Democracy in danger under BJP rule, says Prashant Bhushan
Speaking on the theme of 'Judicial Accountability and Independence', Bhushan argued that the very foundation of constitutional democracy is under threat, as the judiciary, especially at the higher levels, is being systematically compromised by the executive.
While the Constitution intended for the judiciary to be protected from legislative and executive pressure, Bhushan said this protection has failed in practice, particularly over the last decade. He recalled how the Supreme Court once limited the government's role in appointments through the Collegium system, but alleged that the BJP government has found ways to sabotage that very process.
'Whenever the Collegium recommends a name they don't like — someone too honest, too independent, or simply not aligned with their ideology — the government just sits on the file. They won't reject it, and they won't return it. They just keep it pending for years,' he said.
Bhushan called this a direct attack on judicial autonomy. 'Sometimes, even when the Collegium reiterates the recommendation — which, as per the law, makes it binding — the government still refuses to issue the notification. The courts, meanwhile, are too timid to act,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Jagdeep Dhankhar, the most controversial constitutional VP in post-1947 India
The Constitution of India's description of the Vice President as an "ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha" who 'acts as President when the latter is unable to discharge his functions due to absence, illness or any other cause', is a rather innocuous description of the persona of Jagdeep Dhankhar. Rarely, if ever, has a constitutional position been as controversial as this once-centrist politician from Rajasthan, whose surprise resignation on `health' grounds made him the first Vice President to quit for reasons other than contesting presidential polls or taking over as President after winning elections. While disagreements between the Opposition and the Vice-President in his capacity as the Rajya Sabha Chairman is commonplace in India's parliamentary politics, what Dhankhar did was to elevate this rivalry to the level of outright hostility. Elected Vice-President in August 2022, his term as the Rajya Sabha Chairman began on a controversial note during the Winter Session that year as he called the Supreme Court's 2015 judgment striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act a 'glaring instance' of 'severe compromise' of parliamentary sovereignty and disregard of the 'mandate of the people'. Since then, there have been several instances when he and Opposition MPs clashed on a regular basis. In August 2023, Dhankhar told the Opposition that he 'could not and would not' direct Prime Minister Narendra Modi to be present in the House as it was the PM's prerogative, like any other MP, to come to Parliament. He made this statement as the Opposition benches continued to demand the PM's presence in the Rajya Sabha to address them on the issue of violence in Manipur. Ties between the Rajya Sabha Chairman and the Opposition hit a low during the Winter Session of 2023 when 146 MPs were suspended from both Houses of Parliament, mostly over their demand for Union Home Minister Amit Shah's statement on a Parliament security breach, followed by a discussion on the matter. It was the highest-ever number of suspensions in a Parliament session. For the BJP, Dhankhar did not serve the purpose he was elected for. Says political analyst Amitabh Tewari: "For the BJP, Dhankhar did not serve the purpose he was elected for. Despite his farmer background, he was unable to influence agitators. He became too abrasive and partisan in the House.' In December 2024, Dhankhar became the first person holding one of the top two constitutional posts in the country to face the prospect of impeachment as the Opposition submitted a notice to move a no-confidence motion against him, which was rejected. Things reached a stage when the Rajya Sabha became a virtual.
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Election for new Vice President to be held 'as soon as possible' following Dhankhar's resignation
NEW DELHI: With Jagdeep Dhankhar resigning from the post of Vice President, the election to appoint his successor must be held "as soon as possible", as per constitutional provisions. According to Clause 2 of Article 68 of the Constitution, an election to fill a vacancy in the office of the Vice President whether due to death, resignation, removal, or otherwise must be conducted "as soon as possible" after the post becomes vacant. The individual elected to the post will hold office for a full term of five years from the date they assume charge. However, the Constitution is silent on who is to perform the Vice President's duties in the event of a vacancy caused by death or resignation before the end of the term, or when the Vice President acts as President of India. The Vice President holds the second-highest constitutional office in the country. Although the term is five years, a Vice President may continue in office beyond the expiry of the term until a successor assumes office.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Presidential reference LIVE: Supreme Court to hear Presidential reference on President, Governor's powers
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today (July 22, 2025), a Presidential reference on whether the court can 'impose' timelines and prescribe the manner of conduct of Governors and the President while dealing with State Bills sent to them for assent or reserved for consideration. Also Read | Experts debate whether Presidential Reference is a ploy to bypass judicial review The Bench comprising Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai, and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P.S. Narasimha, and A.S. Chandurkar will hear the matter. The Presidential reference has asked whether judicial orders can dictate by what time and in what manner the President and Governors should function under Articles 200 (which covers the process of grant of assent by Governors to State Bills), and 201 (when Bills are reserved by Governors for Presidential assent) of the Constitution. Also Read | Tamil Nadu Governor case: Supreme Court recalls first President's power struggle over Hindu Code Bill The President has sought clarity from the top court after its verdict in a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government challenging the State Governor's delay in clearing 10 re-passed Bills and his subsequent action to reserve them for consideration by the President. The court had ruled that the Governor's action was illegal. Follow LIVE updates here:
