&w=3840&q=100)
‘You buy Russian arms… stay in Brics bloc': US Secy looks rattled by India's defence, diplomatic policies
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has flagged India purchases of Russian military gear and membership of Brics and said that such activities 'get under the skin' of the United States are not 'the way to make friends'. read more
U.S. President Donald Trump holds an executive order about tariffs increase, flanked by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C. File image/ Reuters
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has outlined India's activities gets 'under the skin' of the United States.
Speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum in Washington DC, Lutnick flagged India's purchase of military gear from Russia and membership of Brics.
Lutnick said, 'There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America if you're going to buy your armaments from Russia.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As for the Brics, Lutnick said that the bloc's purported 'move to not support the dollar and dollar hegemony' is 'not really the way to make friends and influence people in America'.
#WATCH | Washington DC | US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick says, "...There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get… pic.twitter.com/CxoqRZQLJ2 — ANI (@ANI) June 3, 2025
For a long time, US President Donald Trump and his aides have criticised India for buying military equipment from other countries. They have also criticised Brics, which they accuse of trying to de-dollarise the world economy. India has repeatedly rejected the charge that Brics is working towards either de-dollarisation or floating any Brics-specific currency.
'I don't think there's any policy on our part to replace the dollar. As I said, at the end of the day, the dollar as the reserve currency is the source of international economic stability. And right now, what we want in the world is more economic stability, not less,' External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said in March.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In his remarks, Lutnick went on to say that the Trump administration and India are working to address the twin issues he flagged.
'The President calls that out directly and specifically, and the Indian government is addressing it specifically. And that's how you move on to a really positive place. Put it on the table, address it straight on, resolve it straight on and get to a really good place. And I think that's where we are,' said Lutnick.
As for ongoing trade talks between the two countries, Lutnick said that the trade deal could be finalised in the 'not-too-distant future'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India opposes ADB's $800mn loan to Pakistan
India opposed a move by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to grant a $800 million loan to Pakistan citing evidence of Islamabad diverting development funds for military use, and cautioned the bank about impending credit risks, two officials familiar with the matter said. India shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, particularly in light of Pakistan's increasing defence expenditure, its declining tax-to-GDP ratio, and the lack of demonstrable progress on key macroeconomic reforms, they added, requesting anonymity. India's strong opposition to ADB's financial aid to Pakistan came almost a month after New Delhi protested the International Monetary Fund's decision to provide a $2.3 billion bailout package to Islamabad, which saw IMF imposing about a dozen stringent conditions attached with the credit facility, making diversion of funds almost impossible. The IMF loan to Pakistan came in the midst of Operation Sindoor, India's direct military response to the April 22 terror strike at Pahalgam in Kashmir that killed 26 civilians in what was the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai strikes. India launched the operation in the early hours of May 7, bombing nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The pre-dawn strikes --- which killed at least 100 terrorists --- sparked four days of strikes and counterstrikes with fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery. Between the launch of the operation in the early hours of May 7 and the ceasefire on the evening of May 10, Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, and the IAF struck targets at 13 Pakistani air bases and military installations. According to a PTI report from Islamabad on Tuesday, ADB approved a $800 million loan to Pakistan for strengthening its fiscal sustainability and improving its public financial management. The credit package included a $300 million policy-based loan (PBL) and a $500 million programme-based guarantee (PBG), the report said. Reacting to this, New Delhi 'vehemently' opposed the move and shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, the officials cited above said. The linkage between Pakistan's increase in expenditure on its military, as opposed to on development, cannot be fully explained solely in terms of its domestic resource mobilization, they said. India highlighted that Pakistan's tax collection as a share of GDP declined from 13% in FY18 to 9.2% in FY23 and continues to remain way lower than the Asia and Pacific average of about 19%. However, there has been a significant increase in defence spending in the same period. This points to the possibility of diversion of funds made available to the country by external agencies, the officials explained. 'India expects the ADB management to adequately ring-fence the ADB financing, to prevent any such misuse,' one of them said. New Delhi questioned the management's argument that improvements were noticed in certain areas of reforms in Pakistan, and said that had the previous programs, funded both from ADB and the IMF, succeeded in putting in place a sound macroeconomic policy environment, the country would not have approached the IMF for the 24th bail-out program, this person added. 'Such a track record calls into question both the effectiveness of the program designs, their monitoring and their implementation by the authorities,' he said. Pakistan's poor track record of implementation stems from the military's deeply entrenched interference in economic affairs, posing risks of policy slippages and reversal of reforms as has been witnessed in the past, he added. Even when a civilian government is in power now, the army continues to play an outsized role in domestic politics and extends its tentacles deep into the economy. The situation has not changed for the better; rather the Pakistan Army now plays a leading role in the Special Investment Facilitation Council of Pakistan, he said. 'In fact, India expressed strong reservations about Pakistan's existing governance system, which poses a continuing severe threat to regional peace and security. The country's policy of cross-border terrorism has led to a worsening of the security situation in the region and has significantly escalated macroeconomic risks for Pakistan, which also heightens the enterprise risks for the ADB.' India expects the ADB to closely monitor the implementation of the policy matrix to achieve the intended outcomes, this official said. Pakistan's continued reliance on external debt raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of future exposures, especially in view of the high debt-to-GDP ratio and poor credit rating of the country, he added.
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
China's rare earth magnet policy: Foreign auto firms win export approvals, their Indian units are kept on hold
New Delhi/Mumbai: India's auto industry has flagged to the government that while China is approving rare earth magnet exports to other countries, applications from India remain stuck, said three industry executives in the know. As a result, India's production of conventional and electric vehicles could be hit as early as this month if China doesn't resume exports of its rare earth magnets to the country soon, auto industry representatives told the secretary of the ministry of heavy industries on 29 May. China has a near monopoly on rare earth magnets, which are essential for manufacturing electric-vehicle motors and other auto components. Representatives from several automotive companies and two industry bodies told the secretary that while foreign units of multinational auto component companies were receiving approvals for rare earth magnet shipments from China, their Indian subsidiaries were still awaiting approvals, according to three industry executives. While the industry body did not name any companies at the meeting, Mint has learned thatGermany-headquarteredBosch, Continental Automotive, and Mahle Group have received approvals for their foreign units but their applications from India are yet to be accepted. 'A supplier's German or US counterpart is getting approvals, but the same supplier's Indian unit is not getting it," said one of the three industry executives cited above. 'There are no written guidelines for applying for a licence. So, something or the other can be missed and they (China) can stop the approval for any flimsy reason." With rare earth magnet exports from China to India stalled, both conventional and electric vehicle production are at risk of slowdown. Major auto players have warned that disruptions could halt production as early as this month. A delegation of industry representatives is ready to head to China, with visas approved for some of them. However, the Chinese commerce ministry hasn't given an official appointment for a meeting, said thesecond of the three executivescited above. The Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA) and the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), whose representatives were present at the 29 May meeting, the heavy industries ministry, and Mahle did not respond to Mint's emails seeking comment. Bosch and Continental declined to comment. Earlier in May, auto industry representatives rushed to the Prime Minister's office and the commerce ministry over concerns that disruptions in the supply of rare earth magnets from China could potentially bring their production lines to a stop. Last week, Bajaj Auto Ltd warned that its production would be severely affected if Chinese restrictions on rare earth magnets are not eased by July. Also read | China's restriction on rare earth magnets repel Indian EV players No immediate alternatives About 30 Indian companies have submitted applications to Chinese authorities for rare earth magnets. None has been approved so far. Two of these applications have been rejected, said asecond industry executive, adding that the rejections cited incorrect documentation. Rare earth elements are a group of 17 silvery white metals like neodymium, gadolinium, dysprosium, and terbium. These are crucial for manufacturing motors used in electric vehicles, electronics, medical devices, and military hardware. China controls over 90% of the global supply of these elements. An executive leading an EV motor manufacturing company in India said his application for importing rare earth magnets remains pending with the Chinese foreign ministry. The company's vendor in China helped file all necessary documentation for the application and is awaiting a response from Chinese authorities, without which it cannot ship even samples, the executive said. At the 29 May meeting with the heavy industries secretary, the domestic auto industry also explored alternative solutions to the problem, including building motors that do not use rare-earth magnets. However, these are long-term solutions as taking any new technology to production could take at least two years, the industry executives cited above said. The only viable alternative is to import aggregate parts like entire motors from China instead of importing just the magnets, they added. There are no restrictions on the export of parts containing rare-earth magnets from China. 'Frankly there is no alternate solution right now except importing the higher-level aggregates. But if larger aggregates are imported, 'Make-in-India' will be hurt," said the first executive quoted above. 'China is weaponizing trade. The government now needs to find a diplomatic solution behind closed doors." Also read | Automakers race to find workaround to China's stranglehold on rare earth magnets Analysts at investment banking firm Jefferies said in a note dated 21 May that while importing motors from China was a solution, automakers would need to realign their supply chains and vehicles might require fresh homologation approvals. Homologation is the approval process for a vehicle to ensure that it meets the technical standards of a country. Import of the entire motor could also reduce domestic value addition, which is a requirement for claiming benefits under the government's production-linked incentives scheme, the Jefferies analysts noted. Rajat Mahajan, partner and automotive sector leader at Deloitte India, said the situation needs to be resolved through diplomatic channels. 'This situation will hopefully get resolved via diplomatic channels. But if it continues then we may see a shift towards other powertrains for large OEMs (original equipment manufacturers)," he said.
New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Conflicting words: Bengalureans opine on actor Kamal Haasan's language remark
This controversy seems more like a politically-motivated stunt orchestrated by certain parties in Karnataka. Kamal Haasan has made immense contributions to Indian cinema – not just to Tamil cinema, he has seen himself as an Indian artiste. In fact, Mani Ratnam's first film was in Kannada, Pallavi Anu Pallavi (1983) and both he and Haasan have consistently expressed their love and respect for the Kannada language and its people. This controversy appears to be a deliberate attempt by some politicians to create unnecessary division. He absolutely does not need to apologise for a misunderstanding. Haasan has already clarified his intention and statement — an apology is unnecessary. Yes, there may be financial losses in crores, but he has taken a principled stance, and that's a risk he is willing to take. This controversy is likely to backfire — it's a significant loss for the Karnataka theatre associations. Moreover, it could strain the relationship between the Tamil and Kannada film industries.
