Bickering overshadows policy positions in first GOP debate of governor's race
The four frontrunners in the Republican race to become New Jersey's next governor met at Rider University Tuesday for their first debate, and things went from discourse to dogfight in less than 10 minutes.
As the interruptions and insults intensified, candidate Bill Spadea, the brash radio personality, noted that the men were bellowing over one other like they were at an 'old Italian dinner.' And at one point, moderator Laura Jones said, 'This is no longer productive.'
'Unfortunately, in a debate as to who is going to be the best next governor, the loudest, most disruptive, annoying person does not win,' Spadea said.
In between the bouts of bickering, Spadea, businessman Jack Ciattarelli, Sen. Jon Bramnick, and former Sen. Ed Durr weighed in on everything from development to the 'deep state' to dismantling the U.S. Department of Education.
Spadea, Durr, and Ciattarelli fought over who was most MAGA, clearly looking to capitalize on President Trump's gains in the Garden State between his first presidential run in 2016 and his White House win last year.
'We now know that Donald Trump appeals to Hispanic voters, Black voters, blue-collar workers. Donald Trump showed us the pathway to victory, and the right way to handle this is to run that style campaign,' Spadea said.
Bramnick, the lone anti-Trump Republican on the stage, took a different tack as he addressed an audience that booed him when he mentioned the Jan. 6 insurrection and cheered a subsequent reference to Trump's pardons of roughly 1,500 Jan. 6 rioters.
'Do you think the people of New Jersey want the debate to be who loves Trump the most or who loves New Jersey the most?' he said.
The candidates also hammered home the personas they hope voters will remember in the ballot box.
Bramnick, an attorney who's served in the Legislature for 22 years, called himself a 'Republican with a heart' who has the power to win Democrats and independents.
Spadea, who hosted a conservative radio talk show until last week, said he's a Trump loyalist intent on reversing the policies of 'woke Democrats who wreck this state and weak Republicans who let it happen.'
Ciattarelli, who lost a tight gubernatorial race against Gov. Phil Murphy in 2021, presented himself as a party unifier capable of raising money and benefitting down-ballot candidates.
Durr, a truck driver and one-time state senator who lost his 2023 bid for reelection, said he's a political outsider and 'regular guy' who will bring an anti-establishment approach to a Statehouse run by career politicians.
'The only way to fix New Jersey is by doing something different. Well, I'm different,' Durr said.
The candidates aligned on many of the GOP's pet issues, even though they argued over the details.
They agreed New Jersey should not be a sanctuary state for undocumented immigrants, that New Jersey's taxes are intolerably high, that government bloat should be slashed, and that the Murphy administration's pandemic restrictions and lockdowns were destructive overreach.
They blasted municipal affordable housing mandates and overdevelopment. They lamented rampant corruption in New Jersey politics at all levels. And none are fans of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, which Ciattarelli called 'affirmative action on steroids.'
But they disagreed on plenty of things too, including whether voters should decide whether to amend the state constitution to give women the legal right to abortion.
Bramnick and Ciattarelli support abortion rights, except for late-term terminations, with Ciattarelli saying teens under 18 should not be able to end a pregnancy without parental notification. Durr and Spadea oppose abortion, with Spadea calling for more funding for anti-abortion centers.
They also split on gender identity politics and book bans.
Asked if they would roll back LGBTQ+ protections adopted by the Murphy administration, Durr and Spadea said they would bar transgender athletes from teams and facilities that don't align with their birth gender, prohibit gender-affirming care for transgender youth, and require schools to involve parents when transgender and gender-questioning students come out at school.
Bramnick and Ciattarelli, though, had different answers.
'I'm here to protect any and all groups, particularly marginalized groups, here in New Jersey, plain and simple,' Ciattarelli said.
Bramnick agreed, saying the Republican Party 'should always have a heart' and respect everyone.
Bramnick was the only lawmaker to defend the recently enacted Freedom to Read Act, which he co-sponsored. The new law limits book bans in public schools and libraries and shields librarians from lawsuits and criminal charges filed by people who find library materials obscene or otherwise objectionable.
'Next time, you should read the legislation before you take a position on it,' he said, as Durr bashed the bill as promoting pornography.
Spadea said he would repeal it, if elected, and blamed it on teachers union the New Jersey Education Association 'pushing their radical agenda.'
Ciattarelli questioned the need for the bill, saying: 'There is only one public employee that needs warrants and deserves immunity, and that is our police, not school librarians, with all due respect.'
The debate was hosted by the New Jersey Globe, On New Jersey, Rider's Rebovich Institute of New Jersey Politics, and Save Jersey. Ten Republicans have declared they'll run in the June primary to succeed Murphy, but only the four frontrunners participated in the debate.
Murphy's term ends in January 2026. The two-term Democrat is barred from seeking a third term in November.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on the International Criminal Court for pursuing investigations into U.S. and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. The State Department on Wednesday announced new sanctions on four ICC officials, including two judges and two prosecutors, who it said had been instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis. As a result of the sanctions, any assets the targets hold in U.S. jurisdictions are frozen. The sanctions are just the latest in a series of steps the administration has taken against The Hague-based court, the world's first international war crimes tribunal. The U.S. has already imposed penalties on the ICC's former chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who stepped aside in May pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, and four other tribunal judges. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had taken action against ICC judges Kimberly Proust of Canada and Nicolas Guillou of France and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. 'These individuals are foreign persons who directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation,' Rubio said. He added that the administration would continue 'to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions.' In a separate statement, the State Department said Prost was hit for ruling to authorize an ICC investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, which was later dropped. Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Khan and Niang were penalized for continuing Karim Khan's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, according to the statement. Wednesday's move carries on a history of Trump administration actions against the ICC, of which the U.S. is not a member, dating back to his first term in office. During Trump's first term, the U.S. hit the ICC with sanctions, but those were rescinded by President Joe Biden's administration in early 2021.


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.


The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.