
Beauty spot famed for its crystal clear water is suddenly becoming murkier... and experts don't know why
The once pristinely clear waters of Lake Tahoe - the freshwater vacation paradise straddling the California-Nevada border - are suddenly become murkier and scientists don't know why.
The annual Lake Tahoe Clarity Report, released Monday by UC Davis' Tahoe Environmental Research Center, found that the lake's clarity in 2024 was 62.3 feet, nearly six feet shallower than it was in 2023.
To determine clarity, researchers have been lowering a 10-inch white disk into Lake Tahoe for nearly 60 years. The depth at which the disc is no longer visible by researchers is considered the clarity level.
Since observations of the lake began in the late 1960s, average clarity has declined by about 40 feet. The clearest reading ever, taken a February day in 1968, was 141 feet deep.
This year's average of 62.3 feet is the third least clear on record and the worst in several years. It has only been surpassed in 2021, when wildfire smoke covered the region, and 2017, when there were many runoff-heavy storms carrying debris into the lake.
'It's not, at this point, noticeably worse. But it's not getting better, and we need to find out why,' said Stephanie Hampton, director of the Tahoe Environmental Research Center, in a statement.
The goal is to get the lake back to a see-through depth of 97.4 feet, which was commonplace throughout the 1980s.
In recent years, there have been massive efforts carried out by the California Tahoe Conservancy, a state agency established in 1984, and environmental organizations to preserve the integrity of the 191-square-mile lake.
Researchers did say there has been progress, with management agencies preventing more than 500,000 pounds of fine sediment and other clarity-harming pollutants from finding their way into the lake every year. This is mainly done through maintaining roads and erosion-control projects.
Even with that success, the lake's waters are still getting murkier, which has convinced scientists there could be something else at play.
'It may be the lake is different than it was 20 years ago, when these policies and practices were implemented,' Hampton said.
'We need to investigate these particles again to find out what kind of particles they are. Are they still mostly sediment? Or are there more algae, wildfire ash or other particles? That may be key to understanding why water clarity is not improving,' she added.
One theory that has gained some traction in the scientific community is that a buildup of microscopic plankton has led to the declining clarity over time.
The report doesn't provide any definitive conclusions with regard to plankton's effect on clarity.
It does point out that 'water clarity tends to be at its highest when phytoplankton are at their minimum densities during the winter season.'
Data from 2024 shows that Lake Tahoe was at most 50 feet clearer in the winter than in the summer, when there were far more plankton in the water.
Scientists have concluded that since clarity levels have stabilized, conservation efforts have worked to a certain extent.
However, they all seem to agree that more work needs to be done to uncover the underlying problem.
'Science-driven policies have underpinned Lake Tahoe's protection for decades, and seeing lake clarity stabilize is an indicator that we are making progress,' said Julie Regan, executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.
The agency leads the Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program (EIP), which was formed in 1997.
A coalition made up of EIP, the state governments of California and Nevada, and more than 80 public and private organizations have consistently worked together to prevent sediment from leaking into the lake.
Because this hasn't improved clarity, Regan said the state of Lake Tahoe is 'concerning.'
'We will continue to work closely with the science community to understand where to direct our management efforts next,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Beauty spot famed for its crystal clear water is suddenly becoming murkier... and experts don't know why
The once pristinely clear waters of Lake Tahoe - the freshwater vacation paradise straddling the California-Nevada border - are suddenly become murkier and scientists don't know why. The annual Lake Tahoe Clarity Report, released Monday by UC Davis' Tahoe Environmental Research Center, found that the lake's clarity in 2024 was 62.3 feet, nearly six feet shallower than it was in 2023. To determine clarity, researchers have been lowering a 10-inch white disk into Lake Tahoe for nearly 60 years. The depth at which the disc is no longer visible by researchers is considered the clarity level. Since observations of the lake began in the late 1960s, average clarity has declined by about 40 feet. The clearest reading ever, taken a February day in 1968, was 141 feet deep. This year's average of 62.3 feet is the third least clear on record and the worst in several years. It has only been surpassed in 2021, when wildfire smoke covered the region, and 2017, when there were many runoff-heavy storms carrying debris into the lake. 'It's not, at this point, noticeably worse. But it's not getting better, and we need to find out why,' said Stephanie Hampton, director of the Tahoe Environmental Research Center, in a statement. The goal is to get the lake back to a see-through depth of 97.4 feet, which was commonplace throughout the 1980s. In recent years, there have been massive efforts carried out by the California Tahoe Conservancy, a state agency established in 1984, and environmental organizations to preserve the integrity of the 191-square-mile lake. Researchers did say there has been progress, with management agencies preventing more than 500,000 pounds of fine sediment and other clarity-harming pollutants from finding their way into the lake every year. This is mainly done through maintaining roads and erosion-control projects. Even with that success, the lake's waters are still getting murkier, which has convinced scientists there could be something else at play. 'It may be the lake is different than it was 20 years ago, when these policies and practices were implemented,' Hampton said. 'We need to investigate these particles again to find out what kind of particles they are. Are they still mostly sediment? Or are there more algae, wildfire ash or other particles? That may be key to understanding why water clarity is not improving,' she added. One theory that has gained some traction in the scientific community is that a buildup of microscopic plankton has led to the declining clarity over time. The report doesn't provide any definitive conclusions with regard to plankton's effect on clarity. It does point out that 'water clarity tends to be at its highest when phytoplankton are at their minimum densities during the winter season.' Data from 2024 shows that Lake Tahoe was at most 50 feet clearer in the winter than in the summer, when there were far more plankton in the water. Scientists have concluded that since clarity levels have stabilized, conservation efforts have worked to a certain extent. However, they all seem to agree that more work needs to be done to uncover the underlying problem. 'Science-driven policies have underpinned Lake Tahoe's protection for decades, and seeing lake clarity stabilize is an indicator that we are making progress,' said Julie Regan, executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. The agency leads the Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program (EIP), which was formed in 1997. A coalition made up of EIP, the state governments of California and Nevada, and more than 80 public and private organizations have consistently worked together to prevent sediment from leaking into the lake. Because this hasn't improved clarity, Regan said the state of Lake Tahoe is 'concerning.' 'We will continue to work closely with the science community to understand where to direct our management efforts next,' she said.


Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
NAACP threatens to sue Elon Musk's xAI over Memphis air pollution
June 17 (Reuters) - The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) on Tuesday sent a notice to billionaire Elon Musk's xAI, signaling its intention to sue the company over air pollution from the AI startup's data center in Memphis. The letter, sent by Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) on NAACP's behalf, alleges xAI has violated federal law by using methane gas turbines at its South Memphis data center without acquiring permits or "best available" pollution controls. Data centers that provide computing power for AI are highly power-intensive and require round-the-clock electricity. Given the slow pace of clean-energy deployments, the surging demand is being met by fossil fuels including natural gas and coal. Methane emissions from human activities such as oil and gas production, electricity generation and agriculture are short-lived in the atmosphere, but are often more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas. Emissions from xAI's data center further exacerbate the already poor air quality in Memphis, SELC said. "These turbines have pumped out pollution that threatens the health of Memphis families. This notice paves the way for a lawsuit that can hold xAI accountable for its unlawful refusal to get permits for its gas turbines," SELC Senior Attorney Patrick Anderson said. "We take our commitment to the community and environment seriously. The temporary power generation units are operating in compliance with all applicable laws," an xAI spokesman told Reuters. The AI company has installed 35 turbines, nearly all of which were running without the required permits as of April, SELC said. The SELC added that while xAI had removed some smaller turbines, the company recently installed three larger turbines. The environmental legal advocacy organization said in August that xAI had installed 20 gas turbines at the site. Representatives of Elon Musk did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity
Gary Marcus is right to point out – as many of us have for years – that just scaling up compute size is not going to solve the problems of generative artificial intelligence (When billion-dollar AIs break down over puzzles a child can do, it's time to rethink the hype, 10 June). But he doesn't address the real reason why a child of seven can solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle that broke the computers: we're embodied animals and we live in the world. All living things are born to explore, and we do so with all our senses, from birth. That gives us a model of the world and everything in it. We can infer general truths from a few instances, which no computer can do. A simple example: to teach a large language model 'cat', you have to show it tens of thousands of individual images of cats – being the way they are, they may be up a tree, in a box, or hiding in a roll of carpet. And even then, if it comes upon a cat playing with a bath plug, it may fail to recognise it as a cat. A human child can be shown two or three cats, and from interacting with them, it will recognise any cat as a cat, for life. Apart from anything else, this embodied, evolved intelligence makes us incredibly energy-efficient compared with a computer. The computers that drive an autonomous car use anything upwards of a kilowatt of energy, while a human driver runs on twentysomething watts of renewable power – and we don't need an extra bacon sandwich to remember a new route. At a time of climate emergency, the vast energy demands of this industry might perhaps lead us to recognise, and value, the extraordinary economy, versatility, plasticity, ingenuity and creativity of human intelligence – qualities that we all have simply by virtue of being HaymanAdvisory board member, Minderoo Centre for Technology & Democracy, Cambridge University It comes as no surprise to me that Apple researchers have found 'fundamental limitations' in cutting-edge artificial intelligence models (Advanced AI suffers 'complete accuracy collapse' in face of complex problems, study finds, 9 June). AI in the form of large reasoning models or large language models (LLMs) are far from being able to 'reason'. This can be simply tested by asking ChatGPT or similar: 'If 9 plus 10 is 18 what is 18 less 10?' The response today was 8. Other times, I've found that it provided no definitive answer. This highlights that AI does not reason – currently, it is a combination of brute force and logic routines to essentially reduce the brute force approach. A term that should be given more publicity is ANI – artificial narrow intelligence, which describes systems like ChatGPT that are excellent at summarising pertinent information and rewording sentences, but are far from being able to reason. But note, the more times that LLMs are asked similar questions, the more likely it will provide a more reasonable response. Again, though, this is not reasoning, it is model TaylorMona Vale, New South Wales, Australia Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.