EU may get 15 per cent tariff deal with US: reports
The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan.
Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-member bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts.
US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however.
Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under five per cent.
There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said.
The US administration does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 per cent tariff on steel, they said.
The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 per cent tariffs.
At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($A166 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval.
A vote is expected on Thursday although no measures would be imposed until August 7.
Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said.
If Trump's 30 per cent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors.
The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April.
European shares climbed about one per cent, led by car stocks, following the US-Japan announcement.
One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 per cent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 per cent, something the EU may want for its own car exports.
The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than $US55 billion ($A84 billion) from Japan last year.
EU exports were 47.3 billion euros.
Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets.
EU officials say the US has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility.
"Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Bill and Hillary Clinton among figures subpoenaed in US congressional Epstein probe
A committee in the United States House of Representatives has issued subpoenas seeking depositions from former US president Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in relation to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The House Oversight Committee, which is controlled by Republicans, also issued subpoenas for Justice Department files and depositions from eight law enforcement officials in relation to the case. The requests were made as part of a congressional probe that some US politicians believe may show links between the deceased financier and current US President Donald Trump. The subpoenas were issued even while the US House of Representatives was on a month-long summer break, with interest in the Epstein files running high. Mr Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago, and he has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation. The department also said Epstein had no secret "client list" — rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Mr Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity. But politicians from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go. Representative James Comer, the Republican chairperson of the oversight committee, noted in letters to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the former officials that the cases of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell "have received immense public interest and scrutiny." "While the Department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell," Mr Comer said. Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial for sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein — and who else knew about his sexual abuse of teenage girls. Republican politicians on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between President Joe Biden's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein. Former president Mr Clinton was among a number of luminaries acquainted with Epstein, a wealthy financier, before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Mr Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. One of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, once gave a newspaper interview in which she described riding in a helicopter with Mr Clinton and flirting with Mr Trump, but she later said in a deposition that those things had not actually happened and were mistakes by the reporter. Mr Clinton has previously said through a spokesperson that while he travelled on Epstein's jet he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes. The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last four presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. The committee also subpoenaed former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans last month to successfully initiate the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. "Today was an important step forward in our fight for transparency regarding the Epstein files and our dedication to seeking justice for the victims," said Democratic politicians Robert Garcia and Summer Lee said in a joint statement. "Now, we must continue putting pressure on the Department of Justice until we actually receive every document." The subpoenas give the Justice Department until August 19 to hand over the requested records, though such requests are typically open to negotiation and can be resisted by the Trump administration. The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for the depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on October 9 and Bill Clinton on October 14. AP
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump is leading an overt attack on the institutions underpinning the US economy
When figures were announced last Friday showing lower-than-expected growth in the United States labour force, a chill went through international markets and the global community of economists and policymakers. There were just 73,000 extra jobs created in July (when 100,000-plus had been expected), while the monthly data set also included huge downward revisions to figures for May and June. The weak numbers reflected a fall in both government and private sector jobs, but economists also noted that the foreign-born labour force had declined by over one million people since Donald Trump came to office. The numbers did not sit comfortably with the president's claims that a US economic renaissance was underway in his second term. They were instead a bleak reminder that, at some point, there are likely to be economic consequences flowing from the world of disruption he has unleashed on the US and global economies. The relative strength of the US economy to date — apparently defying the price and activity shocks that had been predicted to flow from his erratic tariff announcements — has insulated the Trump administration politically from quite a lot of domestic unease. But that could all change if the early signs of a slowdown we are now seeing start to accelerate. Economic growth statistics released just before the labour force figures had already suggested that slowing consumption was driving the economy to lose momentum. Ironically, perhaps, the weak numbers added to the president's strident attacks on the US Federal Reserve, which he demands must cut interest rates. But President Trump did not see it that way and shocked markets and observers by immediately announcing he was sacking the woman responsible for producing the job numbers. His move to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Erika McEntarfer, was unprecedented and has raised questions about whether economic data upon which financial markets rely will now be subject to politicisation and thus be rendered non-credible. "Last weeks Job's Report was RIGGED, just like the numbers prior to the Presidential Election were Rigged. That's why, in both cases, there was massive, record setting revisions, in favor of the Radical Left Democrats," Trump posted on Truth Social, claiming McEntarfer had manipulated the key economic data without offering any evidence. The numbers, he said, were ridiculous. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes," Trump said, claiming without evidence that she had massaged figures to help former president Biden, who had appointed her. Markets did not react well to the move. The Financial Times reported that David Wilcox, the former head of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, which was disbanded by the Trump administration earlier this year, said firing the BLS commissioner would be "a serious blow to the integrity of the US statistical system". It would raise questions among those who use the economic data about "whether the objective was to please the president or present the best possible picture of what's going on in the US economy", he told the FT. A group headed up by the two previous heads of the agency, Friends of BLS, echoed that concern, noting to the FT that, "when leaders of other nations have politicised economic data and destroyed public trust in their data infrastructure, the consequences have been dire". In conjunction with Trump's relentless attacks on the US Federal Reserve, and particularly its chair, Jerome Powell, the BLS sacking is seen as another brazen attack on the institutional underpinnings of the American economy. In the first Trump term — a term that Donald Trump and his team had not really expected to win — many of the erosions in the superstructure of state came about more by neglect than deliberate design. The writer Michael Lewis documented some alarming incidents of this in his book The Fifth Risk. Lewis reported how the first Trump administration didn't appoint people to crucial jobs, including management of the US nuclear arsenal and nuclear waste in the Department of Energy, leaving them empty for years. Or, it sought to appoint allies with commercial interests in a particular field to crucial jobs such as those heading the equivalent of the Bureau of Meteorology, where there had been attempts made to charge people for weather forecasts, including for tornadoes. But the push to dismantle and discredit government institutions in the second Trump presidency is much more overt. The president said this week he would appoint a new head of the BLS in the coming days, just as he would appoint a new member of the US Federal Reserve after one governor shocked markets by unexpectedly resigning early on the weekend. Just as happened with the Supreme Court in the legal sphere, the president now has the opportunity to shape — and possibly distort — America's economic institutions.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
US trade deficit narrows amid drop in consumer imports
The US trade deficit narrowed in June on a sharp drop in consumer goods imports, the latest evidence of the imprint on global commerce that President Donald Trump is making with sweeping tariffs on imported goods. The overall trade gap narrowed 16.0 per cent in June to $US60.2 billion ($A93.1 billion), the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Tuesday. Days after reporting that the goods trade deficit tumbled 10.8 per cent to its lowest since September 2023, the government said the full deficit including services also was its narrowest since September 2023. Exports of goods and services totalled $US277.3 billion ($A429.0 billion), down from more than $US278 billion ($A430 billion) in May, while total imports were $US337.5 billion ($A522.1 billion), down from $US350.3 billion ($A541.9 billion). The diminished trade deficit contributed heavily to the rebound in US gross domestic product during the second quarter, reported last week, reversing a drag in the first quarter when imports had surged as consumers and businesses front-loaded purchases to beat the imposition of Trump's tariffs. The economy in the second quarter expanded at a 3.0 per cent annualised rate after contracting at a 0.5 per cent rate in the first three months of the year, but the headline figure masked underlying indications that activity was weakening. Last week, Trump, ahead of a self-imposed deadline of August 1, issued a barrage of notices informing scores of trading partners of higher import taxes set to be imposed on their goods exports to the US. With tariff rates ranging from 10 per cent to 41 per cent on imports to the US set to kick in on August 7, the Budget Lab at Yale now estimates the average overall US tariff rate has shot up to 18.3 per cent, the highest since 1934, from between two per cent and three per cent before Trump returned to the White House in January.
