
Gucci Owner Kering Banks on De Meo's Record for a Turnaround
'Brand management and marketing are his forte, which dovetails with what the luxury industry does — for which he seems passionate,' Luca Solca, an analyst at Bernstein wrote in a note, recalling a conversation about fine timepieces with De Meo at a Renault event three years ago. Now that De Meo has been named as CEO of the French owner of Gucci and other luxury brands, 'it is not hard to imagine how intriguing he found the Kering opportunity,' Solca said.
Although De Meo has no direct fashion or consumer-goods sector experience — having spent his entire career in the auto business — luxury industry observers are betting his keen sense for what clients want and the attention to detail he displayed at Renault may be just what Kering needs.
De Meo led the turnaround of Renault after taking charge of the French carmaker about five years ago, returning it to profit and growth despite substantial challenges facing the global auto industry, including an uncertain transition to electric vehicles, escalating trade tensions and the rise of highly competitive Chinese rivals.
Kering shares, which on Monday recorded the biggest one-day jump since December 2008, slid as much as 2.3% in early trading in Paris. Renault, which tumbled 8.7% on Monday, was little changed.
Kering, led by Francois-Henri Pinault for more than two decades, can use the help as the luxury industry weathers a slump in Chinese demand and the threat of higher US tariffs. Before the jump on Monday, Kering's stock had lost almost 80% of its value since reaching a record in August 2021 as it fell further behind rivals such as LVMH and Hermes International. The group has tried to turn around its main brand Gucci by naming new designers but the efforts have failed. Kering has also appointed new CEOs for labels including Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent in the past year.
'De Meo has a titanic challenge ahead of him' said Solca. 'Critically, investors will need to hear what it is that De Meo plans to do and digest how soon his plans can be realized. If he says 'more of the same,' then investors would (quickly) go back to where we are now. If he comes in with a vision, then it could be something else.'
In addition to finding growth again at Gucci, De Meo will need to win the trust of all the teams after sweeping changes of top managers in recent years, said Ariane Hayate, a fund manager at Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management. He'll also need to tackle the group's elevated debt, which has soared over the past three years, she said.
Some investors are worried that De Meo's lack of experience in the luxury industry will mean a failure to address the absence of revenue growth in a difficult industry context, according to Zuzanna Pusz, a UBS analyst.
'The concern is that the focus could potentially be on cost cutting,' she said.
What the executive has going for him is the fact that he's an Italian who has worked for many years at French groups, noted Morgan Stanley analysts including Edouard Aubin and Grace Smalley. Kering's Italian Gucci brand accounts for almost two-thirds of its profit. Also, De Meo 'has a strong track record as a turnaround executive and is very well regarded within the automotive industry,' the analysts said.
Renault was in crisis when De Meo — who had previously worked at Fiat and Volkswagen AG — took charge in mid-2020. The French company was coming off a record first-half loss and had announced plans to slash almost 15,000 jobs. Then, even after Russia's invasion of Ukraine prompted the manufacturer to pull out of what had been its second-biggest market, Renault vastly outperformed its European rivals and its longtime Japanese alliance partner Nissan Motor Co.
'We credit him for bringing back 'color,' energy and peak results to Renault after years of sub-par product and financials,' Jefferies analyst Philippe Houchois wrote in a note.
During his tenure, De Meo inked partnerships for Renault with fashion brands such as Agnès B. His affinity for style has also been evident in his custom-made suits and his pocket squares — always impeccably folded with three or four points. A polyglot — he's fluent in Italian, French, Spanish, English and German — De Meo has authored a book entitled 'A Dictionary for Car Lovers,' showing a commitment to the emotional appeal of brands.
For instance, one of the first big moves he made after taking over as CEO was to re-brand Renault's Formula 1 team as Alpine, starting with the 2021 season. Alpine, a more than half-century old French marque that Renault had revived only a few years earlier after two decades of dormancy, could become 'a mini Ferrari,' the executive boasted in October 2020. He then set out to build up the brand's scale and status.
While the Alpine efforts have yet to show success in Formula 1, De Meo impressed investors by the pace of the company's new model launches. Last year, Renault introduced 10 new car models, including the Renault 5 — with accessories, including a wicker basket as baguette holder. This year, it is launching seven, including the electric Renault 4 and Alpine A390. De Meo's approach became a case study for Harvard Business School.
Just how critical he considers brand building was evident at the Geneva car show last year. Even as almost all of the world's carmakers stayed away, calling car shows a thing of the past, De Meo and Renault turned up, winning a lot of attention they may not have gotten for the launch of the new Renault 5 — a car of the past that Renault modernized and launched as electric for the future.
It was vintage De Meo — and helped make R5 one of the company's most high-profile new launches in recent times.
De Meo is someone who has 'great brand insight but who's also able to re-energize the teams he works with and has the courage to try new things,' said Fabrizio Ferraro, professor of strategic management at IESE business school. That's crucial for Kering since 'the usual playbook of the luxury industry seems to have run out of steam,' he said.
(Updates with shares in fifth paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a few seconds ago
- Time of India
Trump thinks owning piece of Intel would be good deal for US: Here's what to know
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump wants the US government to own a piece of Intel , less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping the goal is realised, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more US companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 per cent stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the US government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogramme the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15 per cent commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US , which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the US will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the US in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an "amazing story."The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the US government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly USD 19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last rare, it's not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favour with the president to increase their orders for the company's was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives programme - money that Lutnick derided as a "giveaway" that would better serve US taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. "We think America should get the benefit of the bargain," Lutnick told CNBC. "It's obvious that it's the right move to make."


India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
What is CPEC-II and why is Pakistan betting big on China's ambitious project? Major concern for India due to...
(File) CPEC-II: Pakistan is betting big on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), with the country's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif scheduled to visit Beijing at the end of August to inaugurate the CPEC-II, the second phase of China's ambitious project that aims to build a 3,000 km long sea-and-land-based corridor to to secure and shorten the route for China's energy imports from the Middle East. What is CPEC-II? CPEC phase 2 or CPEC-II is the next phase of Beijing's China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which aims to extend the project to new areas in the region, including Afghanistan. The CPEC-II is focused on industrial development with the aim to establish industries like sugar factories across Pakistan. Additionally, under CPEC-II, the two countries will increase mutual cooperation in various fields such as agriculture, science and technology. CPEC, a vital part of China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), was launched a decade ago in 2015, with the first phase focusing on construction of infrastructure in Pakistan, energy projects, such as roads, power plants and the development of the strategic Gwadar port. How CPEC benefits Pakistan? According to experts, Pakistan views CPEC-II as means to resolve its economic troubles and heal its ruined economy to some extent. Islamabad says the project will boost the country's agriculture sector, technological investment and connectivity, especially in the Gwadar port region. Why there is concern for India? As per security experts, CPEC-II is designed to to indirectly demonstrate Chinese power in South Asia and increase Beijing's military influence in Pakistan, with the proposed establishment of a Chinese military base and airbase in Gwadar. These developments, if true, could pose a major security threat to India as the CPEC passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), which New Delhi considers as part of its territory. Story Highlights CPEC-II is the second phase of Beijing's China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which was launched in 2015. CPEC passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), posing a major security threat to India. China plans to increase its military influence in Pakistan with CPEC-II. Pakistan believes the CPEC-II would help resolve its economic troubles and heal its ruined economy. Notably, the Gwadar port is located in the restive Balochistan province, and anger is simmering in the volatile region due to rampant unemployment and exploitation of resources in the region by China, with Baloch separatist groups using the resentment among locals as a rallying cry.


Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India gets relief as China removes export restrictions on rare earth magnets
After months of speculation, Beijing has withdrawn its export restriction on rare earth magnets to India. The move is some respite for automakers and component makers, especially those engaged in electric vehicle (EV) projects, who were in the hot seat due to the supply chain squeeze. Personalised Offers on Mahindra BE 6 Check Offers Check Offers India depends on China for over 80 per cent of its magnet imports (Photo is representational)(AP File) Why rare earths matter Rare earth magnets may not sound like the backbone of the auto sector, but they quietly are. From electric traction motors to power steering, sensors and infotainment units, they are ubiquitous in a contemporary vehicle. EVs specifically depend on motor-grade magnets to drive production lines forward. (Also read: Tata Motors faces no production impact of rare earth magnet crisis, Q1 FY26 profit tanks 63%: CFO PB Balaji) China's dominance in this space has been well known, it accounts for the lion's share of global supply. That is why when Beijing imposed restrictions, Indian manufacturers had little choice but to either pay more for limited stock or explore alternative sources in markets like Japan and Australia. The impact of the clampdown The curbs, though in place for only a few months, left a mark on the industry. Automakers working on new EV launches saw delays creeping in as suppliers struggled to secure enough material. Some dipped into stockpiles, but those reserves were thin. Alternatives from outside China were available, but at a steep cost. For many companies, the episode was a wake-up call that India's electrification roadmap could be derailed by external shocks. (Also read: India's Bajaj Auto flags lower-than-planned EV output on rare earth magnet crunch) What changes now With the ban lifted, sourcing is expected to stabilise and costs may begin to cool in the coming quarters. For EV makers in particular, the move translates into fewer bottlenecks in the supply of motors and related components. However, the larger issue has not gone away. The dependence on a single nation for a key input makes the auto industry of India vulnerable to subsequent disruptions. Relief with a warning The resumption of Chinese exports has relieved near-term anxiety, but the incident served as a wake-up call. Resilience will take more than praying for steady flows of trade. Pundits say that India now needs to ramp up processing of rare earths and diversify supply streams. Automakers' message is unequivocal, relief now is a good thing, but long-term stability will come only from breaking dependence on Beijing.