logo
Teachers want religion out of the classroom. Here's what has to happen next

Teachers want religion out of the classroom. Here's what has to happen next

Irish Times08-05-2025
Religious faith formation plays a major role in Ireland's taxpayer-funded primary education system. This is highly unusual in a democratic country, and teachers are making their voices heard on the issue. About 90 per cent of primary schools are controlled by the Catholic Church. Sacramental preparation for Confession, Communion and Confirmation presents challenges for teachers, especially those who don't share the faith.
A recent survey by the
Irish National Teachers' Organisation (INTO)
uncovered some interesting findings and related recommendations from an INTO taskforce, which have given the union plenty of homework. The survey asked 34 questions related to religion in schools.
Seventy seven per cent of respondent teachers said schools should have no responsibility at all for preparing children for the sacraments, while only 4 per cent thought it should be left to the primary school. A vast amount of class time is dedicated to sacramental preparation, with knock-on effects for other subjects in an already overloaded curriculum. Communion and Confirmation practice eat into the school day for months in advance, ramping up as the day approaches.
[
Ireland an 'outlier' in requiring religious certs to teach in most primary schools
Opens in new window
]
But for many teachers there is also the gnawing issue of the children who are left out. Ireland has changed as a society – children come from a wide variety of backgrounds. In so many ways, our schools are places of inclusiveness and understanding, but this goes out the window when it comes to religion. Children from outside the shrinking Catholic mainstream can find themselves excluded for lengthy periods, or forced to set their own identity aside.
READ MORE
With no guidance from the Minister for Education, Helen McEntee, few – if any – schools have found a satisfactory way to cater for the many children not partaking in sacramental preparation. These children tend to find themselves herded together and assigned pointless busywork for what adds up to a huge amount of class time. Then on the 'big day' they sit on the sidelines and watch as their peers get dressed up and enjoy their celebration. Many teachers feel conflicted about their role in this institutionalised othering.
The INTO taskforce has recommended that the union work to move sacramental preparation outside the school day. However, the recommendation that it 'engage with' religious patrons in this regard seems like it is starting in the wrong direction. Shouldn't fundamental decisions on the curriculum primarily involve the Minister for Education?
Elsewhere, some of the taskforce's recommendations don't appear to me to make much sense. On the simple question of 'should faith formation take place in primary schools?' 33 per cent of respondents said they 'teach religion willingly'; 19.5 per cent said they would prefer not to have to teach it and 19 per cent said 'I would teach a broad religious education willingly', but would prefer not to have to teach it in a particular faith.
Yet, other than the issue of sacramental preparation, faith formation in schools seems to have been largely ignored by the taskforce.
In almost 90 per cent of schools, the Catholic faith is supposed to be taught for 30 minutes every single day. This is more time than history, geography and science combined. Then there are daily prayers, trips to church, clerical visits and more.
As with sacramental preparation, the Department of Education has provided no guidance on how schools should accommodate non-Catholic children during these times. In truth, in most schools, the 'opted-out' children just sit there – sometimes colouring a picture, sometimes doodling with a puzzle book, listening to every word regardless – segregated, othered and marked as different. The obvious answer, surely, is simply to move faith formation outside the school day and let families 'opt-in', should they wish. This is an inclusive solution that could not offend anyone.
The INTO taskforce has inexplicably ignored the responses on faith formation in the survey and based most of its recommendations on the failed policy of divestment. There are obvious reasons divestment, pursued by successive governments since 2012, has failed. First, it is logistically and financially impossible to build a school system where all families will have access to a school that aligns with their religious outlook. Second, and more importantly, building an entire balkanised school system on a foundation of religious difference among children is patently wrong. Ireland is forging a lonely path internationally with this policy.
The teaching profession in Ireland is monocultural – it reflects neither the diversity of Irish society nor our own classrooms. The taskforce's recommendation that the union must 'campaign and advocate for the removal of section 37.1 of the Employment Equality Act in its entirety' is welcome. This regrettable piece of legislation creates the vague, indefinable transgression of 'undermining the religious ethos' of a school. Moreover, teachers can face any 'action which is reasonably necessary' as a consequence. What does this mean? Sanction, loss of promotion prospects and dismissal?
Understandably, most teachers don't want to find out. The result is a compliant workforce afraid to do anything that might fall foul of this obscure, discriminatory law. The chilling effect on teachers acts as an obvious barrier to entry to the profession at a time of catastrophic teacher shortages.
'Endeavouring' and 'campaigning' are not enough. The union must prioritise ending sacramental preparation in schools and the repeal of section 37.1. It needs to abandon the failed policy of divestment and focus on moving faith formation outside school hours: a real, practical change that will benefit teachers and children alike.
Paddy Monahan is a teacher, Social Democrats councillor and policy officer with Education Equality
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport
Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport

Irish Times

time8 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Child with additional needs loses legal challenge over year-long delay getting school transport

A primary school child with additional needs living in Dublin has lost a High Court challenge over delays of up to a year in providing him with a transport service to school. While the delays were frustrating for the boy and his family, there was nothing to suggest any conscious or deliberate flouting of rights, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said. A 'proactive and reactive' approach was adopted by the Minister for Education, despite practical challenges posed by unsuccessful transport escort recruitment processes and delays due to legal obligations including procurement rules and Garda vetting requirements. The delay was due to 'genuine difficulties' that the relevant personnel are actively seeking to address and suitable alternative supports – a school transport grant and home tuition grant – were offered as a temporary measure. READ MORE While refusing to declare the Minister had not complied with her statutory obligation to provide a school transport service for a child with disabilities or other special educational needs, the judge said the delay in securing services cannot be 'unlimited'. If a transport service is not in place by September, as expected, the child can reapply to the court, she said. In her judgment published on Monday, the judge noted school transport is administered by a Department of Education non-statutory scheme. The child lives with his family in Dublin and had difficulties with previous school placements. After his parents accepted a July 2024 offer of a place, they sent a completed school transport application form on July 13th, 2024 to a special education needs officer but it was not provided to the relevant section of the Department of Education until September 4th. The form referred to the child's anxiety causing 'meltdowns and outbursts when triggered' and said an escort would be required to prevent danger to the driver. On September 25th, Bus Éireann advised the department a driver service was required, which the department sanctioned a week later. A procurement process, required under European law, involved the route being put to tender five times before a successful bidder was appointed on March 3rd. The child's mother was sanctioned for a home tuition grant that was ultimately not availed of as she said sourcing a suitable tutor would take considerable time. She was paying for private dyslexia reading lessons since the previous October. On March 3rd, a transport service was put in place and the school was responsible for employing the escort. One was hired on April 2nd and, after Garda vetting, began employment on May 6th. The transport service involved the boy and two other children with additional needs being transported by a driver and accompanied by the escort in a saloon car. On May 12th, the school principal informed the department the other two children had become dysregulated during the journey, partly due to limited space in the car, and expressed concern the school would lose the escort. She said the boy could not attend school until a new escort was recruited. The escort resigned two days later, the judge noted. The department then sanctioned an individualised transport service for the boy, available from May 25th, subject to getting an escort. That proved difficult, and a temporary arrangement was made to have a post-primary escort who, after Garda vetting, was available for two weeks in July. The department's reasonable expectation was that an escort would be in place for the new school year commencing in September, the judge said. As there is no 'firm arrangement' in place, the issues raised in the proceedings are not moot or pointless, and the application can be renewed if the service is not available, she said.

Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate
Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate

Irish Times

time13 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Are school holidays too long? A mother of two and school principal debate

Niamh O'Reilly: How can a parent continue to work when their primary-aged children are out of school for two months of the year? Ireland's children enjoy almost two months off primary school and three months off secondary school during the summer. But how can a parent continue to work when their primary-aged child/children, who need supervision, are out of school for two months of the year? Even for my five-year-old, this is a simple mathematical equation to solve. The answer is to provide supports such as subsidised summer camps or structured summer programmes within school settings or even paid parental leave which must be taken during the summer holiday period. READ MORE The present solution offered to working parents in Ireland is lacking any real sense. We have a series of messy, just-muddle-through-and-get-on-with-it-style lifelines that are often expensive, unequal or unpredictable. Show me a working parent in Ireland during the summer break who has not had to call in every favour in the book and hope they have an understanding workplace to boot? I can't help feeling the powers that be have forgotten basic mathematics as they seem unable to solve this unbalanced equation for working families. Taking annual leave will only get you so far. That's assuming you haven't used most of your leave for midterm breaks, Easter holidays, parent teacher meetings, school plays or random days off throughout the year. You could also take unpaid parental leave, but with many families already stretched financially this is not a solution. Summer camps are the other go-to, even if the best ones need to be booked by February, cost a small fortune and don't come within an ass's roar of covering a full working day. If you're lucky, you might have secured a childminder to help or have grandparents or family to step in. That's a lot of 'ifs' and it takes just one small 'if' to be knocked out of place and the whole deck of cards will fall, generally on top of an exhausted mum. Asked recently about consideration of any change to the length of school holidays, Minister for Education Helen McEntee said schools were 'very active' throughout the year and they offered people a chance to 'take a break' . It's definitely a break for the children and teachers, just not so much for the working parents. I'm not a total curmudgeon either. Children need a proper break to switch off and be children again. Teachers also put in a serious shift. School is full-on; between homework and after-school activities, most young children are scheduled to the hilt. The summer break isn't really the problem. Shortening it even by a couple of weeks would still leave a huge gap for parents. The elephant in the room is that, unlike my 1980s/1990s childhood when almost everyone, including me, had a stay-at-home parent, today that's not the case. However, neither the length of the holidays nor level of parental support has been adjusted to reflect modern life. Like most working parents, I dream of being able to take the whole summer off and enjoy it with my young children. At eight and five, they are in that blissful stage when their innocence and enthusiasm for life are at an all-time high. It's like a wonder-drug. If I could bottle it and sell it then I'd probably have enough money to be able to make that summer dream a reality. For now, I'd settle for even a few modest supports that don't have me run ragged with guilt and exhaustion. What would also help is not to be told to stop complaining about how long the summer holidays are and just enjoy them while my children are still young. I'll be sure to remember that the next time I've got a work deadline, no summer camps lined up and no village or magic pot of money to call on. Niamh O'Reilly is a journalist and mother of two living in Wicklow Simon Lewis: No. Children aren't designed for non-stop schooling. They need breaks Are school holidays too long? If you ask most parents then they'll reply with an emphatic 'yes' and if you ask most teachers then they'll disagree. As a teacher, I know this argument won't win me many fans, but it might give pause for thought about what we want schools to be. Let's start with some facts. In Irish primary schools, the summer break runs for about seven-and-a-half weeks. This summer, more than half of Irish schools are running summer provision. These are intensive, small-group programmes for children with additional needs or from disadvantaged backgrounds, staffed by teachers and SNAs. Alongside that, most teachers spend two to three weeks on continuing professional development (CPD) during summer, but unless you're living with a teacher then you're unlikely to hear much about that. However, this debate isn't really about teachers. In my view, it's about children and maybe a bit about childcare. Children aren't designed for non-stop schooling. They need breaks. They need time to rest, play and sometimes get bored. More school does not automatically mean better outcomes. Overloading their calendar may help parents in terms of childcare, but primary school isn't about childcare. Irish primary pupils spend a minimum of 910 hours a year in school, well above the average of 805 hours in countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In terms of holidays, our summer sits squarely in the middle, with Germany and the UK on six weeks and Italy on 12 weeks. Our seven-and-a-half weeks doesn't seem excessive. Virtually all countries still have a long summer break. It can't be without merit. The bigger issue here isn't education. It's childcare. More specifically, it's the lack of structured, affordable wraparound care. In the absence of a proper government-funded national strategy, people understandably turn to schools to fill the gap. For example, in the last year, I've been asked to talk about why schools should be responsible for everything from toxic masculinity to smartphone bans and everything in between. Teaching is an intense profession. It's six hours of live performance, decision-making, emotional labour and crowd management. I often compare it to being a doctor, but instead of seeing your patients one at a time you have 25 of them in the room, all with different needs, and you're expected to diagnose, treat and manage them simultaneously all day long. If teaching really were the cushy number some imagine then why are we in the middle of a recruitment and retention crisis? Schools are struggling to fill posts. Burnout is rampant. With so much time off and early finishes you'd think the issue would be too many applicants. However, all that said, we could restructure the school year. We could have a shorter summer, with more frequent breaks during the year, and that's a fair discussion. However, if we do shorten the summer then who runs Summer Provision? If we cut CPD time, when do teachers upskill? These aren't rhetorical questions, they're trade-offs. If we want schools to become year-round childcare hubs then we need to say so and fund them properly. If we want them to remain focused on education, we must stop treating holidays as a perk and start seeing them as part of a sustainable system not unlike the long summer break granted to those in other professions such as third-level lecturers, which rarely draws public outrage. None of this is about teachers asking for sympathy. It's about creating a sustainable, child-centred education system that serves the country well and about the Government providing a properly funded childcare system that meets the needs of working parents. We can then let schools be schools and childcare be childcare. Simon Lewis is principal of Carlow Educate Together primary school

Not wild about Trinity College
Not wild about Trinity College

Irish Times

time19 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Not wild about Trinity College

Sir, – For visitors to Dublin, the Trinity College main entrance is the front door of the city. For years the elegant facade was complemented by a beautifully maintained lawn. Now the space has been given over to wilding in a city centre with more than enough derelict sites. Surely, Trinity could find additional space for wilding elsewhere within its large campus and restore our city-centre oasis of calm. For my part I'm all for wilding, but not in my front yard. – Yours, etc, READ MORE KEVIN DEVINE, Dublin 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store