80 Years After WW2, Japan Again Finds Itself in Uncharted Waters
August is a month of remembrance for Japan. On August 6, 1945, Japan became the first (and so far only) country in the world that has ever been struck by an atomic bomb. This was quickly followed by a second atomic bombing on August 9. Then August 15 marks the date of Japan's unconditional surrender to the Allied Forces, officially ending World War II. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the war and destruction.
Japan's postwar history was a remarkable story of a nation's rebirth and reconstruction. Having vowed to strive to 'occupy an honorable place in international community' in its Constitution – and prohibiting itself from resorting to war as a means to settle disagreements with other countries – Japan has become one of the staunchest supporters of the international order, institutions, and norms that were created after World War II. Placing its bilateral alliance with the United States at the core of its foreign policy, Japan has striven to fulfill the role of 'a rule-promotor, a commons' guardian and an effective partner and ally to the U.S. and other democracies,' as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe put it in 2013.
Indeed, Japan's postwar foreign policy embodies its tireless – and continuing – efforts in this endeavor. Despite persistent economic stagnation, Japan is the third largest financial contributor to the United Nations, only after the United States and China. It also is one of the top providers of Official Development Assistance. Both distinctions are fitting for a country that remains one of the most powerful economies in the world.
Also, as the only country in the world that experienced the catastrophic damage of the atomic bomb, Japan has consistently been among the leading voices to push for nuclear disarmament. Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru reaffirmed Japan's commitment to ultimately achieve a 'world without nuclear weapons' when he spoke at the peace memorial ceremonies in Hiroshima and Nagasaki earlier this month.
Looking at Japan's postwar foreign policy, the Japan-U.S. alliance has undergone the greatest transformation since the two countries signed their original mutual security treaty in 1951, which was later revised into its current form in 1960. What once was a lopsided alliance between the United States as 'protector' and Japan as the 'protected,' in exchange for hosting a U.S. military presence, has evolved into a much more equitable partnership. So far, the alliance has demonstrated a remarkable resilience, adapting to the changing reality of geostrategic environment from the Cold War to the post-Cold War through the 21st century.
However, as Japan reflects on the last eight decades, it also finds itself at a crossroad, both domestically and externally.
Domestically, the so-called '1955 system,' which consistently provided stable political leadership under the dominant rule of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), has been showing signs of atrophy in recent years. The LDP's undeniable decline following its electoral setbacks in three consecutive elections, coupled with a proliferation of small parties (none of which enjoys enough voter support to replace the LDP as a new governing force), strongly suggests that Japan will enter a period of muddling through with weak political leadership with frequent leadership changes.
Meanwhile, Japan's economy continues to struggle, as inflation outpaces the rise in people's wages. With a declining population and a society that is aging at an accelerating rate, Japan is also struggling to deal with enduring issues such as immigration, diversity, and gender equality.
The political, economic, and societal uncertainties at home could not have hit Japan at a worse time. Today, the country finds itself having to navigate uncharted waters as the international order undergoes tectonic shifts. With the U.S. abdicating its noblesse oblige with Trump administration's 'America First' policy and its tariff war against allies, partners, and foes alike, the resilience of the post-World War II liberal international order and the strength of multinational institutions are increasingly being questioned.
The deteriorating environment in the Middle East and protracted war between Russia and Ukraine has been accompanied by increasingly close strategic alignment among North Korea, China, Russia, and Iran. Add to that declining confidence in the postwar multinational framework, and these factors all point to a inevitable reality: anchoring its foreign policy in a robust Japan-U.S. alliance no longer sufficiently serves Tokyo's interest.
In the years immediately followed World War II, Japan's policy was led by the Yoshida Doctrine, focusing on economic development by relying on the Japan-U.S. alliance for security. As the world searched for a post-9/11 adjustment to the international order, the late Abe Shinzo offered visions for Japan such as the 'Proactive Contribution to International Peace' and 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific.'
Will Ishiba be able to offer a forward-looking vision that can guide Japan through domestic and international uncertainty at this important time of reflection for Japan? His ultimate political fate may depend on it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Taliban Rule Hits 4 Years as Global Divide Deepens
Four years ago, just before the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan, the group banned the sale of children's toys in Kandahar province. It was a sign of the group's draconian approach. As the group marks its fourth year back in power, the Taliban have closed off society to Afghan women and have enforced brutal authority in a country where people have been relentlessly repressed by waves of conflict, corruption, poverty, and displacement for over four decades. The myriad challenges in Afghanistan have compounded with the Taliban's rule. At the moment, more than half of the population requires lifesaving assistance, according to the United Nations. Afghanistan is facing a hunger crisis, with more than one-third of the population experiencing dangerous levels of food insecurity and severe poverty affecting 90 percent of the population. This poverty is so terrible that some parents have reportedly been forced to sell their children for survival, due to economic collapse and a healthcare crisis, among other grave humanitarian challenges. Not only that but Afghanistan ranks globally as the sixth most vulnerable country to climate change. The country has been enduring recurring climate-related disasters and faces severe water scarcity, with reports by humanitarian organizations noting that the capital, Kabul, might become the first modern city to run out of water by 2030. Amid these catastrophic humanitarian and climate crises, Afghanistan is also facing a severe rollback of basic human rights, particularly for women and girls. The Taliban's draconian restrictions have been contributing to increased suicide rates, especially among younger generations of Afghans. Not only have women and girls been erased from public life but they've also been dying as a result of the Taliban's decrees. The Taliban's edict requiring women to have a male chaperone to travel outside their homes has led to documented cases of women who urgently required medical attention, especially pregnant women, dying, unable to receive care in time because they weren't able to leave their homes to seek healthcare on their own. Even more troubling, at the end of last year, the Taliban banned medical training for women, which will further harm women's access to health care and increase maternal mortality rates across the country. Despite the urgency of the crises in Afghanistan, the international community's response has been fragmented and divided. This international division was on display in a recent resolution on the situation in Afghanistan adopted by the U.N. General Assembly. According to the Associated Press, the resolution calls on the Taliban to reverse their oppression of women and girls, emphasizes 'the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,' and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis.' Key U.N. member states cast different votes, exposing the divided international response to the urgent crises unfolding in Afghanistan. The United States voted against the resolution, while its major European allies voted in favor of it, and important regional actors including China, India, Russia, and Iran abstained from voting entirely. The contrasting votes by the different stakeholders reveal the evolving policies of these countries toward Afghanistan. At a time when global unity is crucial to address the devastating crises in Afghanistan, stakeholders have remained divided. This split has only allowed the Taliban to solidify its grip on power, with little accountability and pressure from the international community. The U.N. resolution followed Russia's recognition of the Taliban, becoming the first country to do so. While the move highlights Russia's rift with the West and its desire to contain the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), Russian recognition doesn't remedy the Taliban's isolation. Rather, it shows all the more why stakeholders need to come together to pursue one coherent strategy to address the critical challenges in Afghanistan, including the humanitarian and human rights crises, while ensuring they do not give legitimacy to the Taliban. At the same time, stakeholders should continue to push for justice and accountability through international means, including the International Criminal Court. Four years into the Taliban regime, life for Afghans has become even more difficult, with basic aspects of daily life prohibited, while Afghanistan continues to sink deeper into crisis. The challenges in Afghanistan are daunting, but the foremost step is for the international community to come together behind a unified strategy aimed at achieving an Afghanistan where women are free to live according to their will and where girls can play without fear of repression.
NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
Japanese lawmakers visit Yasukuni Shrine to mark end of WWII
Dozens of Japanese lawmakers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni Shrine on Friday, the day Japan marks the end of World War Two. Yasukuni Shrine honors Japan's war dead. Those remembered include leaders convicted of war crimes after the war. Fifty-two lawmakers from a nonpartisan group visited the shrine, as well as all the Diet members of the opposition party Sanseito. Finance Minister Kato Katsunobu and Agriculture Minister Koizumi Shinjiro also paid visits. Koizumi told reporters that it is important to show respect to people who gave their lives for the country. Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru did not visit in person, but made a private cash offering in his capacity as president of the Liberal Democratic Party. As Japan marks 80 years since the end of the war, Ishiba expressed his hope to release a message in September or afterward. His message is expected to follow the historical perceptions of previous Cabinets, while focusing on analysis on why the war happened, and elucidating a path for peace.
NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
S.Korea, China comment on 80th anniversary of WWII end
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung has underscored his resolve to promote cooperation with Japan, calling it an "indispensable partner for economic development." Lee delivered a speech on Friday at a ceremony in Seoul to mark the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Korean Peninsula from Japanese colonial rule. Lee noted this year is also the 60th anniversary of the normalization of relations with Japan. He said it was time to squarely face the past, while wisely stepping forward into the future. He said South Korea will be guided by the principle of engaging in pragmatic diplomacy focused on national interests. Based on this, he said he will seek forward-looking, mutually beneficial cooperation with Japan by holding frank dialogues through "shuttle diplomacy," a term that refers to reciprocal visits by the two countries' leaders. Lee also expressed hope that the Japanese government will squarely face up to the painful history between the two countries and strive to maintain trust between them. The South Korean Foreign Ministry has responded with "disappointment and regret" to visits by Japanese lawmakers to Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo on Friday. Yasukuni Shrine honors Japan's war dead. Those remembered include leaders convicted of war crimes after World War Two. Cabinet ministers were among the lawmakers who paid visits. Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru did not go but made a private cash offering in his capacity as the president of the Liberal Democratic Party. In its statement, the South Korean government expressed "deep disappointment and regret over the fact that responsible leaders of Japan have once again sent offerings to and paid respects at the Yasukuni Shrine which glorifies Japan's war of aggression and enshrines war criminals." Meanwhile, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has reiterated China's position regarding historical issues between Japan and China. Wang spoke to reporters in the southern province of Yunnan on Friday as Japan marked 80 years since the end of World War Two. The minister called it a war of aggression waged by Japanese militarists that brought grave disaster not only to the people of China and other Asian nations but also hurt the Japanese people themselves. Wang noted that even today, some forces in Japan are trying to glorify the invasion, distort history and rewrite it. He said that such actions are shameful and demeaning. He added that only those who squarely face up to history can be respected and urged Japan to make the right choice.
