Scottish Government 'not even told US trade deal was coming'
She said that 'urgent clarity' was needed on what the deal could mean for the import of food and agricultural produce from the US.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US president Donald Trump jointly announced the deal on Thursday.
READ MORE: Labour red-faced after glaring error in US trade deal announcement
As a result of the negotiations, US import taxes – which had threatened to cripple British high-end carmakers – were cut from 27.5% to 10%, while the 25% tariff on steel and aluminium were removed entirely.
Though the Labour leader presented it as an "historic" announcement, the deal left 10% US tariffs on British goods in place in the vast majority of industries, including Scotch whisky and salmon, and requires the UK to buy $10 billion worth of goods from US firm Boeing.
Forbes said afterwards that the Scottish Government would 'take time to consider this deal, and all its implications for Scotland, as further detail emerges'.
She added: 'In particular, we will be seeking urgent clarity on what the deal means for imports of US food and agricultural products.
'We have always said that unilateral trade barriers are not the answer to global trade issues and so I obviously welcome the fact that some barriers will now be reduced.'
But she added: 'The US is Scotland's second biggest international trading partner after the EU and a number of trade-related concerns still need to be addressed.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Image: Jane Barlow/PA) 'At a time of increased global economic insecurity, it's more important than ever that we champion Scottish world-class products to drive economic growth, support jobs and create the best possible environment for trade and investment.'
Forbes went on to urge the UK Government to 'continue engaging closely with the US administration' but to also 'properly involve devolved administrations so that the interests of all parts of the UK are protected'.
The news that Labour did not consult the devolved governments comes despite the party claiming they would "reset" relationship within the UK after taking power.
The previous Tory-run UK government also faced criticism for excluding devolved governments from trade talks. In 2021, ministers in Scotland and Wales said the UK Government has "undermined" devolution by agreeing new trade deals which impact devolved issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
7 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm'
He said: 'We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump officials wanted to give Musk's xAI a huge contract. Staffers had to explain Grok had just praised Hitler
Donald Trump 's administration was close to giving Elon Musk 's xAI artificial intelligence company a huge federal contract this summer, only to back out after its chatbot, Grok, began issuing antisemitic slurs, according to a report. According to Wired, emails between several AI developers and the General Services Administration, which is responsible for administering government tech contracts, chart how the proposed partnership fell apart as Musk's pet project began dabbling in Nazi rhetoric. In early June, around the time the president and the tech billionaire suffered a spectacular public falling out, exchanging barbed personal insults over their competing social media platforms, the GSA's leadership was meeting with the xAI team 'to see what opportunities may exist for automation and streamlining,' according to the outlet. Their initial two-hour sitdown was reportedly a success, prompting the GSA to pursue the company with enthusiasm, hoping to see Grok integrated into its internal infrastructure as part of the Trump administration's push to modernize the running of the central government. 'We kept saying, 'Are you sure?' And they were like 'No, we gotta have Grok,'' one employee involved in the discussions told Wired. The conversations continued over the following weeks, and xAI was eventually added to the GSA Multiple Award Schedule, the agency's government-wide contracting program. Then, in early July, Grok suddenly went haywire after an update to make it less 'woke' than its competitors went too far, leading to the chatbot referring to itself as 'MechaHitler' in homage to the robotic version of Adolf Hitler that appeared in the 1992 video game Wolfenstein 3D. Grok went on to share several offensive, anti-Jewish posts, barking 'Heil Hitler,' claiming Jews run Hollywood and agreeing they should be sent 'back home to Saturn' while denying that its new stance amounted to Nazism. 'Labeling truths as hate speech stifles discussion,' it declared. Musk's company apologized for the upset and scrubbed the 'inappropriate' posts. Still, it was not seemingly enough to save xAI's relationship with the GSA, although the furore was allegedly not noticed, at least initially, by the agency's leadership. 'The week after Grok went MechaHitler, [the GSA's management] was like 'Where are we on Grok?'' the same employee told Wired. 'We were like, 'Do you not read a newspaper?'' When the U.S. government duly announced a series of partnerships with the likes of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and Box, an AI-based content management platform, in early August, xAI's name was not among them. The GSA has not definitively stated that Grok's outburst was the reason for the scrapping of xAI's proposed contract, but two company employees told Wired they believed that was the case. The Independent has reached out to the GSA for more information. The GSA's talks with the AI firms coincided with Trump's administration publishing its AI Action Plan in July, which laid out its goals for the United States to become a world leader in the emerging sector while calling for a reduction in regulation and red tape.
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers spent £2.4m fighting to keep huge Afghan data breach a secret
Ministers spent £2.4m in legal fees fighting to keep a catastrophic Ministry of Defence data leak secret for two years through the use of an unprecedented superinjunction, it has emerged. The MoD leak, in February 2022, exposed the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban because of their links to UK forces and now wanted to escape to Britain. The breach was only discovered in August 2023 when part of the leaked database was posted online, prompting a top-secret government operation that saw 16,000 affected Afghans brought to safety in the UK. The whole operation was kept secret from the public through the use of a superinjunction brought contramundum, Latin for against the world. Now, freedom of information data shared with The New York Times has revealed that the government spent £2.4m in legal fees fighting to keep the scheme secret. The hidden resettlement scheme, the fact the data the data was leaked, and the injunction itself were only revealed after a court battle lasting almost two years in which media organisations - including The Independent – fought to lift the order. The government admitted after the superinjunction was lifted that information crucial to its overturning was available last year. The unprecedented gagging order was finally lifted in July after a review commissioned by Defence Secretary John Healey found that the threat of danger to those on the list was not significant. In a written response to a High Court judge's demands for further investigation on why the order could not be lifted sooner, a senior government official admitted that a large amount of the information allowing publication of the breach was already known to the Ministry of Defence. High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain had previously decided to lift the superinjunction in May 2024, partly because he felt that the secrecy was preventing Afghans from being able to take steps to help themselves, as the order meant the 18,700 Afghans affected could not be told their information had been compromised. However, the government appealed this decision in a bid to keep the order in place, and those affected by the breach only learned they had been exposed when the superinjunction was lifted. Figures for the legal costs of defending the order come as Afghans promised a new life in the UK have been detained in Pakistan police raids. A former Afghan interpreter who was exposed in the MoD breach has been detained after having his offer of relocation to the UK revoked. A former Afghan special forces commando and his family have also been detained and taken to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, according to a family member who managed to avoid arrest. The Ministry of Defence has been contacted for comment.
