Sukhbir announces protests against AAP govt's ‘land pooling policy'
Addressing a press conference here, the SAD president said 40,000 acres of land of 158 villages were being acquired under a purported land pooling scheme which was in fact a 'land-grabbing scheme'.
Sukhbir accused the AAP government of attempting to acquire the land under the Punjab Regional Town Planning and Development Act, 1995. He claimed that the scheme was designed not to benefit farmers or the public but to fill the coffers of the AAP, alleging that the party aimed to raise ₹ 10,000 crore through bribes.
The protests, according to Sukhbir, will take place across various cities where land is slated to be acquired, including Ludhiana (24,000 acres), Mohali (2,535 acres), Amritsar (4,464 acres), and several other districts like Patiala, Jalandhar, Bathinda and Sangrur, with a total of 40,000 acres of land affected.
Sukhbir highlighted the differences between the 1995 Punjab Act and the Central Land Acquisition Act of 2013. He pointed out that the latter would require compensation to be paid at four times the collector's rate and include resettlement plans for affected farmers, while the former gives the state government more leeway in excluding land from acquisition and allowing its auction, lease, or allotment to private developers.
'This is not about development. This is about looting the land and enriching the AAP's Delhi-based leadership. The real agenda here is to help private developers, particularly those with ties to the AAP,' the SAD chief alleged.
Sukhbir also criticised chief minister Bhagwant Mann for allegedly allowing the land acquisition process to be handed over to outsiders, claiming that all four members of the state's development authorities were from outside Punjab.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
T.N. CM Stalin releases ‘Coimbatore Master Plan 2041'
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Friday (July 4, 2025) released the 'Coimbatore Master Plan 2041' — a Geographic Information System-based plan that has been prepared for the Coimbatore local planning area, spread over 1,531 sq. km — at the Secretariat in Chennai. The Coimbatore local planning area includes a municipal corporation, four municipalities, 21 town panchayats, and 66 revenue villages — all of them spread over 1,531 sq. km, an official release said. The document has been prepared by the Directorate of Town and Country Planning under the Housing and Urban Development Department, with inputs from over 40 departments and agencies. Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, Minister for Housing and Urban Development S. Muthusamy, Chief Secretary N. Muruganandam, and senior officials were also present on the occasion at the Secretariat in Chennai. MoU signed In another event, a memorandum of understanding (MoU) was signed to operate the Cuddalore harbour. The pact was signed between the Tamil Nadu Maritime Board and Mahathi Cuddalore Port and Maritime Private Limited, in the presence of the Chief Minister. Minister for Highways and Minor Ports E.V. Velu and senior officials were also present. 'Will help plan development' With the new master plan, 'the public can clearly know the land-use pattern for every survey number, areas available for building new industries, and reserve forest areas, among others. It will help plan development properly,' said Rajesh B. Lund, president of the Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Coimbatore. An official said the G.O. on the master plan is expected soon, and the plan will be uploaded on the government website. Mr. Lund said the master plan was a long-awaited demand of Coimbatore, and that it shows the growth of the region. The government should keep the plan open-ended so it can incorporate the demands and suggestions of the public when necessary. S.R. Arvind Kumar, president of Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India, Coimbatore, said the plan released in 1994 had 59% of area earmarked for agriculture purposes. The revised plan has 33% earmarked as green area and has opened up the remaining area for development. It has incorporated ring road and sewage treatment proposals. The plan has envisioned the needs of the region when the population grows to about 60 lakh, he said.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
‘Drone Strike Near My Home': Indian Techie Lied During Op Sindoor To Skip Work, Says Ex-Boss
Soham Parekh allegedly manipulated his US employer by falsely claiming to be in a war zone during the India-Pakistan military standoff. Soham Parekh, the Indian tech professional embroiled in a massive moonlighting scandal involving over 30 startups, is now facing fresh allegations- this time of lying about being in a conflict zone during Operation Sindoor in order to avoid work. Arkadiy Telegin, co-founder of the US-based AI startup Leaping AI, claimed on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that Soham Parekh emotionally manipulated him in May by pretending to be under threat during the cross-border escalation. According to Arkadiy Telegin, Soham Parekh falsely claimed that a drone had struck near his home in Mumbai. 'Soham used to guilt-trip me for being slow on PRs when the India-Pakistan thing was going on, all while he was in Mumbai," Arkadiy Telegin posted, sharing screenshots of their chat. In one message, Soham Parekh wrote, 'Drone shot down 10 minutes away", later adding that a nearby building was damaged- a claim now believed to be entirely fabricated. Arkadiy Telegin accused Soham Parekh of using the situation to stall work and deflect accountability, calling the incident 'manipulative and dishonest." He added sarcastically, 'The next person should hire him for the Chief Intelligence Officer role." The latest revelation follows an industry-wide uproar over Soham Parekh's admission that he was simultaneously employed by 34 different startups, many of them backed by leading accelerator Y Combinator. Suhail Doshi, former CEO of Mixpanel, was among the first to flag the issue, revealing that he terminated Soham Parekh within a week of hiring him. Other startup founders soon followed with similar experiences. One halted Soham Parekh's trial period after seeing Suhail Doshi's post while another said they discovered his overlapping employment only after conducting their own background check. Soham Parekh Admits To Deception Soham Parekh admitted to working multiple jobs without disclosure, saying, 'It is true. I'm not proud of what I've done. But I had to do this out of necessity. I was in extremely dire financial circumstances." He claimed to have handled all assigned work himself without outsourcing or relying on AI tools and said he worked up to 140 hours a week. Soham Parekh Now Hired By AI Startup Darwin Despite the controversy, Soham Parekh landed a new job with Darwin, a San Francisco-based AI startup. Darwin's CEO, Sanjit Juneja, expressed support for the hire, saying, 'Soham is an incredibly talented engineer, and we believe in his abilities to help bring our products to market." Soham Parekh confirmed that he has ended all other engagements and signed an exclusive agreement with Darwin. In a post, he wrote, 'I've been isolated, written off and shut out by nearly everyone I've known and every company I've worked at. But building is the only thing I've ever truly known, and it's what I'll keep doing."
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab & Haryana HC seeks state's reply on Majithia's plea against arrest
Chandigarh, The Punjab and Haryana High Court Friday asked the Punjab advocate general to respond to Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia's plea against arrest and remand in a disproportionate assets case. Punjab & Haryana HC seeks state's reply on Majithia's plea against arrest Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya deferred the hearing to July 8 without any interim relief to the SAD leader. The court also asked Punjab Advocate General Maninderjit Singh Bedi to seek instructions on the plea, said Majithia's counsel Arshdeep Singh Kler. "The state counsel has been asked to take instructions on what is the petition and what is the petitioner's grouse. The AG himself has appeared in the court," Kler told mediapersons after the hearing. Kler said the court asked for placing an amended remand order on record. The lawyer said a fresh remand order of the Mohali court was placed on record on July 3. "But in the fresh remand order in which July 5 was mentioned as, an amendment has been made. Now an amended remand order has been issued in which the date has been changed from July 5 to July 6. The high court now asked for placing this on record," Kler said. Majithia, arrested in the DA case, was sent to a seven-day vigilance remand by the Mohali court on June 26. The court on July 2 extended Majithia's remand by four days more after his seven-day remand ended. The Punjab Vigilance Bureau on June 25 arrested Majithia in the DA case allegedly involving laundering of ₹540 crore of "drug money". Majithia on July 1 moved the HC against the DA case, calling it "political witch-hunting and vendetta" for being a vocal critic of the current dispensation. He sought the appropriate relief against the "illegal" arrest and subsequent remand granted in the FIR registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. "The said FIR is a result of political witch-hunting and vendetta, initiated by the present political dispensation with the sole object of maligning and harassing the petitioner who has been a vocal critic and political opponent," the petition read. The plea argued that the FIR registered against him was "patently illegal" while his arrest was carried out in "gross violation of settled legal procedures". "The remand application filed by the investigating agency lacked any concrete or urgent investigative ground and merely relied on broad, speculative allegations such as the petitioner's alleged influence, foreign connections, and general statements about the need to confront him with documents or digital devices," it said. The petitioner submitted that the Supreme Court, by its detailed order on March 4, had refused custodial interrogation of the petitioner despite the same allegations being pressed before it via multiple affidavits filed by the State of Punjab. The present petition, therefore, raises important questions of law and principle concerning abuse of criminal process, misuse of remand powers, and the right to fair investigation and liberty, it added. Majithia, therefore, sought quashing of the remand order and directions to prevent further "abuse" of process. In the fresh FIR registered against Majithia, the VB claimed that preliminary investigations revealed that more than ₹540 crore of "drug money" has been laundered through several ways and it was allegedly facilitated by Majithia. The FIR against Majithia stems from an ongoing investigation being conducted by a Punjab Police special investigation team into the 2021 drug case. In 2021, Majithia was booked under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The action was taken on the basis of a 2018 report of the anti-drug Special Task Force. He spent over five months in Patiala Jail and walked out of prison in August 2022 after the high court granted him bail. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
