Will a group form to take forward constitutional convention plans?
READ MORE: John Swinney to host independence debate at SNP National Council in Perth
However, with the petition for decolonisation now with the United Nations, it is up to every person who has the interests of an independent Scotland at heart to meet the challenges that face us. We need to prove beyond all reasonable doubt to the UN that we want independence and above all, that we are able and willing to form a new Scotland and its institutions in our own image. To do so, we need to call for and form a Scottish constitutional convention now and not at some distant time when it is suitable to some faceless civil servants who are doing it because they have been pushed into it by their English masters.
We need answers to a great number of questions before independence and not after it, and above all we need to know what sort of country are we going to be setting up so that everybody is singing from the same sheet. With such a convention we can answer fully the question about currency, fiscal needs, the institutions et al of our country. Then the English Unionists won't be able to trip us up when it comes to a referendum, which is bound to happen when the UN agrees that we are a colony of England.
READ MORE: SNP now seem content to manage Scotland's decline within the Union
When the convention has been called we will be one more step along the way towards independence and it will make it harder for a prime minister of England to stand in our way.
It is important to have representatives from all walks of life involved with the convention. Until then we are at the mercy of Downing Street and the English establishment.
As there have been a reasonable number of letters here on the topic of calling for a convention, I say it is time we put that rhetoric into action. Effectively, I would say that we need to form a group of competent people who have the acumen to take the notion of a convention to the next step and get things up and running. Until then, nothing is going to happen and we are liable to remain just another colony of England. Who amongst the readers are capable of writing reports, asking important questions and knowing how to arrange meetings with groups and associations?
Alexander Potts
Kilmarnock
GOD knows how much 'zooming' and 'teaming' has been done in the name of the independence struggle in recent years in lieu of face-to-face, cheek-by-jowl forums. If you add to that emails, texting, twittering and blogging then is not difficult to discern the principal reason that both esprit de corps, cohesion and solidarity remain sub-optimal in the movement and in society in general, much to the satisfaction of those who are rightly frightened of 'gatherings' of enthusiasts.
I had the privilege to attend the summer conference of the Independence Forum Scotland (IFS) in Perth on Saturday and the way it was convened and conducted greatly advanced my grasp of several topics, from the cultural to nuances of energy policy, mainly rendered to me by folks sitting in close proximity to me. I could ask them about matters that have perplexed me and vice-versa.
READ MORE: 'Scottish cringe' persists despite evidence of our distinctive culture
I received tuition augmented by a three-dimensional 'model' involving non-verbal gesturing and the vast array of the facial expressions that evolution has come up with to facilitate both communication but also bonding among homo sapiens. The whole day was 'value for time t hat the vast majority of Zoom and Teams encounters fail to provide.
The promised but not-now-to-be-delivered independence convention is yet another strategic failure by the SNP leadership to engage with the wider body of the kirk despite entreaties by their own rank-and-file and nearly everyone else and their auntie.
It was suggested that two brief, cheap residential independence 'academy' weekend events for activists and prospective candidates could define the core curriculum and perhaps advance the principle reconciliation between friends who collaborated for several decades. This initiative received an enthusiastic response among among many quarters but a very tepid response from the celebrated, but as yet ineffective, party 'strategists'.
In short, what we need is the microcosm of the IFS transformed to the macrocosm of a convention embedded in a cultural nationwide movement open to the man in the street, young and old.
I fear it is too late for that now, so blundering on will be the tactics. A patriotic SNP leadership could have made such a big difference. There may be yet time!
Dr Andrew Docherty
Selkirk
MICHAEL Shanks thinks that Scotland will lose out on jobs if we do not support nuclear reactors (Shanks 'won't apologise' for GB Energy funding raid, Jun 16).
We are better served with renewables, as nuclear requires small numbers of engineers at a single site whereas renewables can be very small and spread out, along with maintenance staff all over the place. Thus enabling rural and island communities have well-paid jobs and not having the young people of these places leaving.
In the same edition of the paper, North Yell screams out at what small island and rural folk can do if the impetus is nurtured and admired (Islanders borrowed £8.3m to build own wind farm – and it's paying off big time).
M Ross
Aviemore
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
SNP may delay landfill ban to stop rubbish being sent south
The SNP could delay a ban on landfill in Scotland to prevent up to 100 truckloads of rubbish a day being moved to England. John Swinney said it was 'not acceptable for a large amount of waste to be transported' south of the Border when the ban comes into force at the end of this year. The First Minister said 'several options' were being explored to avoid this in discussions with local authorities and waste management firms. Pressed directly, he refused to rule out a further delay to the ban, which was originally scheduled to come into force in 2021. It emerged earlier this week that the SNP's ban on 'black bag' waste being buried in landfill is expected to lead to 600,000 tons of rubbish being transported to England in the first year. Industry experts warned that this was the equivalent of 80 to 100 trucks of waste per day being moved south of the Border. Scotland does not have enough incinerators to handle the rubbish. BBC Scotland's Disclosure programme reported that councils and commercial waste companies have been approaching rubbish handling operators in England to negotiate 'bridging contracts'. However, most incinerators have very little spare capacity, meaning much of Scotland's excess waste is expected to be landfilled in England. Among the rubbish barred from landfill in Scotland will be non-recyclable black bag municipal waste, wood, textiles, paper and food. Some inert material, such as ash from incinerators and building rubble, will still be allowed at landfill sites. Mr Swinney told First Minister's Questions: 'I do not think that it is acceptable for a large amount of waste to be transported from Scotland to England. The landfill ban will be a significant step in reducing methane emissions in Scotland. 'Methane is a greenhouse gas that is around 28 times more potent in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. Preparations have already been made for the ban coming into force and the vast majority of councils have solutions in place.' He added: 'We are working closely with the waste sector and exploring several options to ensure that we are reducing any environmental impacts as much as possible.' Earlier this week, SNP ministers ruled out a further delay to the ban but Mr Swinney failed to repeat this when asked directly. He said 'options' were being 'explored' with councils and waste management firms to avoid the 'scenarios' of waste being moved to England. Asked a second time if the landfill ban could be delayed, he said: 'We're looking at steps that could be taken to make sure that we avoid the situation.' Maurice Golden, a Tory MSP, said the SNP Government's 2013 recycling targets 'remain unmet' and pointed out that the ban would mean £75 million of landfill tax revenue going to the UK Treasury instead of the Scottish Government. He told MSPs that the ban would also result in tens of millions of pounds in costs to small and medium-sized businesses, adding: 'It's the ultimate farce.' Liam McArthur, a Liberal Democrat MSP, challenged Mr Swinney: 'How would the Scottish Government respond if hundreds of truckloads of waste from England were dumped in Scotland daily?' The Scottish Government originally planned to impose a ban on sending biodegradable waste to landfill from January 2021 but the deadline was pushed back five years after industry leaders warned the country was not ready. A lack of waste treatment capacity at the time prompted warnings that a million tons would have to be disposed outside of Scotland, with the majority of it simply shifted across the border to England. This prompted a rush to build more incinerators but SNP ministers decided to curtail the number of developments over concerns there would be overcapacity. There are currently eight operating in Scotland.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Harvie's last hurrah? Even Frank Sinatra's farewell didn't drag on this long
Thursday was Patrick Harvie's final First Minister's Questions as Scottish Green co-leader. He's standing down to spend more time with anyone but Ross Greer. A sneer in search of a personality, Harvie has never contributed much in the way of wit but he makes up for it with pique. I'm an aficionado of parliamentary spite and Harvie has always had it in plentiful supply. Perhaps he kept some in reserve for his final showstopper, for he used his allotted two questions to spit venom at John Swinney. Harvie reckoned Swinney's anti far-Right summit was little more than a talking shop and only confirmed 'a real sense of drift from the first minister'. Moreover, Swinney lacked 'ambition and leadership', and Harvie 'genuinely struggled to think of a single signature policy that he has delivered in his year in the job'. There speaks a man who clearly missed the Short Life Working Group on Economic and Social Opportunities for Gaelic. He began rhyming off Swinney's sins, such as watering down rental controls, U-turning on a new national park, and failing to make progress on human rights. By now the little cabbage was getting so steamed he was at risk of wilting. He was banging on so much that Presiding Officer Alison Johnson finally stepped in and told him to clamp it. Even Sinatra's farewell tour didn't last this long. Aware that he no longer needed to humour the prickliest cactus this side of the Mississippi, Swinney let him have it: 'I appreciate that this is his last First Minister's question time as co-convener of the Green Party, so saying all that to me might have been his last hurrah.' The First Minister didn't fare as well up against Russell Findlay. The Scottish Tory leader gets a gold star for a splendid piece of work on thuggery in schools and the SNP's 49-page guidelines on excluding violent pupils, which he branded 'tedious, hand-wringing nonsense'. Swinney protested that he was 'listening to the teaching profession', just as he had 'throughout my time as education secretary'. We can only hope for his sake that he wasn't listening too closely. As I recall, the consensus among teachers at the time was made up mostly of words you couldn't repeat in a classroom. This allowed Findlay to have some fun, by reading aloud some highlights. When pupils become violent, the document said, teachers should give them 'a laminated paper with a set of bullet points that tell them to think about their behaviour'. When a wee toerag is engaging in 'unsafe behaviour', educators are advised to start 'a conversation to jointly problem solve with the child'. Disruptive pupils, meanwhile, 'should be allowed to leave class two minutes early'. Personally, I think classroom chairs should be replaced with ejector seats and teachers handed a remote control. The First Minister accused Findlay of 'a failure to address the mechanisms and interventions that are required to solve a difficult issue'. Another reason to consider my idea. We'd hire engineers to make sure the ejector seats had really good mechanisms. The fresh guidance, Swinney said, was intended to 'de-escalate situations' and 'address the underlying causes'. And he was against too many exclusions because those pupils would be 'out on the streets and, potentially, able to become involved in criminal activity'. That's how Ronnie Biggs got started, you know. Teacher put him out of class for talking once and next thing you know he was robbing trains. Later in the afternoon, minister Ivan McKee was sent out to announce plans to save £1billion a year in waste, in what is being nicknamed 'McDoge' after Elon Musk's venture during the early months of the second Trump administration. Given that the task of reining in government misspending proved too much for a man who puts rockets in space, I'm not holding out hope that Ivan McKee will do much better.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Will a group form to take forward constitutional convention plans?
READ MORE: John Swinney to host independence debate at SNP National Council in Perth However, with the petition for decolonisation now with the United Nations, it is up to every person who has the interests of an independent Scotland at heart to meet the challenges that face us. We need to prove beyond all reasonable doubt to the UN that we want independence and above all, that we are able and willing to form a new Scotland and its institutions in our own image. To do so, we need to call for and form a Scottish constitutional convention now and not at some distant time when it is suitable to some faceless civil servants who are doing it because they have been pushed into it by their English masters. We need answers to a great number of questions before independence and not after it, and above all we need to know what sort of country are we going to be setting up so that everybody is singing from the same sheet. With such a convention we can answer fully the question about currency, fiscal needs, the institutions et al of our country. Then the English Unionists won't be able to trip us up when it comes to a referendum, which is bound to happen when the UN agrees that we are a colony of England. READ MORE: SNP now seem content to manage Scotland's decline within the Union When the convention has been called we will be one more step along the way towards independence and it will make it harder for a prime minister of England to stand in our way. It is important to have representatives from all walks of life involved with the convention. Until then we are at the mercy of Downing Street and the English establishment. As there have been a reasonable number of letters here on the topic of calling for a convention, I say it is time we put that rhetoric into action. Effectively, I would say that we need to form a group of competent people who have the acumen to take the notion of a convention to the next step and get things up and running. Until then, nothing is going to happen and we are liable to remain just another colony of England. Who amongst the readers are capable of writing reports, asking important questions and knowing how to arrange meetings with groups and associations? Alexander Potts Kilmarnock GOD knows how much 'zooming' and 'teaming' has been done in the name of the independence struggle in recent years in lieu of face-to-face, cheek-by-jowl forums. If you add to that emails, texting, twittering and blogging then is not difficult to discern the principal reason that both esprit de corps, cohesion and solidarity remain sub-optimal in the movement and in society in general, much to the satisfaction of those who are rightly frightened of 'gatherings' of enthusiasts. I had the privilege to attend the summer conference of the Independence Forum Scotland (IFS) in Perth on Saturday and the way it was convened and conducted greatly advanced my grasp of several topics, from the cultural to nuances of energy policy, mainly rendered to me by folks sitting in close proximity to me. I could ask them about matters that have perplexed me and vice-versa. READ MORE: 'Scottish cringe' persists despite evidence of our distinctive culture I received tuition augmented by a three-dimensional 'model' involving non-verbal gesturing and the vast array of the facial expressions that evolution has come up with to facilitate both communication but also bonding among homo sapiens. The whole day was 'value for time t hat the vast majority of Zoom and Teams encounters fail to provide. The promised but not-now-to-be-delivered independence convention is yet another strategic failure by the SNP leadership to engage with the wider body of the kirk despite entreaties by their own rank-and-file and nearly everyone else and their auntie. It was suggested that two brief, cheap residential independence 'academy' weekend events for activists and prospective candidates could define the core curriculum and perhaps advance the principle reconciliation between friends who collaborated for several decades. This initiative received an enthusiastic response among among many quarters but a very tepid response from the celebrated, but as yet ineffective, party 'strategists'. In short, what we need is the microcosm of the IFS transformed to the macrocosm of a convention embedded in a cultural nationwide movement open to the man in the street, young and old. I fear it is too late for that now, so blundering on will be the tactics. A patriotic SNP leadership could have made such a big difference. There may be yet time! Dr Andrew Docherty Selkirk MICHAEL Shanks thinks that Scotland will lose out on jobs if we do not support nuclear reactors (Shanks 'won't apologise' for GB Energy funding raid, Jun 16). We are better served with renewables, as nuclear requires small numbers of engineers at a single site whereas renewables can be very small and spread out, along with maintenance staff all over the place. Thus enabling rural and island communities have well-paid jobs and not having the young people of these places leaving. In the same edition of the paper, North Yell screams out at what small island and rural folk can do if the impetus is nurtured and admired (Islanders borrowed £8.3m to build own wind farm – and it's paying off big time). M Ross Aviemore
