Cooper defends live facial recognition technology expansion amid privacy row
Yvette Cooper denied the technology was being used to catch lower-level crimes such as ticket-touting, as it has been previously in Wales, and said 'safeguards and protections' will govern its deployment.
Critics including Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti have attacked new plans to roll out 10 vans equipped with facial recognition technology across seven police forces in England as part of a Government overhaul of neighbourhood policing.
The former shadow attorney general said the expansion was a step towards a 'total surveillance society' in the UK.
Asked whether the rollout would infringe on people's privacy, Ms Cooper said: 'Well, the way this technology is being used is to identify people who are wanted by the court, who maybe should be returned to prison, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have breached things like sexual harm prevention orders, so serious criminals.
'And I think being able to identify them, alongside having proper legal safeguards and a legal framework in place because there do have to be safeguards and protections, but we also need to be able to use the technology to catch dangerous criminals and to keep communities safe.'
In 2017, South Wales Police said facial recognition was being used to track suspects including ticket touts as the force prepared for the Champions League final in Cardiff.
Pressed on whether she was happy for the technology to be deployed in this way, she said: 'No, that's not how they've (police in South Wales) used it.
'They used it for targeting where there's serious organised crime, where there are criminal gangs, but in every case that they do use it, they need to obviously have safeguards in place and we need to make sure that we've got a new legal framework for it to be operating under, and also that it can be used to tackle serious crimes and keep communities safe.'
Ministers have said a new legal framework will be drawn up to support use of the technology following a consultation launching this autumn.
Checks would only be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions such as sex offenders, the Home Office said.
The vans would be deployed across seven forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – in the coming weeks.
They would be manned by trained officers operating within College of Policing guidance.
But Lady Chakrabarti said the technology was 'incredibly intrusive' and had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law'.
'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society – challenges to privacy, challenges to freedom of assembly and association, and problems with race and sex discrimination because of the higher likelihood of false matches in the context of certain groups,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
'It's particularly odd that this has all been developed pretty much completely outside the law.'
She welcomed plans to consult ahead of possible new legislation, but warned that to date, 'it's been a bit of a Wild West'.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson dismissed the claims, telling BBC Breakfast: 'With the greatest of respect, that's not what this is about.
'This is about giving the tools to our police officers to enable them to keep us safe.'
Forces already deploying live facial recognition had used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions.
Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales had now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes such as anti-social behaviour.
Their details would be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood.
The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours.
The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Simple signs that your partner might be cheating on you... and why it could be YOUR fault
Controversial relationship coach Sadia Khan has issued a brutal wakeup call to victims of cheating partners. During a recent appearance on Jay Shetty's On Purpose podcast, Khan claimed that it may be your own fault if you get cheated on for ignoring obvious warning signs. 'Especially with men in particular it's always your own fault, because most cheaters come with smoking guns on the first date,' she explained. 'People don't usually lie. They may SAY lies, but they'll show you their red flags, pretty much from day one,' she continued. 'It might be that they were in a relationship when you met them, or it might be that you caught them in a few lies when you first got with them. You would've caught some sign that this person is capable of deeper lies.' Khan then claimed that you don't even need evidence to catch somebody being unfaithful. 'Some cheaters will say, "Well you can't prove anything!" Cheaters will always want you to catch them red-handed. You should say, "I don't need red-handed evidence. I can see your behaviour isn't treating me right",' she said. Khan said that the best way to catch a cheater is to 'know your partner better than they know themselves', and that way you'll be in tune with any concerning changes in their behavior. 'If you pay close attention to your partner then it's quite difficult for them to live a whole double life without you catching on,' she explained. Earlier this year, Khan, who boasts over a million followers on social media, said that men get cheated on because 'they don't understand female psychology'. She went on to say that a lot of men who are cheated on were most likely raised by their mothers. 'They tend to think that their mother's advice is the key,' she said. 'They teach you to be kind, they teach you to listen to them, they teach you not to talk back, not to answer back, never to question them,' she continued. 'They train you into becoming this really good boy who's really obedient and all of these things are desexualizing. All of these things are what moms want from boys, from their sons, but it's definitely not what women want from their partners.' Khan then said that men need to be more assertive in their relationships rather than taking the laid back approach. 'We want a man that's fearless. So if you're a man that's afraid of flying, afraid of heights, afraid of confrontation, afraid, afraid, afraid, automatically she's less attracted,' said Khan. 'We like some protective jealousy - they care about you, so they worry about you,' she continued. 'So whenever a man comes to me who's been cheated on, he'll tell me, "I never stopped her from doing anything. I allowed to go on holidays whenever she wanted, I allowed her to come home whenever she wanted, she could post whatever she wanted on Instagram and she still cheated on me!" 'And I say to them, "duh!"' Khan finished. Khan, who bills herself as both a psychologist and a relationship coach, has built up a huge following online for her no-holds-barred advice. She's well known for her brutal dating tips, and even offers a pricey 'high value man' course that teaches men how to be more confident and charismatic. Researchers previously found that women are unfaithful because they want 'good genes' for their offspring, known as 'dual-mating theory.' Women tend to seek out more attractive affair partners for their genetic material, but stay with a long-term mate who would make a better parent, according to a study. However, some participants reported straying out of boredom or a lack of investment from their current partner, saying they simply wanted to have their cake and eat it too. The study was conducted by Australian and UK researchers who surveyed 254 heterosexual people, 116 of whom were women, and asked them to measure their physical physical, personal and parental attraction to both partners.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nicola Sturgeon: Gender opponents said they wanted me ‘raped in toilet'
Nicola Sturgeon has said opponents of her self-ID gender policy have laughed at her miscarriage and said they want her to be 'raped in a toilet' on social media. The former first minister accused self-professed feminists of having 'vilified' her this week, as she released her memoir, despite them claiming to stand up for women's rights. She was forced to deny claims she was responsible for a free speech row over whether critics of her gender policy were being censored, saying she 'does not believe' in cancel culture. The row erupted after an Edinburgh Fringe arts venue indicated that Kate Forbes, the deputy first minister, would not be invited to speak at future events because of her views on trans rights. Summerhall Arts issued an apology to performers for its 'oversight' in allowing Ms Forbes, a devout Christian, to be interviewed on stage last week. Several artists at the venue are performing shows with gay or transgender themes, and some set up a 'safe room' because they claimed to have been 'terrified' while the 5ft 2in-tall politician was in the building, the Daily Mail reported. It also emerged that the National Library of Scotland (NLS) had removed a gender-critical book from an exhibition after staff complained. The library removed The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, a collection of essays by feminists, including JK Rowling, about their fight against Ms Sturgeon's gender self-ID laws. The book was selected to be included in an exhibition celebrating the library's centenary but was removed following complaints that it was 'hate speech'. However, it was still available to read in the library. Stephen Kerr, a Scottish Tory MSP, wrote to Angus Robertson, the Scottish culture secretary, arguing that public bodies that fail to protect freedom of speech should have their funding withheld. In his letter, Mr Kerr asked Mr Robertson to 'seek full and transparent explanations' from Summerhall Arts and NLS about their conduct and to make a 'clear public statement ... that freedom of speech and expression are non-negotiable where public funding is concerned.' He urged the culture secretary to 'require that future funding arrangements include explicit, enforceable commitments to uphold these freedoms in practice, and that breaches will have consequences'. Ms Sturgeon's controversial Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill would have allowed Scots to change legal gender by simply signing a declaration, with no medical diagnosis. The legislation was passed at Holyrood, with Ms Sturgeon arguing that some of its opponents were transphobic, 'deeply misogynist, often homophobic, possibly some of them racist as well'. However, it was vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined women's safe spaces. 'Toxic' trans debate In a sold-out interview with broadcaster Kirsty Wark at Edinburgh Book Festival, Ms Sturgeon described the debate around trans issues as 'toxic on both sides'. Highlighting comments made on social media this week, she said: 'There are people who call themselves feminists, standing up for women's rights, saying things about me such as when I described my miscarriage experience the other day 'I haven't laughed as much in years', accusing me of making it up, people saying they hope I am raped in a toilet.' The former SNP leader has recounted the miscarriage she had aged 40 in 2010 as part of events and interviews to publicise her memoir in recent days. She said she was 'heartbroken' about the loss. In the book, named Frankly, she admitted that she 'should have hit the pause button' on the controversial legislation to allow trans people to self-identify. Reflecting on the row over the policy in her interview with Ms Wark, Ms Sturgeon insisted that not all opponents of gender reform are either transphobic or homophobic, but claimed the issue of trans rights 'has been hijacked and weaponised by people that are transphobic and homophobic'. She said she was 'worried' that if she paused the gender reforms at Holyrood, this would have seen her 'give in to that', but admitted that that 'might have been wrong'. 'I don't believe in cancel culture' Asked if her change of heart on the bill merited an apology to the people who say they were 'vilified' for wanting it paused, Ms Sturgeon said: 'People on both sides of this debate are vilified. 'I've been vilified and received some awful abuse, nothing like the abuse trans people are getting right now.' Pressed later for her response to the free speech rows, Ms Sturgeon said: 'I don't believe in cancel culture and I don't agree with that.' She also refused to take responsibility for the decision made by Summerhall Arts. The Fringe venue was awarded £608,302 of public money from Scottish Government quango Creative Scotland in January. In his letter to the culture secretary, Mr Kerr asked for an audit to be conducted to ascertain how much public money had been given to organisations that have restricted freedom of expression. Mr Robertson told the Herald that the Scottish Government was fully committed to freedom of speech in the arts but added: 'For very good reasons, funding to our major cultural and festival events takes place at arm's length.' The Summerhall venue said: 'This event was booked as a series of long-form interviews prior to the guest list being confirmed. 'Summerhall Arts' primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again.'
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Cops swoop on asylum hotel and arrest two men alleged to be involved in shoplifting racket exposed by The Sun
COPS arrested two men alleged to be involved in a shoplifting racket exposed by The Sun. Officers swooped on the Holiday Inn in Wembley, North West London, and were seen putting one man, in a £180 Boss jacket, into a van. 3 3 Rooms were also believed to have been searched in the 9.30am raid. Last month we told how teams of thieves were leaving the taxpayer-funded hotel to hit London's West End in organised shoplifting sprees. A whistleblower who works for a security firm on Oxford Street had tipped us off about the 'huge influx' of gangs using alarm-dodging tactics to loot thousands of pounds of gear from stores such as Liberty. Commander Andrew Featherstone said: 'Tackling shoplifting remains a priority for the Met and I'd like to thank The Sun for assisting our investigation. Through proactive patrols and activity we have solved 163 per cent more cases this year than in the same period last year.' Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick added: 'It is great to see the police taking action following The Sun's superb investigation. These individuals should face the full force of the law and be deported if they are found guilty.' A Met spokesperson confirmed two arrests had been made and that investigations were ongoing. They said: 'The men, aged 36 and 31, were arrested at a hotel in Wembley on the morning of Thursday August 14 on suspicion of theft. "They remain in custody.' 3
