logo
The Best Way To Invest Money To Avoid Taxes, According to John Liang

The Best Way To Invest Money To Avoid Taxes, According to John Liang

Yahoo14-07-2025
YouTubers often pitch investing tips, but few break down how to grow your money while keeping taxes to a minimum.
Read Next:
Learn More:
In a video by financial creator John Liang, he outlined a practical, tax-efficient strategy for investing your paycheck in the right order, starting with protection and ending with growth.
While not flashy, your first priority needs to be saving money in an emergency fund. While Liang acknowledged that this is a savings account, not an investment account, having this in place can help your long-term investment strategy, as you can use this money in case of emergency rather than pulling money out of other investments.
Liang recommended having one month's worth of expenses in a high-yield savings account as soon as possible. He advised building up the emergency fund from there while also funding other accounts.
Find Out:
Liang called this 'the only investment in which you're going to get a 100% return on your money.'
If your employer matches 6% of your salary in a 401(k), contribute at least that much since it's free money and offers tax-deferred growth.
While putting in enough money to get the employer match may not be possible in your financial situation, Fidelity advises budgeting and doing what you can to get as much of the employer match as possible, as that will help your finances over the long term.
Next, Liang recommended paying down debt with a high interest rate. '[Credit cards] could have interest rates going anywhere from 18% up to 28%,' Liang said. 'That is doing you no favor. In fact, to me, that is like … a financial anchor that's dragging you down.'
In fact, according to Equifax, carrying a lot of high-interest debt that's not managed properly can lead to a lot of financial problems. For example, it can harm your credit score, which could make it harder to borrow money in the future if needed.
Liang suggested using either the debt avalanche (paying off the debt with the highest interest rate first) or snowball (paying off the debt with the smallest balance first) method. You can also consider 0% APR balance transfer cards, but only if you pay it off aggressively before the promotional period ends.
The money you put into an HSA is triple tax advantaged, per Liang. That means contributions aren't taxed, the money in the account grows tax-free and you get tax-free withdrawals for qualified medical expenses.
According to the IRS, to qualify for an HSA, an individual must be covered by a high-deductible health plan, have no disqualifying coverage, not be enrolled in Medicare and not be eligible to be claimed as a dependent. Married couples must open separate HSAs, though funds can be used for each other's qualified expenses.
Liang's hack is to pay medical costs out of pocket and reimburse yourself years later, letting the money grow all the while.
Liang recommended maximizing either a traditional 401(k)/IRA or a Roth IRA/401(k), depending on your tax situation. He explained that traditional options defer taxes, while Roth options offer tax-free growth.
'I actually do lean a little bit more towards a traditional 401(k) just because I can reduce my current year tax liability,' he said.
Liang classified debts such as auto loans and federal student loans as medium-interest, and he recommended paying them off next, depending on some factors.
For example, if the interest rate is higher than what you'd expect from market returns, paying down that debt may offer a better risk-adjusted payoff than investing, especially if you value guaranteed savings.
Brokerage accounts are not tax-efficient, so Liang prioritizes them lower. When you do invest, he suggested sticking to low-cost broad-based index funds, like the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF (VTI), the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) or the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF (VXUS).
Also, Liang recommended avoiding flashy trading apps that encourage excessive activity, such as Robinhood. 'The fastest way to lose money is to buy and sell, buy and sell, buy and sell. Pick the apps that have 'unsexy' UIs because, again, the secret to investing is: put the money in, watch it grow, don't touch it, you're wealthy,' Liang said.
Mortgages with rates under 4% aren't as urgent to pay down. Liang suggested investing extra funds instead to earn a higher return.
If peace of mind is your goal, paying early is fine. For a mortgage, a smart middle ground is to make biweekly payments to finish years sooner and save thousands in interest. In a recent article, money expert Rachel Cruze also offered that strategy to pay off a mortgage earlier, as well as refinancing, downsizing and making more room in your budget.
Ironically, Liang's approach isn't to just grow your money but to keep more of it. With this investment order strategy, you can invest smart while reducing your taxable income, letting your money work for you.
More From GOBankingRates
4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: The Best Way To Invest Money To Avoid Taxes, According to John Liang
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is wage garnishment, and what should you do if you're facing it?
What is wage garnishment, and what should you do if you're facing it?

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

What is wage garnishment, and what should you do if you're facing it?

What is wage garnishment, and what should you do if you're facing it? Following the Education Department's restart of collections on defaulted student loans in May, nearly two million borrowers could reach default status this month - and have some of their paycheck withheld as a result. That's according to an estimate from TransUnion, which in June reported that approximately 1.8 million newly delinquent borrowers could see their loans default in July. The credit reporting agency estimated another one million could reach default status on their student loans in August and two million more borrowers could do so in September. Consumer fintech banking platform Current shares what to do if you're impacted. As of April, 42.7 million borrowers owed more than $1.6 trillion in student debt, according to the Education Department. And until May, defaulted student loan borrowers had enjoyed relief from a pandemic-era pause on collections. But now that collections have been back for several months, some defaulted borrowers need to worry about potential wage garnishment, which can take a large toll on someone's finances. Here's what you need to know about wage garnishment, plus a few options on what to do if you're short on cash as a result. How does wage garnishment work? Loans become "past due" or delinquent the first day after missing a payment, and servicers report that delinquency to the national credit bureaus if you're delinquent for 90 days or more. In many cases, the loan is considered in default if you miss the payment for 270 days. Once loans are in default, you can face wage garnishment, which means that the loan holder can require that your employer withhold 15% of your "disposable income" directly from their paycheck. Disposable income refers to what's left of your earnings after legally required reductions, such as federal, state and local taxes, as well as Social Security, Medicare and State Unemployment Insurance tax. The garnishment continues until your loan is paid back in full or you're no longer in default, which can happen if you rehabilitate or consolidate your loans. Wage garnishment "can happen without a court order and often catches people off guard, especially those already struggling financially," says Laura Mattia, a financial advisor and senior vice president at Wealth Enhancement in Sarasota, FL. "If you are living from paycheck to paycheck and you spend your entire income every month, this can create a large shortfall." What to do if you are facing wage garnishment When you're facing wage garnishment, paying back the loan in full is often not a possibility for many borrowers. Here are two other steps you can take. Consolidate the loan Loan consolidation involves combining your existing loans by replacing them with a new one. "Loan consolidation is often a mixed bag, which is why many financial experts, including myself, approach it with caution. But in a situation where you are facing wage garnishment, this offers a lifeline," Mattia says. "It's one of the fastest ways to get out of default and stop collections, including garnishment." She adds that it also allows borrowers to immediately enter an income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, which can reduce payments to an affordable level, even as low as $0. But it's important to know that it can result in higher interest rates and it also can reset the clock on certain borrower benefits. "While consolidation isn't ideal in every situation, for someone facing imminent garnishment and without the cash buffer, it can be a practical and necessary option," Mattia concludes. Rehabilitate the loan Loan rehabilitation generally involves making nine consecutive payments over 10 months, which can get you out of default. You can start the process by contacting your loan holder. "It's not a quick fix, but it's a clear path forward - and it helps get you back in good standing," says Anna Sergunina, a financial advisor and president and CEO of Smart Financial Decisions in Los Gatos, CA. What to do if you're short on cash While you should prioritize getting out of default to avoid more wage garnishment, here are a few steps you can take in the meantime if you're short on cash. Bring in some extra cash If you don't qualify for an IDR plan and cash is tight, short-term side hustles like delivery driving, pet sitting or selling unused items can create a little financial breathing room, Sergunina says. "It's not about replacing your income," she adds. "It's about keeping up while you work toward a longer-term solution." Trim your spending Review your bank and credit card statements to see what items you may be able to cut back on. Maybe you cancel a streaming service for a couple of months until you're back on track, or swap your gym membership for home workouts. Get paid faster Earned wage access programs let workers pocket a portion or all of their paycheck in advance of their typical payroll cycle, and while some people access these programs through their employers, others can access their funds early through third-party services, including many mobile or online-only banking solutions. Some are available for free if you wait to receive the funds within several business days, or you can pay a fee to receive the money instantly. Make sure you have a fee-free overdraft cushion You shouldn't spend more than you have in your bank account. But if you're facing wage garnishment and short on the money you need to pay for your essentials, it's possible to slip. That's why you also want to have a bank account that has overdraft protection and/or does not charge overdraft fees or minimum balance fees, just in case. This story was produced by Current and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.

CMS Innovation Center plans hiring spree after cuts
CMS Innovation Center plans hiring spree after cuts

Politico

time5 hours ago

  • Politico

CMS Innovation Center plans hiring spree after cuts

Presented by With Simon Levien Driving the Day HELP WANTED — CMS's Innovation Center plans to expand its workforce as it prepares to launch new health care payment models, POLITICO's Ruth Reader and Robert King report. The decision comes after CMS cut nearly 300 people, about 5 percent of its workforce, earlier this year as part of a massive HHS reorganization. 'The CMS Innovation Center is hiring passionate leaders eager to make meaningful change in the healthcare delivery and outcomes in Medicare and Medicaid,' Sarah Fogler, director for the center's Patient Care Models Group, wrote on LinkedIn recently. The Innovation Center wants to fill roughly 100 positions, according to former and current staffers at CMS granted anonymity to discuss internal operations. 'There will be a mix of new hires with subject matter expertise in economics, clinical and data,' according to an official granted anonymity to speak freely on the hiring blitz. Although the center didn't lose staff in the reduction-in-force, it lost probationary employees in February. Two former CMS workers fired as part of the reduction-in-force said they tried to apply for the new positions but were told the agency can't hire RIF-ed employees. One shared an email from Fogler with POLITICO. 'We aren't able to hire individuals who were affected by the reduction in force,' Fogler wrote to one of the former employees who attempted to submit their resume. 'We'll have two postings for direct hire (economist and nurse) otherwise we'll be hiring through the CMS Fellow pathway.' Fellowships are intended to be temporary; the center's payment models are time-limited and sometimes end early. Fellows stay on for at least one year. CMS said in a statement that all hiring decisions follow federal guidelines and 'reflect CMS commitment to program integrity and fiscal responsibility.' Background: The Innovation Center was established under the Affordable Care Act in 2010. It has long promoted creative models of preventive care and has piloted some 50 payment models. Why it matters: The hiring blitz, which will occur in phases, comes as the center is developing new payment models to implement agency policies, with chronic disease prevention a major priority. WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE. An Indiana Amish community is 'considered one of the least allergic populations ever measured in the developed world,' The Washington Post reports. I'm Carmen Paun, POLITICO's global health reporter, filling in today for Kelly Hooper and Sophie Gardner. Send your surprise reaction, tips, scoops and feedback to cpaun@ khooper@ sgardner@ and follow along @carmenpaun, @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. In Congress DEMS DIG IN THEIR HEELS — Congressional Republicans seek to pass a bipartisan health care package by year's end. But Democrats are playing hardball, suggesting that Republicans poisoned the well with their party-line domestic policy megabill, POLITICO's Ben Guggenheim reports. One demand they're making as a condition of engagement: a costly extension of expanded tax credits for Affordable Care Act insurance premiums set to expire at the end of the year. The tax credits, which Democrats enacted over Republican objections during the Biden administration, reduced insurance costs on the 2010 health law exchanges for millions of middle- and upper-income people for the first time. Extending them will be a tough pill to swallow for Republicans, particularly in the House, where Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith of Missouri recently suggested it could be a nonstarter for his conference. Why it matters: There's been chatter for months about reviving a sweeping bipartisan health care package that was on track for passage last December as part of a larger government funding bill, but House GOP leaders dropped the health care provisions after President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk said the funding bill was overly broad and threatened to tank it. A major part of the health package included proposals to crack down on pharmacy benefit managers, which critics accuse of charging health plans more for drugs than the reimbursements they send to pharmacies, among other things. PBMs negotiate drug prices among manufacturers, pharmacies and health plans. It remains to be seen whether Republicans want a PBM overhaul badly enough to trade an extension of the subsidies. RURAL HOSPITAL LIFELINE? Republicans clinched a $50 billion fund to blunt blowback from a near $1 trillion Medicaid rollback — but some rural health experts say it's not nearly enough. The Rural Health Transformation Program, tucked in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, aims to offset deep Medicaid cuts with allotments of $10 billion per fiscal year from 2026 through 2030. Rural communities are expected to lose $155 billion in Medicaid support over the next decade, according to KFF. The program's rollout, however, remains murky, POLITICO's Amanda Friedman reports. CMS will administer the grants, with half the funds distributed equally to states with approved plans. The other half will be allocated at the discretion of CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz, based on each state's rural population, number of rural facilities and the overall 'situation' facing a hospital. In a statement to POLITICO, CMS didn't provide requested details about how Oz would assess which states receive more money and how the agency will remain impartial throughout the approval process. 'The program is under development, and CMS is working in coordination with whole-of-government partners,' CMS spokesperson Alexx Pons said via email. 'Additional details will be shared as implementation advances.' Michael Topchik, a national leader of the Chicago-based consulting firm Chartis Center for Rural Health, which counts hospitals among its clients, told POLITICO the grant program will bring hospitals 'closer to whole,' though he doubts most will escape unscathed. Eligible providers include rural hospitals, clinics, community mental health centers and federally qualified health centers. But because funding must be shared among them, rural hospitals — which bring in more than $12 billion a year from Medicaid, according to Chartis — are expected to face major shortfalls. States have a Dec. 31 deadline to submit a 'detailed rural health transformation plan' outlining how they'll improve rural health access and outcomes, use technology and recruit health care workers. OZ ON THE HILL — CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz is scheduled to meet with members of the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Ben reports. A meeting notice viewed by POLITICO says committee members are invited 'to discuss the priorities' of CMS on July 23, including issues 'involving health care matters' that fall within the panel's jurisdiction. Hospitals 'TOUGH TIMES AHEAD' — NASHVILLE — The American Hospital Association announced the head of a large rural hospital system will become board chair in 2027 at what was likely the largest gathering of health care leaders since President Donald Trump signed into law his 'big, beautiful bill' — which drives deep cuts into Medicaid, Simon reports. The mood among some attendees was understandably dour. The AHA Leadership Summit, which drew about 1,200 hospital C-suite executives and managers, began with a commiseration. Tina Freese Decker, the group's board chair, said they 'did everything they could' to stop the cuts, noting her team's sleepless nights working to blunt the bill's impacts. 'There are very tough times ahead,' she said, calling the current health care system unsustainable and then rallying members to reform it. One health care executive in attendance granted anonymity to speak candidly gave their read on the opening speeches, which featured dire predictions of health care under the cuts. 'AHA must show it recognizes that bad shit happened,' the executive told POLITICO. 'But now we have work to do.' A new leader: Bill Gassen, president and CEO of Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, will be the AHA's board chair-elect, taking over in 2027, Decker announced. Gassen, who says he leads the largest rural health system in the U.S., will begin his tenure as hospitals — particularly those in remote areas with slim margins — could suffer huge financial hits when many cuts take effect after the 2026 midterms. Trump's law will disburse around $50 billion to rural health providers, but many industry groups say the fund isn't enough to offset the cuts. Rural clinics rely on Medicaid to a greater degree than other providers. In his remarks Sunday, Rick Pollack, AHA president, warned to expect potential clinic closures, a slimmer workforce, fewer patients and fewer services if Medicaid cuts aren't negotiated down or repealed. PHARMA WATCH THE TARIFF EFFECT ON DRUGS — If President Donald Trump implements the tariffs on foreign-made drugs he's been threatening, the U.S. could see a shortage of critical medicines, the generic drugs sector and analysts have warned. Trump said he'll impose a low tariff on drugs coming from abroad as of next month and give drugmakers a year to build up production capacity in the U.S. After that, tariffs could rise to 200 percent, he's warned. But while the higher-value, branded pharmaceutical sector might gradually adapt, Europe's generics manufacturers — operating on razor-thin margins and cheaper competition from India and China — face a stark choice: absorb massive costs or abandon the U.S. market entirely, POLITICO's Giedre Peseckyte reports. Why it matters: The U.S. relies heavily on imported generic drugs. Generics account for 92 percent of all prescriptions filled in the U.S., dominating by volume but not by revenue due to their low cost. Tariffs would worsen ongoing U.S. shortages for essential hospital medicines and injectables and deepen America's reliance on Chinese and Indian suppliers, according to Medicines For Europe, Europe's generics drug lobby. Public Health MAHA CELEBRATES — HHS Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other proponents of his Make America Healthy Again movement celebrated over the weekend the latest announcements from food companies about eliminating artificial food dyes and other ingredients considered harmful over the next few years. Kennedy posted a Reuters report to the social platform X about PepsiCo planning to remove artificial dyes and flavors from its potato and tortilla chips, which it sells under the brands of Lay's and Tostitos. WK Kellogg, the maker of Froot Loops cereals, said Friday it would remove artificial dyes from its cereals by the end of 2027. WHAT WE'RE READING The New York Times' Brian M. Rosenthal and Julie Tate report about how a push for more organ transplants is putting donors at risk. Reuters' Bhanvi Satija reports that Sarepta Therapeutics won't comply with the FDA's request to stop shipping its Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy after the death of a clinical trial patient.

Social Security faces deeper troubles than trustees admit
Social Security faces deeper troubles than trustees admit

Miami Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Social Security faces deeper troubles than trustees admit

Most everyone is aware of the bad news on Social Security that is revealed each year in the Social Security Trustees' report. Every year, the Trustees release details on the program's finances. Unfortunately, for a long time, the report has shown that the program's trust fund is at risk of running dry. In fact, the 2025 report shows that the trust fund will run short in 2033, resulting in an automatic 23% cut to benefits because Social Security won't have enough money to keep paying out the full benefit that was promised. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The Social Security Disability trust fund is more stable, and if the two trust funds are combined, the benefit cut could be averted until 2034. The combination of the trust funds would also mean the benefits cut is just 19% instead of 23%. However, combining the trust funds would require a change to the law. Hearing that a Social Security benefits cut is just eight or nine years away is not good for retirees who depend on these benefits to make ends meet. Unfortunately, the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) actually suggests that things may be worse than the Trustees are letting on. Image source: Shutterstock According to the Center for Retirement Research, the Trustees may actually be underestimating Social Security's financial trouble as a result of their too-rosy projections. Related: Social Security's 2026 COLA will be good news for older Americans Specifically, there are three areas where CRR thinks the Trustees have been overly optimistic – all of which could point to the fact that the benefits program may be in much deeper trouble than we realize. Those three areas are: The fertility ratePotential deportation of millions of immigrants and reduced immigration in later years due to a change in immigration policyThe potential for people to live longer than anticipated based on changes in life expectancy over time None of these factors is currently working in Social Security's favor, and as CRR points out, things are already not looking good for retirees who face a substantial shortfall in the benefits they most need to help cover their bills, and for which they worked all their lives by paying into the system. With President Trump's anti-immigration stance, it seems clear that there is a very real risk of fewer immigrants providing support to Social Security. However, the CRR focused its attention for now on assumptions about the fertility rate, and it is clear based on their data that the Trustees are definitely being a little too optimistic in these projections. As CRR pointed out, the fertility rate has been falling since the 1960s, and the Great Recession accelerated that trend. Despite the hopes of policymakers that fertility rates would rebound once economic conditions got more stable, that didn't actually happen. Related: Millions of Medicare beneficiaries could see major price shock Now, the hypothetical number of births for a woman at the end of her childbearing years is just 1.63 in the United States, which is in line with many other developed countries. Despite this fact, the Social Security Trustees project 1.9 children per woman based on surveys of women of childbearing age and their belief that women are just postponing the age when they have kids. However, the Trustee's report is the outlier, and the Congressional Budget Office and the Census Bureau are all projecting lower fertility rates – as low as 1.5 children per woman. If this pans out, the Social Security deficit would be much greater. "If low fertility persists, the Trustees will eventually have to reduce their assumptions," The Center for Retirement Research said. "Lower assumed fertility could produce 75-year deficits in the range of 4 to 4.5 percent." Because of both these flawed assumptions and the basic fact that the program is slated to run out of money in less than a decade, the Center for Retirement Research is very clear on what needs to happen: "Congress just needs to act." Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store