Adidas-Puma family feud to be featured in TV series set in Germany
Hollywood-based film producer No Fat Ego is backing the project, which has the blessing of the family behind the Adidas empire founded by Adolf "Adi" Dassler.
It will delve into one of the most fascinating fraternal blow-ups in corporate history, which pitted Adi against his brother Rudolf ("Rudi") who went on to create rival Puma.
The two men jointly ran a family-owned footwear company before falling out during World War II, with their post-conflict animus splitting their town of Herzogenaurach to this day.
Scriptwriter Mark Williams, behind the hit Netflix series "Ozark", has been hired to lead the project and is currently going through Dassler family home videos and memorabilia to work on the story.
"Everybody knows the brands, but the story behind them is something we don't really fully know," Williams told AFP at the Cannes film festival.
One of the most sensitive areas -- particularly for the reputations of the multi-billion-dollar footwear companies today -- will be how the brothers are portrayed during the war period.
Both became members of the Nazi party in the 1930s, as was customary for the business elite at the time.
READ ALSO:
How is Germany responding to Kanye West's 'Heil Hitler' single?
Rudi went to fight, however, and was arrested by Allied forces on his return to a defeated Germany.
"Adi stayed home and tried to keep the company alive," Williams added.
Their factory was seized as part of the war effort and converted into a munitions plant.
The series promises to be a "Succession-type drama between the family" set over several generations, Williams explained, comparing it to the earlier hit HBO series.
Hollywood backing
The head of No Fat Ego, Niels Juul, who has produced Martin Scorsese's most recent movies, said he was originally drawn to the story after learning about the Dassler brothers' collaboration with legendary black American runner Jesse Owens.
Advertisement
Partly thanks to their innovative spiked shoes, Owens became one of the stars of the 1936 Berlin Olympics which Hitler had hoped would showcase white German supremacy.
No Fat Ego intends to develop the series with full editorial independence before offering it to streaming platforms.
"We want to have the creative control, and Mark has to have absolute silence and quiet to do what he does," Juul told AFP.
READ ALSO:
German sportswear giants Adidas and Puma weighing job cuts
Adidas drops Bella Hadid from campaign over Gaza controversy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
NATO in Transition - A Year with the Soldiers – DW – 06/06/2025
Are the German armed forces prepared for the challenges of the future? With the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, German defense policy arrived at a so-called "turning point'. But can it succeed? Image: SWR The German army is facing enormous challenges: It has too few personnel, too little equipment, too little budget. And, for many years, it was not geared towards the kind of war for which it must now prepare. Image: SWR Namely, a possible defensive war within its own national borders, as well as the capacity to fight alongside NATO partners in the event of an attack on a NATO member. Image: SWR The film explores this dramatic upheaval, from the perspective of the people who must shoulder the task of "national and alliance defense' in their everyday lives, within their units. Image: SWR Yannick recently started training in a new tank. Samira is a recruit - one of a group the German army is desperately looking for. Andreas pilots a 30-year-old reconnaissance aircraft along NATO's eastern border. Image: SWR Joachim is a lecturer and is supposed to make sure that his soldiers understand what this "turning point' means for them. Three male soldiers and one female soldier are the focus of this film. Broadcasting Hours: DW English FRI 13.06.2025 – 01:15 UTC FRI 13.06.2025 – 04:15 UTC SAT 14.06.2025 – 13:15 UTC SUN 15.06.2025 – 19:15 UTC MON 16.06.2025 – 09:15 UTC MON 16.06.2025 – 16:15 UTC MON 16.06.2025 – 21:15 UTC WED 18.06.2025 – 12:15 UTC Lagos UTC +1 | Cape Town UTC +2 | Nairobi UTC +3 Delhi UTC +5,5 | Bangkok UTC +7 | Hong Kong UTC +8 London UTC +1 | Berlin UTC +2 | Moscow UTC +3 San Francisco UTC -7 | Edmonton UTC -6 | New York UTC -4
DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Berlin pays tribute to Christo's iconic 'Wrapped Reichstag' – DW – 06/06/2025
Thirty years ago, Germany's parliament building "disappeared" under silver fabric for two weeks. The work of art by Christo and Jeanne-Claude is now celebrated with a light installation. Anyone who was in Berlin in the summer of 1995 will probably remember it for the rest of their lives: how the Reichstag — the seat of the German parliament — disappeared. Not blown up, not demolished, but completely wrapped in silver fabric and tied up with thick ropes, almost like a gift. A crazy idea? Perhaps. But also one that made history. Behind this spectacular action was a pair of artists who have repeatedly surprised the world with their ephemeral mega works of art: Christo and Jeanne-Claude. Their vision of a wrapped Reichstag was big, bold — and took 23 years to plan. 2025: A special anniversary year 2025 is a real anniversary year for fans of Christo and Jeanne-Claude. Not only is Berlin marking the 30th anniversary of the "Wrapped Reichstag" with a light installation projected onto the west façade of the Reichstag building from June 9 to 22, but other cities around the world are also paying tribute to the couple's works: Paris commemorates the wrapping of its Pont Neuf that happened 40 years ago, while New York marked the 20th anniversary of "The Gates," an installation in Central Park featuring thousands of gates on which fabric panels fluttered. And above all, both artists would have turned 90 this year: They were born on the same day, on June 13, 1935. Christo was born in Bulgaria and later fled from the communist East to Western Europe, first to Prague, then to Vienna, Geneva and finally Paris. There he met Jeanne-Claude in 1958 — she was French with roots in Morocco. The two became an unbeatable team. Christo was the artist, Jeanne-Claude the organizer — whereby both saw themselves as equal partners and later officially signed all projects together. After 23 years of planning, Christo and Jeanne-Claude's dream became a reality Image: 1995 Christo and Jeanne-Claude Foundation, Photo: Wolfgang Volz Their specialty was huge, spectacular art installations in public spaces. They wrapped bridges, buildings or entire coastal strips, stretched gigantic curtains through valleys or erected kilometer-long fabric installations. None of it permanent, all self-financed, without advertisers or sponsors; the money for the projects was only generated through the sale of drawings, collages and designs. 'Wrapped Reichstag': A long wait for approval The idea of wrapping the Reichstag in Berlin was born back in 1971 — in the middle of the Cold War. At the time, the Reichstag stood right next to the Berlin Wall. It was a symbolic building, but was not actually used. The seat of government of the then Federal Republic of Germany was still in Bonn, and the Bundestag (the German parliament) only moved into the Reichstag building with its characteristic glass dome, remodeled by architect Norman Foster, in 1999. In 1978, Christo presented the model of the wrapped Reichstag at an exhibition in Zurich Image: Niklaus Stauss/akg/picture-alliance Christo and Jeanne-Claude were nevertheless fascinated by the building's symbolism and historical role. Time and again, this place has been the scene of significant moments in Germany's history, during the German Empire, the Weimar Republic, the Nazis' "Third Reich" and the Second World War, the division of Germany after the war and its eventual reunification. Christo and Jeanne-Claude wanted to make this building visible again by concealing it for a brief period. But a work of art like this required permission — and that took a long time coming. It was not until 1994, after more than 20 years of discussion, that the Bundestag finally gave its approval, following vigorous debate. And this paved the way to one of the most impressive art projects of the century. The then President of the Bundestag, Rita Süssmuth, supported the project Image: Jockel Finck/AP Photo/picture alliance Summer 1995: A silver dream in the middle of Berlin Finally, in June 1995, the Reichstag was completely wrapped in over 100,000 square meters of silver fabric and 16 kilometers of rope. The wrapping lasted several days and was followed around the world. The wrapped Reichstag appeared soft, shimmering, mysterious, like a work of art amid clouds. From June 24 to July 7, 1995, over 5 million people came to Berlin to witness this spectacle with their own eyes. It was like a huge public festival: People were lying on the grass, having picnics, taking photos and discussing it. Many people who experienced the work later said that they had never viewed the Reichstag as intensely as during these two weeks. A tourist magnet in the summer of 1995 Image: 1995 Christo and Jeanne-Claude Foundation, Photo: Wolfgang Volz Why wrap it at all? Christo and Jeanne-Claude didn't set out to hide a building — quite the opposite. They wanted to give it a new experience. The wrapping removed everything superficial. You could no longer see the details, only the shape, the silhouette, the volume. And most importantly, this work of art was also ephemeral. After two weeks, the magic was over, the fabric was dismantled, and no trace remained. Only memories. For the artist couple, this ephemerality was a central part of their work. "The beauty lies in transience," they often said. You should enjoy the moment because you know it will soon be over. Although the Reichstag is a political symbol, the artwork itself was not intended to be political. Christo and Jeanne-Claude did not want to dictate an opinion. They wanted their art to be an open space for thoughts, feelings and interpretations. Nevertheless, many people saw the wrapping as a strong political symbol: for change, for reconciliation, for a new beginning. This had a special effect, especially in reunified Germany. From June 9 to 20, 2025 the artwork will be projected onto the west façade of the Reichstag in the evening Image: Jens Kalaene/dpa/picture alliance Jeanne-Claude died in 2009,Christo in 2020, but their art lives on — in photos, memories, exhibitions and now also in a special anniversary year. The wrapping of the Reichstag was not only a masterpiece of logistics and aesthetics, it was also a moment of collective fascination. It showed what art can achieve in public spaces. It can surprise, connect, challenge. And it can simply amaze people. Or, as Christo once said: "Our works belong to no one — and at the same time to everyone." This article was originally written in German.
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Is podcast authenticity overrated—or essential?
The word "authenticity" gets tossed around with fervor as a way to connect with audiences and grow your show – "Be yourself!" or "Find your voice!" But what does authenticity actually mean? And does it really matter? For many podcasters and producers, authenticity is seen as a key ingredient in connecting with listeners. The authoritative, slightly formal, calm and measured style of classic news presenters like Walter Cronkite in the US or [insert name of famous TV or radio news reader of decades past here] are over – no longer to contemporary audiences' taste. When people hear a story that's unfiltered and sincere, the thinking goes, they're more likely to invest their time and stay loyal to the show. According to a 2023 article from Podium titled "Authenticity in Podcasting: Building Genuine Connections with Listeners," audiences are more likely to develop trust in a host who appears flawed, relatable and emotionally available – provided it feels sincere. The article noted that hosts who share not just content but context (why this story matters to them) tend to build stronger listener relationships. "Sharing behind-the-scenes content, discussing the podcasting journey, challenges faced, or personal anecdotes can humanize the podcast," the article read. "It reminds listeners that there's a real person with genuine emotions and experiences behind the microphone, fostering deeper empathy and connection." "Indeed, a sense of authenticity can be the secret sauce in making a podcast feel human," said Amanda McLoughlin, co-founder of Multitude Productions, a Brooklyn-based podcast collective. "But it's also one of the hardest things to fake – listeners can sniff it out a mile away." Listeners these days want to feel connected to hosts, and authenticity helps that happen Image: Zoonar II/IMAGO Faking it What insiders warn against is turning vulnerability to a marketing gimmick, the cringey phenomenon of "fake authenticity." This ranges from overproduced vulnerability, overly casual banter or confessional monologues that feel performative, not personal. And, consider if that kind of vibe is what your podcast even needs? If your show is about stock trends, baring your soul every week might not make sense. Podcast coach and strategist Eric Nuzum, co-founder of Magnificent Noise, former VP for programming at NPR, and author of The Audio Insurgent newsletter, put it this way: 'Authenticity isn't about telling your deepest secrets. It's about being consistent, showing up in your audience's feed with a voice that they recognize and trust." The line between authenticity and artificiality is a fine one. One person who did it well is child actor turned book author turned podcaster Jennette McCurdy. Her podcast Hard Feelings, which produced new episodes until Feb. 2024, intentionally leaned into emotional complexity. In an interview with Teen Vogue, McCurdy described the goal as "creating space where messiness isn't just tolerated but expected. It's about allowing for complexity, not just performance." So does that mean you don't need planning or any kind of script, just a microphone and raw emotion? Australian audio producer Chris Marsh has worked behind the scenes of the radio and podcasts of the comedy duo of Hamish & Andy for more than 15 years. He told the PodCircle that authenticity wasn't about chaos or lack of prep. "We do a lot of work behind the scenes – reading thousands of listener emails, planning meetings, testing ideas," he said. "The trick is creating space for spontaneity," he said. Being authentic doesn't mean improvisation. Marsh likes to plan spontaneity into shows Image: Blend Images/Strauss/Curtis/picture alliance One of the things that has kept Hamish & Andy popular since transitioning from radio to podcasting is their consistent commitment to their audience. Early in their career, they dubbed their show "The People's Show," a philosophy that Marsh says still drives their choices: "We make our listeners the stars of the show. We involve them, we meet them, we read their emails. That kind of connection keeps the show grounded." This echoes what many successful podcasters have discovered: authenticity isn't just about what happens behind the mic—it's about the entire listener relationship. So that means in addition to Nuzum's advice to hosts to "talk to one listener," hosts also need to make sure those listeners feel part of a community they've built. A fine line So how do podcasters find this elusive balance between "real" and "faked" authenticity? For McLoughlin, it depends on what works for the person behind the mic. "Some people need a script, others need an outline, and some need to riff. The question is, what gets you into that zone where you sound most like yourself?" Marsh offers this advice: "Don't try to bend yourself to fit a show. Make the show you actually want to make." Ultimately, authenticity in podcasting is not a one-size-fits-all concept. It's a mix of tone, consistency, vulnerability and trust. It's about putting in the work to sound effortless, about being generous with your listeners, and about allowing your show to evolve while remaining true to its mission. So is authenticity overrated? Not if it's real or if it's earned. And it can make the difference in whether someone decides to listen again.
