Oil prices await clues from Zelensky-Trump meet
New York
Oil prices held steady on Monday as traders awaited clues from the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in their efforts to reach a peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years.
Brent crude was at $65.87 a barrel at 08:47 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate crude rose 9 cents, or 0.14 percent, to $62.89 a barrel.
Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Saturday and appeared more aligned with Moscow in seeking a peace deal, rather than a ceasefire first.
'Market focus now turns to today's Washington meeting for signs of a deal that could ultimately increase crude oil and gas supplies. Meanwhile, in the week to August 12, speculators held their first-ever combined net short position in WTI (CME & ICE), leaving prices vulnerable to an upside surprise,' said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank.
'I'm not convinced the oil market has priced in the full peace dividend, which could potentially cause EU crude and gas prices to decline further,' Hansen added. Comments by White House trade adviser Peter Navarro about India's purchases of Russian crude, which are funding Moscow's war in Ukraine, caused crude prices to rally early in the session.
'India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while providing Moscow with much-needed dollars,' Navarro said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Ukrainian man arrested in Italy over Nord Stream pipeline blasts
Italian police have arrested a Ukrainian man suspected of coordinating the attacks on the Nord Stream pipelines, Germany's prosecutor general said. The suspect, identified only as Serhii K under German privacy laws, will be brought before a German judge after being extradited, the prosecutor general said on Thursday. Viewed by both Russia and the West as an act of sabotage, no one has claimed responsibility for explosions that severely damaged pipelines carrying gas from Russia to Europe in September 2022, marking a major escalation in the Ukraine conflict and ramping up an energy supply crisis on the continent. Serhii K was part of a group of people who planted devices on the pipelines near the Danish island of Bornholm, a statement from the prosecutor's office said. He and his accomplices had set off from Rostock on Germany's northeastern coast in a sailing yacht to carry out the attack, it said, adding that the vessel had been rented from a German company with the help of forged identity documents via middlemen. Authorities acted on a European arrest warrant for the suspect, who faces charges of collusion to cause an explosion, anti-constitutional sabotage and destruction of buildings. According to German investigators, the Ukrainian suspect played a coordinating role in the operation rather than being one of the divers who placed explosives on the pipelines. Officers arrested him overnight in the province of Rimini on Italy's Adriatic coast, the German prosecutor's statement said. A German investigation concluded in 2023 that a pro-Ukrainian group was behind the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage. The team that carried out the attack reportedly consisted of two divers, two assistants, a captain, and a medic. Investigators have been largely tight-lipped, but said two years ago they found traces of undersea explosives in samples taken from a yacht that was searched as part of the probe. Germany's Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig said the arrest was an 'impressive success' for Germany's state prosecutors. Hubig also called in a statement for the case to be fully resolved, including under criminal law. Sweden and Denmark had also conducted probes into the explosions. The explosions in 2022 ruptured the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which was Russia's main natural gas supply route to Germany until Moscow cut off supplies at the end of August 2022. They also damaged the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which never entered service because Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine in February of that year. Russia has accused the United States of staging the explosions, a charge Washington denies. The pipelines were long a target of criticism by the US and some of its allies, who warned that they posed a risk to Europe's energy security by increasing dependence on Russian gas. Beyond their geopolitical effect, the Nord Stream pipeline leaks were a huge environmental disaster, with local wildlife affected and huge volumes of methane discharged into the Baltic Sea, in what observers believe could be the single largest release of methane due to human activity.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Tracking US and NATO support for Ukraine: A full breakdown
After a week of high-stakes diplomacy aimed at halting the war in Ukraine, United States President Donald Trump says he is set on arranging a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Following separate meetings with both leaders, Trump has ruled out sending US troops to Ukraine, but pledged security guarantees to Kyiv and indicated that Washington could provide air support to reinforce a potential deal. Ukraine, in turn, told reporters at the White House it would obtain US-made weapons purchased by Europeans for an estimated $90bn as part of the effort to bolster its defences. Which countries are aiding Ukraine? At least 41 countries have contributed to Ukraine's war efforts monetarily, either through military, humanitarian or financial assistance, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank. Military assistance includes weapons, equipment and financial aid for the Ukrainian military. Humanitarian relief covers medical, food and other items for civilians, while financial assistance comes in the form of grants, loans and guarantees. Most contributions to Ukraine have come from NATO, with 29 of its 32 members providing monetary aid, according to the Kiel Institute. Additionally, 12 non-NATO countries and territories have sent monetary aid to Ukraine. These include Australia, Austria, Cyprus, the Republic of Ireland, Japan, Malta, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland, China, Taiwan, and India. The European Union, through the Commission and Council, has also delivered substantial aid to Ukraine. How much aid has Ukraine received so far? So far, Ukraine has received more than 309 billion euros ($360bn) in military, financial, and humanitarian aid, according to the Kiel Institute: Military aid – 149.26 billion euros ($174bn – using today's exchange rate of €1 = $1.17) Financial aid – 139.34 billion euros ($163bn) Humanitarian aid – 21.04 billion euros ($24bn) Who are Ukraine's largest donors? The US has committed the largest amount of aid to Ukraine, providing 114.64 billion euros ($134bn) between January 24, 2022 and June 30, 2025, of which: Military aid – 64.6 billion euros ($75bn) Financial aid – 46.6 billion euros ($54bn) Humanitarian aid – 3.4 billion euros ($4bn) The EU (Commission and Council) is the second biggest donor at 63.19 billion euros ($74bn), followed by Germany (21.29 billion euros or $25bn), the UK (18.6 billion euros or $21bn) and Japan (13.57 billion euros or $15bn). How much aid has been pledged v allocated? According to the Kiel Institute, European countries have collectively allocated 167.4 billion euros ($195bn) to the war in Ukraine, more than the 114.6 billion euros ($134bn) allocated by the US. Allocated aid refers to funds or resources that have actually been set aside, delivered, or officially committed for use by Ukraine. It is different from pledged aid, which is money or equipment promised by a country but not yet delivered or officially set aside. In total, Europe as a whole has committed 257.4 billion euros ($300bn) and the US 119 billion euros ($139bn). US aid to Ukraine plummets under Trump Days before Trump took office, the Biden administration gave one final injection of military support to Ukraine with a weapons package of $500m on January 9. Following the start of the Trump administration's second term in office, aid to Ukraine has plummeted, with Washington suspending all support, including weapons, in March after a tense meeting with Zelenskyy at the White House. Trump made claims that the US has given Ukraine more than $300bn in wartime aid. That number has been contested by Ukraine and its supporters, despite the US being the single largest donor country. What weapons has Ukraine received? Ukraine has received various weapons systems from its allies, including armoured vehicles, artillery, aircraft, air defence systems, drones, missiles, and a wide range of support equipment. According to the Kiel Institute, Poland has supplied its neighbour with the largest number of tanks, totaling 354, while the US leads in providing infantry fighting vehicles (305), howitzers (201), air defence systems (18), and HIMARS rocket launchers (41). The HIMARS, capable of striking targets just a few metres (feet) wide from nearly 80km (50 miles) away, gave Ukraine a vital long-range precision strike capability that slowed Russian advances early in the war. NATO defence spending In a news briefing, the White House said the US could help coordinate a security guarantee for Ukraine. However, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has ruled out the deployment of troops from NATO countries to help secure a peace deal. In June, NATO leaders signed a deal to increase defence spending, which is to be achieved over the next 10 years, and is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to 5 percent. Currently, 23 of the 32 member countries have met this target, with the alliance as a whole spending 2.61 percent of its combined GDP on defence last year. NATO countries bordering Russia, such as Estonia and Lithuania, have significantly increased their defence spending – from less than 1 percent of their GDP just 10 years ago.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US college declines to oppose Trump travel ban after Iranian students' plea
A top university in the United States has declined to oppose President Donald Trump's travel ban on Iran after a call to action by its Iranian students. In a letter last month, the group of students called on the University of Texas at Austin to denounce Trump's 'sweeping and discriminatory' ban, take 'immediate legal action' against the measure, and reaffirm support for Iranian students and scholars. The letter, authored 'on behalf of the newly admitted Iranian students', was sent to interim university President Jim Davis on July 21, weeks after Trump signed an executive order banning citizens from 12 countries, including Iran. 'This Proclamation undermines the very principles upon which UT Austin stands. Iranian students and scholars have long been integral to the university's academic and research excellence, particularly in STEM fields,' the letter said. In the letter, the group noted that the university's department of civil, architectural and environmental engineering was named after Fariborz Maseeh, an Iranian-American entrepreneur and philanthropist, in a 'testament to the enduring legacy of Iranian American contributions to education, innovation, and public service'. 'This is a moment that calls for bold and principled action,' the letter said. 'UT Austin has long benefited from Iranian students' academic contributions. It must now stand in their defense. Failing to act not only jeopardizes the futures of individual students – it risks diminishing the ethical and intellectual standing of the institution itself.' Al Jazeera obtained the letter through a public records request. Despite the students' plea, neither the university nor Davis have made any public comment on the ban. Davis's office did not respond to a request for comment. Last year, 81 Iranians studied at the University of Texas at Austin, according to the university's website, almost all of whom were graduate students. The University of Texas at Austin is considered among the most prestigious tertiary institutions in the US, placing 30th in US News and World Report's 2025 university rankings. 'After months of preparation and acceptance into the world's leading research institutions, we now face the heartbreaking possibility of being denied entry for a long time,' an Iranian student, who was involved in the letter, told Al Jazeera, requesting anonymity. The student said many members of a 1,500-person Telegram group of Iranian students that they belong to have reported being stuck in prolonged post-interview administrative processing. A few of them have been refused visas, while others have chosen to skip visa interviews on the understanding that they would be denied a visa, the student said. Prior to the ban, many of them would have already undergone extensive security vetting to obtain a student visa. Apart from Iran, Trump's travel ban also applies to Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The student said Iranians were facing 'collective punishment' by the Trump administration. 'People must not be equated with their governments,' the student said. 'Such blanket measures are neither reasonable nor fair, and they undermine the very principles of justice, academic freedom, and equal opportunity that the United States has long stood for.' More than 12,300 Iranian students studied in the US during the 2023-2024 academic year, up from 10,812 a year earlier, according to the US State Department.
