Hezbollah vows to keep arms, says Lebanon's disarmament plan serves Israel
Naim Kassem said the government's decision to remove 'the defensive weapons of the resistance, its people and Lebanon during an aggression' facilitates the killing of 'resistance fighters and their families and evict them from their land and homes.'
He said the government should have instead 'spread its authority and evicted Israel from Lebanon.' Speaking in a televised speech to mark a Shiite religious event, he added 'the government is serving the Israeli project.'
Kassem added if the ongoing crisis leads to an internal conflict, the government is to blame. He noted that Hezbollah and its Shiite ally, the Amal movement, did not to ask their supporters to protest in the streets to give way for more discussions. The Amal movement was one of the main armed groups in Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war and is now a powerful political party led by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.
But, he said if a decision is taken to protest in the streets, protesters 'will be all over Lebanon and head to the U.S. embassy.' He did not elaborate.
Hezbollah's weapons have been a major dividing point in Lebanon with some groups that are opposed to Hezbollah saying only the state should be allowed to have arms.
The Lebanese government voted last week for a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of the year and implement a ceasefire with Israel.
The small Mediterranean country has been under international pressure to get Hezbollah to lay down its arms since the 14-month war with Israel that ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire in November.
However, the Hezbollah leader said his group will only discuss a national defense strategy over its weapons once Israel withdraws from Lebanon and stops its almost daily airstrikes that have killed scores of Hezbollah members since the war's end.
'The resistance will not hand over its weapons as the aggression continues and occupation remains,' Kassem said, adding that the group will fight a long battle if needed.
The Israel-Hezbollah war weakened the Iran-backed group and left much of its military and political leadership dead. The war killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon, displaced over 1 million and caused destruction that the World Bank said will cost $11 billion in reconstruction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Oklahoma starts giving tests to teachers from NY and Calif. to weed out ‘woke indoctrinators'
Educators from liberal states like New York and California who want to teach in Oklahoma will now have to take a test to prove they aren't 'woke indoctrinators' before they are allowed in Sooner State classrooms, the state's school chief said Friday. Ryan Walters, Oklahoma's superintendent for public instruction, told The Post that arriving teachers will need to pass a multiple-choice quiz that includes questions on the 'biological differences between males and females,' Christianity and American history. 'Here in Oklahoma, our academics are going to be grounded in fact,' the school leader declared. Advertisement Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters. AP 'We've seen states like New York and California go so radical with gender theory and Marxist indoctrination, they are warping the minds of young people … We need our teachers to agree to not be woke indoctrinators in the classroom.' The 50-question test was developed by conservative media company PragerU and newly minted Oklahomans need to pass it in order to obtain a teaching license, according to CNN. Advertisement One question asks applicants which chromosome pairs determine biological sex, according to a sample of questions obtained by The Post. Other questions ask what the first three words in the Constitution are and why freedom of religion is important to America's identity. Additional questions probe how many US senators there are, what the two parts of Congress are, and why some states have more US representatives than others. 'We're also going to be teaching the foundations of American history… So we can continue to be the greatest country in the world. We want our students to be patriots,' Walter told The Post. Advertisement 'You're not gonna lie to kids about the influences Christianity had on American history,' he added. 'We want you to teach history appropriately.' State Flag flies over Oklahoma State Capitol, Oklahoma City. Universal Images Group via Getty Images The Sooner State has seen an influx of about 500 new teachers from a signing bonus program that aimed to draw in the 'highest quality' educators — but Walters cautioned that any 'radical woke gender theory that goes against biology and science' won't be tolerated. 'We've begun to be concerned with what we're seeing from teachers moving from blue states,' he said. Advertisement Only new teachers from New York and California need to take the test so far, CNN reported, but newcomers from up to eight more states might also be assessed. Walter didn't know the number of new teachers who had moved from the two coastal states, but an aide told CNN it was a 'fairly large' number of applicants seeking teachers' licenses. Walters, a staunch conservative, hasn't been shy about his stances and policies that have been lambasted by critics on the left. He put in place mandates to teach students the Bible as a 'necessary historical document,' which got kudos from President Trump at the time.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Clark becomes highest-ranking Democrat to accuse Israel of ‘genocide' in Gaza
House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), the number two House Democrat, called Israel's actions in Gaza a 'genocide' in remarks earlier this week. 'We each have to continue to have an open heart about how we do this, how we do it effectively, and how we take action in time to make a difference, whether that is stopping the starvation and genocide and destruction of Gaza, or whether that means we are working together to stop the redistricting that is going on, taking away the vote from people in order to retain power,' Clark said during a Thursday event in her district hosted by Friends Committee on National Legislation. Clark is now the highest-ranking House Democrat to use the term 'genocide' to describe the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. She joins other lawmakers, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who have said the same. The Hill reached out to Clark's office for comment. During the Thursday event, constituents questioned the Massachusetts Democrat over her acceptance of $371,187 from the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), as shown in a video posted by a reporter at The Greyzone News. 'In the past, I have taken AIPAC money, but again, that is not saying you're not going to do what is right here,' she answered. 'I understand that for some of you that's a red line.' Criticism in recent months has mounted against Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu over its war in Gaza. This week, Netanyahu said he has no choice but to ' finish the job ' in Gaza. During the 22-month war, which began after Hamas attacked Israel in 2023, the death toll has risen to over 60,000 people, and the enclave is experiencing mass starvation according to U.N. sources, which Netanyahu denies. Netanyahu has floated the relocation of Palestinians as the Middle Eastern country has been in talks with South Sudan about taking in people. 'I think that the right thing to do, even according to the laws of war as I know them, is to allow the population to leave, and then you go in with all your might against the enemy who remains there,' Netanyahu said in an interview with i24, and Israeli TV station last week.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights.
