
There's a ‘ghost hurricane' in the forecast. It could help predict a real one
Hurricanes
Storms
Social mediaFacebookTweetLink
Follow
A scary-looking weather forecast showing a hurricane hitting the Gulf Coast in the second half of June swirled around social media this week—but don't panic.
It's the season's first 'ghost hurricane.'
Similar hype plays out every hurricane season, especially at the beginning: A cherry-picked, worst-case-scenario model run goes viral, but more often than not, will never come to fruition.
Unofficially dubbed 'ghost storms' or 'ghost hurricanes,' these tropical systems regularly appear in weather models — computer simulations that help meteorologists forecast future conditions — but never seem to manifest in real life.
The model responsible this week was the Global Forecast System, also known as the GFS or American model, run by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It's one of many used by forecasters around the world.
All models have known biases or 'quirks' where they tend to overpredict or underpredict certain things. The GFS is known to overpredict tropical storms and hurricanes in longer-term forecasts that look more than a week into the future, which leads to these false alarms. The GFS isn't alone in this — all models struggle to accurately predict tropical activity that far in advance — but it is notorious for doing so.
For example, the GFS could spit out a prediction for a US hurricane landfall about 10 days from now, only to have that chance completely disappear as the forecast date draws closer. This can occur at any time of the year, but is most frequent during hurricane season — June through November.
It's exactly what's been happening over the past week as forecasters keep an eye out for the first storm of the 2025 Atlantic hurricane season.
No weather forecast model is designed in the exact same way as another, and that's why each can generate different results with similar data.
The reason the GFS has more false alarms when looking more than a week out than similar models – like Europe's ECMWF, Canada's CMC or the United Kingdom's UKM – is because that's exactly what it's programmed to do, according to Alicia Bentley, the global verification project lead of NOAA's Environmental Modeling Center.
The GFS was built with a 'weak parameterized cumulus convection scheme,' according to Bentley. In plain language, that means when the GFS thinks there could be thunderstorms developing in an area where tropical systems are possible – over the oceans – it's more likely to jump to the conclusion that something tropical will develop than to ignore it.
Other models aren't built to be quite as sensitive to this phenomenon, and so they don't show a tropical system until they're more confident the right conditions are in place, which usually happens when the forecast gets closer in time.
The western Caribbean Sea is one of the GFS' favorite places to predict a ghost storm. That's because of the Central American gyre: a large, disorganized area of showers and thunderstorms that rotates over the region and its surrounding water.
The combination of abundant moisture and spin in the atmosphere makes it a prime breeding ground for storms, especially early in and during the peak of hurricane season. Given the model's sensitivity, it's quick to pounce on these possible storms.
But this sensitivity has an advantage: By highlighting almost anything that could become tropical, the GFS misses very few actual storms.
Its tendency to cry wolf isn't ideal, but the GFS team found it was worth giving the model a higher chance at catching every storm and better predicting each one's intensity than to prioritize fewer false alarms, Bentley explained.
'It was critical to improve the probability of detection of tropical cyclone formation and tropical cyclone intensity forecasts… and we did achieve that,' Bentley said.
During the 2024 hurricane season, the GFS had the least error when forecasting the intensity of tropical cyclones – tropical depressions, tropical storms and hurricanes – of any other global forecast models in its class: the ECMWF, the CMC and the UKM. However, the ECMWF and UKM outperformed the GFS in tropical track forecasts out more than five days in the future.
Despite how often the GFS conjures ghost systems in its longer term forecasts, it can't be discounted.
'The crucial role of the forecaster is to understand a model's known biases and use that knowledge to their advantage to produce a better forecast,' Bentley said.
Knowing the GFS latches onto anything that could even vaguely become tropical well in advance helps forecasters keep an eye on areas where conditions may ultimately come together to create the next hurricane.
The more reliable solution for predicting tropical behavior more than a few days in advance is to take advantage of ensemble forecasting, according to Bentley.
'A deterministic model like the GFS produces one forecast at a time; it gives one answer,' Bentley explained. 'An ensemble forecast can show you a variety of possible outcomes, as well as which forecast looks like a possible outlier.'
Unlike social media clickbait, no well thought out forecast is made from a single model run. Forecasters use everything at their disposal – deterministic and ensemble models, observations, climatology and more – to predict weather as accurately as possible to give people the time and information they need to stay safe.
The National Hurricane Center, for example, typically uses a blend of different types of models to make their forecasts. That strategy, combined with extensive expertise, led to their most accurate track forecasts on record for the Atlantic last season.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
40 minutes ago
- New York Times
Buildup to a Meltdown: How the Trump-Musk Alliance Collapsed
President Trump was peeved. Just minutes before he walked into the Oval Office for a televised send-off for Elon Musk, an aide had handed him a file. The papers in that file showed that Mr. Trump's nominee to run NASA — a close associate of Mr. Musk's — had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Mr. Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through the public farewell, with both men praising each other and saying their relationship would continue. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Mr. Musk. Mr. Trump started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head and pointing out several of the most recent ones in the file. This was not good, the president said — an early signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later. Mr. Musk, who was sporting a black eye, which he blamed on a tussle with his young son, tried to explain. He said his friend Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next NASA administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Maybe it's a good thing, Mr. Musk told the president — it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Genetics testing startup Nucleus Genomics criticized for its embryo product: ‘Makes me so nauseous'
Nucleus Genomics, a genetic testing startup founded by 25-year-old Kian Sadeghi, initially launched in 2021 with the goal of calculating a patient's risk for specific diseases. But it's been courting controversy for years with products that claim to tell people how their genetics correlate to a host of complex issues, including their IQ. On Wednesday, it ratcheted up the controversy to an ear-splitting level when it announced a new product called Nucleus Embryo with a tweet that said: 'Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment.' Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment. Welcome to Nucleus — Nucleus Genomics (@nucleusgenomics) June 4, 2025 Nucleus says it can test IVF embryos not just for well-known specific genes that have a high chance of illnesses like breast cancer, but also for appearance — sex, height, hair color, eye color — as well as IQ and complex health attributes like anxiety and ADHD. The launch video includes a screen shot of a comparison menu. The idea is to help parents choose which embryos to pick and which ones to, perhaps, discard. Nucleus Genomics embryos features screen Image Credits:Nucleus Genomics (opens in a new window) Genetic testing of embryos isn't unheard of. IVF physicians can test for genes that can cause conditions like Down syndrome, or when parents know they are of high risk for a particular genetic disorder, like cystic fibrosis. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW But that's not exactly what Nucleus is doing. It is using controversial 'polygenic scores' to determine 'complex genetic outcomes, like intelligence and anxiety,' a spokesperson says. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, polygenic scores only calculate the probabilities of a certain complex illness occurring, mainly within populations. 'A polygenic risk score can only explain the relative risk for a disease,' the NHGR says. This is not the same as discovering a specific gene, such as for example the BRCA1 gene mutation, which gives a person a 60-80% 'absolute risk of breast cancer,' the NHGR says. There's a reason doctors don't typically use such tests for individuals. 'Polygenic risk scores are not yet routinely used by health professionals because there are no guidelines for practice and researchers are still improving how these scores are generated,' according to the NHGR. Nucleus defends that its method can be used to determine an individual's risk. The spokesperson pointed us to a 2018 paper where the authors said they had developed validated methods for five common diseases: coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast cancer. That paper was advocating screenings to help individuals make lifestyle or therapeutic decisions, similar to Nucleus's initial concept. Wednesday's tweet was promising parents that Nucleus can help them create designer babies. It has now been viewed more than 4 million times and has hundreds of comments, many of them either expressing disbelief that this works as promised, or horror at the idea. One VC chimed into the discussion saying, 'I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous.' I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous — Max Niederhofer ❤️🔥 (@maxniederhofer) June 5, 2025 Nucleus has experienced this kind of controversy before, as TechCrunch previously reported, when it its $14 million series A earlier this year. The startup is backed by Founders Fund, Alexis Ohanian's 776, and angels including Adrian Aoun (CEO at Forward Health), Brent Saunders (former CEO at Allergan), and Matteo Franceschetti (CEO at Eight Sleep). Last year, Sadeghi launched Nucleus IQ, which is supposed to tell users how much their genetics influence intelligence. The product was blasted as 'bad science and big business' by some critics. Sadeghi published a lengthy defense of his company's methodology. Even so, telling adults that they are genetically smart is one thing. Telling IVF parents that they can choose the appearance and other complex attributes for their children is, many would argue, something else. Nucleus is not currently conducting such tests via IVF lab partners itself, The Wall Street Journal reports. It's partnering with Genomic Prediction, which works with IVF clinics. A Genomic executive told the WSJ that many parents request intelligence tests, and it doesn't provide that. Parents can voluntarily upload genetic data information to Nucleas if they want to pursue it. Or, as Sadeghi said in the launch video aimed at would-be parents: 'Not that long ago IVF-1 sparked fear and the stigma of test tube babies,' he said. 'What was once controversial is now an everyday practice. The same is true with genetic optimization. The technology is now here and it's here to stay.'


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels break seasonal records: NOAA
Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide made history last month by climbing to their highest seasonal peak available in historical records, a team of researchers reported. For the first time ever, these levels surpassed 430 parts per million (ppm) at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, which is considered the global benchmark site for tracking atmospheric carbon dioxide. The 430.2 ppm calculation for May 2025 marked a 3.5 ppm increase over the previous May's reading of 426.7 ppm, according to scientists from the University of California San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who worked together with colleagues at NOAA. 'Another year, another record,' Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program, said in a statement. 'It's sad.' At an elevation of 11,141 feet above sea level, the observatory is located on the slopes of the Mauna Loa volcano and produces measurements that reflect the average state of the atmosphere for the northern hemisphere. Carbon dioxide, the scientists explained, acts like a blanket — trapping heat and warming the lower atmosphere, as well as altering weather patterns and fueling extreme weather events. The surge in CO2 concentrations is also contributing to acidification and causing changes in ocean chemistry that affect the survival of marine organisms, according to the researchers. A half-century of sampling at Mauna Loa, conducted by researchers at both NOAA and Scripps, have provided a baseline for tracking the increase of human-generated carbon emissions, the scientists noted. They acknowledged, however, that the station does not capture the full extent as to how carbon CO2 concentrations can vary across the planet — as stations in the Southern Hemisphere have yet to cross the 430-ppm threshold. NOAA's global sampling network, as well as 14 worldwide stations operated by the Scripps CO2 program, are also contributing to the broader planetary picture and helping identify locations of carbon sources and sinks, the researchers added.