logo
Ferocity of Recent Killings in Syria Reveals Country's Fragility

Ferocity of Recent Killings in Syria Reveals Country's Fragility

Yomiuri Shimbun5 days ago
SWEIDA, Syria – Charred bodies sat in an awful heap on a city sidewalk. Blood mixed with dirt in a traffic circle where civilians were gunned down. Grieving women clasped arms on Sweida's stricken streets, wearing black.
This was the aftermath of the brutal violence that seized the Sweida area in mid-July, among the deadliest in Syria since rebels toppled Bashar al-Assad's dictatorship last year. In a fight charged by sectarian rage, more than 1,000 people were killed as gunmen battled for days, according to human rights groups.
Weeks later, the conflict still simmers, with government forces surrounding the city of Sweida in a standoff with Druze fighters within. The carnage has polarized Syria, sparking protests by members of the Druze religious minority, counter-demonstrations by government supporters, accusations of treachery and vows of revenge.
'They killed, and we killed,' said Saud al-Wadi, 58, a Bedouin who fled the violence with his family, speaking of his former Druze neighbors. 'There is blood between us.'
The two sides battled again briefly Sunday, along several front lines. Inside the city, the mainly Druze residents who remain are running low on water, fuel and other essentials. Stranded in the no-man's-land between the forces are perhaps hundreds of uncollected bodies, rescue workers say.
Nearly a week of intense fighting in the city, in southwest Syria, was set off by the kidnapping of a Druze merchant and retaliatory abductions of Sunni Muslim Bedouins, residents said. The communities have clashed in the past, including over land.
The ferocity of the dispute this time delivered a warning about the fragility of Syria's social fabric. And the authorities' failure to quiet the confrontation is highlighting the struggles of President Ahmed al-Sharaa's young government in responding to tensions or outbreaks of violence – without making them worse.
Sweida's descent was marked by atrocities and summary killings, heavy-weapons fire and airstrikes. Buildings throughout the city were looted. Villages beyond it were emptied and burned. Nearly 200,000 people have been displaced, according to the United Nations. Scores remain missing.
The majority of those killed appeared to be Druze, who are the majority in Sweida and the surrounding province of the same name, said Fadel Abdul Ghany, head of the Syrian Network for Human Rights. It was unclear how many were combatants or civilians. The dead included at least 26 children and 47 women, he said.
Survivors told Washington Post reporters who visited the city and surrounding villages in recent weeks that atrocities were committed by all the armed factions. 'Everyone contributed to the blood that was shed in the province,' said Laith al-Balous, a local Druze leader seen as close to the government.
Bodies were kept for days in the courtyard and morgue of the city's main hospital. Some were later buried in a mass grave, on a hill overlooking the city, under red-brown dirt. The dead were still being tallied, doctors at the hospital said. For days, they said, requests for coffins poured in from villages around Sweida.
A pattern of killing
The combatants on one side included local Bedouins, Sunni tribesmen from across Syria who had answered Bedouin pleas for help, and army and Interior Ministry troops. They battled Druze fighters backed by Israel, which carried out airstrikes, in Sweida and in the Syrian capital, Damascus.
Mazen Aleddine, a Druze resident, said members of the state's general security forces and allied Sunni tribesmen killed his brother, Safwan – executing him with a bullet behind the ear before dumping his body under a nearby bridge.
Safwan had stayed in the city to protect their family's home after Mazen left for a village outside the city to care for his own family on July 15 as the violence was peaking. When Mazen returned, he said, he discovered that the building containing their home had been torched. So had their business, a car showroom on the first floor.
Around the building, someone – presumably the tribesmen – had scrawled graffiti with the names of tribes and the Syrian towns from where they came, along with taunts denigrating the Druze as disloyal. 'Down with traitors,' a phrase on a blackened building column read.
Safwan's killing fit a pattern described by residents: Sunni fighters raided Druze homes, demanding any weapons inside, and, in some cases, confronted and executed the residents.
The family of Hosam Saraya, a Syrian American who returned to Sweida last year, said he and several relatives were killed in a similar fashion. They were grabbed from their home by men the family said included government forces, marched to a square and executed while kneeling.
Government forces implicated
The alleged killings by government fighters were another woeful turn for Syria, whose citizens are clamoring for order, accountability and inclusive rule. The killings added to the apprehension – or outright fear – in Syria's minority communities over the hard-line Islamists who are fighting alongside the government, as well as to misgivings about Sharaa, a former leader of Syria's al-Qaeda affiliate.
'We will not accept al-Sharaa even if he slaughtered us all,' said Kamal Maqlad, a Druze resident whose family building was burned. 'We will not accept him as long as a single Druze man remains.'
The government said it sent troops to Sweida to tamp down the conflict between the Bedouin and the Druze. Quickly though, the troops suffered setbacks, including an ambush by Druze fighters that killed at least a dozen people, and the Israeli airstrikes, which killed hundreds of soldiers, a government spokesman said.
Soon, the government troops were seen as a faction in the fighting, rather than a mediating force.
Videos were circulated showing men in uniforms, including military police, forcibly shaving off the mustaches of Druze men, in acts of forced humiliation. Other videos showed Druze men being executed, prompting the Interior Ministry to release a statement that condemned the killings and said an 'urgent' investigation had been launched.
Late last month, the Justice Ministry said a committee, composed of judges and others, would investigate violations in Sweida and refer perpetrators to court.
Starting the fire
Bedouin quarters of Sweida also were viciously attacked, including the neighborhood of al-Maqwas in the east of the city. Residents from there said the attacking Druze fighters were loyal to Hikmat al-Hijri, the Druze spiritual leader in Syria.
Government supporters have singled out Hijri as an instigator of the chaos in Sweida, faulting him for opposing the government's presence and for calling on Israel for support. Israel, which has demanded that Syria keep its south demilitarized – and has frequently bombed military and other installations to enforce the edict – said it intervened last month to protect the Druze.
A representative for Hijri, responding to a request for an interview, said he was unavailable.
Balous, the Druze leader, blamed Hijri's 'stubbornness' for the violence in Sweida. 'They only wanted to start the fire,' he said.
In the past, incidents like the kidnappings that set off the conflagration were resolved in a few days by tribal figures, said Emad Salama, 40, a Bedouin resident from al-Maqwas. 'This time, no one wanted to initiate the peacemaking,' he said. 'Both sides were stubborn.'
The government's allies have charged that Israel's support emboldened Druze factions in the city seeking autonomy from the government. Druze residents have alleged that the state was looking for any excuse to bring a restive Sweida to heel. Whatever the reasons, Salama's Druze friends called him to warn him about the dangers coming.
'This time is bigger than the others,' he quoted them as saying.
Neighbors betrayed
As the fighting intensified, Salama's relatives – his brother Wael, a brother-in-law, a nephew and a cousin – were stuck outside Sweida. 'We told them not to come. They worried about their families,' he said. They were killed as they attempted to return, he said.
At least 26 people were killed by Druze fighters in al-Maqwas, he said.
Some Bedouin residents said they were shocked at how quickly Druze neighbors turned on them. Mohammed al-Wadi, 22, said he sheltered Druze residents from his neighborhood as the fighting started. When government forces withdrew, 'it was those people we hosted who turned against us,' looting his house, he said.
He and his family spoke to reporters in a village west of Sweida called al-Darah where they were sheltering. Elsewhere in the village, Druze families were being protected, too, after fleeing al-Thaala, a Druze village a few miles away, said Khalid Ahmed, 42.
The two villages had long been intertwined, and as the violence started in Sweida, they agreed to a truce, brokered by local leaders, Ahmed said.
'The Druze are peaceful, honestly. They would not be involved in all this,' he said. 'The problem is the Hijri gangs.'
Peril at a checkpoint
When Post reporters visited a few days after a ceasefire was announced July 19, government fighters had established a checkpoint in Walgha, west of the city, where they drank tea and warned of snipers just down the road.
As they spoke, a white Toyota pickup truck drove toward the checkpoint, sparking panic. Fighters rushed to the car, dragging the driver out – a Druze man carrying a rifle mounted with a sniper scope. It was not clear whether he had driven to the checkpoint by mistake or gotten lost.
At first, the man was desperate. 'Please, I have a son,' he pleaded to fighters who quickly surrounded him, binding his hands with zip ties. Then he sounded resigned. 'If you want to kill me, just kill me.' An officer told the man he would be taken for 'investigation.'
By the hour, the city's complexion was being altered. Every night, convoys arranged by the Syrian Arab Red Crescent were shuttling mostly Bedouin families out of Sweida: some on buses, some sharing the back of flatbed trucks with furniture and sheep. Some said they are unlikely to ever return.
A few miles from Walgha, Druze fighters watched a convoy preparing to set out one evening from the city's Omran Square. A few seethed that the Bedouin were being allowed to safely depart. 'Sixteen people were killed, women and children,' one fighter growled, referring to a massacre that he said occurred in one of the villages.
Another Druze fighter, with a machine gun slung on his shoulder, had to be restrained by his comrades. 'They killed my brother,' he shouted, a few feet away from passengers in the idling convoy waiting nervously for it to move.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

80 Years After WW2, Japan Again Finds Itself in Uncharted Waters
80 Years After WW2, Japan Again Finds Itself in Uncharted Waters

The Diplomat

timean hour ago

  • The Diplomat

80 Years After WW2, Japan Again Finds Itself in Uncharted Waters

The country's postwar history was a remarkable story of national rebirth. Now the assumptions that underpinned the last 80 years of policy are being stressed to the limit. August is a month of remembrance for Japan. On August 6, 1945, Japan became the first (and so far only) country in the world that has ever been struck by an atomic bomb. This was quickly followed by a second atomic bombing on August 9. Then August 15 marks the date of Japan's unconditional surrender to the Allied Forces, officially ending World War II. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the war and destruction. Japan's postwar history was a remarkable story of a nation's rebirth and reconstruction. Having vowed to strive to 'occupy an honorable place in international community' in its Constitution – and prohibiting itself from resorting to war as a means to settle disagreements with other countries – Japan has become one of the staunchest supporters of the international order, institutions, and norms that were created after World War II. Placing its bilateral alliance with the United States at the core of its foreign policy, Japan has striven to fulfill the role of 'a rule-promotor, a commons' guardian and an effective partner and ally to the U.S. and other democracies,' as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe put it in 2013. Indeed, Japan's postwar foreign policy embodies its tireless – and continuing – efforts in this endeavor. Despite persistent economic stagnation, Japan is the third largest financial contributor to the United Nations, only after the United States and China. It also is one of the top providers of Official Development Assistance. Both distinctions are fitting for a country that remains one of the most powerful economies in the world. Also, as the only country in the world that experienced the catastrophic damage of the atomic bomb, Japan has consistently been among the leading voices to push for nuclear disarmament. Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru reaffirmed Japan's commitment to ultimately achieve a 'world without nuclear weapons' when he spoke at the peace memorial ceremonies in Hiroshima and Nagasaki earlier this month. Looking at Japan's postwar foreign policy, the Japan-U.S. alliance has undergone the greatest transformation since the two countries signed their original mutual security treaty in 1951, which was later revised into its current form in 1960. What once was a lopsided alliance between the United States as 'protector' and Japan as the 'protected,' in exchange for hosting a U.S. military presence, has evolved into a much more equitable partnership. So far, the alliance has demonstrated a remarkable resilience, adapting to the changing reality of geostrategic environment from the Cold War to the post-Cold War through the 21st century. However, as Japan reflects on the last eight decades, it also finds itself at a crossroad, both domestically and externally. Domestically, the so-called '1955 system,' which consistently provided stable political leadership under the dominant rule of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), has been showing signs of atrophy in recent years. The LDP's undeniable decline following its electoral setbacks in three consecutive elections, coupled with a proliferation of small parties (none of which enjoys enough voter support to replace the LDP as a new governing force), strongly suggests that Japan will enter a period of muddling through with weak political leadership with frequent leadership changes. Meanwhile, Japan's economy continues to struggle, as inflation outpaces the rise in people's wages. With a declining population and a society that is aging at an accelerating rate, Japan is also struggling to deal with enduring issues such as immigration, diversity, and gender equality. The political, economic, and societal uncertainties at home could not have hit Japan at a worse time. Today, the country finds itself having to navigate uncharted waters as the international order undergoes tectonic shifts. With the U.S. abdicating its noblesse oblige with Trump administration's 'America First' policy and its tariff war against allies, partners, and foes alike, the resilience of the post-World War II liberal international order and the strength of multinational institutions are increasingly being questioned. The deteriorating environment in the Middle East and protracted war between Russia and Ukraine has been accompanied by increasingly close strategic alignment among North Korea, China, Russia, and Iran. Add to that declining confidence in the postwar multinational framework, and these factors all point to a inevitable reality: anchoring its foreign policy in a robust Japan-U.S. alliance no longer sufficiently serves Tokyo's interest. In the years immediately followed World War II, Japan's policy was led by the Yoshida Doctrine, focusing on economic development by relying on the Japan-U.S. alliance for security. As the world searched for a post-9/11 adjustment to the international order, the late Abe Shinzo offered visions for Japan such as the 'Proactive Contribution to International Peace' and 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific.' Will Ishiba be able to offer a forward-looking vision that can guide Japan through domestic and international uncertainty at this important time of reflection for Japan? His ultimate political fate may depend on it.

Plastic pollution treaty talks in disarray
Plastic pollution treaty talks in disarray

Japan Today

time3 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Plastic pollution treaty talks in disarray

Five previous rounds over the past two and a half years failed to seal an agreement on dealing with plastic pollution By Robin MILLARD Attempts to secure a landmark treaty combating plastic pollution descended into disarray on the penultimate day of talks Wednesday as dozens of countries rejected the latest draft text, leaving the talks in limbo. With time running out to seal a deal among the 184 countries gathered at the United Nations in Geneva, several countries slammed a proposed compromise text put forward by talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador. A larger bloc of countries seeking more ambitious actions blasted what they consider a dearth of legally binding action, saying the draft text was the lowest common denominator and would reduce the treaty to a toothless waste-management agreement. But oil-producing states said the text went too far for their liking, crossing their red lines too and not doing enough in paring down the scope of the treaty. The talks towards striking a legally binding instrument on tackling plastic pollution opened on August 5. Five previous rounds of talks over the past two and a half years failed to seal an agreement, including a supposedly final round in South Korea last year. But countries seem no closer on a consensus on what to do about the ever-growing tide of plastic rubbish polluting land, sea and human health. With a day left to go, Vayas presented a new draft but the discussions quickly unravelled as the text was savaged from all quarters. Panama said the goal was to end plastic pollution, not simply to reach an agreement. "It is not ambition: it is surrender," their negotiator said. The European Union said the proposal was "not acceptable" and lacked "clear, robust and actionable measures", while Kenya said there were "no global binding obligations on anything". Tuvalu, speaking for 14 Pacific island developing states, said the draft risked producing a treaty "that fails to protect our people, culture and ecosystem from the existential threat of plastic pollution". Britain called it a text that drives countries "towards the lowest common denominator", and Norway said "It's not delivering on our promise... to end plastic pollution." Bangladesh said the draft "fundamentally fails" to reflect the "urgency of the crisis", saying that it did not address the full life cycle of plastic items, nor their toxic chemical ingredients and their health impacts. "This is, as such, without ambition entirely," it said. A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group -- including Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran -- want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. Kuwait, speaking for the club, said the text had "gone beyond our red lines", adding that "Without consensus, there is no treaty worth signing." "This is not about lowering ambition: it's about making ambition possible for all," it said. Saudi Arabia said there were "many red lines crossed for the Arab Group" and reiterated calls for the scope of the treaty to be defined "once and for all". The United Arab Emirates said the draft "goes beyond the mandate" for the talks, while Qatar said that without a clear definition of scope, "we don't understand what obligations we are entering into". India, while backing Kuwait, saw the draft as "a good enough starting point " to go forward on finalizing the text. Environmental non-governmental organisations also blasted the draft. The proposed text "is a gift to the petrochemical industry and a betrayal of humanity", said Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes. The World Wide Fund for Nature called the draft text a "devastating blow" to people suffering from the impact of plastic pollution. The Center for International Environmental Law delegation chief David Azoulay said it "all but ensures that nothing will change" and would "damn future generations". More than 400 million tons of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items. While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled. Nearly half, or 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter. © 2025 AFP

TICAD Draft Outlines African Development Strategies;Japanese Technologies to Have Key Role in Cooperation
TICAD Draft Outlines African Development Strategies;Japanese Technologies to Have Key Role in Cooperation

Yomiuri Shimbun

time13 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

TICAD Draft Outlines African Development Strategies;Japanese Technologies to Have Key Role in Cooperation

Leaders of Japan and African countries aim to support economic growth in Africa through private-sector initiatives using Japan's cutting-edge technologies, according to a draft document to be adopted at the Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD 9) to be held on Aug. 20-22 in Yokohama. The draft document, the Yokohama Declaration, obtained by The Yomiuri Shimbun, also states the importance of the 'rule of law' for sustainable growth on the continent. TICAD 9 will be cohosted by the Japanese government, the United Nations, the African Union Commission and others, and will be chaired by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. TICAD 8 was held in Tunisia in 2022, and this will be the first time for the conference to be held in Japan since 2019. The draft proposes cooperation measures in three key areas — economy, peace and stability, and society — aimed at strengthening relations between Japan and Africa, where population growth is expected to continue and economic growth is anticipated. In the field of economy, the draft proposes the establishment of 'Africa-Japan Innovation Hubs' to promote digitization and technological cooperation. Japan will support Africa's economic growth by leveraging its strengths in robotics and artificial intelligence. The draft also calls for the establishment of a governance system aimed at realizing 'safe, secure and trustworthy AI.' In regard to procurement of development funds in African countries, the draft emphasizes the need for reforms, such as improving transparency. 'The high cost of capital, largely due to inadequate credit ratings … [is] diverting Africa's resources away from financing development,' the draft says. The background to this is that China has provided huge loans to African countries for the purpose of securing resources, resulting in many of these countries falling into debt and facing the risk of default. The draft also says, 'Increasing trade protectionism is limiting Africa's access to global markets.' This appears to be in response to tariff measures taken by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The draft says, 'We aim to accelerate efforts to … integrate African countries into global supply chains through a free, open, and fair trade and investment environment.' In the field of peace and stability, the draft emphasizes that 'democracy and the rule of law are foundational pillars.' It also states the view that strategic cooperation between Japan and the African Union, which conducts peacekeeping activities in Somalia, should be strengthened to improve security in Africa. In the field of society, the draft mentions plans to promote the manufacturing of medicines and vaccines in Africa. It also proposes the use of Japanese satellite data for drought and flood countermeasures.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store