CroisiEurope unveils ship name and itineraries for Brazil river cruises
River cruise line CroisiEurope announced its new Amazon itineraries in Brazil, which will begin in 2027.
The itineraries will be offered on the line's new river ship, the 32-passenger Brasilian Dream, and will focus on eco-tourism on the Amazon. The line will operate three 11-day itineraries.
Amazon & Rio Negro will sail roundtrip from Manaus, Amazon & Rio Tapajos will cruise between Manaus and Santarem, and Cruise Along the Amazon Between Brazil & Colombia will operate between Manaus and Tabatinga.
The cruises will visit major parks and UNESCO sites, where passengers will observe the region's wildlife in dinghies and dugout canoes. Guests will embark on nocturnal excursions and visit river villages.
The four-deck Brasilian Dream will have vibrant colors and local artwork inspired by Amazonian culture. Lodging consists of 16 suites with private balconies, including two presidential suites. The ship also will feature a restaurant serving Brazilian-inspired dishes, spa, fitness room, sun deck and conference room.
The Brasilian Dream will have an advanced wastewater treatment system and solar panels.
More information, including prices, will be unveiled in July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
SXSW London Debates: Is The Green Transition Financially Viable?
Rhian-Mari Thomas argues that the green transition is financially viable at SXSW London, referencing ... More the record amount of investment in the sector in 2024 Thought leaders across green finance and economics gathered to debate the financial viability of climate progress on day four of SXSW London. Held at the innovation and ideas festival's Climate & Nature House, a space hosted by Bellwethers to have meaningful environmental conversations, the session followed a traditional debate format encouraging a jovial air of competition. Sophie Lambin, founder and CEO of Kite Insights, and Stephen Dunbar-Johnson, president, international at the New York Times Company moderated the conversation. Lambin clarified that the debaters were tasked with addressing whether we can realistically and successfully invest our way to a green future, considering our current economic system and the state of the climate emergency, or whether we need new financial tools and a financial system. Arguing for the notion that 'the green transition is financially viable' were Rhian-Mari Thomas, CEO Green Finance Institute, Marisa Drew, chief sustainability officer, Standard Chartered Bank, and Fiona Howarth, CEO of Octopus Electric Vehicles. Arguing against the notion were Kathy Boughman McLeod, CEO Climate Resilience for All, Chaitanya Kumar, head of economy & environment at New Economics Foundation and Erinch Sahan, business and enterprise lead at Doughnut Economics Action Lab. Each debater was given three minutes to make their case. The debaters prepare their arguments on stage at SXSW London In support of the motion, Thomas started the conversation by saying that the green transition is 'economically strategic, it is socially imperative, and it is already underway.' She highlighted that a record $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy technology in 2024 according to BloombergNEF. Thomas sees this as evidence that the financial markets view green investments as smart economic strategy that not only provides financial opportunity, but protects us from the social and economic damage of the climate crisis. Howarth drew on the enormous success of her employer, Octopus Energy Group, as evidence that current investment is working. Started nine years ago, the company now employs 10,000 people and is valued at $9 billion while making green energy a viable option for consumers. She says this is thanks to 'smart innovators', and 'clever policy mechanisms'. Drew, instead, highlighted that emerging markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Middle Eastern countries have some of the fastest growing economies and are doubling down on green energy transition. 'What is Saudi Arabia doing? It is spending billions, if not trillions, on diversifying its economy. What does that tell you? The energy transition is viable, and the old way is no longer going to be the case in the not-too-distant future,' she argued. The first rebuttal came from Sahan, who highlighted that while $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy last year, the Climate Policy Initiative estimates that $6 trillion per year is needed to fund a green transition. He also argued that financial viability of a movement currently means that it is still satisfying the ROI needs of the financial market. 'These parameters are holding us back,' he said, taking off his belt to use as a symbol that financial markets are placing a straightjacket on businesses and governments to make progress on climate. He then pulled out an apple to make the point that the current green transition focuses on low hanging fruit, undermining the need for larger systemic change that picks the fruit at the top of the tree too. Chaitanya Kumar argued that the current financial system is too heavily influenced by fossil fuel ... More companies to be a fully viable solution to the green transition Kumar's speech made the point that large investment funds have interests in many of the biggest companies in the world as well as oil and gas companies, intrinsically tying them together, and creating strong lobbying power. 'Incumbent power and the political economy of the transition is still very much held by fossil fuel interests around the world,' he said. He drew on examples of the lobbying by fossil fuel companies which saw the EU label natural gas as a 'green energy' in 2022 and Microsoft's pivot on its sustainability strategy to adjust for escalating AI emissions. Finally, McLeod, highlighted the social costs, as well as the environmental costs of the current system. 'The market we have, not necessarily the market we wish to have, incentivizes pollution, devalues people and overlooks protection,' she told the audience. Addressing the plight of informal women workers who are on the frontline of the climate crisis, she said: 'This economy is chaos. We cannot maintain these expectations of return and believe that there is a green future. That is a fantasy.' The debate was declared a tie after the audience were invited to applaud the team they felt debated the best. Summarising the conversation, Dunbar-Johnson emphasised the importance of debate on these issues: 'What you did is encapsulate the complexity of the arguments in these subjects. This is a subject that we must grapple with. If the money is there, do we have the political solutions to drive that? We do have instruments to drive it, but the reality is, too much of the narrative is about the cost of the transition, not about the cost of not transitioning and the opportunities.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kimberly-Clark, Suzano form $3.4B tissue joint venture
This story was originally published on Manufacturing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Manufacturing Dive newsletter. Kleenex tissue maker Kimberly-Clark and pulp producer Suzano are forming a $3.4 billion global consumer and professional tissue joint venture in an effort to bolster their long-term growth strategies, the companies announced Thursday. Suzano has agreed to pay the tissue manufacturer $1.7 billion to acquire 51% of the new entity, which will be based in the Netherlands. The deal includes 9,000 employees and 22 manufacturing facilities across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, South and Central America, Africa and Oceania. Kimberly-Clark will own the remaining 49% and retain its consumer and professional entities in the United States, as well as existing joint ventures in Mexico, South Korea and Bahrain, among other countries. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2026. The joint venture is part of Kimberly-Clark's long-term growth strategy introduced last year, Chairman and CEO Mike Hsu said in a statement. The plan aims to save the company more than $3 billion through improved productivity and accelerate the growth of its brands and businesses, particularly its North America and international personal care segments. More than 40 of Kimberly-Clark's regional brands under its international family care and professional portfolio will be transferred into the joint venture. Additionally, Suzano plans to enter a long-term license with the new company for the use of global brands, including Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, WypAll, Viva and Kimberly-Clark Professional, the Brazil-based pulp producer said in its press release. The deal follows Suzano's acquisition of Kimberly-Clark's Brazilian tissue assets and brands in 2023, the paper maker said in its release. The pending transaction aligns with Suzano's long-term cost-effective and growth strategy that's focused on scalable businesses where it can strengthen its operational efficiency. Once the deal closes, approximately two-thirds of Kimberly-Clark's net revenues will come from its personal care categories, progressing its long-term growth, profitability and returns on investment, according to the tissue maker's press release. The joint venture is expected to reduce Kimberly-Clark's exposure to volatile input costs, improving the company's ability to deliver expected and deliverable margins and profitability over time. Kimberly-Clark anticipates $300 million in additional costs from tariffs this year, Hsu said in his remarks during an April earnings call. The majority of products sold in the U.S. are sourced and domestically produced, Kimberly-Clark CFO Nelson Urdaneta said in the earnings call. In terms of raw materials and finished goods, the company's exposure to China, Mexico and Canada was around or less than 10% of its total cost of goods. 'If we factor in all of our raw materials and finished goods imports for our US business, 80% of our total costs in the U.S. are U.S.-based, so only 20% of our U.S. costs are exposed to tariffs,' Urdaneta said. The volatile tariff backdrop is affecting Kimberly-Clark on three fronts. The 145% duty on China drives about two-thirds of the $300 million, Urdaneta said. The U.S.'s reciprocal tariffs account for 10% and retaliatory tariffs from other countries represent 25% of the impact costs, he added. The company is working fast to mitigate the costs, Urdaneta said. Still, he added that Kimberly-Clark is in a much better position to handle many of these headwinds. 'You can't solve that overnight because we're having to reaccommodate some of the elements of our supply chain, and we intend to already be able to address about a third of the impact this year,' Urdaneta said. 'Now it'll take us through 2026 to pretty much be able to address the whole element in a consistent manner based on what's been enacted today.' The joint venture is one of many actions Kimberly-Clark has taken to make progress on its strategy and alleviate tariff costs. Last month, the Scott paper towel maker announced plans to invest more than $2 billion over the next five years in its North America segment, expanding its U.S. manufacturing capacity and modernizing its supply chain. Recommended Reading Kimberly-Clark to invest over $2B in US operations
%3Amax_bytes(150000)%3Astrip_icc()%2FTAL-man-with-stomach-ache-HOWLONGUHOLD0525-033d51b3687d4f6682abf62d5bfa0b41.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Travel + Leisure
2 hours ago
- Travel + Leisure
This Is How Long Travelers Hold Their Bowels and Bladder While Traveling, Survey Finds
There are a lot of things that can throw off your digestion while traveling. From the airplane ride itself to eating new foods in your destination that are far from your typical meals, it's no surprise when our tummies get a little upset. The key thing to know here is that it's nothing to be embarrassed about. In fact, a new QS Supplies survey shows that 51 percent of travelers experience "digestive changes" while traveling. But that's not the wildest stat it found. In March, the online bathroom warehouse brand, released the findings of its Toilet Troubles While Traveling Study, which surveyed more than 1,000 UK and American travelers to learn the "unfiltered truth about what really happens when nature calls on the go." The most critical piece of information this survey found is that if you're a traveler it's important to try to overcome any fear of public toilets, which is a real diagnosable disorder known as parcopresis, or "shy bowel syndrome," which the IBD News Daily explains, is "the inability to defecate in public." It noted that while the American Psychiatric Association doesn't officially recognize parcopresis, it does consider paruesis (aka shy bladder syndrome) a social anxiety disorder. Paruesis impacts up to 16.4 percent of people. The reason it's critical to address this before traveling is because the QS Supplies survey found that the average traveler will hold their bladder and bowels for 83 minutes if they are traveling instead of using an unfamiliar toilet. It also noted that "one in five travelers hold it for more than two hours before using an unfamiliar toilet." The survey stated that 89 percent of respondents said they hold it over "cleanliness concerns," followed by 60 percent citing "bad smells" and 53 percent citing "no toilet paper or soap." "Brits tend to hold it longer than Americans, waiting 90 minutes on average before using an unfamiliar toilet while traveling, compared to 79 minutes for Americans," the team shared in the findings. "This hesitation extends to the air as well, where opinions on in-flight etiquette vary. More than half of travelers (52 percent) believed people should never fart on an airplane and should hold it in, with Americans (54 percent) more likely than Brits (47 percent) to agree." Again, can't stress enough, science says to please just pass the gas. You can hurt yourself holding it in. Still, the respondents to the QS Supplies survey certainly had feelings about other people's stomach issues. Nearly 1 in 5 respondents (19 percent) said that passengers with "particularly smelly farts should be removed from a flight, while 29 percent of travelers said they should be "reimbursed for sitting next to someone who farts, with Americans (33 percent) more likely than Brits (24 percent) to feel entitled to a refund." This, despite the fact that 40 percent of respondents also stated they have experienced a bathroom emergency while traveling. So yes, digestive drama on the road is more common than you think and remember: we're all human and none of this has to be as embarrassing or scary as it seems. Just maybe don't skip the pre-boarding bathroom break if you've got the chance.
