Ukraine aid row: EU withholds $1.7 billion; Zelenskyy's new bill faces internal and external pressure
The withheld amount represents over a third of the funding set aside by the Union under its Ukraine Facility fund, which was launched last year to support Kyiv's war recovery and its path to EU membership.
The move follows what EU officials described as a troubling shift in Ukraine's governance standards.
The legislation in question hands greater authority to the politically appointed Prosecutor General over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), two key institutions created in the wake of Ukraine's 2014 Revolution of Dignity to fight high-level corruption.
The decision sparked the first wartime protests against Zelenskyy's administration, with thousands taking to the streets to demand that the NABU and SAPO remain free from political interference. Under public pressure, Zelenskyy swiftly introduced measures aimed at safeguarding the agencies' independence, but concerns continue to grow.
Marta Kos, the EU's Commissioner for Expansion, warned that Ukraine's efforts to exert political control over its top anti-corruption bodies had raised 'serious concerns' within the bloc, New York Post reported.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
China is wooing Malaysia and Indonesia with mega investments. Is the plan working?
CNA
Read More
Undo
Although the EU's freeze on funds is not yet final, Brussels has made it clear that the money will only be released once Ukraine realigns with the bloc's anti-corruption benchmarks.
Zelenskyy has previously pledged to continue Ukraine's anti-corruption campaign but has grown increasingly critical of the agencies, especially after they began targeting individuals close to his inner circle. Among them is former deputy PM Oleksiy Chernyshov, who was investigated by SAPO.
The president initially defended the bill by arguing it was necessary to rid the agencies of 'Russian influence' and to address a backlog of unresolved cases. However, that explanation has done little to ease tensions either within Ukraine or among its allies.
British prime minister Keir Starmer also reportedly urged Zelenskyy to reconsider the bill and take concrete steps to address governance concerns, as per the New York Post.
Further pressure is mounting from the International Monetary Fund, which has tied its $15.6 billion aid package, to be distributed over four years, to Ukraine's progress on anti-corruption reforms. Kyiv now faces a Thursday deadline to appoint a new head of its Economic Security Bureau in order to maintain eligibility for the IMF programme.
Zelenskyy has so far refused to appoint Oleksandr Tsyvinskyi, the official who led the case against Chernyshov, despite a recommendation from an independent commission. The post remains vacant, with no update yet on who might be chosen.
As Ukraine continues to fend off Russia's invasion, the controversy over anti-corruption efforts threatens to undermine both foreign confidence and much-needed financial support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump goes off the rails over Epstein, again blames Barack Obama in explosive new meltdown
Donald Trump is again blaming Barack Obama. He claims Obama plotted against his presidency. This comes as Trump faces scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump accuses Obama of a 'coup'. He says Obama tried to undermine his win. Tulsi Gabbard supports Trump's claims. She alleges Obama created false evidence. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is Trump reviving the 'coup' narrative now? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does Tulsi Gabbard allege about Barack Obama? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How is Donald Trump responding to renewed Epstein scrutiny? FAQs US President Donald Trump is lashing out again, this time deflecting questions about Jeffrey Epstein by reviving old allegations against Barack Obama. In a flurry of Truth Social posts, Trump accused Obama of planning a "coup" to undermine his 2016 election win. His allies support him, but critics call it a distraction. Now, a tragic twist involving a known Epstein victim has emerged in Trump's pressure mounts, Trump resurrects debunked claims, promotes conspiracy theories, and accuses Obama-era intelligence officials of treason in a fiery Trump is reiterating the discredited conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama orchestrated a "coup" following the 2016 election, vehemently asserting that those implicated "must pay," as quoted in a report by The Daily to a report, in a series of Truth Social posts, Trump has reverted to his previous strategy, diverting his MAGA supporters from the intensifying Epstein files controversy by reiterating unfounded allegations against Obama and senior U.S. intelligence officials who determined that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.'The Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX is now TOTALLY UNDISPUTED! THE FACTS ARE ALL THERE, IN BLACK AND WHITE,' Trump asserted on Truth Social Friday morning. 'It is the biggest scandal in American History. The perpetrators of this CRIME must pay a big price. This can never be allowed to happen in our Country again!'Trump went one step further and posted a video from The Daily Signal in which right-wing pundit Victor Davis Hanson claimed that Obama-era intelligence officers were planning to "destroy" him following his victory over Hillary Clinton. "The crime of the century must be paid for by them," Trump continued, as per a Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, made accusations earlier this month that are the source of the most recent attacks. Using recently declassified documents as support, she asserted that Barack Obama and top national security officials engaged in a "treasonous conspiracy" to create false proof of Russian election meddling in order to sabotage the validity of the 2016 election order to undermine Trump's triumph, Gabbard claimed that Obama and senior intelligence officials purposefully produced phony evidence of Russian intervention. This was a concerted attempt, she claimed, to undermine the legitimacy of the new government right away, as quoted in a report by The Daily also charged Obama's team with creating the framework for what she called a "years-long coup" against Trump by spreading false material to support attacks on his accusations are based on a purported inconsistency in January 2017 U.S. intelligence reports. Although the studies determined that Russia conducted an influence effort to support Trump's campaign, she says there are unverified reports that Moscow manipulated vote counts to Trump's Obama administration has maintained that Russia did not alter any vote totals or compromise American voting machines in spite of these allegations.A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report from 2020 verified that Russia did try to use influence operations to support Trump's 2016 Obama's team and independent agencies have repeatedly confirmed that no vote totals were recent flurry of posts that target Barack Obama arrived as his relationship with convicted offender Jeffrey Epstein, who passed away in August 2019, comes under increasing has long claimed he cut ties with Epstein over a 'business dispute,' but now suggests the fallout stemmed from Epstein 'stealing' young staff members from Mar-a-Lago.'He took people. I said, 'Don't do it anymore,' because they work for me,' Trump said, referring to his former resort Trump's supporters, including Dan Scavino, applaud his online offensive, others see it as a calculated effort to divert attention away from the Epstein FBI's previous investigation into Hillary Clinton's alleged efforts to link Trump to Putin resurfaced in his posts, though analysts note that much of that claim could be attributed to Russian is claiming that Obama orchestrated a plot to delegitimize his presidency without providing any Trump's comments have resurfaced as public attention returns to his past ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jaguar CEO Adrian Mardell steps down after controversial 'woke' pink rebrand: Why did he quit after 35 years?
Adrian Mardell, Jaguar CEO, is retiring after 35 years with the company, a tenure that included both record profits and controversy over a "woke" rebrand featuring bright colors and androgynous models. The campaign, criticized by figures like Nigel Farage and Elon Musk, led to a search for a new ad agency. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Jaguar ad turns head Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Jaguar CEO Adrian Mardell quits Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Jaguar CEO Adrian Mardell is stepping down months after leading a controversial "woke" rebrand campaign for the auto company. Adrian Mardell, 64, has announced plans to retire from the firm for which he has worked for 35 years. In a statement, the firm said: "His successor will be announced in due course."Adrian Mardell oversaw JLR's strongest profit levels in a decade during his term as CEO. Adrian Mardell, who faced heavy backlash over the "Barbie" pink marketing campaign, will retire from his post at the end of the year. The iconic British car manufacturer sparked outrage in November when it launched a glossy ad campaign with bright colours and catwalk models."Mr. P B Balaji will be joining in this role from November-2025. Mr. Adrian Mardell will continue to helptransition and support until the end of his contract," Tata Motors turned heads last year with its release with its release of a new ad, which featured a reimagined logo under the slogan "Copy Nothing." The ad featured androgynous models in brightly colored, over-the-top outfits, featuring bright colours, catwalk models, and a pink concept car. It included one man wearing a dress, along with other slogans such as "create exuberant," "live vivid," "delete ordinary" and "break moulds", sparking a fierce ad did not feature a car throughout its entire 30-second run. Jaguar's revamped logo and badge courted criticism and ignited strong reactions from fans and critics alikeThe video blew up on social media, drawing tens of thousands of comments and nearly 47 million views in 24 hours. Soon after, it unveiled the bizarre Type 00 concept car - a large, pink grand tourer - as well as a much-maligned new logo and likes of Nigel Farage and even Elon Musk led the critics, with Farage describing it as "woke" and warned the automaker risked "going bust" due to its new design turned the knife on X, simply asking Jaguar ''Do you sell cars?' Adrian Mardell, on the other hand, stood by the company transformation, saying it would 'create the same sense of awe that surrounded iconic models like the E-Type.'But months later, JLR switched tone, announcing its hunt for a new ad agency after the 'woke disaster.'Last month, Jaguar announced its plans to cut around 500 management jobs in the UK amid pressures linked to US trade tariffs. The company also registered a drop in sales in the three months to June caused partly by it pausing exports to the US because of tariffs, and also the planned wind-down of older Jaguar was appointed to the role in 2023 following the abrupt departure of Thierry Bolloré. He took the position amidst heavy financial headwinds, with the automaker in the throes of a post-pandemic slump."Adrian Mardell has expressed his desire to retire from JLR after three years as CEO and 35 years with the company," a spokesperson said in a statement to Car and to Reuters, Adrian Mardell joined the British carmaker in 1990. Prior to his role as the chief executive officer, which initially kicked off on an interim basis in November 2022, he served as the company's chief financial officer from June his connection with the carmaker, Jaguar Land Rover not only amassed its highest profit in a decade, but also got rid of its $6.6 billion in debt.'Outside of work, I enjoy running marathons. I've done six so far and hope to complete another one soon,' Mardell writes on his LinkedIn 64-year-old executive led the British luxury carmaker for nearly three years, initially stepping in as interim CEO in late 2022 following Thierry Bolloré's abrupt departure after just two years in the role. Mardell officially took over as Chief Executive Officer in July 2023. According to sources cited by the Financial Times, the latest leadership change aligns with Mardell's long-standing plan to retire after a three-year time at the helm of JLR was not without turbulence. His leadership coincided with the impact of a 25% tariff imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on all imported vehicles, which forced the automaker to suspend its U.S. exports for a month. Shipments resumed in May. Most recently, Mardell was seen attending the high-profile opening of Trump's new golf course in Scotland, part of the President's official visit to the UK.(With inputs from Reuters)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Ukraine is betting big on its interceptor drones in war against Russia
Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level recently. Russia in July alone launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. read more The Ukraine war in a new phase. Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level. Russia in July launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. That's the most in any month since the beginning of the war in 2022. On July 9 alone Russia launched over 700 strikes against Ukraine using its Iranian-made Shahed drones. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine is now attempting to combat Russia's attacks via interceptor drones. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. 'I met with representatives of this production and with other manufacturers. Our request is 1,000 interceptors per day,' Zelenskyy said. But what do we know about interceptor drones? How do they work? Why are they so important to Ukraine? Let's take a closer look Interceptor drones and how they work First, let's take a closer look at interceptor drones. While drones are Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAVs), interceptor drones are UAVs built to find, follow and destroy other drones and airborne threats. These drones are built to actively engage with threats. They work autonomously or semi-autonomously. They come with features such as advanced sensing, autonomous navigation capabilities in order to maneuver at high speeds, recognising targets automatically and precision hovering. They are also equipped with net launchers, electronic jammers, and kamikaze-style impactors. They use advanced navigation tech like AI-powered inertial navigation systems. They work by using their radar, spotters or sensors to spot incoming threats. Some are synced up with a country's air defence network. This allows them to respond to threats in real time – at a fraction of the cost of missile systems or ground-based radar systems. Once they intercept enemy UAVs, they can either ram into them – known as the Kamikaze method – use nets and even explosives to down the enemy's object. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These interceptor drones are smaller than other UAVs and faster – which allows them to intercept – as well as highly manouverable. For example, experts say the Shahed drones Russia is using can fly between 200 and 300 kilometres per hour. They are also more effective when they are autonomous. As Lyuba Shipovich, CEO of Dignitas, which helps train Ukrainian soldiers on interceptors, told The Interpreter, 'You can't expect to have 700 operators for 700 drones during a mass strike like the ones we're seeing now. AI allows us to launch swarms of interceptor drones without that limitation.' Though they are more expensive than regular drones, they do not cost nearly as much as other defensive systems. Anti-aircraft missiles, for example, can cost as much as $1 million (Rs 8.5 crore), while surface-to-air missiles can cost between $40,000 (Rs 34.98 lakh) and $100,000 ( Rs 87.44 lakh) A single interceptor drone can cost as little as $5,000 (Rs 4.39 lakh). Kamikaze interceptor drones are even cheaper, costing as little as $200 (Rs 20,000) to $2000 (Rs 2.20 lakh). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Ukraine's armed forces that's a downright bargain. Why are they important to Ukraine Because interceptor drones can combat Russia's Shahed drones, which have become a menace in Ukraine. The Russian strategy has been to overwhelm Ukraine and demoralise its defenders through sheer numbers. In July, Russia sent 6,297 long-range drones into Ukraine. That figure is 14 times what it was in July 2024, when Russia sent around 400 drones. From June 1 to June 20, Russia hit Ukraine with 3,681 Shahed drones and fake UAVs. This completely disrupted the rhythm of Ukraine's defenders. A year ago, the monthly average was at around 600 UAVs per month. Experts say these are estimates and that real numbers may even be higher. Worse, Russia is ramping up its production of Shahed drones to nearly 100 UAVs per day. They now fly two to four kilometres above the ground – putting them out of reach of ground fire. Kyiv predicts Moscow will be looking to manufacture 30,000 long-range drones and two million FPV (first-person-view) drones this entire year. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. AP Which is why Ukraine is betting big on interceptor drones. Indeed, Zelenskyy even said the same at the G7 in Canada in June. 'In particular, we are working on interceptor drones to enhance protection against Shaheds', Zelenskyy said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Many Ukrainian companies are already working on this task. Wild Hornets, a non-profit group making UAVs for Ukraine, has had great success with its Sting interceptor drone against the Shahed drones. 'You can make a drone, for example, at a firm like us, fast, cheap, and en masse,' a company representative told the Kyiv Independent. 'While missiles for an S-300 are unique technologies, that maybe, seems to me, a few companies in the world can make, and more than half of those are in Russia.' Even though Ukraine has been the world's largest importer of weapons from 2020 to 2024 and is buying millions of drones, experts say it isn't doing enough. They say it needs to ramp up production even further to counter Russia. 'Russia is going to bomb our entire country with Shahed drones. They have significantly increased production and will continue to do so. If we don't act immediately, our infrastructure, our production and our defence systems will be destroyed', military and communications expert Serhiy Beskrestnov wrote on social media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, it is important to note that these interceptor drones are no silver bullet. 'We're already using them, and we are expanding their use. But they can't replace everything. We have to understand that anti-drone air defence is a complex system,' Yuriy Ignat, a spokesman for the Ukrainian air force, told The Telegraph. 'First, they don't have a very long range – only a few dozen kilometres. Secondly, you need to scale up the depth of territory they cover. They only work locally. And they can't always fly, in bad weather, fog, and so on.' Simply put, they are an important piece of Ukraine's defence puzzle.
