logo
The US plotted and toppled Iran's regime in 1953. Are we seeing a repeat today?

The US plotted and toppled Iran's regime in 1953. Are we seeing a repeat today?

First Post6 days ago

The 1953 CIA-backed coup in Iran remains one of the most consequential regime changes orchestrated by the United States. Decades later, with tensions rising again between the US, Israel, and Iran, echoes of that intervention reverberate. As Donald Trump talks regime change, we look at how foreign powers once overthrew Iran's elected leader to secure oil interests read more
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves during the 36th anniversary of the death of the leader of Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, at Khomeini's shrine in southern Tehran, Iran, June 4, 2025. File Image/Reuters
With US President Donald Trump issuing warnings and discussing the possibility of removing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — this is not the first time that foreign powers have fundamentally altered the West Asian country's path.
We take a look at the 1953 US- and UK-backed coup that toppled Iran's democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh.
Calls for regime change have been growing louder with Israel pushing for more aggressive action, and the US bolstering its military presence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But for many Iranians, such moves echo a long history of foreign interference — particularly the CIA-orchestrated coup that ousted Mossadegh and reinstated monarchical rule under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Mossadegh's rise and the nationalisation of oil
Mohammad Mossadegh became a revered figure in Iranian politics during the early 1950s. Known for his nationalist policies and social reforms, his most consequential act was the nationalisation of the Iranian oil industry.
Until then, Iran's vast oil wealth was under the control of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, a British firm that reaped substantial profits while Iran received a limited share.
In 1951, with widespread support in parliament and among the public, Mossadegh initiated legislation to nationalise the oil fields. This move triggered an intense backlash from Britain, which saw it as a direct threat to its economic and strategic interests.
Negotiations between Mossadegh and the British government broke down, and Mossadegh barred further British involvement in Iran's oil sector. In response, Britain sought ways to undermine his government.
At first, the British government attempted to convince the Shah to dismiss Mossadegh by issuing a royal decree through parliament. That effort failed and only served to elevate Mossadegh's stature among Iranians.
Britain, reluctant to act alone, appealed to the United States, invoking Cold War anxieties by suggesting that Mossadegh, although an avowed anti-communist, might align with the Tudeh Party and the Soviet Union.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Operation Ajax: How the coup was engineered
Under US President Dwight D Eisenhower, the United States agreed to participate in a covert operation to remove Mossadegh from power.
This effort, known as Operation Ajax, was led by CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt Jr, the grandson of former US President Theodore Roosevelt. Alongside Britain's Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), the CIA began laying the groundwork for a coup.
The CIA and SIS funded propaganda campaigns, purchased influence within Iranian media outlets and recruited collaborators from within religious and political groups.
According to Stephen Kinzer, author of All the Shah's Men, Roosevelt succeeded in recruiting clerics, bribing newspapers and spreading anti-Mossadegh messaging to turn public sentiment against the prime minister.
He also worked to convince Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi — initially reluctant — to back the plan.
The first coup attempt failed when Mossadegh learned of the plot and resisted. On the following morning, he announced his victory on national radio. Despite the setback, Roosevelt refused to give up and launched a second, more forceful attempt.
On August 19, 1953, with support from pro-Shah military units and orchestrated public demonstrations, Mossadegh's government was finally overthrown.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Shah returned from exile to Iran and resumed rule, while Mossadegh was arrested, tried and sentenced to three years in prison. He spent the rest of his life under house arrest.
Documents later revealed that within two days of the coup's success, the CIA covertly made $5,000,000 available to stabilise the new government led by General Fazlollah Zahedi, the newly appointed prime minister.
Declassified documents amid a long-coming CIA acknowledgement
Although Iranians had long believed the US and Britain were responsible for Mossadegh's ouster, official confirmation came decades later. On August 19, 2013, the CIA publicly admitted for the first time that it was directly involved in orchestrating the coup.
The admission came in the form of declassified documents published by the National Security Archive and made available to George Washington University researchers under the Freedom of Information Act.
These documents detailed how the CIA collaborated with the British SIS to provoke unrest through disinformation and street-level agitation. They confirmed that the coup had the formal approval of Eisenhower and was centrally directed by the CIA from within Iran.
Earlier, in 2009, then-US President Barack Obama acknowledged America's role in the 1953 coup, describing it as a 'difficult part of our history.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The 2013 declassification was the first formal institutional recognition of the operation, providing a clearer understanding of how foreign powers conspired to subvert a democratic government in Iran.
The long-term fallout which led to the 1979 Islamic Revolution
The reinstatement of the Shah after Mossadegh's ouster ushered in 25 years of pro-Western monarchical rule. Backed by the US, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi pursued aggressive modernisation programmes and centralised power.
However, discontent grew over time, fuelled by allegations of corruption, repression by the SAVAK (secret police) and widening economic inequalities.
By the late 1970s, millions of Iranians — secular nationalists, leftists and Islamists — took to the streets demanding an end to the Shah's rule. He was widely seen as an illegitimate ruler imposed by foreign powers.
The protests culminated in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which saw the Shah exiled and the establishment of the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a Shia cleric.
Khomeini's leadership was rooted in the doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), and he became Iran's Supreme Leader until his death. In 1989, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei succeeded him and continues to serve in that role today.
The 1953 coup is often cited by Iranian officials, political figures and academics as a root cause of the revolution and a key reason for the country's persistent mistrust of Western powers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The memory of Mossadegh's ouster remains central to Iran's political consciousness.
Fast forward to today
Fast forward to the present day, and echoes of 1953 are once again visible in the geopolitical confrontation between Iran, the United States and Israel.
Following Israel's expanded military actions against Iranian targets, Trump has openly discussed removing Iran's leadership, while warning that 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.'
Speaking about the potential for direct US involvement against Iran, Trump said, 'I may do it, I may not do it — nobody knows what I'm going to do.' He also wrote on Truth Social that 'Iran cannot win this war.'
Although he reportedly rejected an Israeli proposal to assassinate Khamenei, Trump added, 'We know where he is hiding. He (Khamenei) is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers.'
Amid increasing pressure, the United States has deployed over 31 refuelling aircraft to Europe and redirected the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier to the region to bolster its military capacity and protect its interests.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel has requested US assistance in deploying bunker-busting weaponry like the GBU-57 to target Iran's fortified Fordow nuclear facility, which is embedded deep underground.
Despite this, Iran has avoided escalating the conflict with the US directly, refraining from targeting American bases or disrupting international shipping in the Strait of Hormuz — a move seen by analysts as an effort to prevent American entry into the war.
Khamenei responded to Trump's rhetoric by stating, 'The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened. The Iranian nation isn't frightened by such threats.'
With inputs from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth, Gabbard, CIA scramble after leaked intel challenge Donald Trump's Iran nuclear strike ‘obliteration' boast
Hegseth, Gabbard, CIA scramble after leaked intel challenge Donald Trump's Iran nuclear strike ‘obliteration' boast

Mint

time23 minutes ago

  • Mint

Hegseth, Gabbard, CIA scramble after leaked intel challenge Donald Trump's Iran nuclear strike ‘obliteration' boast

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is set to address the media on Thursday in a high-stakes press conference aimed at countering growing scepticism about the effectiveness of last weekend's US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The move comes amid a fierce backlash sparked by leaked US intelligence documents that contradict President Donald Trump's bold claims of having 'obliterated' Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. Pete Hegseth is expected to offer a "fresh assessment" of the bombings, which targeted three major Iranian atomic sites: Natanz, Fordow, and Esfahan. The strikes followed escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, with both countries engaging in retaliatory military action since 13 June. US military said it dropped 14 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs – powerful 13,600kg (30,000lb) weapons – on three Iranian nuclear sites. Pentagon's push for damage control comes after CNN first reported a classified Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment suggesting the strikes had only delayed Iran's nuclear programme by a few months, rather than years. The leaked DIA assessment also found that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which would provide the fuel for making any future nuclear warhead, had been moved before the strikes and may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran. That conclusion, reportedly based on satellite imagery and intercepted communications, starkly contradicts the Donald Trump administration's initial declaration of a decisive blow. His comment came amid growing scrutiny of a leaked DIA assessment suggesting that Iran's nuclear capabilities may only have been delayed by months, not destroyed outright. The admission marked a rare moment of ambiguity from the US president, who is known for emphatic declarations on matters of national security. However, just hours later, Donald Trump reversed course. At a separate public appearance, he struck a far more confident tone, claiming, 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop.' The sudden shift raised eyebrows in Washington, with critics accusing the administration of scrambling to maintain a narrative of total success. Behind the scenes, officials insisted that updated briefings and 'new intelligence' supported the president's renewed certainty. Amid the mounting confusion, Donald Trump's cabinet have doubled down. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard posted on X (formerly Twitter): 'New intelligence confirms what President Trump has stated. Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities entirely, which would likely take years to do.' CIA Director John Ratcliffe echoed Tulsi Gabbard's claim, stating: 'Several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Ratcliffe said the assessment was based on information from a 'historically reliable' intelligence source. Despite these public assertions, the internal rift within the US intelligence community appears to be deepening. According to The Washington Post and Associated Press, the White House now intends to limit the sharing of classified materials with Congress—an unprecedented move during an active overseas crisis. On Wednesday, the White House pushed back on those claims, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling Fox News the US had 'no indication that that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes, as I also saw falsely reported'. 'As for what's on the ground right now, it's buried under miles and miles of rubble because of the success of these strikes on Saturday evening,' she said. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer slammed the proposal: 'Senators deserve information, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening right now abroad.' The controversy intensified after it emerged that much of Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile had likely been relocated before the US-led strikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed it had lost 'visibility' of Iran's nuclear material after hostilities began. In an interview with French television, IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi offered a cautious clarification: 'I don't want to give the impression that it's been lost or hidden.' As Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth prepares to face the press, the Biden–Trump-era divide over intelligence reliability, wartime transparency, and nuclear non-proliferation is once again in sharp focus. With both global security and domestic political credibility on the line, Thursday's briefing may prove pivotal in shaping public perception of one of the most volatile military confrontations in recent US–Iran history.

Pope Leo laments diabolical intensity of Middle East conflicts
Pope Leo laments diabolical intensity of Middle East conflicts

Mint

time24 minutes ago

  • Mint

Pope Leo laments diabolical intensity of Middle East conflicts

VATICAN CITY, June 26 (Reuters) - Pope Leo said on Thursday that conflicts in the Middle East were raging with an unprecedented "diabolical intensity" and appealed for greater respect for international law, in comments to Catholic bishops and aid agencies operating in the region. At a meeting in the Vatican, the pontiff said countries in the region were being "devastated by wars, plundered by special interests, and covered by a cloud of hatred that renders the air unbreathable and toxic." "Today, violent conflict seems to be raging... with a diabolical intensity previously unknown," he said, adding that the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza was "tragic and inhumane". Leo, elected on May 8 to replace the late Pope Francis, appealed last month for Israel to allow more humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. He did not name Israel in his remarks on Thursday. The U.S.-born pope also did not directly address the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran that also saw the United States bomb suspected Iranian nuclear facilities but he called for countries to show better respect for international law. "It is truly distressing to see the principle of 'might makes right' prevailing in so many situations today, all for the sake of legitimising the pursuit of self-interest," he said. "It is troubling to see that the force of international law and humanitarian law seems no longer to be binding, replaced by the alleged right to coerce others," Leo added. (Reporting by Joshua McElwee Editing by Gareth Jones)

US to offer new defence of strikes on Iran nuclear sites
US to offer new defence of strikes on Iran nuclear sites

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US to offer new defence of strikes on Iran nuclear sites

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is set to hold a news conference on Thursday to offer a fresh assessment of strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, following a stinging row over how much American bombardment set back Tehran's nuclear program. After waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since June 13, the United States bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities at the weekend. The extent of the damage in Iran, where Israel said it had acted to stop an imminent nuclear threat, has become the subject of profound disagreement in the United States. An initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strike did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear program was set back only months at most. Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400 kilogram (880 pounds) of enriched uranium -- which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country. Live Events The US administration has hit back furiously, with Trump repeatedly saying the attack "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain. "I can tell you, the United States had no indication that that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes, as I also saw falsely reported," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News. "As for what's on the ground right now, it's buried under miles and miles of rubble because of the success of these strikes on Saturday evening," she said. Trump said that Hegseth, whom he dubbed "war" secretary, would hold a news conference at 8 am (1200 GMT) on Thursday to "fight for the dignity of our great American pilots". CIA chief John Ratcliffe said in a statement on Wednesday that "several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years". The Israeli military said it had delivered a "significant" blow to Iran's nuclear sites but that it was "still early" to fully assess the damage. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that "we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project". "And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt," he said. - Nuclear talks? - Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Al Jazeera that "nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure". After the war derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope "for a comprehensive peace agreement". Trump told reporters that Israel and Iran were "both tired, exhausted", before going on to say that talks were planned with Iran next week. "We may sign an agreement. I don't know," he added. Iran has systematically denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its "legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. It has also said it was willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington. In both Iran and Israel, authorities have gradually lifted wartime restrictions. Iran on Wednesday reopened the airspace over the country's east, without allowing yet flights to and from the capital Tehran. In the Israeli coastal hub of Tel Aviv, 45-year-old engineer Yossi Bin welcomed the ceasefire: "Finally, we can sleep peacefully. We feel better, less worried... and I hope it stays that way." - State funeral - While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, their 12-day conflict was by far the most destructive confrontation between them. The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures. According to Mehr news agency, the funeral of Revolutionary Guard commander Hossein Salami, who was killed in an Israeli strike, will no longer be held in his hometown on Thursday. Instead, a state funeral will be held on Saturday in Tehran for top commanders including Salami and nuclear scientists killed in the war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store