logo
It's the call of duty for Knudsen, Gianforte

It's the call of duty for Knudsen, Gianforte

Yahoo23-05-2025

A picture of a sprinkler on grass (Photo by Michael Mol via Flickr | CC-BY-SA 2.0).
Montana's public officials take an oath of office when they assume their positions. This is not optional and is required by Montana's Constitution:
Article III – General Government – Section 3. Oath of office. Members of the legislature and all executive, ministerial and judicial officers, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, before they enter upon the duties of their offices: 'I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect and defend the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the state of Montana, and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity (so help me God).'
Now, it appears that another enclave for the mega-wealthy is defying both Montana's water rights laws and the constitution — and so far, they're getting away with it as Gov. Greg Gianforte and Attorney General Austin Knudsen are lax in upholding their sworn duty 'to protect and defend' our constitution.
As reported this week, the Crazy Mountain Ranch is an 18,000 acre super-upscale development by 'Lone Mountain Land Co., a subsidiary of CrossHarbor Capital Partners, a private-equity firm behind the development of the equally exclusive Yellowstone Club, Spanish Peaks Mountain Club and Moonlight Basin Resort at Big Sky.'
By now Montanans are deep into learning the hard lessons that those with big money tend to do what they want, following the old adage that 'it's easier to ask forgiveness than permission.' And in this case, neither permission nor forgiveness are even being asked for — merely a 'we'll do what we want and if you don't like it, sue us.'
But there's another old adage in the West that's equally applicable here: 'Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting.' And while the monied clients of the 'ranch' may be eating thick steaks and sipping old whiskey, the multi-generational ranchers whose water rights are threatened are 'lawyering up' and fighting — and they could use some help from the governor and attorney general.
In short, the Crazy Mountain Ranch spent a million bucks to 'lay turf' on a 112-acre golf course — and they have stated their intention to water that high-price turf with or without state-approved rights to the water, even openly admitting they did so last year and intend to do so this year. There's a word for these kinds of people, and that word is 'scofflaws.'
The same constitution both Gianforte and Knudsen swore to uphold is clear: 'All surface, underground, flood, and atmospheric waters within the boundaries of the state are the property of the state for the use of its people and are subject to appropriation for beneficial uses as provided by law.'
Despite wearing cowboy boots and jeans, Gianforte is not a rancher and may not understand the complexity of the Prior Appropriation Doctrine. But Attorney General Austin Knudsen, who was raised in Culbertson in rural Roosevelt County, surely knows that water is the lifeblood of ranching in Montana. As former Speaker of the House, he is also well acquainted with the state's water rights laws — and the need to either follow those laws or be back to killing each other with shovels on irrigation diversion ditches.
If these mega-wealthy developers want to defy Montana's water laws, then let them take on the State and all Montanans, not just a handful of old ranchers they can easily outspend. Comes now the 'call of duty' to Gianforte and Knudsen to honor their oaths 'with fidelity,' protect the state's water rights system, and immediately move to shut down the irrigation of the elite scofflaws' 'turf.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Montana Public Service Commission finally stands up to NorthWestern Energy
Montana Public Service Commission finally stands up to NorthWestern Energy

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Montana Public Service Commission finally stands up to NorthWestern Energy

Electricity pylons (Photo by Getty Images). It's fair to say Montanans have been raked over the coals for electricity costs by the utility companies that have followed in the wake of the disastrous utility deregulation bill passed by the 1997 Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Marc Racicot. The faulty premise on which the measure was sold to the Legislature was that Montanans would enjoy lower electricity costs thanks to customers having 'choice' to shop among the various utilities that were supposed to materialize. But that didn't happen. The opponents to the measure cited the simple fact that Montana already had the lowest price for electricity in the region, thanks in large part because Montana customers had already paid the Montana Power Company, as a regulated monopoly, to build and maintain a series of hydroelectric dams. As one long-time lineman quipped 'you can't make electricity cheaper than water running downhill.' Driven by the Montana Power Company's intent to change from a utility to a telecommunications company, Touch America, the 200+ page bill was jammed through in the last weeks of the session with most legislators having no idea what was in it — nor the consequences of their actions. Yet the Republican legislative majorities voted to grant Montana Power's wish, bolstered by the Butte Democrats — except for brave Danny Harrington who didn't kow-tow to the utility. It was arguably the worst decision ever made by Montana's lawmakers and governor. First to go were the dams, which were sold to an out-of-state utility, Pennsylvania Power and Light. Next to go was the Montana Power Company itself, taking with it the pensions and stock holdings of Montanans who thought of it as 'our' power company. Then Touch America, headed by Bob Gannon, the former CEO of the Montana Power Company, went bankrupt. In the meantime, Montanans' electricity bills began their skyward climb as the dams were sold yet again, each time for a higher price, that was then loaded on customers. Realizing the extent of the damage caused by the deregulation debacle, the Legislature finally decided to re-regulate in 2001. NorthWestern Energy is now our 'regulated' electricity supplier since acquiring the system in 2000. It's fair to say Montana's Public Service Commission has not been diligent in holding down rates, which have gone from the lowest to the highest in the region. But here's the good news. Thanks to Brad Molnar, who was a commissioner from 2004-2012, was re-elected in 2024, and is now the new president of the Commission, NorthWestern has finally hit resistance to its unending requests for rate increases. In a tremendous article, Daily Montanan's deputy editor, Keila Szpaller, lays out in detail Molnar's firm stance against the increase. Citing a 50-year old law, NorthWestern claims the Commission did not take timely action and raised rates nearly 17% on May 25 without Commission approval. Molnar says the increase 'will be crushing to many low-income people, many of whom are simply elderly, that are being handed their butts every day in property tax increases, in utilities, insurance for their houses, insurance for their cars. You name it. This is a very, very bad time to be a poor person, and this will make it worse.' If the rate increase is unjustified, NorthWestern will have to refund the over-charge plus 10%. As Molnar put it: 'It is time for them to grow up and quit playing the victim and actually take responsibility for their actions.' We'll see what happens, but for now, Montanans owe a debt of gratitude to Commissioner Molnar for finally standing up to NorthWestern instead of rubber-stamping their endless rate increases.

Committee starting work on ballot initiative for nonpartisan judicial elections
Committee starting work on ballot initiative for nonpartisan judicial elections

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Committee starting work on ballot initiative for nonpartisan judicial elections

The door to the old Supreme Court Chamber at the Montana Capitol. (Micah Drew/Daily Montanan) A newly formed political committee is beginning a campaign to enshrine nonpartisan judicial elections in the state constitution, after a multitude of efforts by the Montana Legislature to attach party labels to judges failed. Pepper Peterson, the political director for Montanans for Fair and Impartial Judges, said the goal of putting a constitutional initiative to voters in 2026 came after watching the repeated rebuffing of those actions during the session. 'I think the people of Montana can see the system here is fair,' Peterson told the Daily Montanan. 'This is a common sense idea to have in our state constitution. Anything else is just raw partisanship, and I don't think most Montanans are on that train.' Throughout the 2025 session, legislators introduced more than a half-dozen bills aimed at allowing, or requiring, judicial candidates to declare a party label, a stated goal of Republican leaders in the Legislature and Gov. Greg Gianforte, who argue that the judicial branch is 'nonpartisan in name only.' One bill passed — House Bill 39, which allows political parties to donate to judicial candidates — but a majority failed to gain traction in at least one chamber. Five separate bills attempted to allow, or require, judges to run under a partisan label. Some bills would have only applied to the Montana Supreme Court, others would have included any judicial candidate, including district and municipal judges, and justices of the peace. Lawmakers who supported those measures said that allowing candidates to align with a political party would bring transparency to the process and help educate voters. While a majority of lawmakers didn't seem to have an appetite for changing the system, it was a point of discussion all the way until the final day, with Gianforte's office considering adding the partisan judicial issue into an amendment of a spending bill. Despite the thwarted attempts to alter the judicial selection process, Republican leaders in the Senate said they had laid a foundation for future reform. 'I think that judicial reform is critical, continuously. It's important for our judges to have accountability. It's important for preventative transparency, and what we did this session helps start that process,' said Senate Majority Leader Tom McGillvray, R-Billings, during a press conference at the end of the session. But Peterson said seeing lawmakers pushing partisan judicial elections get 'slapped down over and over and over again' set the stage for bringing the issue to the ballot box. 'That's what we anticipate the people to do as well. We're going to put this in the Constitution, and we're going to stop this,' he said. 'The people are going to have to send this message very loud and very clear so that lawmakers know this is what Montanans want.' Peterson is working with Ted Dick, a former executive director of the Montana Democratic Party more than a decade ago, on the ballot issue — the same team behind the successful ballot initiatives in 2020 designed to legalize adult use of recreational marijuana. Peterson said their experience on that campaign, as well as his decades of political work in the state on issues from coal mining to gun rights, make them the right group to bring forward the ballot initiative, despite not working on judicial issues during the session. 'My career has been nonpartisan activism for the rights of citizens. I consider myself a civil rights activist over anything, whether that's the rights of the 2nd amendment, 1st amendment, 4th amendment,' Peterson said. 'I can get signatures and get this issue across the finish line … It's a complicated process, there's only a few people who are experts, and we're some of them.' To get the issue onto the ballot as a constitutional initiative in 2026, the committee must collect valid signatures representing 10% of votes cast for governor in the last election stateside, as well as 10% in at least 40 legislative districts. If the issue makes it onto the ballot, a simple majority of votes will enshrine it as a part of the state constitution. Two new laws passed by the Legislature make changes to the process for gathering signatures for ballot initiatives. Senate Bill 226, sponsored by Sen. Mike Cuffe, R-Eureka, requires signatures be submitted incrementally, rather than by a single deadline. House Bill 201, by Rep. Braxton Mitchell, R-Columbia Falls, mandates that a paid signature gatherer must verbally disclose their first name, state where they legally reside, and position as a paid gatherer to anyone they approach. They must also wear a nametag with that information. Peterson said the committee intends to have 'thousands of conversations' during the early stages of building out their campaign with lobbyists, special interest groups, and most importantly, citizens. 'Polling done on this issue shows overwhelming support from Montanans for nonpartisan elections,' Peterson said. 'I don't think it's our uphill battle to fight at all — I think it's an uphill battle for the other side to convince people the system we have in place is flawed.'

The prescription for discord? Discourse.
The prescription for discord? Discourse.

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

The prescription for discord? Discourse.

Former Montana lawmaker Dorothy Bradley and former Republican Gov. Marc Racicot embrace at a rally to stop the dozens of constitutional amendment proposals made in the 2023 legislative sessions. Both were keynote speakers at the Feb. 1, 2023, event. (Photo by Blair Miller, Daily Montanan) On June 22, at the Ellen Theater in Bozeman, Todd Wilkinson, the editor of Yellowstonian, a publication focused on the environmental issues in the Greater Yellowstone, hosted and moderated a discussion between two old political rivals. In 1992, Republican Marc Racicot and Dorothy Bradley campaigned all over the state, conducting more than 20 joint town halls, where they debated the issues of the day. Racicot won in a very close race, and went on to become one of the most popular governors in Montana, up until he made a fateful decision concerning the deregulation of utilities, a piece of legislation that had a long-term impact and has led many Montanans to never forgive him. But it's hard to overlook the fact that Racicot is a man who reflects on these things in a way that is not typical of most politicians, especially from his party. When Racicot endorsed Monica Tranel during the 2022 congressional race, the state Republican party decided to censure him, a particularly confounding decision considering that Racicot was, at one time, the chairman of the Republican National Committee after his term as governor. He also managed George Bush's campaign during the 2004 presidential race. But Racicot never classified himself as a full-on conservative, and he and Bradley both highlighted the fact that during their campaign against each other, they were able to maintain a strong feeling of respect and civility despite their differences. This was one of many issues they pointed to that are contributing to the current political situation. Another was the influx of money, and Bradley pointed out that the maximum donation during their campaign was $35 and they were meticulous about following that. But one of the most striking revelations during the evening for me was when someone asked Racicot whether any of the current Republican leadership in Montana ever reaches out to him for advice. 'They don't even return my calls,' Racicot answered. And although it wasn't exactly a surprise, I still found myself kind of amazed that these people would completely dismiss the years of experience of someone like Racicot. It's not hard to imagine that the same holds true for most of the other former office-holders in our state—people like former governors Brian Schweitzer and Steve Bullock, or former congressman Pat Williams, and especially Jon Tester. It's obviously a product of our current political culture, which values winning over all else, that would produce the kind of arrogance that completely dismisses an entire sector of our population without a thought. But how shortsighted is it to believe that only you and those who think like you have all the answers you need? Or, that asking for advice or feedback is some kind of weakness? People can say that Donald Trump is to blame, but this started way before he descended that golden escalator, back when Newt Gingrich and his cadre of icy collaborators decided that winning at all costs was way more important than worrying about what is important to the voters. This attitude has slowly poisoned the Republican party to the point where they feel completely justified in disowning one of the people who was considered a shining star. And the most maddening part about it is how gleefully and smugly they continue down this path. It's not hard to imagine why. Because so far, it's working. Because of Project 2025, they are no longer relying on Trump to drive the train, and it puts him in the perfect position as someone who just has to keep yelling 'All aboard' and blowing his own horn. He doesn't even have to worry about steering. So where does that leave us? I think Bradley said it best when she pointed out that we are all responsible for where we are, and that we are also responsible for figuring out what to do next. 'Trump is eventually going away,' she pointed out. 'And it's hard to imagine anyone else in his circle having the same sway over the public. So we have to figure out how to proceed once he's gone, and how to repair the damage he's done.' The same holds true for our state. Greg Gianforte is serving his last term, and there's no question that people are becoming disillusioned by the lack of access to our political leaders. Our current office-holders have made it their policy to avoid as much contact with the public as possible, and it's not hard to imagine why. Each time they do that, someone tries to hold them accountable for the many decisions they've made that have done untold damage to the citizens of Montana, with the most outrageous being the (still unexplained) increase in property taxes. Todd Wilkinson and I are starting a new podcast soon, affiliated with Yellowstonian, and one of our first episodes is going to be a discussion about this conversation between Bradley and Racicot. But as a brief preview, I can tell you that most of the solutions they offered were ones we've heard before, and that we will certainly hear again. We need to continue to speak up, gather, make our voices heard, and of course vote. But it was nice to see people with different views coming together to discuss how we got here. And I suspect we will see more of that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store