
Their books now banned in Kashmir, these authors will still write for ‘generation with no access to truth'
Now, 'life has come full circle' for Kanjwal. The very censorship she wrote about has returned to haunt her. Her book is among 25 titles banned by the J&K home department at the orders of Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha. 'It only emboldens me to keep writing. If they're clamping down on literature, it must be saying something significant,' Kanjwal, an assistant professor of history at Lafayette College in the US, tells ThePrint over the phone.
New Delhi: It was as a result of the 1953 'coup' that Sheikh Abdullah was ousted, and Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad took over as the second prime minister of Jammu and Kashmir. In her book Colonizing Kashmir: State-Building under Indian Occupation , 38-year-old Kashmiri author Hafsa Kanjwal documented how Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad's regime was marked by censorship of literature, and bans on public gatherings and political speech.
The issue of the notification coincided with a book fair in Srinagar.
The notification issued by the principal secretary of the home department, Chandraker Bharti said the books propagate 'secessionism'.
'…it has come to the notice of the Government, that certain literature propagates false narrative and secessionism in Jammu and Kashmir… This literature would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting (a) culture of grievance, victimhood and terrorist heroism,' read the notification.
Adding, 'Some of the means by which this literature has contributed to the radicalization of youth in J&K include distortion of historical facts, glorification of terrorists, vilification of security forces, religious radicalization, promotion of alienation, pathway to violence and terrorism etc.'
Since the announcement, Jammu and Kashmir police have raided bookshops, followed by inspection of roadside book vendors and other establishments dealing in printed publications in Srinagar and across multiple locations in the Union Territory to confiscate the banned literature. Earlier this year, Srinagar district police declared it had seized '668 books' which it said 'promoted the ideology of a banned organisation'.
While the police did not specify the banned organisation, National Conference MP Syed Aga Ruhullah Mehdi cited media reports to say that the police had seized literature by Abul Ala Maududi, the Islamic scholar who founded Jamaat-i-Islami. Jamaat-e-Islami Kashmir, an offshoot of Jamaat-e-Islami, is banned in India under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Another offshoot, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, was banned twice by the Government of India since its formation in 1948, but the Supreme Court revoked the ban on both occasions.
As for the J&K home department's blanket ban on 25 books, including political commentaries and historical accounts, the move has drawn criticism not only from literati but also political and religious leaders.
Kashmir's chief cleric Maulvi Omar Farooq wrote in a post on X on 7 August: 'Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the repertoire of lived memories of people of Kashmir.' The ban, he said, 'exposes' the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such 'authoritarian' action.
Also Read: 'Abrogation of trust': 6 yrs since Article 370 repeal, civil society urges govt to restore J&K's statehood
'Blend of Orwellian and Kafkaesque'
Kanjwal sees the ban as part of a broader, ongoing effort, which she says became particularly stark after 2019, to 'suppress information and silence narratives' that challenge the official discourse. According to her, the earlier crackdown on Jamaat-e-Islami literature didn't attract as much international attention, but inclusion of West-based Indian and Kashmiri authors this time around may have prompted wider outrage.
Her own book, published by Stanford University Press and a recipient of the Bernard Cohn Book Prize awarded by the Association for Asian Studies (AAS), underwent rigorous academic review, she says. 'Nothing that was written in my book or the other books that have been banned was factually incorrect or exaggerated.'
Days after the ban, Kanjwal like several other authors whose books have been banned, is still contemplating the possible reasons behind the ban. She says it is clear that the aim was to 'suppress information about Kashmir,' but she believes the move has backfired, drawing more attention to the very works it aimed to 'suppress'.
Works by Kashmiri authors often offer alternative narratives, she points out, adding that the ban on mostly scholarly texts today could extend to poetry and fiction tomorrow.
Currently, Kanjwal is working on a people's history of Kashmir aimed at younger readers, driven by the urgency to preserve and share Kashmiri narratives in a 'climate of erasure'. She says growing censorship affirms the importance of writing about Kashmir, 'especially for a generation growing up without access to political discourse or historical truth.'
The banned literature also includes works by noted scholars and writers such as Seema Kazi's Between Democracy & Nation (2009), Ather Zia's Resisting Disappearance (2019), and Essar Batool's Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora (2016), all of which foreground Kashmiri lived experiences, especially of women.
Also banned are Al Jihad fil Islam by late Abul Ala Maududi and Mujahid ki Azan by Egyptian cleric late Hassan al-Banna, as well as scholarly works on international politics and law by Piotr Balcerowicz and Sumantra Bose. The banned titles include those published by both Indian and foreign publishers, from academic presses like Stanford University Press and Cambridge University Press to Penguin, HarperCollins, Routledge, and Zubaan.
Veteran journalist and author Anuradha Bhasin, whose book A Dismantled State is among those banned, calls the move 'absolutely bizarre,' though not surprising.
'It is part of a pattern,' she tells ThePrint over the phone, pointing to a growing intolerance for independent thought, historical nuance, and rational voices, particularly on Kashmir. Bhasin argues that the banned works, many published by reputable academic houses, are rigorously vetted and based on deep research. 'These are books that bring out the truth … nuanced, well-researched, and grounded in reality,' she says, rejecting the J&K home department's claim that such literature glorifies terrorism or spreads false narratives.
Speaking of her own book, Bhasin says it was a product of over a year of journalistic reporting, interviews, and legal vetting. She sees the ban not only as an 'attack' on literature but as part of a broader ecosystem of erasure, 'from manipulated school textbooks to a complete silencing of media, civil society, and now, scholarship.'
'You're going to produce a generation of youngsters who will have no knowledge, who will be reduced to non-thinking persons,' she says.
For Bhasin, the ban is particularly disheartening because the targeted books are foundational for academic engagement with Kashmir. 'These are the books that professors recommend. Now, what are university students going to read?'
Political scientist Sumantra Bose, author of Kashmir at the Crossroads, tells ThePrint his goal was to identify 'pathways to peace' and a future free of 'fear and war' in Jammu and Kashmir. Dismissing defamatory slurs on his work, Bose calls the ban a 'tragi-comic farce,' citing the police seizing books even at a state-sponsored festival. 'This is a surreal dystopia … a real-life blend of the Orwellian and the Kafkaesque,' he says, adding that such bans are crude, futile in the digital age, and only draw global attention.
Calling it 'criminalisation of scholars,' Bose notes both his banned books stem from years of field research in conflict zones. Drawing a parallel, he recalls how the British banned his granduncle Subhas Chandra Bose's book The Indian Struggle in 1935. 'Ninety years later, I follow in the footsteps of a legendary freedom fighter,' he says.
Ather Zia, anthropologist and author of Resisting Disappearance and co-editor of Resisting Occupation, another book that has been banned, says the move is not merely about silencing authors but about 'criminalising history, memory, lived realities, and truth-telling.'
She, too, calls it part of a broader effort to suppress Kashmiri narratives that challenge the official discourse, particularly those grounded in Critical Kashmir Studies, a well-established academic sub-discipline shaped by Kashmiri scholars over the last two decades. Alongside her own works, she cites Colonizing Kashmir by Hafsa Kanjwal as among the globally taught, peer-reviewed books being targeted.
Despite the crackdown, Zia says Kashmiris 'will continue to write, remember, and resist.'
ThePrint also reached Christopher Snedden and Essar Batool for a response but both declined to comment.
'An exercise in not forgetting'
The ban by the administration has cast a chilling shadow over the region's growing literary landscape, especially for young, emerging authors. Bhasin tells ThePrint that soon after the ban was announced, a young writer reached out to her, unsure of how to proceed in the current climate. Bhasin encouraged them to keep writing, but with caution.
'My advice would be to continue working, but to do it silently and wait for the opportune moment to write,' she says.
In the years following the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, as space for independent journalism in Jammu and Kashmir rapidly shrank under state pressure, many Kashmiris turned to literature as a safer medium of expression. Fiction, memoir, poetry, and personal narrative became tools to explore grief, memory, and resistance.
Writers like Mehak Jamal, Sadaf Wani, Zahid Rafiq, Farah Bashir, and Javed Arshi emerged as part of a new wave of Kashmiri voices that began gaining prominence in the post-abrogation period. Their works did not always take overt political positions, but subtly mapped the psychological, social, and cultural consequences of conflict.
Jamal, whose book Loal Kashmir: Love and Longing in a Torn Land became available to readers in January this year, tells ThePrint that there has been a slow clampdown on legacy media and other important voices in Kashmir over the past few years. 'That this censorship is getting extended to books from/on the region is shocking but not surprising,' she says, adding that most of the works getting banned are non-fiction academic, historic, journalistic books on the political situation in Kashmir.
'When there is an erasure of such important documentation, it becomes even more imperative for more Kashmiris to tell their stories through various means of literature, media and other forms of storytelling—however small or big. This in itself becomes an exercise in not forgetting,' she says, adding that the decision has left her disheartened.
But at the same time, Jamal does not want to stop writing. 'I wouldn't shy away from writing another book when the time comes, or from telling our stories in any way I can. I will always want to speak truth to power.'
Kashmiri award-winning author Mirza Waheed says the authors on the list include some of the world's finest historians and thinkers who have written on Kashmir. Bans on books are the worst kind of censorship as they 'attack' knowledge and its transmission from one mind to another, he tells ThePrint.
'A political culture that permits such a thing cannot survive for long,' he says, 'because books, thoughts and words are like spring water, they always find a way to flow on.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: Restoring J&K's statehood won't be enough. Kashmiris need to be treated like other Indians
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
With China rivalling, Australia seals $325 mn security & economic deal with Vanuatu in the Pacific
Australia and Vanuatu on Wednesday agreed a A$500 million ($326.50 million) deal to strengthen economic and security ties between the two countries, amid increasing competition from China, the Pacific island nation's largest external creditor. This handout photo released on August 13, 2025 by Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) shows Australia's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles (L) presenting a shoe to Vanuatu's Prime Minister Jotham Napat (C), as Vanuatu's Deputy Prime Minister of Vanuatu Johnny Koanopa (R) reacts on the Island of Tanna in the South Pacific nation of Vanuatu. AFP PHOTO Australia and Vanuatu have agreed on a A$500 million ($326.5 million) package to deepen economic and security cooperation, as both nations contend with growing Chinese influence in the Pacific. Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat said the pact, called the Nakamal Agreement, would see Australia invest over the next decade in areas ranging from security to trade, with a strong emphasis on labour mobility. 'The agreement… will transpire into a lot of trade benefits between the two countries, whether it be the security agreement, economic transformation, with some specific focus on labour mobility,' Napat said at a press conference on the island of Tanna. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Australia's Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles described the deal as recognition of a 'shared destiny' between the two countries. 'It acknowledges that as neighbours, we have a shared security environment and a commitment to each other,' he said. The agreement, to be formally signed in the coming weeks by Napat and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, also includes funding for climate resilience in the wake of a December earthquake in Port Vila that killed at least 14 people and injured hundreds. In recent years, Vanuatu has drawn closer to China, its largest external creditor, following a decade of infrastructure loans, including funding for a new presidential office completed last year. With inputs from agencies


News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Will Govt Staff Get 18-Month Frozen DA Arrears? Here's What the Finance Ministry Says
Last Updated: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government put a hold on three instalments of dearness allowance to reduce financial strain during the economic disruption. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government froze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) for its employees and pensioners. This decision came as a result of severe economic disruption and the need to reduce pressure on government finances. The move affected payments due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The freeze prompted questions in Parliament regarding when the pending arrears would be cleared and the government's fiscal health during and after the pandemic. Member of Parliament Anand Bhadauria asked the government about the DA and DR arrears, seeking clarity on the reasons behind the freeze and the current status of payments. In response, the government explained that the freeze was necessary due to the pandemic's financial impact and the additional welfare measures undertaken to support citizens during that period. What is Dearness Allowance? Dearness Allowance (DA) is extra money given to government employees to help them keep up with rising prices. Dearness Relief (DR) is the same kind of support, but for pensioners, so inflation doesn't reduce their spending power. When asked whether the freeze was due to economic disruption and to ease pressure on finances, the government stated: 'The decision to freeze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) / Dearness Relief (DR) to Central Government employees/pensioners due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020 & January 1, 2021 was taken in the context of COVID-19, which caused economic disruption, to ease pressure on government finances." On the question of the government's fiscal condition, the government clarified: 'The fiscal deficit of the government of India has narrowed from 9.2 per cent in the Financial Year (FY) 2020-21 to 4.4 per cent in the FY 2025-26 (Budget Estimates)." Regarding when the arrears of 18 months' DA/DR would be paid, the government explained that the economic impact of the pandemic, combined with additional welfare spending, left no room in the budget for these payments: 'The adverse financial impact of pandemic in 2020 and the financing of welfare measures taken by the Government had a fiscal spill over beyond FY 2020-21. Therefore, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible." This clarification comes amid growing talk about the 8th Pay Commission, which got approval from the Union Cabinet in January this year but hasn't been officially set up yet. Once the commission is formed, it will meet with stakeholders and prepare a detailed report, usually taking over a year. The report will suggest changes to salaries and allowances for central government employees. Typically, when a new pay commission is implemented, the DA is reset to zero. At present, under the 7th Pay Commission, DA is 55 per cent of basic pay. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Out-Of-Court Mechanism Proposed In Bankruptcy Law Amendment Bill
New Delhi: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has proposed an "out-of-court initiation mechanism" for genuine business failures in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The main objective behind introducing this Bill is to amend the law to improve its operation, enhance its effectiveness, clarify its original intent, and incorporate novel concepts. To incorporate these changes, new provisions have been inserted in the proposed law for the effective implementation of the Code. The Bill categorically states that, "The proposed amendments aim to reduce delays, maximise value for all stakeholders, and improve governance of all processes under the Code. They seek to modify existing provisions to better align with the overall objectives of the Code and to introduce new provisions that follow global best practices for resolving insolvency." For the first time, "the proposed legislation introduces a new 'creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process' with an out-of-court initiation mechanism for genuine business failures to facilitate faster and more cost-effective insolvency resolution, with minimal business disruption". It is expected to ease the burden on the judicial systems, promote ease of doing business, and improve access to credit. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill also has a provision for two new frameworks - "group insolvency" and "cross-border insolvency". According to the text of the proposed legislation, the group insolvency framework seeks to efficiently resolve insolvencies involving complex corporate group structures, minimising value destruction caused by fragmented proceedings and maximising value for creditors through coordinated decision-making. "The cross-border insolvency framework seeks to lay the foundation for protecting stakeholder interests in domestic and foreign proceedings, promoting investor confidence, and aligning domestic practices with international best practices. This will also pave the way for improved recognition of Indian insolvency proceedings in other jurisdictions," the text reads. The decision to amend The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 followed extensive consultation with key stakeholders. A colloquium was organized with stakeholders way back in November, 2022, followed by deliberations in the Insolvency Law Committee in January, 2023. Later, the Government issued a discussion paper inviting public comments on the proposed changes to the Code. The key amendments proposed in the draft legislation have been included after a thorough examination of the comments received from the public and stakeholders, so as to incorporate the global best practices for resolving insolvency.