
Saudi Arabia's Syria investment a strategic bet on stability
When Saudi Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih led a delegation of more than 130 businessmen and investors into Damascus on July 23, the timing could hardly have been more precarious. The visit, authorized by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, came as sectarian violence raged in Sweida province, claiming innocent civilian lives, and Israeli strikes targeted Syria's Defense Ministry and security forces stationed in Sweida. Yet this $6 billion investment push represents something far more than a fleeting diplomatic or economic gesture. It embodies the Kingdom's enduring political doctrine, grounded in understanding and cooperation rather than confrontation and estrangement.
Despite daunting security and economic obstacles, Saudi Arabia's unwavering political commitment signals a potential turning point for Syrian stability and reconstruction. The Kingdom views Damascus not as a distant investment opportunity but as a critical buffer against regional chaos. Riyadh's strategic imperative is clear: prevent Syria's fragmentation into warring fiefdoms or its evolution into a sanctuary for extremist groups that could destabilize the entire neighborhood.
Through active diplomacy, Saudi Arabia has convinced the American administration to lift economic sanctions on Syria and pushed for the new Damascus regime's integration within its Arab sphere. This positions Riyadh ideally to lead this gradual transformation in Damascus — not only for Syria's benefit but also to reshape the entire regional order on solid foundations: security, development and sovereignty.
Saudi Arabia's foreign policy strategy seeks to shield Syria from becoming a battleground for broader regional rivalries while working to reestablish stability. This approach aligns with the Kingdom's broader vision of promoting security and development across the region.
One of the primary avenues for reducing conflict in Syria involves improving citizens' living conditions and establishing infrastructure that provides access to essential daily services: healthcare, education, transport, communication and others. Additionally, the government must be capable of curbing inflation, high prices and unemployment, while maintaining the ability to pay state employees' salaries.
The investment package, encompassing 47 agreements and memorandums of understanding with a total value of between $6 billion and $6.4 billion, dwarfs the $2.8 billion in Saudi investments Syria attracted before 2011. Infrastructure and real estate projects account for $2.93 billion of this amount, while the telecommunications and information technology sectors represent approximately $1.07 billion in commitments.
The signed agreements encompass housing, tourism, healthcare, recreation and basic facility projects, including the construction of three new cement factories and the launch of the country's first white cement factory with an investment of about $20 million. The agreements also include a massive real estate project in Damascus, known as Al-Jawhara Tower and valued at $100 million.
The implementation of these projects will follow a designated timeline and is expected to generate about 50,000 direct employment opportunities and 150,000 indirect jobs within Syria's economy. The initiatives are also anticipated to attract investment from other nations into the Syrian market, as Saudi Arabia's involvement is expected to catalyze additional future investment efforts rather than remain an isolated action.
Saudi Arabia's Syria strategy exemplifies what analysts call 'positive containment' — ensuring Syria is not left exposed to security and political instability, while preventing regional imbalances that might drive regional powers into destructive roles, similar to Israel's current military interference in Syria's internal affairs.
This approach requires a delicate balancing act. Riyadh must work with Syria's new leadership without alienating Iran and Russia, Bashar Assad's former backers, while avoiding confrontation with Turkiye and Israel, both of which maintain significant interests in Syrian territory. This approach also aligns with Saudi Arabia's new foreign policy, which is based on stability, partnership and de-escalation.
Syria's reconstruction stands as the primary objective for the upcoming period. Establishing a politically and security-stable environment under equitable legal governance, where the state maintains exclusive control over weapons and the government operates without sectarian or ethnic quota systems, will build investor confidence in the Syrian market and motivate their participation. This represents the direction Saudi Arabia is currently pursuing in its approach toward Syria.
Nevertheless, the Syrian government holds primary responsibility for dismantling armed militias, resolving sectarian and ethnic tensions, establishing modern state institutions and pursuing transparent, constructive dialogue that fosters a unified national identity in which all Syrians feel included and represented.
The Kingdom views Damascus not as a distant investment opportunity but as a critical buffer against regional chaos.
Hassan Al-Mustafa
Despite the optimistic projections, significant obstacles remain. Syria's security situation remains fragile, particularly in the south and areas populated by Druze, Kurds and Alawites. Furthermore, the new political landscape poses challenges, as the current government is perceived as catering to transitional interests and may encounter claims that it reinforces particular sectarian influence or religious-based economic policies, stemming from distrust among Syria's diverse population and recent transgressions by various armed groups.
Institutional weakness poses another challenge. Years of conflict have decimated Syria's legal and regulatory framework. Building a strong judicial and legal system will encourage companies and investors to enter Syria with greater momentum.
Saudi Arabia has maintained and continues to fulfill important constructive roles supporting Syria, its security, stability and the success of its new transitional period. The ultimate success of Saudi investment in Syria depends on factors beyond Riyadh's control. The Syrian government must demonstrate genuine commitment to establishing internal stability, ensuring a transparent operational environment and incorporating Syrian civil society into oversight and implementation processes, so that local investors and citizens can participate in the reform initiative and civil state development.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Saudi Gazette
3 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US allies break with Trump to force diplomatic shift on Gaza
NEW YORK — As Canada joins France and the UK in announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state, the US is standing firmly with Israel — but does Trump have a long-term plan for Gaza's future? Of all history's declarations about the Middle East, one that may be less prominent in the global collective memory was in Tokyo in November 2023. Then-US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken laid out a series of principles for the "day after" the war in Gaza at a meeting of the G7, a group of the world's most powerful countries. He travelled there from Tel Aviv, after meeting Israel's leadership a month after the Hamas attacks on October 7, during the ensuing Israeli offensive on Gaza. Blinken listed what amounted to US conditions for Israel's military objectives and the wider conflict: No forcible displacement of Palestinians. No Israeli re-occupation of Gaza after the war ends. No attempt to blockade or besiege Gaza. A future governance that must be Palestinian-led, involving the internationally backed Palestinian Authority. No role for Hamas. The principles were intended to generate support from America's allies in Europe and parts of the Arab world — even if Israel objected to many of them. Few probably remember Blinken declaring his Tokyo Principles — least of all the Trump administration, which immediately jettisoned them. But the ideas are still supported by many US allies, who travelled to the United Nations in New York this week for a French-Saudi-led conference calling for a rekindling of the two-state solution. The conference made headlines as France, then the UK, committed to recognising a Palestinian state later this year under certain conditions. On Wednesday afternoon, Canada followed suit. But the Trump administration boycotted the meeting, viewing it as anti-Israel. "The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace," said US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, deriding the conference as a "publicity stunt". Now, a chasm has opened up between the US and its traditional allies on the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This raises a question: Does the Trump administration have a vision for the future governance of Gaza and longer-term permanent peace? It is becoming increasingly clear that it doesn't — at least not one of its own. Earlier this month, I asked Ms Bruce what the administration's vision was for the future governance of Gaza, beyond its requirement that Hamas cannot exist. She responded that "countries, our partners in the region" were working to implement "new ideas" the president had asked for. When I pressed her on what this involved she said: "I won't exactly tell you today." In February, President Trump declared that the US would take over the Gaza Strip and build a "riviera of the Middle East" in a plan that involved the forced displacement of Palestinians in the territory, which the US and Israel later tried to claim meant "voluntary" emigration. Whilst the idea was clearly unfeasible and would be in violation of international law, it appeared to be Trump's post-war plan. It would presumably have involved Israeli military occupation of the strip to facilitate it. It was not clear how any continuing insurgency by Hamas or aligned armed groups would have been defeated. Since then, the plan has been slowly, quietly dropped — at least in its fuller form. Asked on Tuesday about his plan to move Palestinians Trump described it as "a concept that was really embraced by a lot of people, but also some people didn't like it". The latter was probably a reference to rejection by Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, which Trump visited in May for a lavish trade tour to take in gilded palaces. The administration prefers to talk about the immediate issue: freeing hostages and getting a ceasefire. When Trump was again asked to look beyond that, during a recent White House visit from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he immediately deferred to the Israeli leader to answer. It amounts to a growing evidence that the Trump administration's strategy on Gaza increasingly parallels that of its Israeli ally. Netanyahu rejects any involvement of the Palestinian Authority in future governance of Gaza, where his forces now control some two-thirds of the territory. The far-right flank of his coalition demands permanent military occupation, the expulsion of Palestinians and the building of Jewish settlements. Israel and the US have attempted to take control of the food supply for Palestinians, within militarised zones, while Israel also arms Palestinian militiamen who rival Hamas. The international body that monitors famine, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), said there is mounting evidence of widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease in Gaza. Israel has blamed Hamas and the UN for the crisis, but said it is facilitating more aid. Many European nations have watched aghast. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told me on Wednesday: "We have seen the most horrific scenes. The global community is deeply offended by children being shot and killed as they reach out for aid." Starvation appears to be an inflection point for European countries — a moral impetus to drive their divergent diplomacy. Domestic pressures in Britain and France also mounted to recognize a Palestinian state under certain conditions. Without a coherent, internationally backed plan for future governance, Gaza faces the prospect of increasing chaos. Blinken was aware of this risk from early in the war, and shuttled between Arab states trying to get them to sign up for a future plan involving parts of the Palestinians Authority and Arab countries providing security forces. He also intervened on at least three occasions, forcing Israel to allow more aid into Gaza, twice using the threat of restricting US weapons to make his point. There has been no such pressure by the Trump administration, which accelerated arms to Israel since January. The US has left what amounts to a strategic vacuum on Gaza's long-term plan. The Europeans, working with Gulf Arab counties, spent this week trying to fill it. For them, without effective aid, governance and a long-term peace plan, the impact on the ground will only deteriorate. They called this week for urgent aid intervention, backing the Palestinian Authority, and reviving work towards a two-state solution — even without the US signed up. It upends years of convention by which major Western powers would recognize a Palestinian state only at the end of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. Importantly, their combined statement meant Saudi Arabia, a leader of the Arab and Muslim world, was joining the condemnation of Hamas and call for its disarmament. Now they're hoping their move, supported by Arab countries, pressures Trump back towards a more established diplomatic process. But their conference — which will meet again in September — is working against all odds. The superpower seat is empty. — BBC


Saudi Gazette
3 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Belgium refers complaints against Israeli soldiers over Gaza war crimes to the ICC
BRUSSELS — A legal complaint against two Israeli soldiers, who were accused by an NGO of violating international humanitarian law in Gaza after being identified at a music festival in Belgium, has been sent by Belgian prosecutors to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Belgian Federal Public Prosecutor's Office said it received two complaints earlier this month from the Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF), a Belgium-based pro-Palestinian group, against two Israeli soldiers who were in the country to attend the annual Tomorrowland festival. Police last week questioned the pair over allegations of "serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza", according to the prosecutors. On Wednesday, the prosecutor's office said it had decided to refer the complaints against the two members of the Israeli military to the ICC, in the "interest of the proper administration of justice and in accordance with Belgium's international obligations". — Euronews


Leaders
14 hours ago
- Leaders
Two-State Solution Conference: Saudi-French Initiative toward Regional Peace
By: Sobha Beghoura Sobha Beghoura Saudi Arabia and France have jointly chaired a high-level meeting for the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian conflict and the implementation of the two-state solution. The High-Level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, which kicked off on July 28, 2025, brought together top diplomats and senior officials from dozens of countries in New York. Critical Juncture The conference was seen as a unique opportunity to transform peace calls into an action plan to implement the two-state solution. It was also considered a critical juncture and a turning point toward halting Israel's war on Gaza, ending Israeli occupation of Palestine, and activating the two-state solution as the only viable path to peace in the Middle East. The Path to Peace In his opening speech, the Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, called for an immediate end to the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza, stressing that the Arab Peace Initiative, presented by Saudi Arabia and adopted by the Arab League in Beirut in 2002, represents a comprehensive foundation for any just and inclusive solution. Furthermore, Prince Faisal bin Farhan welcomed the announcement made by the French President, Emmanuel Macron, regarding Paris' intention to formally recognize the State of Palestine. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia's Ambassador to the US, Princess Reema Bandar Al Saud, emphasized that the two-state solution is 'the only viable path to lasting peace, one that ensures dignity and self-determination for Palestinians while establishing a foundation of security and stability for Israel and the region.' Turning Dream into Reality While the conference witnessed a broad international recognition and support for the two-state solution initiative, it unveiled an approach toward focusing on practical measures to support a political settlement. In the light of this, Saudi Arabia is accelerating its efforts to secure international recognition of Palestine and mobilize further global support to turn the Palestinian dream of an independent, recognized state into a reality. Unwavering Support Saudi Arabia's sponsorship of the conference is a tangible proof that the current efforts are a continuation of the Kingdom's prioritization of the Palestinian cause in its foreign policy. This dates back to the reign of King Abdulaziz Al Saud. The Kingdom intensified its diplomatic efforts by hosting an international summit in New York in September 2024, with the participation of more than 100 countries. During that summit, Saudi Arabia introduced the two-state solution initiative. Shortly after, the Kingdom hosted the first meeting of the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution in October 2024 to support the initiative. Short link : Post Views: 8