logo
Opinion: A secret foreign army is already here

Opinion: A secret foreign army is already here

Daily Mail​28-07-2025
Atlanta's main airport grinds to a halt when drones are seen buzzing in the sky. Hours later, Chicago goes dark after a power substation mysteriously catches fire. San Diego officials were already struggling to control an oil spill on the Coronado. Faucets have run dry in Denver due to a contaminated reservoir. Then, a racist TikTok meme inspires a mass shooting in Minnesota , a cyberattack briefly shutters the Nasdaq exchange, and armed immigrants storm the Eagle Pass border post in Texas.
No, this isn't the opening sequence to a Hollywood movie — these are the nightmare scenarios in two bombshell reports from America's top national security think tanks. Sandor Fabian, at the Modern War Institute, and RAND Corporation's Ian Mitch, paint a terrifying picture of the growing web of Chinese agents, often passing for students and businesspeople, deployed on US soil. They've been in the US for years, silencing dissidents among the Chinese diaspora. But this 'secret army' can be redirected to acts of sabotage if US-China relations turn nasty, the scholars warn.
'The ways available for China to inflict serious physical and psychological damage on the US homeland and population in case of war are only limited by Beijing's imagination,' says Fabian, a former commando. The US federal government faces a 'significant challenge' because our society is already a tinder box of racial and political differences ready to be lit by foreign psy ops, he adds. The reports are a clarion call for tighter security at power plants, airports, data centers and other potential targets, and more intelligence officers to counter the growing menace.
China's embassy in Washington DC in a statement told the Daily Mail that the reports were 'groundless and malicious smear attacks', asserting that Beijing is committed to 'peaceful development' and does not interfere in other countries' affairs. Fabian and Mitch do not envisage an all-out war involving nuclear weapons between the US and China. Instead, they imagine a conflict playing out between the two superpowers 6,000 miles away in the Indo-Pacific. In that scenario, China could launch non-conventional attacks from within the US that it could plausibly deny, so as not to escalate into a nuclear war.
The reports come amid deepening tensions between the two economic powerhouses, and credible reports that Chinese President Xi Jinping has ordered his forces to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. The US has defense ties with the self-governing Island, which Beijing views as a wayward province. A Chinese assault or naval blockade of Taiwan could quickly spiral into a conflict between the US and China, experts say. Still, a US-China war is by no means a certainty, and both countries conduct wide-ranging talks on everything from trade disputes to developing norms on artificial intelligence and combating terrorism.
Fears about clandestine operations on US soil came to a head in June, when a Chinese researcher in Michigan and her boyfriend were charged with smuggling a biological pathogen that ravages crops into the US . Yunqing Jian, 33, a University of Michigan postdoctoral fellow and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) member, and her partner, were caught at an airport with a dangerous fungus known as Fusarium graminearum. They were charged with smuggling and lying to investigators.
FBI Director Kash Patel called it a 'sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions.' Jian's arrest raised troubling questions about the roughly 280,000 Chinese students enrolled at US universities, and spotlights a series of shockers on US soil that can be traced back to Beijing.
Chinese-American scholar Shujun Wang was in 2024 convicted of posing as a pro-democracy activist , but in reality gathering information on dissidents and feeding their details to Beijing. He famously burned down an artwork depicting Xi's head as a coronavirus molecule at a sculpture park in the Mojave Desert in July 2021. Chinese operatives have meanwhile been caught running alleged political smear campaigns and monitoring dissidents in the US with spying gear and GPS trackers . New Yorker Chen Jinping faces jail for running a bootleg police station for the Chinese government in Manhattan, to which he pleaded guilty in December 2024.
During Xi's visit to San Francisco in 2023, China-aligned groups launched coordinated raids on anti-Beijing protesters, attacking them with flagpoles and chemical sprays, and tossing sand in their eyes. US authorities meanwhile have tracked dozens of incidents in which Chinese nationals, sometimes posing as tourists, attempted to access military bases and other sensitive sites — perhaps probing security and laying plans for future attacks . House Republicans took action this week, introducing a bill to end the CCP's grip on American farmland.
Chinese entities have in recent years bought up 265,000 acres of American agricultural land , official figures show. Some of it is near sensitive military sites, stoking fears that the purchases could be used to stage military operations in the future. US officials have already quietly busted dozens of espionage rings in recent years. But experts say that's just the tip of the iceberg. Mitch, a former Department of Homeland Security intelligence officer, says China has built up a 'deep bench' of spies, sources, and contacts in the US chiefly aimed at silencing and harassing critics of its government.
All the while, he adds, they are 'developing the skills to physically sabotage critical infrastructure during a conflict.' Fabian says the US homeland is far more vulnerable than most people — and policymakers — want to believe. From drone attacks and cyber sabotage to manipulated mass protests and chaos at the border, he says the nightmare scenarios are endless. He outlines a disturbing future: one where Chinese operatives exploit deep divisions in US society, weaponize immigration flows, crash critical infrastructure, and use social media to turn Americans against each other.
He points to real-world examples — fishing boats cutting undersea cables, drones grounding commercial planes, and malware shutting down gas pipelines — as proof of how low-tech or deniable attacks can cause massive disruption with minimal effort. Both researchers warn that America's intelligence teams are overstretched. The FBI in 2020 revealed that about half of its caseload of 5,000 counterintelligence probes related to China. That has likely increased in the past five years, even as agents have been transferred to the immigration enforcement beat.
For Fabian, Washington must not only bolster security at soft targets and expand intelligence operations — but also wake up the American public to the chilling threats their enemies may already be plotting. 'It is time to begin developing a total defense approach to preparing American society, not just the military, for the realities of a future war,' he said. A spokesperson for China's embassy in Washington strongly rejected the claims in the reports.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell's Texas ‘Club Fed' prison ups security after taking in the Epstein sex trafficker
Ghislaine Maxwell's Texas ‘Club Fed' prison ups security after taking in the Epstein sex trafficker

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Ghislaine Maxwell's Texas ‘Club Fed' prison ups security after taking in the Epstein sex trafficker

Ghislanine Maxwell's Texas prison, dubbed 'Club Fed,' has reportedly upped security after taking in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficker. Maxwell, a disgraced British socialite who was a close associate of Epstein's for years, is serving a 20-year sentence for her part in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse minor girls with the wealthy financier. Epstein, who had pleaded guilty to state sex offenses in 2008, died in jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges. Maxwell was recently moved from a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, to a minimum security prison in southeast Texas called Federal Prison Camp Bryan. FPC Bryan has increased security measures in response to Maxwell's transfer, NBC News reported Wednesday, citing a senior law enforcement official. Two prison employees told the outlet members of the federal Bureau of Prisons' Special Operations Response Team have been positioned outside FPC Bryan's front entrance since the weekend. The special ops crew is there to check people's IDs and wave them through, the employees reportedly said. It's unclear if Maxwell has received any direct threats since her move. The Independent has reached out to the Bureau of Prisons to confirm the reporting, and Maxwell's lawyer, David Oskar Markus, to ask about her security at the new prison. Epstein and Maxwell's names have once again made headlines after the Justice Department and FBI released a memo in early July stating there was no so-called client list of powerful people who may have partaken in Epstein's crimes; Epstein did, in fact, die by suicide, and 'no further disclosure [of information regarding Epstein] would be appropriate or warranted.' The memo sparked backlash, notably from Trump's own base, as it left many unanswered questions and concerns the government may be covering up materials that would be of interest to the public. Amid the Epstein files drama, Trump enlisted the Justice Department to ask the courts for grand jury testimonies in the cases against Epstein and Maxwell and to interview the disgraced socialite. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell in Florida last month for two days, during which, according to Markus, 'She was asked about maybe about 100 different people. She answered questions about everybody and she didn't hold anything back.' Maxwell's transfer to FPC Bryan came shortly after she met with the Justice Department. Experts said she got 'special preference' with the move. 'Someone gave special preference to Maxwell that, to my knowledge, no other inmate currently in the Federal Bureau of Prisons has received,' Robert Hood, a former warden of the Florence 'supermax' prison in Colorado, told the Washington Post in an article published Tuesday. When asked if he'd personally approved the transfer, Trump said Tuesday, 'I didn't know about it at all. I read about it just like you did.'

The Voting Rights Act is facing the biggest threats in its 60 years
The Voting Rights Act is facing the biggest threats in its 60 years

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The Voting Rights Act is facing the biggest threats in its 60 years

Facing images of violent white mobs defending racial segregation, the condemnation of the world and of its own citizens, Congress in 1965 passed the Voting Rights Act, a law meant to end the hypocrisy of a democratic country that denied Black people the power of their vote. Sixty years later, race remains at the center of American politics. Cases before the US supreme court, and a platoon of Texas legislators fleeing the state to prevent redistricting, demonstrate how the Voting Rights Act – and its erosion – remains on the frontline of the political battlefield. 'Democracy is at stake,' said Todd Cox, associate director-counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Even as voting rights advocates use the act to win additional congressional representation in Alabama and press cases in Louisiana and North Carolina, a conservative supreme court makes gains precarious, he said. 'We wouldn't be under such a threat if we weren't doing so well in making sure our communities were engaged, that they were turning out and that their rights were protected,' Cox said. 'This is a cyclical part of history, that when we see some success in advancing rights, there's always backlash.' Veterans of the struggle for civil rights view passage of the act as a revolutionary, historical demarcation point equal to the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Confederate general Robert E Lee's surrender at Appomattox or the establishment of women's suffrage. Enforcement of the Voting Rights Act fundamentally rewrote politics in America. 'I know I stand on the shoulders of folks … who fought and died in some cases,' Cox said. Though constitutional amendments passed after the American civil war ended slavery and commanded racial equality before the law, American lawmakers regularly found ways to keep Black citizens from exercising political power. Literacy tests, poll taxes, separate ballot boxes for Black and white voters, white-only primary elections, purges of Black voters from the rolls and discriminatory district lines rigged elections for white voters in the US's Jim Crow era. Each time a court struck down a state law or demanded the end of a discriminatory practice, obstructionist local lawmakers – mostly but not exclusively in southern states – would quickly adapt, often enacting new election changes without enough time for a court to intervene. Civil rights laws at the time held insufficient authority to stop the practice. After years of campaigns for voting rights and racial equality across the south, the civil rights struggle came to a head in March 1965 in Selma, Alabama. The death of Jimmie Lee Jackson, a Baptist deacon and local voting rights activist, at the hands of state troopers led 600 people to march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. State troopers attacked demonstrators with truncheons and teargas. As networks broadcast the assault, the US watched future US representative John Lewis get beaten into unconsciousness by white police officers live on national television. Support crystalized for civil and voting rights after the events of the 'Bloody Sunday' broadcast. Congress wrote the Voting Rights Act to prevent the case-by-case whack-a-mole games local lawmakers were playing with election rules. It forced jurisdictions with a history of discrimination to clear elections changes with the Department of Justice before they could go into effect. It banned literacy tests to vote and allowed challenges to district maps when those maps would not allow proportional representation for minority voters. The principles of the Voting Rights Act have shaped the way lawmakers from the halls of Congress to a city council hearing room have to respond politically to voters of color. Congress has reauthorized the Voting Rights Act four times since its enactment, each time under a Republican president. But the law's protections have suffered a death of a thousand cuts. In the Shelby County v Holder case of 2013, the US supreme court held that the data defining jurisdictions with a history of discrimination was too old to be relied upon; Congress must update it for the Voting Rights Act's pre-clearance rules in Section 5 to remain constitutional, the court ruled. Republicans in Congress have blocked legislation – the John Lewis voting rights advancement act – updating the law, effectively ending pre-clearance. 'It was a pretty significant blow to the project of ensuring voting free of racial discrimination in this country,' said Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the ACLU's voting rights project. 'I think it really accelerated in this moment the attacks on voting access across the country.' States previously restricted by pre-clearance enacted a wave of election legislation following the ruling, closing polling places, changing voter registration rules and redrawing district lines unhindered. The 5-4 decision in Rucho v Common Cause in 2019 further eroded the power of the Voting Rights Act, by explicitly permitting political gerrymandering, even as racial gerrymandering remained off-limits. The mid-decade redistricting in Texas proposed by Donald Trump presents a particularly vivid example of the consequences of an end to pre-clearance and recent supreme court decisions. Democratic state representatives have fled the state to deny Republicans a quorum to pass the redistricting legislation, which would likely grant Republicans an additional five congressional seats in Texas by concentrating some minority voters into fewer districts while diluting clusters of other voters. 'Those maps would have had to be reviewed by the federal government coming in after the fact to challenge them, and winning,' Lakin said. In 2003, the eighth circuit federal appellate court further restricted the use of the Voting Rights Act, ruling in Arkansas State Conference NAACP v Arkansas Board of Apportionment that private groups do not have a right to challenge state election laws under the act; only the Department of Justice can bring a voting rights case to court. A second eighth circuit decision extended the ban on private voting rights suits from redistricting cases to suits challenging restrictions on voter assistance. Of the 180 or so successful claims brought under the Voting Rights Act, only 15 have been brought by the Department of Justice, said Jacqueline De León, senior staff attorney with the Native American Rights Fund. The Department of Justice's voting rights division used to have about 30 staff attorneys; under the Trump administration, it has lost all but two or three, she said. 'We know the Department of Justice is not going to be in the business of enforcing voting rights,' De León said. 'Right now, we don't know if there will be a future where a Voting Rights Act is available to our country. This is really a moment for concern and reflection on this anniversary.' Lakin said she expects the eighth circuit ruling to be appealed to the supreme court. Meanwhile, a case in Louisiana that has reached the US supreme court threatens the last leg standing of the Voting Rights Act. On Friday, the court signaled that it will consider the constitutionality of section 2, asking for supplemental briefs in Louisiana v Callais. The case, to be heard later this year, asks whether the state's creation of a majority-minority congressional district violates the 14th or 15th amendment to the constitution. 'I think this is, unfortunately, another opportunity for the court to continue to attack this pillar of our democracy, the Voting Rights Act,' Lakin said. In Callais, a group of 'non-African-American voters' filed suit against the state of Louisiana, arguing that lawmakers acting on the order of the federal court drew a congressional district map that unconstitutionally considered race. The Equal Protection Clause of the US constitution and the 15th amendment's guarantee that the right to vote cannot be denied because of race says that lawmakers cannot consider race predominantly over other factors when redistricting without a compelling reason. But section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires lawmakers to consider race when it is necessary to ensure that the voting power of racial minorities has fair representation. The cases are an effort to create conflict between the Voting Rights Act and the constitution as a rationale for a conservative court to chip away, Lakin said. 'Congress can enact laws to ensure the 14th and 15th amendments are given life,' she said. 'I think that there's an attempt to create tensions around this and say that there's a disconnect with the Voting Rights Act. But as the supreme court has stated … the act is a properly, constitutionally authorized use of Congress's powers.' Such a finding would turn hard-fought civil rights law on its head. It would establish a legal basis for white voters to challenge laws meant to protect minority voters from discrimination. 'I would say it's a perversion of what the Department of Justice has symbolized, specifically what its historic role, its purpose was meant to be,' Lakin said.

Suspect in shooting of Israel embassy couple faces hate crime and murder charges
Suspect in shooting of Israel embassy couple faces hate crime and murder charges

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Suspect in shooting of Israel embassy couple faces hate crime and murder charges

Prosecutors have formally charged a suspect in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staff members in Washington DC in May with hate crimes and first-degree murder. Along with the nine-count indictment against Elias Rodriguez, 31, the US Department of Justice filed legal findings that could allow the death penalty to be pursued in the case. Prosecutors say Mr Rodriguez opened fire on couple Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, outside the Capital Jewish Museum before shouting "Free Palestine" during his arrest. The defendant - who has been held in federal custody since he was arrested - has yet to enter a plea in court. Prosecutors say Mr Rodriguez, who is from Chicago, had expressed support for violence against Israelis, including in social media posts where he allegedly wrote: "Death to Israel."Prosecutors say he travelled from Chicago to the Washington DC area on 20 May with a handgun. They say Mr Rodriguez researched an event on 21 May at the Capital Jewish Museum. Prosecutors allege he bought a ticket to the event, which was sponsored by the American Jewish Committee and attended by both of the victims. The event was described as a networking opportunity to bring Jewish young professionals and the diplomatic community Mr Lischinsky and Ms Milgrim left the museum, the assailant allegedly fired 20 shots and told police at the scene: "I did it for Palestine. I did it for Gaza." The Israeli Ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, said that Mr Lischinsky had just bought an engagement ring and was planning to propose to Ms Milgrim next week in say Mr Rodriguez wrote a document called "explication" in which he expressed his support for Palestine and claimed Israel was trying to exterminate Palestinians. In the charging documents, prosecutors also detailed Mr Rodriguez's eligibility for the death penalty, including that he was older than 18 years of age at the time of the shooting, that he allegedly intentionally killed the victims and did so after substantial planning.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store