
Stinging deaths, back yard poisons and billions spent: model predicts Australia's fire ants future
The Australia Institute research breaks down the impact of red imported fire ants (Rifa) by electorate, with the seats of Durack and O'Connor in Western Australia, Mayo in South Australia and Blair in Queensland the hardest hit if the ants become endemic.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Drawing on census data and earlier studies about the impact of Rifa, the new figures show that pesticides and pest control pose the highest financial cost to households annually, $581m, followed by medical expenses of $233m and veterinary costs of $215m. A co-author of the report warned the 'huge' volume of pesticide needed to fight the ants will affect the environment.
The new modelling doubles an earlier estimate that put total household costs at $536m, and has concerned experts who say individuals may take eradication into their own hands.
In the WA seat of Durack alone, the forecasting shows more than 60,000 people would be stung, 1,209 of whom would develop an anaphylactic reaction. Almost 19,000 dogs and cats would require the attention of a vet after being stung.
In the marginal Queensland electorates of Blair, held by Labor's Shayne Neumann; Dickson, held by Peter Dutton; and the Greens-held Ryan, the annual costs of Rifa total $21.1m:
Blair: $1.7m in medical costs, $1.5m in vet costs and $5.1m in household pesticide costs.
Dickson: $1.4m in medical costs, $1.2m in vet costs and $4m in household pesticide costs.
Ryan: $1.5m in medical costs, $1.3m in vet costs and $3.4m in household pesticide costs.
The ants would create an additional 2.1m visits to vets nationwide – a figure that comes after the Invasive Species Council warned 'a lot' of pets are suspected to have been killed by fire ant stings, including a puppy found dead on a fire ant nest in Greenbank about 15 months ago.
Rifa are managed over an 830,000-hectare zone of south-eastern Queensland by the national fire ant eradication program. It uses a combination of bait and direct nest injection to suppress and eliminate the pest.
Given their rapid spread, Rifa may increasingly be managed by stand-alone households which, according to the forecasting, would each spend $83 on pesticides each year.
The Invasive Species Council's Reece Pianta said if eradication funding was not ramped up, the modelling suggested Australia could follow in the footsteps of the US.
'Fire ant eradication failure means Australian households could get slugged with a $580m bill each year as they take fire ant control into their own hands.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'In the United States, where fire ants cannot be eradicated, residents in fire ant zones find their neighbours using a range of harsh or off-label chemical treatments to control these killer invaders,' he said.
'Parents are not going to just sit by and let their kids be stung by these tiny killers, so it's no surprise we hear of stories in the USA of petrol being poured on nests, or uncontrolled chemical use.'
He said the new financial modelling for suppression alone amounted to as much as the current four-year fire ant eradication program budget of $592.8m every year – for ever.
A 2021 government study found that governments and individuals would need to spend $200m to $300m annually over the next 10 years to stamp out Rifa and avoid ongoing annual costs of at least $2bn caused by the pest. The planned funding was only half that amount, the council said.
Research director at the Australian Institute and the report's co-author, Rod Campbell, said the figures showed the economic case for fire ant eradication was 'a no-brainer'.
'Behind the dollar figures though, is what the money would be spent on – pesticides.
'Australia needs to eradicate fire ants urgently not just to save money for households, but to avoid huge volumes of pesticides going into our back yards, fields and bushland.'
Rifa were first detected in Queensland in 2001 and can kill people, native animals and livestock as well as damage infrastructure and ecosystems.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Marles insists Australia ‘not supplying weapons to Israel' but critics argue ‘parts of weapons are weapons'
The federal government won't follow Germany and introduce new export restrictions to pressure Israel, with the defence minister, Richard Marles, insisting no weapons are being sent from Australia to aid the killing in Gaza. Marles, the acting prime minister, said on Sunday that Australia was not exporting any weapons for use by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), a contested claim rejected by human rights campaigners and the Greens. 'Let's be clear: we don't supply weapons to Israel,' Marles told ABC TV. 'We've seen a lot of misinformation in relation to what Australia is doing here. The fundamental point is that we are not supplying weapons to Israel, and there is no step that we could take, equivalent to that of Germany, which would have any impact in relation to that.' The comments follow Germany's decision last week to halt exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza. The chancellor, Friedrich Merz, announced the decision on Friday, in response to Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to dramatically expand Israel's Gaza operations, a move condemned by the international community. Marles was asked about Australia exporting armoured steel and, separately, parts for F-35 fighter jets, which Israel previously conceded were used in operations in Gaza. 'We're an F-35 country and we have been that for a couple of decades. That is a multi-lateral arrangement with supply chains that are organised by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple suppliers in respect of all of those supply chains.' David Shoebridge, the Greens' spokesperson on foreign affairs, labelled Labor's statements meaningless. 'Australia is a key part of the F-35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs. 'Two years of hollow talking points from the Albanese government aren't washing with the public any more as we watch a genocide in real time.' Shoebridge argued that, under international law, component parts were considered weapons. 'Watching the defence minister, Richard Marles, refuse to answer basic questions about Australia's export of weapons parts and defence material to Israel is excruciating,' he said in a statement. 'The Australian public knows that the Albanese government is permitting the export of armoured steel, F-35 weapons parts and other critical materials to Israel and wants it to stop.' Shoebridge said if the Albanese government stopped the export of F-35 parts to Israel, their fleet would, in time, be grounded. 'The fact Albanese is choosing not to do that makes us complicit,' he said. Donald Rothwell, a professor of international law at the Australian National University, said Australian exports of component weapon parts to the IDF were 'contributing to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'. 'Part of the difficulty is that there can be so many component parts of weapons. Some component parts may have been exported to Israel for civilian use but then utilised for weapons,' he said on Sunday. 'The clearer position that Australia could take is that if it diplomatically, legally and politically objects to Israel's occupation of Gaza, then all exports could be suspended for the time being. That would be the clearest way of ensuring that no Australian exports contribute to the Israeli military effort in Gaza.' Rothwell said he 'would not be as decisive as Senator Shoebridge as to his interpretation of international law'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Guardian Australia reported in November that Australia had amended or lapsed at least 16 defence-related export permits to Israel. A spokesperson said all of the permits were approved before the 7 October terror attacks by Hamas and none related to weapons or ammunition. The ABC reported in April that a remote weapon system designed and built by an Australian company was one of dozens of counter-drone technologies tested by Israel this year. The Australian Centre for International Justice, a non-profit legal centre, is among organisations questioning the government's claims on military exports. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said Australia had appropriate sanctions in place against members of Israel's war cabinet and would not publicly discuss other considerations. 'What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,' he said during a visit to New Zealand. Albanese said the government wanted hostages held by Hamas released and for urgent aid to stop the 'humanitarian catastrophe' unfolding in Gaza. Australia's opposition home affairs spokesman, Andrew Hastie, told Sky that Netanyahu's plan to control Gaza City was 'a very risky proposition' and could add to the humanitarian crisis. 'It would be incredibly difficult for IDF troops to move through and clear. All the advantage would be with Hamas defenders and anyone else who would stand and fight.' The foreign minister, Penny Wong, joined Germany, Italy, New Zealand and the UK in a joint statement on Saturday, stating Israel's plan would make an already perilous situation worse and risked breaching international law. London's high court ruled a month ago that Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was lawful.


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ross Greer: Forbes exit makes post election SNP Greens deal 'easier'
Ms Forbes, who has a three year old daughter, and three older step daughters, said she wanted to spend more time with her family. Mr Greer is currently standing in the Scottish Greens leadership contest following the decision by current co-leader Patrick Harvie to step down from the role. At his campaign launch in Edinburgh last month, he made clear he would like to see his party return to power with the SNP after the next Scottish Parliament elections and less keen on striking a deal with Labour. READ MORE: However, some in his party would be reluctant to go into government with the SNP with Ms Forbes as Deputy First Minister regarding both her economic outlook and her socially conservative views including against equal marriage as major barriers to a new deal. The Herald on Sunday asked Mr Greer now that Ms Forbes would be leaving Holyrood, would a new BHA be easier to achieve. "It is no secret that Kate Forbes believes in things that are fundamentally at odds with what the Scottish Greens believe in on LGBT rights, for instance marriage or trans rights, but also on economics as well," he said. "Kate's economics are clearly to the right of where the SNP has been in the last decade and well to the right of the Scottish Greens. On a personal level it is difficult for me as a queer man to be siting across from someone I know doesn't believe I should have the same rights under the law that she does. "But Kate is stepping down and the reasons why she is stepping down I have a huge amount of sympathy for. The parliament and our political culture have not done nearly enough for people to get into and stay in elected office and have a family." Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Image: PA) He added: "As far as the Scottish Greens are concerned I think we have a moral obligation to seize the opportunity to deliver the kind of fairer and greener Scotland we believe in. We will not lift children out of poverty, we will not save a single species by remaining in opposition for the rest of our lives. "When we where in government we delivered transformational shouldn't be afraid of being in a position of power and influence." He was pressed if Ms Forbes leaving Holyrood at next May's election made it easier for the SNP and Greens to strike a post election governing deal. 'The short answer is yes," he said. "But I am not saying deal between the SNP and Greens is likely. 'There is an election to happen. It is for the public to decide what the balance of the parties is in the parliament. There is only going to be a Green SNP deal if there is a Green SNP majority. 'But there is no doubt Kate's position on equality issues particularly and her position on economics would have been a huge barrier to significant co operation between the two parties." He said it was too early to say what his party's prospective negotiations positions or red lines could be. However, he pointed to a ban on conversion practices and fossil fuel heatings systems in homes as possible issues. Both were sidelined by the Scottish Government following the collapse of the BHA with ministers in Edinburgh opting to see what progress the UK Government would do on the former. "The SNP dropping its commitment to ban so-called conversion therapy was absolutely gutting," he said. "This is a form of torture against the LGBT community. Personally I would want a conversion therapy ban to be part of any future government programme the Greens were involved with. But setting red lines is for our membership as a whole. We are a genuinely democratic party." Mr Greer, who helped to negotiate the BHA with Nicola Sturgeon's government in 2021, pointed to recent polling suggesting his party could get 15 or 16 MSPs putting it in a strong position to re-enter government with the SNP which polling suggest looks like to be returned as the largest party but with fewer MSPs. He said there was an opportunity for the Greens to build support among progressive voters as he accused Labour of moving more to the right since coming to government by defeating the Conservatives at last year's general election and the SNP moving to the centre ground. "The is a huge gap opening up in Scottish politics. Labour have moved to the right. We have a UK Labour Government which looks and feels a lot like the government it replaced while the SNP have moved to the centre," he said. "They have dropped a lot of progressive policies which we were pursuing jointly when we were in government. That leaves the Scottish Greens as the only party unequivocally on the progressive left." Announcing her intention to stand down as an MSP next May, the DFM said: 'I have grown up in the public eye, getting married, having a baby and raising a young family. I have consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's during that time. "I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure. Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life – which can never be rewound." Scottish Labour Deputy Leader Jackie Baillie said 'The Scottish Greens gave up the last of their credibility during their shambolic stint in government. 'Labour has ended over a decade of devastating Tory austerity and is delivering the greatest upgrade to workers rights in a generation and a publicly-owned energy company. 'The truth is only Scottish Labour can put an end to SNP failure and deliver a new direction for Scotland, our public services, our economy and our environment.' The SNP was approached for comment.


Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Greens leadership candidates Ross Greer, Gillian Mackay admit party 'painfully white and middle-class'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Candidates vying to become the next leader of the Scottish Greens have warned the party is 'painfully white' and 'painfully middle class'. Four candidates have put themselves forward to be the next co-leader of the Scottish Greens, including incumbent co-leader Lorna Slater, alongside senior MSPs Gillian Mackay and Ross Greer. Local activist Dominic Ashmole is also in the running for one of the two positions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dominic Ashmole, Ross Greer, Gillian Mackay and Lorna Slater are running to be the co-leaders of the Scottish Greens | PA A leadership hustings on Friday night ahead of voting opening to party members heard a call for the Greens to take inspiration from the rise of Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Asked what the party's biggest weakness was, Mr Greer bluntly warned the Greens were 'far too white', adding there was a 'need to reach out to minority communities'. He said another weakness the Greens faced was being 'far too complicated about talking about things'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Mackay, who agreed with Mr Greer on a number of issues during the hustings, said the party was 'painfully white', but added it was also 'painfully middle class'. The Central Scotland MSP stressed there was a need for the Greens to be 'speaking plainly to voters and cutting out some of that jargon'. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images She added: 'The rise of Reform is a potential thing that could cost us certain votes in places.' Ms Mackay suggested Reform, although saying its views and policies are "abhorrent", had an ability to 'speak to people on a very simplistic basis'. She said: 'We need to do the same, but from that left angle.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Slater, who previously served as a minister in the Scottish Government, told activists that 'success has been a team effort'. She stressed she wanted to continue a role in 'taking on the anti-immigrant, anti-trans and climate denial' from other parts of Scottish politics and 'counter the narrative that the Greens are anti-business'. The Lothians MSP warned the party 'sometimes misunderstands our voters'. But she insisted it had been 'wonderful working with [co-leader] Patrick [Harvie] over the last six years'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Slater also called for the party to 'ensure there is a woman leader', particularly taking part in events leading up to next year's election with every other Scottish political leader being a man. But Ms Mackay, who is on maternity leave until January, took a thinly veiled dig at Ms Slater, accusing her of backing 'tokenism'. Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire She said: 'It is not progressive to force that tokenism of having a woman there and it being detrimental to them, whether that be for their health, whether that be family or caring responsibilities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That is something we as a party need to be comfortable with and not tear strips off each other if that happens. Very often, there is a good reason behind it.' Mr Ashmole called for the Greens to be 'working together with other progressive forces to see off that threat' of Reform. If he is successful, Mr Ashmole is planning to 'tour the country" and would take on a 'grassroots mobilisation and support role', with him not poised to enter Holyrood until next year, if elected. He warned the Greens not to continue pushing for 'drastic change' and 'not just falling in with other people's agenda'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Since the Greens left government last year in Humza Yousaf's catastrophic final act as first minister, the party has been subject to infighting. Activists who believe the Greens are not radical enough failed in an attempt to de-select Mr Harvie from the Glasgow regional list, while internal documents have been leaked to the media. Greens MSP Ross Greer | Getty Images Mr Greer insisted those members taking part in 'leaks and spreading dirt' to the press should 'just leave' the Greens. He said: 'It hasn't felt like the party's pulling in the same direction over the last year.'