Calgary's political earthquake? Liberals bet on Carney Effect to shatter Conservative dominance
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A seismic shift may be underway in Calgary 's political landscape as the Liberal Party, buoyed by the arrival of Mark Carney , mounts an audacious challenge to the city's long-standing Conservative dominance.Once dismissed as a pipe dream, the prospect of multiple Liberal seats in this traditionally blue bastion is now a tangible possibility, sparking intense scrutiny and strategic maneuvering from all sides.The catalyst for this potential upheaval is the "Carney effect." The former Bank of Canada governor's leadership has injected new energy into the Liberal campaign, erasing the "fear factor" that previously plagued the party in Alberta.Candidates like Lindsay Luhnau, initially reluctant to run under Justin Trudeau's banner, now find themselves leading competitive races in toss-up ridings like Calgary Centre.The Liberals' strategic gamble hinges on exploiting divisions within the Conservative ranks and attracting moderate voters disillusioned by Pierre Poilievre 's populist style.In Calgary Centre, incumbent Conservative Greg McLean, known for his moderate stance, is conspicuously distancing himself from the national campaign, highlighting the internal tension within the party.Meanwhile, in Calgary Confederation and Skyview, the Conservatives are grappling with nomination controversies and infighting, creating openings for the Liberals' Corey Hogan and Hafeez Malik.These ridings, along with George Chahal's defense of Calgary McKnight, have become battlegrounds, attracting significant attention and resources from both parties.The Liberals' aggressive campaign, featuring high-profile endorsements and strategic messaging, is forcing the Conservatives to divert resources from other battleground regions.Veteran Conservatives, typically deployed to swing ridings in other provinces, are now campaigning in Calgary, a testament to the perceived threat.However, historical precedent and deeply ingrained political loyalties remain formidable obstacles. Calgary's staunch Conservative identity, rooted in decades of political tradition, presents a significant challenge for the Liberals.The city's electorate, historically resistant to Liberal overtures, requires a near-perfect alignment of factors for a red surge to materialize.The NDP, despite its provincial success, faces an uphill battle in the federal contest, with polls indicating a significant decline in support.This has led to strategic voting considerations, particularly in Confederation, where the non-Conservative vote could prove decisive.The Liberals' ambitious pursuit of four seats in Calgary, a feat that would double the party's historical best, is a high-stakes gamble.A victory would not only reshape the city's political landscape but also signal a broader shift in Alberta's political identity.As the election's final week unfolds, the battle for Calgary intensifies, with both parties deploying their resources and rhetoric to sway undecided voters.The outcome will determine whether the Liberal's calculated risk pays off, potentially rewriting the political narrative of a city long considered a Conservative stronghold.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration gives personal data of immigrant medicaid enrollees to deportation officials
US President Donald Trump 's administration this week provided deportation officials with personal data, including the immigration status, on millions of Medicaid enrollees, a move that could make it easier to locate people as part of his sweeping immigration crackdown. An internal memo and emails obtained by The Associated Press show that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully sought to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. Nevertheless, two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr ordered the dataset handed over to the Department of Homeland Security , the emails show. Officials at the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the directive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo The dataset includes the information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, DC, all of which allow non-US citizens to enrol in Medicaid programmes that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. CMS transferred the information just as the Trump administration was ramping up its enforcement efforts in Southern California. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Besides helping authorities locate migrants, experts said, the government could also use the information to scuttle the hopes of migrants seeking green cards, permanent residency or citizenship if they had ever obtained Medicaid benefits funded by the federal government. Live Events You Might Also Like: Nationwide protests erupt in the US over ICE raids as Trump deploys troops, plans military parade California Governor Gavin Newsom's office said in a statement that it was concerned about how deportation officials might utilise the data, especially as federal authorities conduct immigration raids with the assistance of National Guard troops and Marines in Los Angeles. "We deeply value the privacy of all Californians," the statement said. "This potential data transfer brought to our attention by the AP is extremely concerning, and if true, potentially unlawful, particularly given numerous headlines highlighting potential improper federal use of personal information and federal actions to target the personal information of Americans." Some California lawmakers on Friday also expressed alarm. US Rep. Laura Friedman, a Democrat, wrote on X that "we should never use a person's need to go to the doctor against them. This will only lead to more chaos and pain in our communities". US Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the data sharing was legal. He declined to answer questions about why the data was shared with DHS and how it would be used. You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban in effect, citizens from 12 nations barred from US "With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority -- and in full compliance with all applicable laws -- to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them," Nixon said. An official with DHS, Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, said in a statement that Trump "promised to protect Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries. To keep that promise after Joe Biden flooded our country with tens of millions of illegal aliens CMS and DHS are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans". The initiative appears to be part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to provide DHS with more data on migrants. In May, for example, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help agents locate and detain people living without legal status in the US. A targeted review of millions of immigrant Medicaid enrollees CMS announced late last month that it was reviewing some state's Medicaid enrollees to ensure federal funds have not been used to pay for coverage for people with "unsatisfactory immigration status". In a letter sent to state Medicaid officials, CMS said that the effort was part of Trump 's February 19 executive order titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidisation of Open Border". As part of the review, California, Washington and Illinois shared details about non-US citizens who have enrolled in their states' Medicaid programme, according to a June 6 memo signed by Medicaid Deputy Director Sara Vitolo that was obtained by the AP. The memo was written by several CMS officials under Vitolo's supervision, according to sources familiar with the process. The data includes addresses, names, social security numbers and claims data for enrollees in those states, according to the memo and two people familiar with what the states sent to CMS. Both individuals spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to share details about the data exchange. CMS officials attempted to fight the data-sharing request from Homeland Security, saying that to do so would violate federal laws, including the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act of 1974, according to Vitolo's memo. "Multiple federal statutory and regulatory authorities do not permit CMS to share this information with entities outside of CMS," Vitolo wrote, further explaining that the sharing of such personal data is only allowed for directly administering the Medicaid programme. Sharing information about Medicaid applicants or enrollees with DHS officials would violate a "long-standing policy", wrote Vitolo, a career employee, to Trump appointee Kim Brandt, deputy administrator and chief operating officer of CMS.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘It's our responsibility to apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre': UK MP Bob Blackman
Bob Blackman, a five-time Conservative MP from Harrow East, London says it is the responsibility of the UK government to apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Punjab's Amritsar on April 13, 1919. In an interview with The Indian Express via web conferencing, Blackman also accepts the presence Khalistani separatists in UK, but adds that are a small minority. Excerpts: Time and again, you have demanded from successive governments in your country that the UK must apologize to India for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. As a Britisher, why do you feel that the apology must come? What came as an eye-opener for me was a visit to the (Jallianwala) Bagh in Amritsar. Of course, we can talk about the massacre, about terrible events that took place, from afar but I have to confess, I was ignorant about several things before I actually visited the Bagh. And when you see the site of the massacre, where those innocent people had gathered on the auspicious day of Baisakhi, just to be with family and friends– you realize how tragic it was. They were not a threat to anyone. And then, the troops marched in, literally shooting at them till they ran out of ammunition. For us, as Britishers, to pretend that it never happened, is not right. So why do you think that despite your repeated demand, the apology hasn't come even after more than a century. I led a debate on the centenary of the massacre in our Parliament in 2019, urging the then government to issue an apology to India. The then PM, Theresa May, 'regretted' the massacre and called it a 'shameful scar' in British-India history but stopped short of issuing a formal apology which I think was extremely regrettable. Had we apologized then, it would have been far better. I reiterated that demand earlier this year as well on the massacre's 106th anniversary. Whatever wrong things were done in the name of the British Empire around the world, they should be apologized for. We can't be responsible for actions taken by our forebears, but what we can do is to say, look, it was wrong, and we are sorry. So what convinces you to consistently ask your own country for an apology to India even as it hasn't happened yet? Is it some guilt as a Britisher? No, I don't carry any guilt as I wasn't the one to order that firing. But I do not feel any hesitation in saying that what was done was wrong, absolutely wrong, it should not have been done and we should apologize. It is equally regrettable to see the length of time that it has taken to drag out an apology, given the huge number of people who lost their lives. At the Bagh, when you see that well, where so many people jumped inside to escape firing, you realize it was a terrible way to die. So for me, it's not a feeling of guilt, this is our responsibility. It was one of those incidents that if you don't apologize, it will continue to be a running sore. We can't bring those people back but can say that what happened to them was utterly wrong. Coming to the recent developments between India and Pakistan, you met the Indian Parliamentarians' delegation post Operation Sindoor. Your views on the meeting. We absolutely condemn the heartrending terrorist attack that took place in Pahalgam. We were given to understand that India's recent military action against terror bases in Pakistan was not just about Pahalgam, but several terrorist attacks that have taken place in the past. The sad reality however is, that no one's quite sure of who's incharge in Pakistan, whether it's their so-called elected government or their generals and military who seem to be literally calling the shots. It was made clear to us by the visiting delegation that India is, and will react proportionally to the attacks from the Pakistani side, if any. So what do you think Pakistan can do to stop fostering terrorism on its soil? First, Pakistan should remove the terror bases that exist along the line of control, whether for training terrorists or facilitating the entry of terrorists into sovereign India. It is pretty clear that Pakistan is, at the very least, not just tolerating the terrorist camps, but probably almost certainly encouraging them, because anything that destabilizes India seems to be good news for Pakistan, which I think is regrettable. Equally, there are reports of Pakistan linked terrorists tunneling into the Kashmir Valley. Pakistan has even attacked in the Punjab and the Indian forces had to thwart attacks on the Golden Temple, for example, which is a direct threat to religious places of worship, which is outrageous. The second thing that Pakistan can do is to withdraw their military forces from Jammu and Kashmir, end the illegal occupation and allow it to be part of India, as was always intended back in 1947. The US President, Donald Trump, has been regularly trying to portray that he was the one who got this ceasefire done, whereas India has denied that and they said that it was Pakistan, which had requested the ceasefire. Your comments. As we know, the Americans have been strong supporters of Pakistan for quite a long time. Indeed, during the Bangladesh war of independence 1971, the Americans were on the Pakistani side. I think India takes a very strong stance on these things and quite rightly so. India has suffered at hands of terrorism and was going to make sure that the terrorists understood that they will not be allowed to gain ground, they will not be allowed to terrify the people of Kashmir and there would be grave consequences of any such act in future. I know that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has built a good relationship with the Americans, quite rightly too, that's good news for India. It's good news for world trade. And indeed, we want India to be part of the democracies of the world that encourage justice and peace. But I think we should be very clear that the initiative for a ceasefire came from Pakistan, not from India. Because basically India was saying, if you attack us, we're going to attack you back, but we are not going to be the aggressors. The separatist Khalistani elements have been flourishing on UK soil. India has raised this several times. Your take. Yes. And I've called them out. We've had these pro-Khalistan demonstrations outside the Indian High Commission in London. And indeed, when Prime Minister Modi or other key visitors from India have been on official visits to the UK, there have been such demonstrations. But this is a very small minority. I think we should be very clear that in the UK, the vast majority of British Sikhs do not agree with a so-called independent Khalistan. The vast majority of Sikhs are loyal to Britain now and indeed maintain their loyalty to India and don't want to see this misguided campaign. I've called on the police to take firm action outside the Indian High Commission when Khalistanis have demonstrated. I've called them out for what they are, thugs and potentially terrorists. And we need to ensure that the police and the security services take every action necessary to ensure they can't cause problems. There's nothing wrong with people demonstrating peacefully on what they have to say as long as they're not causing criminal damage or intimidating people.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Swiggy Drops ‘Dilli Se Hu BLCK' Newspaper Ad. No, The Internet Isn't Laughing
Last Updated: Swiggy made a high-profile announcement on the front page of a leading newspaper to mark One BLCK's arrival in the national capital. It has been almost half a year since Swiggy launched One BLCK, its exclusive, invitation-only premium membership offering a range of perks on deliveries, dining and more. Now, as the food delivery giant expands the service to Delhi, the move has sparked criticism from many quarters. Swiggy recently made a high-profile announcement on the front page of a leading newspaper to mark One BLCK's arrival in the national capital, only to face immediate backlash from the public. What caught everyone's attention was a bold phrase that read, 'Dilli Se Hu BLCK," suggestively mimicking a popular Hindi slang. Notorious advertising, allowed on the front page of a prestigious newspaper. This is a play on an abusive slang. Amazing how all this is cool and normalised. @Swiggy @EconomicTimes. — Sanket Upadhyay (@sanket) June 12, 2025 Journalist Sanket Upadhyay shared the same on his X (formerly known as Twitter) handle, calling out the advertisement as 'notorious." Along with the pictures of the newspaper, Sanket wrote, 'Notorious advertising, allowed on the front page of a prestigious newspaper. This is a play on an abusive slang. Amazing how all this is cool and normalised." Many took to the comments section and agreed with Sanket's views. One wrote, 'There is a need for a code to put reasonable restrictions on these kinds of abusive advertisements," while another added, 'Newspapers alone should not be blamed for this; those with the power to communicate bear the primary responsibility." Speaking about Swiggy's One BLCK services, it is an exclusive membership aimed at customers seeking premium convenience and better services. As per the company, the invite-only membership offers a range of benefits like faster deliveries and complimentary drinks and desserts when dining out. Besides, members will also have access to priority support from the platform's top-tier customer care agents. Apart from the benefits of One BLCK, the upgrade will retain all the features of the existing Swiggy One membership. First Published:
