Donald Trump's Reported Reaction To Elon Musk Apology
There's an update on Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship after Elon apologized for the inflammatory tweets he posted.
In case you somehow missed it, the two recently clashed over Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which Elon slammed for potentially increasing the national debt and undermining his work at DOGE. He further called it "a disgusting abomination" on X, setting off a war of words between him and Trump that saw Elon taking credit for the results of the 2024 election and alleging that Trump is "in the [Jeffrey] Epstein files," which is "the real reason they have not been made public."
Trump denied the claim by resharing a Truth Social post from Epstein's lawyer, who said he "had no information to hurt President Trump."
After Elon expressed regret for some of the tweets, the White House said Trump was thankful and "appreciative" of his apology — however, it sounds like he's certainly not forgiving or forgetting, as a source tells People the two remain on "so far from good terms."
"Nobody trusts you again after you go that nuclear," a source said.
A separate source echoed those comments, saying Trump and Elon's relationship has gone from "love to transactional" to now one of "pure avoidance."
"And Trump doesn't forget," the insider shared. "He may say something acceptable for public consumption, but after what Elon wrote on social media, and despite his apology, Trump's relationship with Musk will never again be the same."
Oof. Well, Trump and Elon have yet to comment on the report, but BuzzFeed has contacted their reps for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Eyeing New Trade Deals at Critical G7 Summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump is set to arrive in the Canadian Rockies late Sunday evening for the Group of Seven (G7) summit, expressing optimism about potential trade agreements and dealmaking as world leaders prepare to address escalating global tensions. The gathering in Kananaskis, Alberta, will bring together leaders of the world's largest economies amid an increasingly volatile international landscape. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters This G7 summit represents a critical test of international cooperation as leaders confront multiple crises simultaneously. The gathering comes at a pivotal moment when global trade relationships, Middle East stability, and international security concerns intersect, potentially reshaping diplomatic alliances and economic partnerships. What To Know "I think we'll have a few new trade deals," Trump told reporters at the White House on Sunday as he departed for the summit. The summit agenda encompasses a broad range of pressing issues, including fairness in global trade, critical minerals access, illegal migration, drug smuggling, and international security. However, the gathering is overshadowed by escalating conflict between Israel and Iran following Israel's surprise attack on Iranian leadership and nuclear facilities last week. Trump's trade ambitions at the G7 come against the backdrop of his administration's struggling "90 deals in 90 days" promise. Announced in April alongside sweeping tariffs, the initiative has yielded only two agreements so far—with the UK and China—far short of the ambitious 90-deal target before the July 9 deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that the administration would likely extend the 90-day pause on tariff implementation to allow more time for negotiations with trading partners acting "in good faith." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has made the unprecedented decision to abandon the annual practice of issuing a joint communique at the summit's conclusion, reflecting the challenging diplomatic climate. The summit risks becoming a series of bilateral conversations rather than a unified display of international cooperation. Trump's inflammatory threats to make Canada the "51st state" and take over Greenland loom over the proceedings. French President Emmanuel Macron made a symbolic stop in Greenland on Sunday, declaring that the territory is "not to be sold" nor "to be taken." Other invited leaders from India, Ukraine, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, Australia, Mexico, and the UAE will be focused on avoiding potential U.S. tariffs. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Middle East tensions: "Sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens. I think there's a good chance there will be a deal." French President Emmanuel Macron on Greenland: "Everybody in France, the European Union thinks that Greenland is not to be sold, not to be taken. The situation in Greenland is clearly a wakeup call for all Europeans." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Canada's sovereignty: "Canada is an independent, sovereign country and a much-valued member of the Commonwealth." Former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien on Trump's approach: "He tends to be a bully. If Trump has decided to make a show to be in the news, he will do something crazy. Let him do it and keep talking normally." President Donald Trump, from right, speaks with reporters as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt listen before departing the White House on his way to attend... President Donald Trump, from right, speaks with reporters as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt listen before departing the White House on his way to attend the G7 Summit in Canada, Sunday, June 15, 2025, in Washington. More AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta What Happens Next The summit officially begins Monday with Trump's bilateral meeting with Carney, followed by multilateral discussions throughout the week. World leaders will navigate complex negotiations on trade agreements while addressing the Israel-Iran crisis and surging oil prices. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
29Metals Limited (ASX:29M) has caught the attention of institutional investors who hold a sizeable 41% stake
Significantly high institutional ownership implies 29Metals' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you want to know who really controls 29Metals Limited (ASX:29M), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 41% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of 29Metals, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for 29Metals Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. We can see that 29Metals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at 29Metals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in 29Metals. The company's largest shareholder is PT Buma Internasional Grup Tbk, with ownership of 19%. EMR Capital Advisors Pty Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Australian Super Pty Ltd holds about 15% of the company stock. A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in 29Metals Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$295m, and insiders have AU$3.1m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. With an ownership of 7.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public. We can see that Private Companies own 4.7%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. Public companies currently own 22% of 29Metals stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for 29Metals (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump told Israel not to kill Iran's supreme leader
US President Donald Trump rejected a plan by Israel to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, three US officials have told BBC's US partner CBS News. Trump reportedly told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that assassinating Khamenei was not a good idea, according to one official. The president has not commented publicly on the report. The conversation is said to have happened since Israel launched its attack on Iran on Friday. During an interview with Fox News, Netanyahu did not directly confirm or deny a report from Reuters that Trump had vetoed a plan to kill the ayatollah. "There's so many false reports of conversations that never happened and I'm not going to get into that," the Israeli prime minister said. "But I can tell you I think we do what we need to do. We will do what we need to do and I think the United States knows what is good for the United States and I'm just not going to get into it." An Israeli official told CBS News that "in principle," Israel does not "kill political leaders, we are focused on nuclear and military. I don't think anyone making decisions about those programs should be living free and easy." Israel first launched an attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure and other targets on Friday. Iran later confirmed the head of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) intelligence unit, Mohammad Kazemi, had been killed, alongside a deputy and another commander. The two countries have continued to launch massive strikes at each other since, with attacks entering a third day on Sunday. In his latest post on Truth Social about the escalating situation in the Middle East, Trump said "Iran and Israel should make a deal", adding that he would get the two to cease hostilities "just like I got India and Pakistan" - referring to the recent confrontation between the countries. In a separate post on Saturday, the president said the US "had nothing to do with the attack on Iran". "If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before," he warned.
