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. The bench said that parents' anguish over their daughter choosing her life partner without consultation cannot eclipse the right of an adult to choose a life partner, since Article 21 of the Constitution safeguards an individual's right to marry a person of one's choice. 'The constitutional guarantee under Article 21 enables every adult citizen may shape the course of their own life, free from fear, coercion or unlawful restraint. The choice to marry, especially across lines of faith, may test the resilience of social norms and familial expectations, yet in law, it remains a matter of personal liberty and individual autonomy, immune from any external veto. While the anguish of a parent is understandable, it cannot eclipse the rights of a major to select their life partner,' the court said. It added, 'The court is mindful of the anguish of the girl's father, who opposes the relationship on grounds that he perceives as legitimate and rooted in his concern for his daughter's welfare. However, upon attaining the age of majority, the right to make decisions regarding marriage becomes the individual's personal prerogative. Parental preference, however well-intentioned, cannot legally override that autonomy.' Noting the couple's allegation of being forcibly separated, the court directed the DCP to submit a report on whether any unlawful separation had occurred and, if so, to identify the officer responsible. The direction came after the woman claimed she was taken to a shelter home by the police against her will, while the police maintained that no coercion, unlawful action, or procedural lapse had taken place. The matter will next be heard on September 12. The same bench, in a similar plea filed by another couple, also ruled that a family's disapproval cannot override the right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and live together peacefully. 'The right of two consenting adults to choose each other as life partners and to live together in peace is a facet of their personal liberty, privacy, and dignity protected under Article 21. Family disapproval cannot curtail that autonomy,' the court said in an order on August 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store