Walmart and Target threaten shoppers with up to $2,500 fines
Consumers could be hit with fines of up to $2,500 for taking a shopping cart off the property at major retailers like Target and Walmart . Roughly two million carts vanish from stores each year — costing companies an estimated $175 million annually to replace Several states throughout the US have proposed and passed bills with the hopes of solving this problem, as well as coming up with ways to keep carts from leaving the premises. The issue isn't new, but it's getting more attention as retailers escalate their fight against rising shoplifting and in-store losses.
Fighting to survive its second bankruptcy , Rite Aid began rolling out locked display cases nationwide after the pandemic. Shoppers have also looked for tricks on how to open cases themselves . Other measures implemented by retailers for theft protection include hidden barcodes on products , and advanced technology like Walmart's robotic parking lot security guard . One of the biggest changes retailers are making to prevent thefts is axing self-checkouts. Dollar Tree removed machines from 12,000 stores , and found themselves experiencing an 8 percent sales boost . With retailers doing everything they can to prevent shoplifting, these are some of the states that don't tolerate shopping cart disappearances.
Arizona
Arizona residents are at risk of civil lawsuits if they steal a shopping cart from a retailer. Each thief could receive a fine of up to $250, depending on the cart's worth, and first-time offenders could also face criminal charges. Shoppers who are charged with theft may also be required to pay an additional fee of up to $500. It's unclear how often Arizona residents steal shopping carts, but the city of Phoenix is on the verge of requiring retailers to install locking wheels or GPS devices on them as a way to lower the chances of them going missing .
California
Shoppers in California who steal a cart 'with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the owner or retailer of possession ' will charged with a misdemeanor. Fines for this charge can be up to $1,000, and some thieves could even be sentenced to six months in jail. Shopping cart theft is growing in the Golden State, and San Jose even began enforcing a rule last month requiring large retailers with over 76 carts to invest in prevention plans . San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan revealed these plans include locks, deposit systems, and retrieval services that can all serve as 'better security' in parking lots.
Florida
Customers in Florida can be charged with a misdemeanor and receive a $100 civil fine if they steal a shopping cart from a retailer's parking lot. However, the price could grow depending on how long the individual has the cart in their possession. This law is also enforced on residents looking to steal a retailer's laundry carts, or altering or obliterating any identifying marks or serial numbers. Thieves who receive severe penalties for the offenses could expect a fine of up to $1,000 or more and a possible year-long jail sentence.
Hawaii
Shoppers in Hawaii who swipe a store's carts and abandon them in public places could receive up to a $500 fine and 30 days in jail. Honolulu got the ball rolling on passing the bill to make cart stealing illegal in 2023 after approximately 4,823 of them were stolen the year before. 'This is clearly intended for the homeless and I'm surprised the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) isn't here,' public testifier Natalie Iwasa said in a 2023 meeting via Island News .
Illinois
Thieves who are caught stealing shopping carts could receive a fine of up to $2,500 depending on the price of the cart and prior criminal records. However, if the theft were to occur in Chicago, shoppers would typically only face a $200 fine. If the stealer were to be charged with a misdemeanor over the theft in Illinois, they could also be sentenced to one year in jail.
Nevada
Shopping cart thefts in Nevada are classified as misdemeanors, as the items typically cost less than $1,200. This action is considered to be petty larceny, which can result in a $1,000 fine or up to six months in jail. The costs would be applied to each cart that's stolen by the shopper.
New York
Shoppers in New York could receive a $100 civil fine if they snag a store's shopping cart without consent. Depending on how extensive the theft is, the culprits could be charged with a misdemeanor. If that is the case, the thieves could receive a fine of up to $1,000 per cart and up to a year in jail. The cost of the stolen property is a prime factor in how much money or jail time the stealer could potentially receive.
Texas
Any shopping cart theft is considered to be a Class C misdemeanor, meaning the fine won't be too severe. The shoppers who commit this crime will usually be fined up to $500. However, if the thief were to have other offenses on their record, it could raise the penalty from Class C to Class B. This change would hike the fine up to $2,000 at most, a 180 day jail sentence, or both.
Washington
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US safety board to scrutinize Boeing role in 737 MAX 9 mid-air emergency
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board will hold a hearing on Tuesday to determine the probable cause of a mid-air cabin panel blowout of a new Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab 737 MAX 9 flight in January 2024 that spun the planemaker into a major crisis. The board is expected to harshly criticize Boeing's safety culture and its failure to install four key bolts in a new Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), opens new tab MAX 9, officials told Reuters. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy has said the incident was entirely avoidable because the planemaker should have addressed unauthorized production work long ago. "This accident should have never happened. This should have been caught years before," Homendy said last August during a two-day investigative hearing. "The safety culture needs a lot of work." The accident prompted the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation and declare that Boeing was not in compliance with a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement and CEO Dave Calhoun announced he would step down within a few months of the mid-air panel blowout. The incident badly damaged Boeing's reputation and led to a grounding of the MAX 9 for two weeks and a 38 planes per month cap by the Federal Aviation Administration on MAX production that still remains in place. Boeing created no paperwork for the removal of the 737 MAX 9 door plug - a piece of metal shaped like a door covering an unused emergency exit - or its re-installation during production, and did not know which employees were involved, the NTSB said last year. Boeing did not respond to a request for comment ahead of the meeting. Then-FAA Administrator Michael Whitaker said in June 2024 the agency was "too hands off" in Boeing oversight and it has boosted the number of inspectors at Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems (SPR.N), opens new tab factories. Boeing had agreed last July to plead guilty to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge after two fatal 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. But it last month struck a deal with the Justice Department to avoid a guilty plea. The Justice Department has asked a judge to approve the deal, which will allow Boeing to avoid pleading guilty or facing oversight by an outside monitor but will require it to pay an additional $444.5 million into a crash victims fund to be divided equally per crash victim.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Fed should wait on rate cuts with price hikes expected, Bostic says
ATLANTA, June 24 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve need not cut interest rates with companies planning to raise prices later this year in response to higher import taxes and with the job market still stable, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told Reuters. "I think we have some space and time" to watch how the tariff and other policy debates evolve, said Bostic in an interview at his office in downtown Atlanta. He sees the Fed only needing to approve a single quarter-point rate cut late in 2025, based on his view that economic growth will fall to perhaps 1.1% this year and inflation returning to nearly 3% by year's end. Though some Fed officials say rates could fall as soon as July, and U.S. President Donald Trump has been criticizing tight Fed monetary policy, Bostic said the job market shows little sign of fading, while inflation remains a risk. "I'm more concerned about what happens if we don't get to our 2% mandate. Because of that I'm willing to stay in this restrictive posture for longer just to be absolutely sure," said Bostic, referring to the 4.25% to 4.5% policy interest rate the Fed has maintained since December to contain inflation. "I would see the last quarter (of the year) is sort of when I would expect we would know enough to move." Fed policy will be the focus of congressional hearings this week, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell beginning two days of testimony Tuesday morning before the House Financial Services Committee. Trump has called for immediate rate cuts, but uncertainty around his trade and other policies has pushed the central bank onto a cautious footing that may be further amplified by new risks around the conflict with Iran. After a turbulent few months in which recession risk rose alongside the Trump administration's plans for historically high import tariffs, then fell as Trump backed off, Bostic said business sentiment has improved recently - something Powell alluded to in a press conference last week. "Business leaders have lowered the probability of the doomsday scenario" in which tariffs and prices skyrocket and demand wanes, Bostic said. Business executives, he said, have told him they are confident about finding strategies to deal with the tariff levels they expect they are most likely to face. Those strategies include raising prices, perhaps in several steps over time, as companies respond to their competitors, negotiate with suppliers and monitor how consumers adapt, he noted. "They tell me 'I'm pretty sure I am going to have to raise my prices. The question is not whether but when,'" Bostic said, citing a major reason he remains reluctant to cut rates until more is known. Bostic's single anticipated cut this year is less than the two quarter-point cuts at the median of projections issued last week by the Fed's 19 policymakers. Bostic is not a voter this year on interest rates, but like all Fed officials he participates in Federal Open Market Committee debates about appropriate policy. Since December that has meant holding the benchmark overnight rate steady as the Trump administration moved to reorder global trade by imposing stiff tariffs on imported goods. Some of those levies are already in place, but have yet to significantly affect the pace of price increases that are near but still above the central bank's 2% target. In recent days, Fed Governors Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman, who is also the U.S. central bank board's vice chair for supervision, said recent inflation data has been mild enough to justify a rate cut as soon as July. But much remains unknown ahead of a July 9 deadline for the imposition of U.S. tariffs as high as 50% on European Union nations and various levies across much of the rest of the world. Bostic said many businesses in his southern Fed district say they have held the line on prices so far, but have nearly exhausted the tools at hand to keep doing so. "More and more businesses are telling me that in their sector, the strategies that they had to forbear are increasingly running their course," Bostic said. "They have worked but they have run their course and they can't keep doing it."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Powell is staying at the Fed, with Trump appointments possibly limited
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell begins two days of congressional testimony on Tuesday under fire from President Donald Trump for not cutting interest rates but with his status as head of the central bank seemingly secured from any presidential action by a Supreme Court ruling last month. Trump has mused about firing Powell or naming a successor soon, in what some analysts see as an effort to influence monetary policy through a "shadow" Fed chair even before Powell leaves office in May 2026. However the Supreme Court's acknowledgment last month that the Fed has a unique status, with its seven governors immune from removal over policy disagreements, has highlighted not just that Powell will serve out his term, but that Trump may be able to appoint only one additional board member before leaving office in January 2029. The risk of naming a Powell replacement early, months before a board seat opens in January, and months after that until Powell departs, could be greater than any influence a chair-in-waiting might have, Evercore ISI vice chair and former New York Fed official Krishna Guha wrote recently. "Nominating the next Fed chair now with the expectation that this person would be an active alternative voice on monetary policy for the best part of a year would confuse the ways that would not help advance rate cuts," Guha wrote. "The intended be unable to exercise real influence on policy for some time, and could lose credibility critiquing a Committee he would need to manage upon taking over." Any missteps could also complicate Senate confirmation. Powell starts his twice-yearly round of Capitol Hill hearings on Tuesday before the House Financial Services Committee with many policymakers reluctant to cut interest rates, despite Trump's public demands, until the administration's back-and-forth debate over tariffs is resolved and there is more clarity about how they may influence inflation, growth and jobs. The U.S. bombing of Iran and conflict between Iran and Israel could also factor into Powell's appearance, with the possibility of rising oil prices becoming part of a Fed economic outlook that has been revised towards slower growth and higher inflation since Trump took office and embarked on his tariff campaign. So far, though, oil prices have remained steady. Whatever Trump thinks the Fed should do, the ranks of policymakers are all but settled, absent unexpected resignations. To limit how much change a president can make at the Fed in any four-year term, and thus cap political leverage over interest rate decisions that can have electoral consequences, Congress sets Fed governors' terms at 14 years, with expirations staggered every two years. The chair's term runs on a separate four-year schedule to give every president the chance to name the central bank's powerful head. While his chair term expires next May, Powell's Fed board term expires in 2028, though he may well follow precedent and leave the Fed once his time as chair is over. That means Trump has only two certain vacancies to fill in his term, Powell's and another seat held by Governor Adriana Kugler, appointed by former President Joe Biden, that expires in January. Two other board members, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Chris Waller, were appointed by Trump in his first term. They are now as insulated from pressure as the others, and have joined a series of unanimous votes this year to keep interest rates steady, though both recently said a cut as soon as July may be appropriate. Interest rates, though, are set at meetings that include the 12 regional Fed bank presidents, five of whom vote on rates in any given year. They are even further outside of presidential control, hired by the boards of directors of what are quasi-private institutions established more than a century ago to ensure regional input into national monetary policy. While a chair or a president could veto a given candidate to run a reserve bank, terms of only three of the 12 expire before Trump leaves office, and none until 2028. The rest are under terms extending into the 2030s. Former and current Fed officials talk about the pull of the institution on those inside it. Each of eight annual meetings involves extensive staff and other briefings on the state of the economy and the outlook. Officials also shape their views from interviews with business and community leaders, the regular cycle of data from government statistical agencies, and the almost constant chatter of colleagues expressing their opinions in public. Markets play a role as well, voting daily on emerging Fed policy through the pricing of bonds, stocks, and contracts tied directly to the Fed's policy rate. For actual policymakers, let alone "shadow" officials not acting in any formal capacity, there's not much room to hide, a sea change from the days when former Chair Alan Greenspan tightly controlled the Fed's sometimes cryptic messaging. "We have 19 members, all of whom are pretty confident and opinionated. One thing that we get very well conditioned to do is to listen attentively to the opinions of the many people who think that there are things we could do differently and better, but then still try to make the right decision," Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin told Reuters. "I think we're well conditioned to focus on the mission and not focus on the noise."
