Megan Jayne Somerville: Mum's extraordinary request after stabbing two young sons on the North-South Highway while high on a drug bender
A mother who stabbed her two sons beside a major highway late at night has requested she be released from custody once a week to go shopping.
Supreme Court Justice Sandi McDonald found Megan Jayne Somerville, 37, not guilty of attempting to murder her children in 2022 by way of mental incompetence.
Justice McDonald found that while Somerville had carried out the violent attack on Adelaide 's North-South Motorway, she did not know it was wrong at the time.
During the decision in March this year, the judge said her 'mental impairment at the time of the conduct... was substantially caused by self-induced intoxication'.
Somerville, who has been residing in the mental health facility James Nash House, fronted the South Australia Supreme Court on Wednesday via video link.
Her lawyer submitted a request on Somerville's behalf to release her into the community for weekly shopping trips, The Advertiser reported.
Through the lawyer, Somerville profusely apologised to her two young sons, saying she didn't deserve forgiveness but hoped she would have it one day.
'Nothing I can say that can change anything. I am so sorry. I don't deserve to be forgiven,' she said.
Police were called to the North-South Motorway at 11.30pm on August 15, 2022 after reports a woman was being held by a member of the public.
The court previously heard Somerville had stopped her silver Honda sedan and took her sons, aged three and eight at the time, out of the car.
She then stabbed them 'a number of times' with a knife.
The court also heard Somerville had used meth, cannabis and prescription medication that night.
A forensic psychiatrist said the mother-of-two's account of what happened included a fear that she and her boys were in great danger.
'She had such severe delusions that were of a certain nature that meant she thought her children were in danger of a fate worse than death, that they were being groomed to kill her, and when that was done, they would be abducted, tortured and killed,' the psychiatrist said.
'In harming the children, she thought she was doing the right thing in the circumstances.'
During the hearing this week, Somerville wept as the father of her now six-year-old son described the little boy's emotional state in a moving victim impact statement.
'He has been horrifically affected from this incident. He is incredibly clever so he remembers a lot. He often talks about violence,' he said.
'He is either petrified of knives and blood, or, when playing with other kids, he talks to me about wanting to use a knife when he disagrees with them.
'We can only hope that the accurate punishment is given for such heinous, evil acts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Primary school deputy head who bit and scratched child avoids teaching ban
A primary school deputy headteacher has been allowed to continue working in the profession after she bit, slapped and scratched a child. Claire Herbert, who worked at the Red Rose Primary School in Chester-le-Street, County Durham, got into an argument with the girl that became physical on June 18 2022, leaving the child with reddening and bruises on her skin, according to a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) tribunal. When visited by a police officer three days later, the girl said the teacher had caused two bite marks to her hand and head, scratched her with false nails and called her fat. Photographs of the child's injuries showed various red marks, scratches and bruising to various parts of her body, including her face, neck, leg and hand, the tribunal heard. The incident took place outside the education setting where there appeared to be alcohol involved. In an email responding to the incident in October last year, Miss Herbert said: 'I have read and considered the attached paperwork and I will admit to all allegations listed although it is a blur.' She had worked at the school since April 2019 and also held the role of deputy safeguarding lead, the tribunal heard. Miss Herbert accepted a conditional police caution in December 2022 for the offence of common assault on the child. A TRA panel found the teacher guilty of unacceptable professional conduct that could bring the profession into disrepute. But it stopped short of recommending a permanent banning order for Miss Herbert as she 'otherwise appeared to have an unblemished record'. 'The panel was mindful that this was an isolated incident which it considered, taking into account the mitigating circumstances and wider context, sat at the less serious end of the possible spectrum of severity,' it said. 'The panel took account of the mitigating factors that were present and the contribution Miss Herbert had made, and could continue to make, to the education sector.' A number of character references provided to the panel commented positively on Miss Herbert's abilities as a teacher and that she normally demonstrated high standards of personal and professional conduct. Miss Herbert, who also sustained injuries from the incident, had shown 'genuine and significant regret, remorse and insight' for her conduct and had been honest about what happened, the panel said. Decision maker Marc Cavey, acting on behalf of the Education Secretary, said: 'In my judgment, the extent of the insight and remorse demonstrated by Miss Herbert, when considered alongside the isolated nature of the misconduct found and the mitigating circumstances that were present, means that there is only a very limited risk of the repetition of this behaviour. 'I have therefore given this element considerable weight in reaching my decision.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I make a living inspecting dodgy new properties… here are six steps you can take to stop your dream home turning into a nightmare
A property inspector who exposes dodgy new builds has revealed the best way Australians can avoid getting caught out when buying a home. Zeher Khalil, who goes by the moniker ' TikTok Inspector', has used his decade in construction to inform potential buyers on how to avoid poorly built homes. Clad in black clothes, the 43-year-old uses a body camera and phone to shine a light on every crack or shaky awning at new properties. The videos are a way to raise awareness about his day-to-day, Melbourne-based business 'Site Inspections', which provides customers with forensic assessments. The aim, he told Daily Mail Australia, is to save people from losing money by highlighting issues before they move in and the builders leave the property. 'It's one of the biggest investments you will ever have in your life,' he said. 'These guys that we're busting, they're just scammers and I'm glad we're naming and shaming most of them.' While inspections by his company can cost up to a few thousand dollars, Mr Khalil has shared some steps for buyers to avoid their dream homes becoming a nightmare. Don't trust the display home 'Sometimes a display home is made by the A-team,' he said, adding that this doesn't always guarantee they will also be the builders behind the other properties. 'The company will get different supervisors for different jobs, and you might end up with a different kind of home,' he said. As a result, Mr Khalil advised buyers to keep an eye on the property during its progress to follow changes that are made. Always get an independent inspection Leading on from his first suggestion, Mr Khalil advised bringing in an expert throughout the construction process. 'If you're building (a home), before you make a payment, or you go to make a final stage payment, get it checked,' he said. 'Because you might not see it again, and you might not be getting what you're paying for.' But even if a buyer isn't able to afford an independent inspector, Mr Khalil suggested customers tell the builders they are planning to. 'If they resist, that is a massive indicator that you have to get someone to look at it because these guys are trying to hide something,' he said. He said homeowners he previously worked for have told builders they are bringing in an independent inspector and the job has been delayed, cleaned up or fixed. Read the contract 'Read the contract like you're suing them tomorrow,' Mr Khalil said, warning that there could be clauses that customers might not expect. 'If you're late on payment, or you have to accept alternative solutions, there's all these things that come up later on. 'People just sign the contract, they don't even read it.' The inspector said a lawyer costs a few hundred dollars but it would be worth it to make sure 'no shifty things' are in the contract. Never use the builders' surveyor or certifier Builders sometimes recommend a surveyor who gives a building permit, but Mr Khalil advised buyers to 'always consult someone else'. 'Get someone independent, not someone who's recommended by a builder, because most likely, they'll be more lenient,' he said. 'You want somebody to be really assertive and stringent with their findings.' What to focus on Mr Khalil suggested there are three features on properties that should always be checked when buying: the roofing, bathrooms and balconies. He said these locations are the most common areas that have potential issues with water. 'Water just destroys everything and that's the biggest problem here in Australia,' he said. 'Get those assessed properly and watch out for what's going on.' He also advised that, if there is any subsidence in the pavement around the home or if there are cracks in the external walls, this could mean there is 'movement in the slab'. The Victorian Building Authority has previously described this issue as 'foundation movement' or 'slab heave'. When the foundation lifts excessively in part of a house, this can then develop cracks. Mr Khalil also pointed to 'patched up bricks' as a sign that vendors might be 'trying to hide something'.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Teacher who bit child can still work ‘because her record is otherwise unblemished'
A primary school deputy head teacher who bit, slapped and scratched a child can continue to work because she 'otherwise appeared to have an unblemished record'. Claire Herbert, who worked at the Red Rose Primary School in Chester-le-Street, Co Durham, got into an argument with the girl that became physical on June 18 2022. The child was left with reddening and bruises on her skin after the row, according to a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) tribunal. When visited by police three days later, the girl said the teacher had caused two bite marks to her hand and head, scratched her with false nails and called her fat. Photographs of the child's injuries showed various red marks, scratches and bruising to parts of her body, including her face, neck, leg and hand, the tribunal heard. The incident took place outside the education setting, and alcohol appeared to have been involved. 'It is a blur' In an email responding to the incident in October last year, Miss Herbert said: 'I have read and considered the attached paperwork, and I will admit to all allegations listed although it is a blur.' She had worked at the school since April 2019 and also held the role of deputy safeguarding lead, the tribunal heard. Miss Herbert accepted a conditional police caution in December 2022 for the offence of common assault on the child. A TRA panel found the teacher guilty of unacceptable professional conduct that could bring the profession into disrepute. However, it stopped short of recommending a permanent banning order for Miss Herbert as she 'otherwise appeared to have an unblemished record'. 'The panel was mindful that this was an isolated incident which it considered, taking into account the mitigating circumstances and wider context, sat at the less serious end of the possible spectrum of severity,' it said. Character references provided to the panel commented positively on Miss Herbert's abilities as a teacher and said that she normally demonstrated high standards of personal and professional conduct. 'Limited risk of repetition' Miss Herbert, who also sustained injuries from the incident, had shown 'genuine and significant regret, remorse and insight' for her conduct and had been honest about what happened, the panel said. Marc Cavey, the TRA chief executive acting on behalf of the Education Secretary, said: 'In my judgment, the extent of the insight and remorse demonstrated by Miss Herbert, when considered alongside the isolated nature of the misconduct found and the mitigating circumstances that were present, means that there is only a very limited risk of the repetition of this behaviour. 'I have therefore given this element considerable weight in reaching my decision.'
