logo
Scientists Discovered a New Creature That Exists Between Life and Not-Life

Scientists Discovered a New Creature That Exists Between Life and Not-Life

Yahoo6 hours ago

Here's what you'll learn when you read this story:
Viruses typically aren't considered 'alive,' as many core biological functions are outsourced to their hosts. But a newly discovered organism appears to straddle the line between virus and cell.
Like a virus, this new organism 'Sukunaarchaeum mirabile' outsources some functions to its host, but can still create its own ribosomes and RNA.
Its genome is also surprisingly small, and is roughly half the size (238,000 base pairs) of the next-smallest archaeal genome.
At first glance, creating a definition for 'life' seems somewhat straightforward. Sentient animals all the way down to single-celled organisms capable of reproduction are welcome on the tree of life, but there are other organisms that challenge this understanding, like viruses. Because virus don't grow, reproduce on their own, or make their own energy, they're typically excluded from definitions of life. But once a virus infects a host, it's immensely active, and can be responsible for world-altering events (see: Spanish flu, ebola, COVID-19, and so on).
However, life is complicated, and this controversial categorization of 'life' and 'not life' can have gray areas in which organisms appear to defy the expectations of both camps. Recently, scientists found a new member of this head-scratching cadre. In a new paper published on the bioRxiv server, researchers in Canada and Japan outlined how they identified a new cellular entity that appeared to straddle the typical definitions of a virality and cellular life.
Currently named 'Sukunaarchaeum mirabile' (after a deity in Japanese mythology known for its small stature), this entity contains the necessary genes to create its own ribosomes and messenger RNA—something your typical virus lacks. But like a virus, it offloads certain biological functions onto its host and it appears singularly obsessed with replicating itself.
'Its genome is profoundly stripped-down, lacking virtually all recognizable metabolic pathways, and primarily encoding the machinery for its replicative core: DNA replication, transcription, and translation,' the authors wrote. 'This suggests an unprecedented level of metabolic dependence on a host, a condition that challenges the functional distinctions between minimal cellular life and viruses.'
Led by Ryo Harada, a molecular biologist from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, the team chanced upon this strange creature while studying the bacterial genome of the marine plankton Citharistes regius. Within the genomic data, Harada and his team found a loop of DNA that didn't match with any known species. They eventually determined that the organism belonged to the domain Archaea—a group associated with prokaryotic cells, but from which eukaryotic cells (i.e. you and me) ultimately descended a couple billion years ago.
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of Sukunaarchaeum is its extreme genome reduction, with only 238,000 base pairs of DNA. Viruses, as Live Science points out, can contain many hundreds of thousands more base pairs, and can even reach up into the millions. As for fellow archaea, the smallest known complete genome within this group stretches to 490,000 base pairs, meaning that Sukunaarchaeum contains less than half the number of base pairs posessed by even the smallest archaeal genome.
'The discovery of Sukunaarchaeum pushes the conventional boundaries of cellular life and highlights the vast unexplored biological novelty within microbial interactions,' the authors wrote. 'Further exploration of symbiotic systems may reveal even more extraordinary life forms, reshaping our understanding of cellular evolution.'
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crash Risk After Heart Device Implant Still Hard to Predict
Crash Risk After Heart Device Implant Still Hard to Predict

Medscape

time44 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Crash Risk After Heart Device Implant Still Hard to Predict

TOPLINE: Models using driving and health data to predict 1-year crash risk after the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator showed poor discrimination between individuals who crashed motor vehicles and those who did not. However, such models with good calibration may help guide discussions about crash risk between clinicians and patients. METHODOLOGY: Clinical guidelines recommend temporarily ceasing driving after the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator; however, these restrictions can result in social isolation or loss of income. Empirical data to inform such driving restrictions are limited. Researchers in Canada used population-based administrative data and identified licensed drivers who had a first implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator between 1998 and 2018 to estimate the subsequent risk for a motor vehicle crash using prediction models. The recipients were stratified into two cohorts according to the indication for their implants: those receiving implants for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (n = 3652; median age, 66 years; 18% women) and those receiving implants for secondary prevention (n = 3408; median age, 65 years; 16% women). The outcome of interest was the involvement of the implant recipient as a driver in one or more crashes within the first year after the implantation procedure; crashes considered were those attended by police and/or involving an insurance claim. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 352 drivers (9.6%) in the primary prevention cohort and 270 drivers (7.9%) in the secondary prevention cohort were involved in crashes within the first year after implantation. The crash prediction models poorly distinguished between individuals who crashed and those who did not in both the primary and secondary prevention cohorts (c-statistics, 0.60 and 0.61, respectively). However, the models showed good calibration for both cohorts (calibration slopes, 1.14 and 1.07, respectively), suggesting that the models could be helpful in guiding discussions between clinicians and patients. In the primary prevention cohort, the top predictors of crash were male sex, number of crashes in the past year, and active vehicle insurance in the past year; in the secondary prevention cohort, the predictors were male sex, no history of seizure, active opioid prescriptions, and active vehicle insurance in the past year. IN PRACTICE: "Clinicians already use clinical intuition and common sense to identify patients at higher risk of SCI [sudden cardiac incapacitation] , reserving their most strident advice to avoid driving for the individuals they consider to be at highest risk," the researchers noted. "Using baseline health and driving data to formally predict post-implantation crash risk and personalize driving restrictions is a strategy that has the potential to strengthen this clinical practice, but our findings suggest this approach is not yet ready to deploy in clinical practice," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by John A. Staples of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. It was published online on June 24, 2025, in Heart. LIMITATIONS: This study lacked a direct measure of road exposure, which may have affected the model performance. Data regarding several parameters, including the indication for implantation, were missing at several occasions. The researchers were unable to identify the crashes specifically caused by sudden cardiac incapacitation. DISCLOSURES: This study received a grant from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. One author reported receiving a Mentored Clinician Scientist Award from Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and a Health Professional-Investigator Award from Michael Smith Health Research BC. Another author reported receiving support from Michael Smith Health Research BC and the British Columbia Emergency Medicine Network. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

NOAA delays the cutoff of key satellite data for hurricane forecasting
NOAA delays the cutoff of key satellite data for hurricane forecasting

Washington Post

time3 hours ago

  • Washington Post

NOAA delays the cutoff of key satellite data for hurricane forecasting

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday it is delaying by one month the planned cutoff of satellite data that helps forecasters track hurricanes. Meteorologists and scientists warned of severe consequences last week when NOAA said, in the midst of this year's hurricane season , that it would almost immediately discontinue key data collected by three weather satellites that the agency jointly runs with the Defense Department.

Heart Attacks No Longer a Leading Cause of Death in the U.S. Here's What Is Instead
Heart Attacks No Longer a Leading Cause of Death in the U.S. Here's What Is Instead

Health Line

time4 hours ago

  • Health Line

Heart Attacks No Longer a Leading Cause of Death in the U.S. Here's What Is Instead

Heart attacks have become more survivable in the past 50 years, and are no longer the leading cause of heart disease-related deaths, a new study reports. As heart attack deaths fall, fatalities from other heart conditions are rising due to various factors, including higher rates of other forms of cardiovascular disease. In recent decades, deaths from heart disease have still been responsible for more U.S. fatalities than any other cause. Heart attacks are no longer the number one cause of heart-related deaths in the United States, according to a new report. Fatalities from heart attacks — acute myocardial infarctions — decreased by 89% from 1970 to 2022, the report, published on June 25 in the Journal of the American Heart Association, shows. Heart attacks are severe ischemic heart disease events in which blood flow to and from the heart is restricted. Ischemic heart disease was responsible for 91% of all heart disease-related deaths in 1970, declining to 53% by 2022. Heart disease overall has decreased by 66% since 1970, yet it remains the leading cause of death among Americans. With more people avoiding death from myocardial infarctions (MI), fatalities from other heart disease subtypes now represent 81% of heart-related deaths. These include: heart failure, for which fatalities have increased by 81% hypertension-related heart disease deaths, which have risen by 106% arrhythmia-related fatalities, which have increased by 450% Heart attack deaths drop in recent decades Jayne Morgan, MD, cardiologist and vice president of medical affairs for Hello Heart, told Healthline that the report does not indicate that fewer heart attacks are occurring. Morgan wasn't involved in the new report. 'I did not note a decline in myocardial infarctions themselves, but rather a decline in heart attacks being the primary cause of death,' she said. 'As Americans, we are not that great at prevention. Our strength has been in the science and application of medicine.' 'The inference is that more and more heart attacks are survivable now as compared to 55 years ago,' Morgan said. This is because emergency physicians have become better at saving people experiencing heart attacks with the help of contemporary medications, lifesaving procedures, and devices. Deaths from non-fatal heart attacks Morgan explained that the non-fatal heart attack 'was the catalyst for the chain of events leading to eventual long-term chronic heart disease conditions such as heart failure and arrhythmias.' 'Patients who otherwise would have passed from their heart attack are now surviving, and then living longer dealing with the consequences,' Cheng-Han Chen, MD, board certified interventional cardiologist, told Healthline. Chen wasn't involved in the new report. Chen described heart-muscle damage that non-fatal heart attacks often leave in their wake. The extent of that damage depends on the severity and duration of the attack. Weakness in the heart muscle can result in heart failure. It's important to understand that heart failure does not mean that a heart has completely failed. Rather, it means that it is no longer functioning as well as it once did. 'Heart failure is a spectrum in which the heart just doesn't work perfectly,' said Chen. 'It could be very mild, or it could be very severe and everything in-between.' 'You can actually live with mild heart failure for the remainder of your life,' said Chen, 'and it doesn't really affect you that much, and you can control it with medication.' Another obvious result of non-fatal heart attacks is that people who survive them tend to live longer. Heart failure, hypertension-related heart disease, and arrhythmia are all associated with aging. Living longer only increases the odds of eventually developing these conditions. Lifestyle factors impact heart health The typical American lifestyle puts many people at a high risk for heart failure, hypertension, and arrhythmia, Morgan noted. It is characterized, she said, by ' obesity, hypertension, sedentary lifestyles, processed and palatable fast food, decreased physical movement, smoking, cholesterol, diabetes, as well as societal stressors leading to chronic inflammation.' She noted that socioeconomic issues complicate lifestyle risk factors and make addressing them especially difficult for many. 'This includes pregnancy complications such as hypertension of pregnancy, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, etc.,' Morgan added. 'These all increase a woman's lifetime risk of heart disease, and are still the primary drivers of maternal mortality outcomes.' The general decline in heart fatalities, however, indicates that some progress is being made against some of these risk factors. Sharp increase in arrhythmia-related deaths The report found the most dramatic increase in arrhythmia-related deaths. Arrhythmias are disorders in which the rate at which the heart beats is abnormal. There are four main types of arrhythmia: bradycardia — slow heart rate tachycardia — fast heart rate ventricular arrhythmia — begins in the ventricles supraventricular arrhythmia — begins above the ventricles (i.e., atrial fibrillation or irregular heartbeat) Arrhythmias are common and are often harmless. However, should an arrhythmia interfere with the heart's ability to maintain blood flow, damage may occur to the heart, brain, lungs, and other vital organs. As the report describes, arrhythmias can be fatal. It is important to get annual checkups that include a heart-health examination. In addition, if you can feel your heart is beating without having your hand on your chest, it is a good idea to consult your doctor to be checked for arrhythmia. This is especially essential for heart-attack survivors. 'Reducing the risk of arrhythmias after a myocardial infarction is crucial, as these irregular heart rhythms — especially ventricular arrhythmias — can be life threatening,' Morgan said. She cited several interventions that can help the survivor of a non-fatal heart attack avoid death from arrhythmia, including a four-drug combo known as the 'foundational four' for managing HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction). Morgan said statins, cardiac rehab, implantable defibrillators, sleep apnea management, and lifestyle changes may also be valuable in such cases. AHA's tips for staying heart-healthy The American Heart Association (AHA) provides an eight-step framework for maintaining heart health: eat healthy be more active quit tobacco get healthy sleep manage your weight control your cholesterol regulate your blood sugar manage your blood pressure

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store