Musk says Tesla, Samsung Electronics sign $16.5 billion chip supply deal
Samsung shares rose more than 4% after the news.
"Samsung's giant new Texas fab will be dedicated to making Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip. The strategic importance of this is hard to overstate," Musk said in a post on X on Monday.
If Musk was referring to Samsung's upcoming Taylor, Texas, plant, the deal could revive the project that has faced delays amid Samsung's struggles to retain and win major customers.
"Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency. This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house," Musk said on his social media platform.
Samsung had earlier announced the $16.5 billion chip supply deal without naming the client, saying the customer had requested confidentiality about the details of the deal, which will run through the end of 2033.
Three sources briefed about the matter told Reuters that Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab was the customer for the deal.
The deal comes as Samsung faces mounting pressure in the race to produce artificial intelligence chips, where it trails rivals such as TSMC (2330.TW), opens new tab and SK Hynix (000660.KS), opens new tab. This lag has weighed heavily on its profits and share price.
Samsung, the world's top memory chip maker, also makes logic chips designed by customers through its foundry business.
Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said the latest deal would help reduce losses at Samsung's foundry business, which he estimated exceeded 5 trillion won ($3.63 billion) in the first half of the year.
Analysts say Samsung has struggled with the defection of key clients to TSMC for advanced chips. TSMC counts Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab among its customers.
The Samsung-Tesla deal may also be significant for South Korea, which is seeking U.S. partnerships in chips and shipbuilding amid last-ditch efforts to reach a trade deal to eliminate or reduce potential 25% U.S. tariffs.
Samsung is grappling to boost production yields of its latest 2-nanometer technology, but the order is unlikely to involve the cutting-edge tech, said Lee Min-hee, an analyst at BNK Investment & Securities.
Samsung has been losing market share to TSMC in contract manufacturing, underscoring technological challenges the firm faces in mastering advanced chip manufacturing to attract clients like Apple and Nvidia, analysts said.
($1 = 1,378.7000 won)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Grok's behavior isn't surprising – but we needn't settle for Musk's vision of the future
Elon Musk's chatbot Grok went on a hateful tirade earlier this month. The AI-powered account praised Hitler and posted a series of antisemitic comments over X, the digital platform also owned by Musk. The company's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, resigned the next day – though it's unclear whether her exit was directly related to the bot's rant. Posting on X, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) said Grok's behavior was 'irresponsible, dangerous and antisemitic'. xAI and the Grok account on X apologized for the incident, but days later released two chatbot 'companions', including an NSFW anime avatar available to children and a red panda character built to issue crude insults. Musk, meanwhile, chalked Grok's behavior up to it being 'too eager to please' and to responding to user-generated prompts. He said that the issue had been fixed. US politicians and platform advertisers said little, unlike past responses to similar incidents on X. Their silence and Musk's downplaying of the event speak louder than if we had heard significant public denunciations of the chatbot's actions from the powers that be. The relative quiet at the top is illustrative of two things. First, Grok's behavior is not surprising. At this point, it's predictable. Second, little about Grok, X, or xAI is likely to change in the short term. Grok sharing hateful content is Grok working precisely as it was designed to. Before the inflammatory chatbot was 'born' and launched on X in late 2023, Musk spoke about the need for AI alternatives to ChatGPT, which he deemed too politically correct. He has consistently referred to his anti-woke AI as 'TruthGPT'. Grok was deliberately built to be provocative – and 'to tell it like it is'. Grok is a fitting representation of the current culture of X and, more broadly, of social media and those at its reins. In the years since Musk purchased the internet platform, originally named Twitter, many have pointed out that it has devolved into a space rife with 'racism, misogyny, and lies'. It's also full of spam and scams. Shortly after the platform changed names and hands, most of the people behind content moderation and platform trust and safety were unceremoniously fired. Extremists and conspiracy theorists who had been deplatformed from Twitter were reinstated on X. In late 2024, the social media organization's first transparency report in years revealed serious problems with this new laissez-faire approach, including unsettling new instances of child exploitation. According to Musk, Grok was built to seek and reveal truths beyond the supposedly sanitized content seen on competing generative AI systems or prior social media platforms. But Grok what actually does is tell the 'truth' of the current hands-off, malignant, version of X, and of other social media platforms and tech leadership. Since Musk's acquisition of X – and the deregulation of content that followed – other platforms have followed suit. These shifts follow an executive order and other moves from the Trump administration aimed at curtailing 'censorship' through digital content moderation and, seemingly, the collaborative study of social media propaganda. Meanwhile, social media and AI companies are getting more cozy with Washington: xAI just signed a $200m contract with the Pentagon to provide 'Grok for government'. In past research, I've found that billionaires' and global political leaders' claims about striking down digital media censorship and preserving free speech online are often suspect at best. At worst, and closer to what I've encountered in my analyses, such claims are self-serving for those in power. These figures not only own a significant stake in the digital information environment; they have also purposefully and steadily cultivated the online space to be favorable to their goals and ideas. They seek to artificially control what trends, or what people see as popular behavior, and to make such statements or actions acceptable. But an online world where hate, spam and scams run rampant is only one version of what the internet and digital media technology can be. The opposite, as Musk and others in Silicon Valley and Washington have rightfully pointed out, is an overtly censored online space. China's internet and social media platforms, for instance, have been tightly controlled by the government since the outset. We do not have to accept either extreme. Empirical research and lessons from recent history show us that we can indeed have healthier, more connective, communication tools. We can have social media platforms that are sensibly and systematically moderated from both the top down and bottom up. But to have such spaces we must demand better, more thoughtful, content moderation and tool design from technologists and policymakers. We must also break big tech's stranglehold on innovation in the social media space. Too much power online is consolidated in the hands of too few companies and individuals. We need new digital platforms that genuinely center human rights, pluralism and democratic discourse, and better policies that allow for such an experience. Samuel Woolley is the author Manufacturing Consensus: Understanding Propaganda in the Era of Automation and Anonymity and co-author of Bots. He is a professor at the University of Pittsburgh
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: A secret foreign army is already here
Atlanta's main airport grinds to a halt when drones are seen buzzing in the sky. Hours later, Chicago goes dark after a power substation mysteriously catches fire. San Diego officials were already struggling to control an oil spill on the Coronado. Faucets have run dry in Denver due to a contaminated reservoir. Then, a racist TikTok meme inspires a mass shooting in Minnesota , a cyberattack briefly shutters the Nasdaq exchange, and armed immigrants storm the Eagle Pass border post in Texas. No, this isn't the opening sequence to a Hollywood movie — these are the nightmare scenarios in two bombshell reports from America's top national security think tanks. Sandor Fabian, at the Modern War Institute, and RAND Corporation's Ian Mitch, paint a terrifying picture of the growing web of Chinese agents, often passing for students and businesspeople, deployed on US soil. They've been in the US for years, silencing dissidents among the Chinese diaspora. But this 'secret army' can be redirected to acts of sabotage if US-China relations turn nasty, the scholars warn. 'The ways available for China to inflict serious physical and psychological damage on the US homeland and population in case of war are only limited by Beijing's imagination,' says Fabian, a former commando. The US federal government faces a 'significant challenge' because our society is already a tinder box of racial and political differences ready to be lit by foreign psy ops, he adds. The reports are a clarion call for tighter security at power plants, airports, data centers and other potential targets, and more intelligence officers to counter the growing menace. China's embassy in Washington DC in a statement told the Daily Mail that the reports were 'groundless and malicious smear attacks', asserting that Beijing is committed to 'peaceful development' and does not interfere in other countries' affairs. Fabian and Mitch do not envisage an all-out war involving nuclear weapons between the US and China. Instead, they imagine a conflict playing out between the two superpowers 6,000 miles away in the Indo-Pacific. In that scenario, China could launch non-conventional attacks from within the US that it could plausibly deny, so as not to escalate into a nuclear war. The reports come amid deepening tensions between the two economic powerhouses, and credible reports that Chinese President Xi Jinping has ordered his forces to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. The US has defense ties with the self-governing Island, which Beijing views as a wayward province. A Chinese assault or naval blockade of Taiwan could quickly spiral into a conflict between the US and China, experts say. Still, a US-China war is by no means a certainty, and both countries conduct wide-ranging talks on everything from trade disputes to developing norms on artificial intelligence and combating terrorism. Fears about clandestine operations on US soil came to a head in June, when a Chinese researcher in Michigan and her boyfriend were charged with smuggling a biological pathogen that ravages crops into the US . Yunqing Jian, 33, a University of Michigan postdoctoral fellow and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) member, and her partner, were caught at an airport with a dangerous fungus known as Fusarium graminearum. They were charged with smuggling and lying to investigators. FBI Director Kash Patel called it a 'sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions.' Jian's arrest raised troubling questions about the roughly 280,000 Chinese students enrolled at US universities, and spotlights a series of shockers on US soil that can be traced back to Beijing. Chinese-American scholar Shujun Wang was in 2024 convicted of posing as a pro-democracy activist , but in reality gathering information on dissidents and feeding their details to Beijing. He famously burned down an artwork depicting Xi's head as a coronavirus molecule at a sculpture park in the Mojave Desert in July 2021. Chinese operatives have meanwhile been caught running alleged political smear campaigns and monitoring dissidents in the US with spying gear and GPS trackers . New Yorker Chen Jinping faces jail for running a bootleg police station for the Chinese government in Manhattan, to which he pleaded guilty in December 2024. During Xi's visit to San Francisco in 2023, China-aligned groups launched coordinated raids on anti-Beijing protesters, attacking them with flagpoles and chemical sprays, and tossing sand in their eyes. US authorities meanwhile have tracked dozens of incidents in which Chinese nationals, sometimes posing as tourists, attempted to access military bases and other sensitive sites — perhaps probing security and laying plans for future attacks . House Republicans took action this week, introducing a bill to end the CCP's grip on American farmland. Chinese entities have in recent years bought up 265,000 acres of American agricultural land , official figures show. Some of it is near sensitive military sites, stoking fears that the purchases could be used to stage military operations in the future. US officials have already quietly busted dozens of espionage rings in recent years. But experts say that's just the tip of the iceberg. Mitch, a former Department of Homeland Security intelligence officer, says China has built up a 'deep bench' of spies, sources, and contacts in the US chiefly aimed at silencing and harassing critics of its government. All the while, he adds, they are 'developing the skills to physically sabotage critical infrastructure during a conflict.' Fabian says the US homeland is far more vulnerable than most people — and policymakers — want to believe. From drone attacks and cyber sabotage to manipulated mass protests and chaos at the border, he says the nightmare scenarios are endless. He outlines a disturbing future: one where Chinese operatives exploit deep divisions in US society, weaponize immigration flows, crash critical infrastructure, and use social media to turn Americans against each other. He points to real-world examples — fishing boats cutting undersea cables, drones grounding commercial planes, and malware shutting down gas pipelines — as proof of how low-tech or deniable attacks can cause massive disruption with minimal effort. Both researchers warn that America's intelligence teams are overstretched. The FBI in 2020 revealed that about half of its caseload of 5,000 counterintelligence probes related to China. That has likely increased in the past five years, even as agents have been transferred to the immigration enforcement beat. For Fabian, Washington must not only bolster security at soft targets and expand intelligence operations — but also wake up the American public to the chilling threats their enemies may already be plotting. 'It is time to begin developing a total defense approach to preparing American society, not just the military, for the realities of a future war,' he said. A spokesperson for China's embassy in Washington strongly rejected the claims in the reports.
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Rivian Adds Tesla Superchargers To Its Adventure Network
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. View post: Mercedes' New Electric AMG Wagon Is So Powerful It Destroyed Tires in Just a Few Laps View post: Walmart Is Selling a 'Compact and Useful' $60 Car Trash Can for Only $10, and Shoppers Say It's a 'Game Changer' Third-party charging solutions have been hit-or-miss for years, offering spotty reliability and an unpredictable experience in many cases. Tesla's Supercharger network delivers a significantly friendlier experience, leading most automakers to install the company's charging ports in new EVs. Rivian will soon begin rolling out vehicles with Tesla's North American Charging Standard (NACS), and it was recently reported that it will soon add them to its growing Adventure Network. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:09 Full screen 2024 Kia EV6 GT-Line review: Is this the EV that will convert you? Watch More Source: Rivian Rivian's Adventure Network (RAN) is a fraction of the size of Tesla's Supercharger spread, with CEO RJ Scaringe saying that RAN and Superchargers are both great charging networks, but noting that Tesla's solution is scaled far past that of his company's network. As Rivian looks to expand its charging presence, the addition of Tesla plugs will ensure continued access to a wide range of EVs. Current Rivian owners must use an adapter to charge at NACS-equipped locations, but the company is expected to begin installing the ports in next-generation versions of the R1 and upcoming R2 vehicles. The automaker installed the first plugs at its location in Joshua Tree, CA, where it converted a third of the CCS plugs to NACS. The automaker's 'Charging Outposts' blend the feel of a rest stop with a traditional charging station, offering a lounge, snacks and coffee, and Rivian merchandise. The first location opened in Yosemite last year, and the company is building an east coast headquarters location in Georgia. Workers lower an R1T truck body onto a chassis in the assembly line at the Rivian electric vehicle plant. — Source:Rivian's Outposts are neat, but they might be overshadowed by Tesla's new Diner, which recently opened in Hollywood, offering charging, movies, merchandise, and food. Tesla plans to open more locations if the first is successful, but it took the company eight years to build the first location, so there's no telling how or when another may arrive. About the Author Chris Teague View Profile
