
Map Shows Which States Lost Most Tax Money After Recent Population Shifts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Americans moving out of places like California and New York are costing those states billions of dollars in taxpayer funds, according to data analysis released by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF) this week.
Why It Matters
States bleeding population face myriad challenges, including the loss of taxpayer funds that could be used to pay for critical services for residents. It also has political ramifications, including the loss of seats in the House of Representatives. The next round of redistricting could have major implications for political representation, with larger red states poised to gain House seats. Major Democratic states, meanwhile, are on track to lose seats if migration patterns do not shift.
The report noted that population shifts are largely among high-income residents, underscoring the loss of taxpayer funds to other residents in those states.
A house for sale in Los Angeles.
A house for sale in Los Angeles.
Ringo Chiu via AP
What To Know
The new data analysis from the NTUF, a conservative-leaning economic organization, revealed estimates for how each state's population shifts are affecting tax revenue in 2025.
Florida gained the most new residents to internal migration, with more than 1.5 million Americans moving into the state from 2011 to 2021, which is resulting in $4.1 billion in additional revenue in 2025. Texas followed, gaining more than 1.2 million new residents and an additional $914 million in additional revenue, according to the data analysis.
North Carolina, Arizona and South Carolina were among the other states that have seen the highest increase in tax revenue as a result of attracting new residents from other states.
On the other end of the spectrum was California, which lost 1.6 million residents from 2011 to 2021, resulting in a $4.5 billion revenue loss. New York followed, seeing a $3.8 billion revenue lost in 2025 after losing 1.7 million residents during that time frame, according to the report.
Illinois, New Jersey and Massachusetts were other states that have lost at least $500 million in tax revenue as a result of losing residents.
Estimated revenue changes are "driven primarily by the movement of high-income earners, who tend to pay far more in taxes than they receive back in government service," according to the report.
What People Are Saying
Andrew Wilford, director of NTUF's Interstate Commerce Initiative and author of the report, in a press release: "While tax rates are not the only reason taxpayers move to different states, it is hard to deny that they play a substantial role in where taxpayers decide to live. When looking at broader trends, the clear pattern is that taxpayers move from states with higher tax burdens towards states with lower ones. Tax rates explain this trend better than any other explanation put forward, from weather to the cost of housing."
William Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told Newsweek in December: "When it comes to deciding when to move, it's sort of like the last election. It's a pocketbook thing. When it's too expensive to live somewhere, you're going to look where there are job opportunities."
What Happens Next
Whether these trends hold over the coming years will impact redistricting and state budgeting. If it holds, the impact could be felt in next decade's presidential elections.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NYC mayoral candidates face off in forum held by PIX11 News
NEW YORK (PIX11) – The top six Democratic candidates for New York City mayor are facing off against one another during a forum airing exclusively on PIX11 News. Comptroller Brad Lander, former Comptroller Scott Stringer, Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and state Sen. Zellnor Myrie are all vying for the Democratic nomination for November's general election. More Local News Polling from Emerson College/PIX11 News/The Hill showed Cuomo maintaining a lead, followed by Mamdani – who's made the biggest dent in Cuomo's popularity. Lander rounded out the top three candidates, according to the poll. It's the second mayoral primary to use ranked-choice voting. Early voting starts in New York City on June 14. 'Seeking City Hall: The 2025 New York City Democratic Mayoral Forum' is airing on PIX11 News, and PIX11+ smartTV app at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday. To learn how to submit your questions to the forum, click here. Erin Pflaumer is a digital content producer from Long Island who has covered both local and national news since 2018. She joined PIX11 in 2023. See more of her work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amid LA deployment, Hegseth falsely attacks Tim Walz over 2020 George Floyd riots
WASHINGTON – Amid an increasingly militarized response to immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attacked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for his handling of the riots prompted by George Floyd's killing in 2020. Hegseth implied that federal intervention in Los Angeles is vital to preventing scenes, such as those seen in 2020 in Minneapolis. In June 2020, President Donald Trump praised Walz for his state-controlled use of the National Guard, telling a conference call of governors, "What they did in Minneapolis was incredible. They went in and dominated, and it happened immediately." More: Marines in LA, response to Ukraine: details from Hegseth hearings Hegseth's comments came in response to a Minnesota lawmaker at a June 10 hearing before the House Armed Services Committee. He argued the former Democratic vice presidential candidate "abandoned a police precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground' during the Black Lives Matter protests in Minneapolis. Hegseth falsely claimed that Walz waited until after the burning of Minneapolis' third police precinct building to call up the Minnesota National Guard. Walz, in fact, ordered a mass mobilization of his Guardsmen on the afternoon of May 28, 2020, several hours before the police building burned. The defense secretary, defending his decision to deploy 700 Marines and around 4,000 federalized National Guard troops to Los Angeles without the consent of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, tried to compare Walz and Newsom's respective handling of the protests. "President Trump recognizes a situation like that, improperly handled by a governor, like it was by Governor Waltz... If it gets out of control, it's a bad situation for the citizens of any location,' said Hegseth. National Guard units, most of whose troops serve part-time and maintain civilian careers, can take days to fully mobilize and deploy. Newsom has strongly condemned President Donald Trump and his administration's actions in response to the ongoing protests, and the California attorney general filed a lawsuit against the administration over the National Guard federalization on June 9. Trump has openly mused about having the governor arrested for impeding immigration enforcement. "[Marines] shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President," Newsom said. More: Marine infantry unit deploying to Los Angeles amid immigration enforcement unrest The anti-ICE protests are poised to roll into their fifth day on June 10. Los Angeles officials blamed fringe groups for the violence and said more than 100 people were arrested Monday evening. Several driverless Waymo cars were set ablaze over the weekend, leading the company to suspend its autonomous taxi service in the city. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Amid Marine LA deployment, Hegseth falsely attacks Tim Walz


Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
New Hampshire extends ‘education freedom account' eligibility to all students, regardless of income
Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up With this policy change, state-level spending on EFAs is projected to climb from Advertisement Ayotte said these numbers represent a fiscally responsible approach to a core commitment. 'As a mom, I can't think of anything more important than making sure that every child in this state has the opportunity to reach his or her full potential in the setting that works best for them in terms of education, and that's really what this bill does,' she said. Advertisement Ayotte was joined at a bill-signing ceremony by outgoing Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut, lawmakers who supported the EFA expansion, and a cadre of children. The bill's prime sponsor, Republican Senator Victoria L. Sullivan of Manchester, said the legislation will help Although other states in New England have school-choice programs, New Hampshire's policies already ranked highest in the region in terms of ' With its latest move, New Hampshire has 'set a new benchmark for what educational freedom should look like,' Robert Enlow, president and CEO of Until now, the EFA program had allowed those earning up to 350 percent of the federal poverty level (about $112,500 for a family of four) to take money the state would have contributed toward the cost of their public education and instead spend it on private school or certain other educational expenses. Since the state contributes The actual financial impacts will depend in large part on which newly eligible students opt to participate. A student who uses EFA money to transfer from a public charter school to a private school, for example, could save the state about $5,100 per year, but a student who uses the money to continue attending a private school where they were already enrolled could cost the state an additional $4,400 per year, according to legislation's fiscal impact statement. Advertisement In 2021, when lawmakers first considered establishing the EFA program, the New Hampshire Department of Education estimated that What's more, critics have noted that a public school's overhead costs do not necessarily decrease at a rate proportional to the number of local students who opt to use EFA money elsewhere. Megan Tuttle, president of National Education Association in New Hampshire, said the EFA expansion 'will exacerbate the already inequitable public education funding system in New Hampshire.' Deb Howes, president of American Federation of Teachers in New Hampshire, said the state is 'underfunding' public schools, so it's 'appalling' that the EFA expansion will extend subsidies to families who can already afford to pay for the education of their choosing. 'That is the one priority they're going to fund in the budget, while Democratic Representative David Luneau of Hopkinton said spending on the EFA program could balloon more than the budgeters have projected. 'We're potentially looking at north of $100 million once this program is fully phased in over the next few years,' he said, calling the program 'an unaccountable and Advertisement The legislation that Ayotte signed into law includes a circuit-breaker provision to limit how rapidly the EFA program can expand. No more than 10,000 students will be allowed to participate for the 2025-2026 school year. If more than 9,000 students apply, then the cap will increase to 12,500 students in the following school year. (Whenever the number of EFA applicants exceeds 90 percent of the maximum, the cap will increase by 25 percent in the following school year.) Once the number of applications remains below the cap for two consecutive school years, the cap will disappear. There are currently about The state's EFA program is administered by the Steven Porter can be reached at