Regeneron Launches $200 Million Donation Matching Program to Support Vision Care
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:REGN) is one of the best S&P 500 stocks with huge upside potential. On June 24, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals announced a new and pioneering donation matching program to support Good Days, which is an independent national non-profit charitable organization. The initiative is designed to support Good Days' Retinal Vascular and Neovascular Disease Fund.
Through this program, Regeneron has committed to matching donations at a one-to-one rate, up to a total of $200 million, for the remainder of the 2025 calendar year. The primary goal is to enable more patients to afford essential medicines that help protect their vision. The Retinal Vascular and Neovascular Disease Fund provides copay assistance to US patients who meet specific criteria determined by Good Days.
A pharmacist in a lab coat carefully analyzing a vial of medicine for its quality.
The donations are not intended to incentivize the use of any particular product, and copay support is granted without regard to the specific medicine prescribed, as long as it is FDA-approved. Regeneron also facilitates access to medicines through various other initiatives, such as product support & Managed Access Programs, patient assistance programs, and collaborations with experienced stakeholders.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:REGN) discovers, invents, develops, manufactures, and commercializes medicines for treating various diseases worldwide.
While we acknowledge the potential of REGN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the .
READ NEXT: and .
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI hires team behind AI recommendation startup Crossing Minds
Crossing Minds, a startup that provides AI recommendation systems to e-commerce businesses, said on Thursday that its team is joining OpenAI. The startup was backed by Index Ventures, Shopify, Plug and Play, and Radical Ventures, and had raised more than $13.5 million across multiple rounds, according to Crunchbase. Crossing Minds largely worked with e-commerce companies to improve their personalization and recommendation systems. The company claims it studies customers' on-site behavior data to gather insights on their shopping preferences without compromising privacy. 'Joining OpenAI allows us to bring our work — and our values — into a mission we deeply respect: to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. We're thrilled to bring our experience and energy to a team that's setting the direction for the future of AI. We're excited to learn, to contribute, and to help shape what's next,' the startup's co-founders wrote in a post on its website. Alexandre Robicquet, one of the co-founders, has updated his bio on LinkedIn, which now reads 'Research, Post-training and Agents at OpenAI.' It is not clear if all of Crossing Minds' team is joining OpenAI. Crossing Minds' website also says that the company won't take up any more clients. Per its archived 'About' page, Crossing Mind previously said it was trusted by Intuit, Anthropic, Udacity and Chanel. AI companies have built a plethora of tools to help customers shop. Google and Perplexity have launched AI features to improve recommendations, while startups like Daydream have received massive investments to launch AI shopping assistants. Earlier this year, OpenAI updated ChatGPT to provide recommendations, images, and reviews for items its users ask questions about. OpenAI didn't immediately return a request for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Gun, Silencer Provisions Blocked From Trump Tax Bill in Senate
Senate Republicans' effort to use President Donald Trump's massive tax bill to eliminate regulations on short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns and silencers has hit a roadblock with the chamber's ruleskeeper. The Senate parliamentarian decided the policy provisions violate the fast-track budget rules Republicans are using to avoid a filibuster and pass Trump's legislative agenda with only GOP support.
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Organizational Mistake That Can Stall New Product Success
Ryan Gray is Co-Founder and CEO of SGW Designworks, a product engineering and design firm featured in The Lean Startup. Should your engineering department be doing product development? Two decades ago, when I was employed by a fortune 500 company within their new product development group, I was immersed in big-budget projects with massive cross-functional teams. Those projects often focused on developing a new product, as well as the technology to manufacture it—in parallel. In that setting, the business made a clear distinction between staff focused on engineering versus those focused on Product Development. Today, I've got sixteen years of experience working with smaller and mid-sized businesses to develop new products. The businesses we work with are typically not running multiple new product development projects with eight-figure budgets in parallel like a Fortune 500 might. Instead, they are trying to get the most out of each talented team member. In these businesses, we often see leaders intentionally conflate engineering departments with new product development teams. Why does this happen? There are a few drivers: • Businesses hire engineers to provide field support, incrementally improve the product line and get the most out of manufacturing processes. On paper, these engineers have the skills to develop new products as well. • SMBs are resource-constrained: sometimes by cash, sometimes by talent pool limitations. It becomes the norm for team members to wear multiple hats. • Leadership recognizes that the engineering team that supports the product line is probably the group most knowledgeable about the product, how it's made, and its weaknesses. It would seem that this positions them well to create the next generation of product. These drivers lead to organizational structures that ignore the important differences in the skills required to support a product line versus the work required to create new tech, features and products. Let's dig deeper: Characteristics Of A High-Performing Engineering Team The most effective engineering teams I've worked with focus on solving product or manufacturing problems to help enable sales growth. This means supporting users, making product changes (and related manufacturing changes) to address product shortcomings, and cost-optimizing at the product and process level. This type of team thrives in situations with defined constraints, where the problems to solve are measurable. Characteristics Of A High-Performing Product Development Team Product development teams with a high rate of success (meaning launched, profitable products) focus on understanding use cases, challenging assumptions about feature sets, figuring out what's possible with today's tech (and what will be possible with tomorrow's), running disciplined regimens of experiments, navigating product feature pivots and aligning the product manufacturing path to business goals. This team runs with less defined, more exploratory work. And while engineers often play a key role in executing it, effective new product development requires a different mindset: one that balances creativity, technical experimentation and business acumen. The Risk Of Combining Roles Is there overlap between engineering and product development? Certainly. But people who excel in one area are often less effective—and less satisfied—in the other. Engineering tends to reward precision and predictability. Product development, on the other hand, demands comfort with failure, iteration and shifting targets. When one team is responsible for both supporting existing products and creating new ones, it creates organizational drag. Prioritization becomes murky. People gravitate toward what's familiar. Sales support requests, field issues and manufacturing challenges will almost always displace exploratory design and prototyping. The end result? New product efforts can stall. Building The Right Structure Successful new product development in SMBs requires explicit role clarity, even if the teams are small. That doesn't always mean building two separate departments—but it does mean being deliberate about expectations, timelines and resource allocation between engineering and new product development efforts. Some practices that help: • Define clear responsibilities for roles in engineering and NPD separately, especially if the same people contribute to both. • Set aside focused time and resources for product development efforts that's protected from daily operational noise. • Ensure leadership understands the trade-offs involved in dual-role assignments. • Consider using an outside team for your new product development efforts, keeping the internal engineering team focused on their critical responsibilities. Good new products don't typically emerge from your engineering department. In fact, assuming they will—without providing the time, tools and team structure to support true product development—can quietly sabotage your growth strategy. Ask yourself this: Are you expecting your engineers to innovate while they're busy keeping the existing product alive? If the answer is yes, it may be time to rethink your structure and resourcing plan. Product development deserves its own space. Without it, even the best ideas may never make it off the whiteboard. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
