
Woman's Post On Chennai Vs Delhi Maids' Work Ethic Draws Backlash: "Biased And Irrelevant"
"In Chennai, whether it was professionals or household help, I saw sincerity. My maid started her day at 6:30 AM, worked in 5–6 houses till 1 PM, and then joined an MNC from 2 PM to 9 PM for cleaning. On weekends, she'd take up extra work — tailoring, garland-making — to earn more and give her children a better life. What amazed me was their honesty. On day one, she told me: 'I'll take two fixed leaves. If I take more, cut my salary.' No drama — just accountability," Ms Pathal wrote.
" But then I moved to Delhi. In just one year, I hired six maids. Despite getting the salary they asked for, there were constant unannounced leaves. When questioned, I got excuses — 'someone died,' 'I fainted,' 'a relative is in hospital.' It became routine. Forget saying 'cut salary' — here, even suggesting it offends them. Boundaries turn you into the villain. Even accepting leftover food was an issue, often rejected with ego. That's when I started wondering: What's different?", she added.
She attributed these differences to a broader "mindset and ambition" gap between the two regions. She further noted that many domestic workers, despite lacking formal education, speak English with confidence, prioritise time, and aspire for a better future. Meanwhile, some in the North seem content with surviving on subsidies like cheap rice and dal, lacking ambition.
"This is not about North vs. South. It's about how values, systems, and environment shape people. Where work is respected, people thrive. Where support replaces ambition, growth stops. It's time we rethink our approach — not just as citizens, but as a society. Government aid is important, but when it replaces ambition, the whole system suffers," she concluded her post.
The post divided opinions. Some supported her observations, noting cultural and economic factors influencing work attitudes, while others criticised her for generalising and stereotyping, arguing that individual experiences vary and such comparisons fuel regional biases. Some also pointed out that Delhi's urban pressures and diverse migrant workforce might contribute to the perceived differences, rather than inherent regional traits.
One user wrote, "What's the purpose of this post? Apart from being hugely problematic. Firstly, why should anyone be expected to accept leftover food? You realise how entitled and wrong that is, right, Naina Pathak? Secondly, why are we dissecting our house-helps on this forum, where they have no voice or opportunity to share their side of the story? Thirdly, house-helps in India, south-north-east-west, are mostly exploited. How are we empowering them? Now that can be an ethical post."
Another commented, "I found workplace culture in Chennai far more progressive and constructive than anything in northern part. There is a stark difference and that shows also why many giants across the world have South Indian CEO , Chief Architect , Head Of IT , etc."
A third said, "I think it depends upon person to person. When I stayed in Bangalore we had a maid who used to lift money from my wallet. I got to know much later when one day she emptied my wallet. In Delhi our maid gave us 500 Rs note lying under the sofa and is very kind and punctual. It is not good to generalise. You could have just shared your experience rather than generalizing."
A fourth simply said, "Such a #biased & #irrelevant post for LinkedIn."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Man says firing 25 people was 'darkest day' of his career. Netizens roast him: 'Something is deeply wrong...'
Synopsis Sampark Sachdeva's LinkedIn post about the emotional toll of layoffs backfired when it was ridiculed on Reddit's LinkedIn Lunatics. Intended as a reflection on leadership and compassion, the post was perceived by many as self-promotion. The criticism highlights the growing cynicism towards LinkedIn storytelling and the fine line between genuine empathy and performative leadership.


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Explained: The rise of fake productivity at work; how employees are ‘task-masking' to look busy
If your calendar looks like a Mumbai local at rush hour and Teams pings like a Diwali bazaar, you're not alone; that bustle may not be real productivity. But it may not be real productivity. A new workplace habit is spreading: Fake productivity, the theatre of looking busy while sidestepping high-impact work. One recent clue: A Workhuman poll found more than a third of UK employees (36%) admit to 'pretend productivity', driven by pressure to appear constantly active and to protect work–life balance. In parallel, leaders are wrestling with 'productivity paranoia': Microsoft's Work Trend Index reports 85% of managers say hybrid work makes it hard to trust productivity, even as employees themselves report feeling productive—an optics paradox tailor-made for performative busyness. The conditions are ideal for what social and workplace commentators now call task-masking—performative micro-tasks (reply-all, calendar clutter, meeting hopscotch) that signal effort without moving outcomes. Media analyses link the behaviour to return-to-office pressures and the surveillance vibe of 'bossware,' which nudge people to show activity over achievement. Meanwhile, collaboration load has ballooned: Microsoft shows people attend roughly three times more Teams meetings than in February 2020, while investigative summaries of Atlassian's State of Teams suggest tens of billions of work hours are lost yearly to pings, low-value meetings and duplicated effort. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Add the cognitive drain of video calls—Stanford's validated Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue scale has tied specific design factors (mirror anxiety, close-up eye contact) to depleted energy—and you get a recipe for surface-level work that 'looks' productive but isn't. This is not simply a moral failing; it is a systems problem. Always-on messaging fuels telepressure—the compulsive urge to respond—which research in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology connects to poorer sleep, higher burnout and worse work–life balance. People learn to survive the signal-choked day by doing visible tasks that keep the Slack dot green. The result: energy burns on the appearance of work, outcomes lag, and trust erodes. Understanding why task-masking thrives—and how to replace it with outcome-first habits—is now a core career skill. What exactly is 'task-masking' (and how is it different from simple busyness)? Task-masking is performative busyness: Behaviours that signal industriousness (typing loudly, darting between meetings, carrying a laptop everywhere) while avoiding deep, outcome-bearing work. The label has spread through Gen-Z-heavy social feeds and newsrooms. Analysts describe it as a productivity theatre tuned for the open-plan and the activity dashboard. The underlying prevalence is plausible given Workhuman's finding that 36% of UK workers confess to 'pretend productivity,' often to escape burnout or unrealistic expectations. The psychology and systems that fuel fake productivity Fake productivity doesn't emerge in a vacuum—it's shaped by systems that reward responsiveness, visibility and performative hustle. At the centre is telepressure: the compulsive need to answer messages instantly, regardless of urgency. Multiple studies in occupational psychology link this behaviour to poor sleep, elevated burnout and fractured work–life boundaries. But the pressure isn't confined to pings and emails. According to Microsoft's 2023 Work Trend Index, employees now attend nearly three times as many Teams meetings as they did before the pandemic. That explosion in meeting load may aim to increase coordination, but it comes at the cost of cognitive fragmentation and depleted focus time. The problem is compounded by the medium itself. Stanford's research on Zoom fatigue finds that constant video calls introduce non-verbal stressors—close-up eye contact, mirror anxiety, and reduced mobility—that accelerate exhaustion across the day. Layered on top is the rise of digital presenteeism—the compulsion to appear online and 'active' even when unwell or mentally drained. According to the CIPD & Simplyhealth Health and Wellbeing at Work survey (2022), 81% of UK organisations reported presenteeism among remote workers, compared to 65% in physical workplaces. The numbers expose a system where visibility trumps well-being—and where looking busy matters more than being effective. Together, these factors fuel task-masking: a survival strategy in a workplace architecture built for appearances. Why Gen Z is over-indexed on task-masking Gen Z did not invent pretend work, but they are operating in a post-pandemic labour market where visibility is often misread as value. Return-to-office rules, legacy KPIs and leader distrust make 'being seen' a protective strategy. Coverage of task-masking consistently spotlights younger workers navigating visibility politics while fearing job loss or AI displacement. At the same time, values have shifted: Deloitte's 2025 global survey finds Gen Z prioritises well-being, balance and learning ; they will comply with optics if outcomes and boundaries are unclear, but they are quick to disengage from rituals that feel meaningless. Several surveys show that many Gen Z workers resist full-time office returns, increasing the temptation to 'signal' productivity when present rather than to refactor the work itself. Task-masking and quiet quitting: Cousins, not twins Quiet quitting is disengagement to the contractual minimum; task-masking is disengagement disguised as hustle. According to Gallup's State of the Global Workplace 2024 report, only 21% of employees worldwide were actively engaged at work. The majority were either disengaged or quietly quitting, creating ideal conditions for fake productivity to flourish. In such environments, workers are more likely to adopt surface-level behaviours that signal busyness, such as excessive meetings or constant online presence, rather than contributing to meaningful outcomes. When trust is low and objectives are fuzzy, people hedge: They keep the lights blinking, attend everything, and avoid risk. In that sense, task-masking can be the performative arm of quiet quitting—a way to stay safe while mentally stepping back. How managers create (or crush) faux productivity Leaders can unintentionally train teams to optimise for optics: Obsessing over green dots, input metrics and time online. Microsoft's 2022–2025 data calls this 'productivity paranoia,' visible when managers track activity rather than outcomes and calendars swell to compensate. A related body of research, Atlassian's State of Teams report, highlights the enormous time sink caused by pings, meetings, and duplicated effort. It estimates that billions of work hours are lost annually to ineffective collaboration. The fix is not more dashboards; it is clarity (what is the outcome, who owns it), cadence (fewer, sharper meetings) and evidence (show progress with artefacts, not attendance). Bottom line Fake productivity isn't laziness—it's a symptom of misaligned systems. In today's workplace, visibility has become a proxy for value. When calendars are packed and Slack is never silent, activity becomes the performance, not the means to an end. Employees aren't defying work; they're adapting to cultures where being seen outweighs producing results. Task-masking emerges as the rational response to environments that reward optics over output. Quiet quitting and fake productivity aren't opposites—they're parallel forms of disengagement. One retreats quietly, the other performs loudly. Both thrive when trust is low, goals are vague, and measurement skews toward motion instead of meaning. In this landscape, the green dot—the little status indicator once meant to show availability—has evolved into a badge of allegiance, a digital placeholder for presence. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


News18
10 hours ago
- News18
Dividend, Bonus & Split This Week: HAL, Coal, P&G, Godfrey Philips, PowerGrid, RVNL, IRCTC
Last Updated: Several companies announced dividends, stock splits, and bonuses for investors between August 18-23, 2025. Upcoming Dividends, Bonuses, Splits and Rights Issues: A host of listed companies have announced various corporate actions for investors, with dividend announcements, stock splits, bonus issues and rights offerings, with ex-dates and record dates falling this week from August 18 to August 23, 2025. Among the major dividend declarations, Apollo Hospitals announced a final dividend of Rs 10 per share, while Coal India approved a payout of Rs 5.15 per share. Hindustan Aeronautics also rewarded its shareholders with a hefty Rs 15 per share dividend. The biggest surprise came from Godfrey Phillips India, which declared a massive Rs 60 per share dividend, and Procter & Gamble Health, which announced Rs 45 per share. Other notable payouts include Industrial & Prudential Investment Company offering Rs 110 per share, KFin Technologies at Rs 7.5 per share, LIC Housing Finance at Rs 10 per share, and APL Apollo Tubes with Rs 5.75 per share. These announcements are expected to keep dividend-focused investors highly engaged. On the corporate restructuring front, Algoquant Fintech announced both a bonus issue in the ratio of 8:1 and a stock split from Rs 2 to Re 1, with effect from August 18. Chandrima Mercantiles too declared a stock split from Rs 10 to Re 1, effective August 20. Dev Information Technology followed with a split from Rs 5 to Rs 2 on August 21. Adding to the trend, Bemco Hydraulics not only announced a stock split from Rs 10 to Re 1 but also a one-for-one bonus issue, both effective on August 22. These moves are likely to improve liquidity and attract small investors by lowering the entry price of shares. Meanwhile, Josts Engineering Company announced a rights issue of equity shares, with the record date fixed for August 20, 2025. top videos View all Disclaimer: The views and investment tips by experts in this report are their own and not those of the website or its management. Users are advised to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions. About the Author Varun Yadav Varun Yadav is a Sub Editor at News18 Business Digital. He writes articles on markets, personal finance, technology, and more. He completed his post-graduation diploma in English Journalism from the Indian More Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google, Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated. tags : bonus dividend split view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 16, 2025, 11:05 IST News business » markets Dividend, Bonus & Split This Week: HAL, Coal, P&G, Godfrey Philips, PowerGrid, RVNL, IRCTC Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.