South Korea's Lee plans to hold bilateral talks at G7 summit, his office says
South Korea's Lee plans to hold bilateral talks at G7 summit, his office says
SEOUL - South Korean President Lee Jae-myung plans to hold bilateral talks with the leaders of countries attending the G7 summit, with details still being coordinated, his office said on Sunday.
Lee will depart on Monday for the summit in Canada, National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac told a briefing.
The presidential office said Seoul was open to holding trilateral talks with Washington and Tokyo, the Yonhap news agency reported.
Lee was also preparing for potential talks with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in case he attends, Yonhap said, citing a presidential office official.
"By engaging with the leaders of the United States and Japan, we can explore ways to resolve pending economic and trade issues such as tariffs," Wi said.
Lee plans to hold meetings with leaders of key countries before and after attending the extended session of the summit, Wi added, without naming countries.
Seoul and Washington are holding working-level tariff talks, crucial for South Korea's export-oriented economy, with key sectors from chips to vehicles and shipbuilding heavily exposed to global trade.
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed tariffs on South Korea, a long time ally with which it has a bilateral free trade deal, and pressed it to pay more for the 28,500 U.S. troops stationed there.
Lee, a liberal, was elected on June 3 after former conservative leader Yoon Suk Yeol was impeached and ousted over his short-lived declaration of martial law last year.
The visit will mark Lee's first diplomatic trip since taking office. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
How a Ukrainian designer helped Zelenskiy dress for Trump diplomacy
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy waves as he meets U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House, amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque KYIV - When Ukrainian designer Viktor Anisimov showed Volodymyr Zelenskiy a new black suit last Friday, it included a small detail. A back vent on the back inched it closer to a civilian suit, compared to the military outfits the president has favoured throughout the war in Ukraine. "These are our hopes for peace," Anisimov told Reuters about the tweak. "We think that if we add something subtle to this image, something from civilian clothing to his uniform, then it will be like a lucky charm.' On Monday, the lucky charm worked to set a warm tone for a White House meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. Moments after Zelenskiy arrived, Trump complimented him on the suit. Zelenskiy's dark military-style outfit was one of the things Trump objected to during a disastrous Oval Office meeting in February, when the Ukrainian leader was given a public scolding. Anisimov, 61, from the northern region of Chernihiv, said he was watching videos of that interaction and felt the jabs. He perceived them as aimed at the Ukrainian citizens, not just at Zelenskiy. "There was a slight sense of despair because they do not understand how we breathe, how we live," he said. A reporter at the White House who asked Zelenskiy in February why he was not wearing a suit also praised the Ukrainian on his attire on Monday, saying "You look fabulous in that suit". Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail Anisimov said he was not watching for criticism or compliments this time but wanted to ensure the Ukrainian president looked dignified. "They praise, they scold. If we win, and we will win, then whose suit it was doesn't matter," he said. Zelenskiy has worn military-type outfits, often with collar-less shirts and heavy boots, to show solidarity with Ukraine's troops since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. "In this moment, internally, we all changed, everything changed, life changed. It was a point of no-return," Zelenskiy said in an interview with a Ukrainian media outlet a year later. URGENT REQUEST The black suit worn on Monday was originally presented, along with an identical navy option, as an outfit idea for Ukrainian Independence Day on August 24. While the team was going back and forth on the back vent, Anisimov took it back for alterations on Friday. Before he even got to making the adjustments on sleeves, the phone rang with an urgent request from the administration on Saturday – the president needed the suit for his U.S. trip. It was not the first time that Anisimov had been charged with changing the president's style. In the early 2000s, then-comedian Zelenskiy and his team 'Kvartal 95' sought to establish their identities on the Ukrainian screens after getting their initial break in comedy competitions. The process was gradual: black t-shirts gave way to white shirts with ties and then morphed into suits worn by the team during the shows. Anisimov said he had not heard from Zelenskiy for over five years when a mutual acquaintance from the previous make-over contacted him in January. They floated the idea of creating a capsule collection for the president. Anisimov said he used the military uniform as an inspiration point to ensure versatility for all items in the capsule. "I can't say that we sewed (a suit) specifically for the NATO summit or for an important conversation with Trump and European leaders. The suit is just a suit," Anisimov said, adding that Zelenskiy has about five similar-looking jackets with small tweaks. Since then, the Ukrainian president wore Anisimov's designs to the funeral of Pope Francis in April and a NATO Summit in June, both occasions that helped to bring the U.S. and Ukraine closer together after the public rift in February. REUTERS
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Explainer: Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in US elections?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the US Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the US Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the US is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the US Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the US have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are US citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said US District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama. REUTERS
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
With ‘stop the killing', EU tries Trump-pleasing lexical shift on Ukraine
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (centre, right) during his meeting with US President Donald Trump (centre, left) and European and Nato leaders at the White House in Washington on Aug 18. BRUSSELS - The EU has dropped its calls for a 'ceasefire' in Ukraine and is instead demanding that Russia 'stop the killing', in a semantic shift that aims to grab the ear of US President Donald Trump. Having failed to yield a breakthrough on a pause in fighting when he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week, Mr Trump has pivoted to seeking a full peace deal. Brussels, which as recently as last week insisted that a ceasefire should proceed any peace talks, has since adapted its language. 'The message for us is: stop the killing. Anything that stops the killing is welcome,' European Commission spokeswoman Arianna Podesta said at a press conference on Aug 19. Her remarks echoed the words of EU chief Ursula von der Leyen who, speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Brussels on Aug 17, said the 'effect' was more important than the 'term'. 'And the effect must be stop the killing,' she said. 'That's the most important part. Whether we call it a ceasefire or a peace deal, stop the killing.' European Council president Antonio Costa used a different formulation, telling a press conference in Lisbon on Aug 19 that 'As a first step, Russia must immediately end the violence.' 'Our top priority must be to stop the killings. Whether we call it a ceasefire or a truce is secondary,' he said. European sources said Mr Trump now disliked the term 'ceasefire', and the intention was to avoid antagonising the US president on a matter of form as high-stakes negotiations on Ukraine and European security were under way. Yet at the White House summit on Aug 19, European leaders made clear their basic demands had not changed. 'I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that and let's try to put pressure on Russia,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. French President Emmanuel Macron summed it up by saying that 'a truce, a ceasefire or at least, to stop the killings' was 'a necessity'. AFP
